If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my free Email alerts. Thanks for visiting!


by Sharon Rondeau

Why does everyone in Washington, DC avoid the topic of the forgery of Obama’s purported documentation?

(Mar. 14, 2014) — On Thursday evening, The Post & Email reported that Randy Foreman of NewsBlaze had spoken to two congressmen at a recent event who told him that they were not “following the birth certificate issue at all.”

Their statements appeared to relate to the criminal investigation conducted by the Maricopa County, AZ Cold Case Posse over a two-and-one-half-year period which determined after six months that the long-form birth certificate and Selective Service registration form of Barack Hussein Obama are “computer-generated forgeries.”

Foreman, with whom The Post & Email spoke once several months ago, stated that if the congressmen’s responses were representative of the general attitude of Congress, then Washington is “unprepared” for the major announcement soon to be made by Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio, who launched a second investigation springing from the posse’s birth certificate probe.

Rep. Tim Huelskamp of Kansas and Rep. Raul Labrador of Idaho were those responding that they were not keeping up with the developments in the case relating to the fraudulent birth certificate image posted on the White House website on April 27, 2011.

However, Mike Volin, founder of WheresObamasBirthCertificate.com, and a team member, Tom Pavich, told The Post & Email that when they traveled to Washington, DC last November to distribute “Sheriff’s Kits” containing a formal presentation given by posse lead investigator Mike Zullo about the forgeries, staffers for both Huelskamp and Labrador were personally given copies of the kits with the information.

On Friday afternoon, The Post & Email contacted the office of Rep. Huelskamp by phone to inquire if the staffers to whom the kit was given had passed it to the congressman.  We asked for Mr. Jim Pfaff, Huelskamp’s chief of staff, one of the staffers to whom Pavich and his team partner, Jeff Harrison, spoke in November.  When we stated we were making a media inquiry, we were also directed to a Jamie Jackson and provided email addresses for both.

Our message to them reads as follows:

To: jim.pfaff@mail.house.gov
Cc: jamie.jackson@mail.house.gov

Hello, I read the following article posted at NewsBlaze last evening and would like to obtain clarification on a related matter:


In the article, author Randy Foreman states that he spoke with Rep. Huelskamp at a conference sponsored by The Heritage Foundation, date unspecified, during which the congressman reportedly told Foreman that he “has not been following the birth certificate issue,” meaning the reported forgery of the long-form birth certificate image purported to be Obama’s and posted on the White House website since April 27, 2011.

As you may know, a law enforcement investigation declared the image a “computer-generated forgery” two years ago as well as Obama’s Selective Service registration form.  While composing this email, I discovered that the Cold Case Posse website has been hacked, perhaps because of an imminent press conference which is expected to confirm that the American people were duped by the image placed on the White House website.


From that investigation sprang a second criminal investigation conducted by Sheriff Joe Arpaio.  A press conference on those findings is also expected within the next 4-6 weeks, with the information to be imparted to the public described as “universe-shattering.”


In November, a team of volunteers visited Washington, DC and distributed “Sheriff’s Kits” to Rep. Huelskamp and many other members of Congress, with business