The Tennessee Judiciary is Completely Corrupt

“A WATCHDOG, NOT WILLING PARTICIPANT”

April 6, 2014

Adolf Hitler established “The People’s Courts” which systematically condemned innocent people to prison or worse. The criminal courts in Tennessee operate in the same manner and have for decades in the “land of the free and the home of the brave.”

Mr. Dewey Morgan, Staff Writer
The Daily Post-Athenian
Via Email

Dear Mr. Morgan:

I am owner/editor of The Post & Email, an online newspaper which reports on corruption in government.

Early in our publication’s 4.5-year history, residents of your state began to report systemic corruption within the judicial branch which affects every single citizen of the Volunteer State but has not been reported by the local press.

I read your March 23, 2014 article regarding the March 18 indictment and arrest of Walter Francis Fitzpatrick, III, who is now out of jail on bond, for “aggravated perjury and extortion.”  There were also two other charges listed on the indictments from the “grand jury.”

The indictments against Fitzpatrick are completely bogus, and the District Attorney General’s office, including Steve Morgan, whose name appears on the indictments which are in my possession, knows it.  So does Jeffrey Cunningham, a bank executive and attorney who was illegally serving as grand jury foreman until March 4 and claims he was the object of “stalking” and “harassment” by Fitzpatrick.

The grand juries in eastern Tennessee are nothing but tools of the government used to incarcerate people, extort money  and ruin their fellow citizens’ lives, saddling them with attorneys’ fees, insurmountable debt, loss of property, and fear for their lives.

The same thing has been done to Marvin Young by the illegally-convened and duly-rigged Monroe County grand jury in a case scheduled for trial on June 26, 2014.

http://www.thepostemail.com/2014/04/02/monroe-county-tn-prosecutes-innocent-man-who-uncovered-forgery-of-his-fathers-will/

These “trials” are nothing but show trials in the style of the “People’s Court” during the reign of Adolf Hitler used to incarcerate, and sometimes murder, political enemies.

State code dictates that grand jurors and trial jurors must be selected randomly, “without opportunity for the intervention of any human agency…”  (TCA 22-2-304).

Are you aware that grand juries in the state of Tennessee are illegally formed?  State code TCA 40-12-206 states that grand juries must have 13 people, and the District Attorneys General Conference agrees with that:

http://www.tndagc.org/vwh.htm#jury

Instead, criminal court judges illegally choose a foreman from wherever they want, via an unknown vetting process, and mix him or her in with the 12 others who have allegedly been randomly-chosen. On December 7, 2011, Fitzpatrick was an eyewitness to Judge Amy Reedy hand-picking names of grand jurors for the next term from a pile of papers placed before her rather than from a box, blindly, as also is dictated by state law.

While Criminal Court Rule 6(g)(1) states that the judge can pick the foreman, it does not mean that the judge can “pick the foreman from wherever they choose.”   In Davidson County, that amounted to a convicted felon serving as grand jury foreman and the review of hundreds of indictments thereby invalidated:  http://www.thepostemail.com/2014/02/19/fitzpatrick-tennessee-criminal-courts-a-closed-system/

Rule 6(g)(2) then clarifies:  “(2) Qualifications of Foreperson. The foreperson shall possess all the qualifications of a juror.”

Picking a foreman by an unknown vetting process means that no one knows whether or not the foreman “possesses all the qualifications of a juror,” meaning that he has not previously served during the preceding 24 months, as mandated by TCA 22-2-314, and other qualifications, such as being a resident of the county for the required amount of time and a U.S. citizen.

A handpicked foreman represents the interests of the judge and the county or state and cannot therefore be considered impartial, as grand jurors are supposed to be.  This has been evidenced and reported on countless occasions in Monroe and McMinn Counties over the last four years by The Post & Email, including the case of George Raudenbush, whose case was reversed and allegedly will be reheard by the same criminal courts which falsely convicted him of eight driving violations after denying him access to an attorney.  Raudenbush has just spent 2.5 years in prison for crimes he did not commit, with the full knowledge of criminal judges such as Amy Reedy and Carroll Lee Ross.

“Defense” attorneys and the public defender’s office appear to be part of the racket which has been ruining people’s lives for at least six decades.  What no one wants to admit is that the judges, law enforcement, court personnel and sheriffs’ departments have all been working together for decades to bring false charges against people they don’t like or to serve as “fall guys” for crimes when they know they are innocent or there is not enough evidence to even issue an indictment.

Jessica Kennedy Powers was sentenced to 22 years in prison for “facilitating” the murder of Jim Miller, while the real killers have gone unprosecuted, even though The Post & Email has long reported, with evidence, just who they are and why they carried out “a government hit.”

http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/06/06/conclusion-monroe-county-tn-judiciary-convicts-defendant-in-kangaroo-court/

The grand juries are completely controlled by the courts and the “commanding officer” foremen who are placed there purposely by vindictive judges.

http://www.thepostemail.com/2014/01/23/fitzpatrick-grand-jury-foreman-a-commanding-officer-over-grand-jurors/

http://www.thepostemail.com/2014/04/02/monroe-county-tn-prosecutes-innocent-man-who-uncovered-forgery-of-his-fathers-will/

Hundreds, if not thousands, of innocent people have gone to jails and prisons across your state because of tainted grand juries.  If the people are not told, how can they stop it?  How can they get back their constitutional rights to a fair trial after proper evidence is presented to a legally-convened grand jury?

I realize that because my paper is subscription, you cannot read the entire articles for which I have sent you links.  I am more than willing to grant you complimentary access to The Post & Email so that you can read what we have written on Tennessee corruption over nearly five years.  I know it will not only inform you, but also shock you.

Additionally, just after District Attorney General Steve Bebb gloated that the BOPR had exonerated him of criminal wrongdoing after the legislature tried to have him removed from his post, he is now accused of assaulting an employee in his department:

http://www.timesfreepress.com/news/2014/apr/06/attorney-claims-assault-by-bebbtbi-investigation/?breakingnews

The following is a letter I wrote on March 25 to the BOPR, the Tennessee Supreme Court, and several state legislators about the rampant judicial corruption in Eastern Tennessee:

What Do Tennessee “Public Servants” Have to Say About Corruption in Their State?

Posted By Sharon Rondeau On Wednesday, March 26, 2014 @ 12:04 PM In States | 3 Comments

“SYSTEMIC CRIMINALITY”

by Sharon Rondeau

(Mar. 26, 2014) — The following letter has been sent to the Tennessee Supreme Court and the individuals noted below.

March 25, 2014

Tennessee Supreme Court
Administrative Office of the Courts
511 Union Street, Suite 600
Nashville, TN 37219

Dear Sir or Madam:

RE:         GRAND JURY FOREMEN/CONFLICT OF INTEREST

I am owner and editor of The Post & Email (www.thepostemail.com), an online newspaper which covers government corruption.

I have been reporting on corruption in your state, particularly eastern Tennessee, for the past four years.  During this time, I have learned that systemic criminality involving judges, sheriffs, court personnel, local police, members of the TBI and even the FBI works to incarcerate as many people as possible in order to glean money from state and federal coffers, which is then used for other illicit purposes, most likely drugs and the drug trade.

While this might sound harsh, it is true, and it is no secret.

A major factor in the criminal syndicate which operates in the Tenth Judicial District and most likely, other districts, is that the grand juries are wholly corrupted, put in place only to serve the local government’s desire to indict as many citizens as possible, innocent or guilty, to keep the money flowing.

While Tennessee Code states that grand jurors are chosen from a jury pool via random selection http://www.chattbar.org/downloads/Book18_2_1.pdf   http://www.tn.gov/attorneygeneral/op/2010/op/op10-125.pdf , as you know, in Tennessee, the foreman is chosen by the judges and serves for years and perhaps decades.  Last fall, the attorney general, who you appoint every eight years, affirmed in a brief filed in the Knoxville appeals court that the grand jury foreman “is not a juror.”  http://www.thepostemail.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/HIXSON-BRIEF.pdf  Why, then, does the foreman vote with the grand jury on whether or not to indict someone?

There is nothing in the state codes which allows for a judicially-appointed foreman http://www.lawserver.com/law/state/tennessee/tn-code/tennessee_code_22-2-304 .   If a judge were to select a trial jury foreman, the jury would certainly be considered compromised.

What are the qualifications of such a court-appointed foreman?  What about the state law which mandates 13 members to a grand jury, http://www.lawserver.com/law/state/tennessee/tn-code/tennessee_code_40-12-206 , not 12 plus a judicially-chosen foreman who serves indefinitely and votes the way the judge, his employer, wishes?

In McMinn County, for example, the grand jury foreman, Jeffrey Lane Cunningham, is a trained and licensed attorney active in the Tennessee Bar Association (TBA) http://www.tba.org/profile/jeffrey-cunningham and serving his third term as foreman.  Atty. Cunningham expresses one of his areas of concentration as “Criminal Law – Prosecution.”  How could his appointment as grand jury foreman not be considered a conflict of interest and an injustice to the people of the county?

What about judges who hand-pick grand jurors’ names with all of their personal information visible rather than out of a closed box, as mandated by law?  http://www.thepostemail.com/2013/11/21/will-there-be-consequences-for-judge-amy-reedy-pb/

http://www.thepostemail.com/2013/11/21/will-there-be-consequences-for-judge-amy-reedy-pb/

It is no coincidence that the same judge, Amy Reedy, picked and installed Cunningham.

What about a judge who denies a defense attorney the opportunity to present his case, upholds forged charging documents, and opines in court that the defendant is a “self-appointed vigilante?”  http://www.thepostemail.com/2013/11/21/will-there-be-consequences-for-judge-amy-reedy-pb/

http://www.thepostemail.com/2013/01/11/judge-walter-c-kurtz-denies-fitzpatricks-request-for-new-trial-pb/

In agreement with the legislature, the District Attorneys General Conference describes a grand jury as “a group of thirteen citizens chosen from the jury panel. One of these thirteen is the fore person and will preside over the grand jury.”  http://www.tndagc.org/vwh.htm#jury  How, then, is a judge allowed to choose the foreman through an unknown vetting process?

In one case in Davidson County, it was found that a judicially-selected grand jury foreman was a convicted felon, which violated TCA 22-1-102 http://franklincountycircuitcourtclerk.org/juror-information/ and resulted in the need to review approximately 900 cases in which he had been involved, at taxpayer expense.  http://www.knoxnews.com/news/2013/jan/31/nashville-da-says-grand-jury-foreman-was-felon/?preventMobileRedirect=1

An article in The Tennessean on the subject has conveniently been removed.  http://www.tennessean.com/errors/404/

According to Criminal Court Rule 6g(2), “the foreperson must possess all the qualifications of a juror,” which means that he or she must have first been selected by the random method used for everyone else.  http://www.tncourts.gov/rules/rules-criminal-procedure/6  At that point, the foreman would then be chosen from the group of screened jurors, not “from wherever they [the judges] choose.” http://advocateanddemocrat.com/story/21576

Finally, why is Judge Jon Kerry Blackwood called repeatedly to preside over cases involving CDR Walter Francis Fitzpatrick, III (Ret.), who has exposed much of the aforementioned corruption, at his own peril, over the last four years?  http://www.knoxnews.com/news/2010/oct/28/grand-jury-intruder-arrested-east-tennessee/?comments_id=1533841  In the most recent case against Fitzpatrick, on March 17, 2014, Blackwood denied Fitzpatrick’s request for a restraining order against Cunningham, who threatened to have Fitzpatrick arrested just for bringing a criminal complaint to the McMinn County courthouse.   After Cunningham gave false testimony on March 18 to his “grand jury” to have Fitzpatrick arrested, Blackwood was the judge called in to preside over the initial hearing on March 24, 2014.  How could that not be considered a conflict of interest?

Blackwood has also said on the record that a juror serving consecutive terms is acceptable, which directly contradicts TCA 22-2-314.  http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/10/15/the-dictatorship-of-the-judiciary/    http://www.thepostemail.com/2012/06/22/tennessee-prosecutors-and-judges-try-to-deny-state-law/   http://franklincountycircuitcourtclerk.org/juror-information/

I would very much appreciate your explanation of how and why these issues continue year after year to the detriment of Tennessee citizens.  These questions continue to make headlines at The Post & Email and certainly beg answers from you as public servants sworn to uphold the Tennessee and U.S. constitutions.

Very truly yours,

Sharon Rondeau, Editor
The Post & Email
P.O. Box 195
Stafford Springs, CT  06076
editor@thepostemail.com
203-987-7948

IMPORTANT NOTE:  Just as this letter was being reproduced for mailing, this writer learned that Cunningham resigned from his position as grand jury foreman on March 4, which was then confirmed with Sherry at the McMinn County courthouse.

Cc:           Board of Professional Responsibility
10 Cadillac Drive
Suite 220
Brentwood, TN 37027

Rep. Jon Lundberg
Tennessee General Assembly
Chairman, House Civil Justice Committee
301 6th Avenue North
Suite 20 Legislative Plaza
Nashville, TN 37243

Rep. Eric Watson
Tennessee General Assembly
Chairman, House Criminal Justice Committee
301 6th Avenue North
Suite 112 War Memorial Bldg.
Nashville, TN 37243

Senator Brian Kelsey
Chair, Senate Judiciary Committee
Tennessee General Assembly
301 6th Avenue North
Suite 7 Legislative Plaza
Nashville, TN 37243

© 2014, The Post & Email. All rights reserved.


Article printed from The Post & Email: http://www.thepostemail.com

URL to article: http://www.thepostemail.com/2014/03/26/what-do-tennessee-public-servants-have-to-say-about-corruption-in-their-state/

————————————–

To date, I have received no response back from any of the copied parties.

This corruption must be exposed.  The First Amendment calls upon the press to be a watchdog on government, not a willing participant in what government does against the citizenry.

Sharon Rondeau, Editor
The Post & Email
www.thepostemail.com
P.O. Box 195
Stafford Springs, CT  06076
203-987-7948
editor@thepostemail.com

Sharon Rondeau has operated The Post & Email since April 2010, focusing on the Obama birth certificate investigation and other government corruption news.  She has reported prolifically on constitutional violations within Tennessee’s prison and judicial systems.

2 Responses to "The Tennessee Judiciary is Completely Corrupt"

  1. gigclick   Monday, April 7, 2014 at 1:09 AM

    Misprision Of Felony is now a “culture” in American Political Operations. Treason/Perjury/Election Fraud/Identity Fraud In POTUS/Murder Of Special Operators, Mission Compromising, Theft Of Trillions, Sabotage Of U.S. Military And Chain Of Command. They’re doing a great job!

  2. OPOVV   Sunday, April 6, 2014 at 4:04 PM

    I convened a couple of presidential prep rallies when I ran for that office in 2012. The word went out (by word of mouth) a couple of weeks prior to one of the gatherings (that had somewhere between 600-1,000 attendees) and at no time did I inform law enforcement nor the press of our “right of assembly”, nor did any of the participants, which ran the gambit of Americana: a cornucopia of age and ethnicities.
    I had one requirement and one requirement only: in order to attend, you MUST be carrying a loaded weapon. Most women showed their handguns that they carried in their purses, whereas most of the men showed-up with shotguns and scoped rifles.
    Here’s the point: no one squealed to the cops or the press. Everyone who attended were believers in the Constitution. The word that went out was transmitted to “Lovers of America and her Constitution” that OPOVV was to hold a meeting at so-and-so at such-and-such a time.
    Interesting, is it not, that no one passed the word to any law enforcement personnel or any politicians?
    Have faith in Americans, I certainly do.
    And if I were a member of the court or a member of the press who supports corrupt behavior, of denying their fellow citizens their Constitutional rights, well, I wouldn’t.
    Word to the wise, don’t you think?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.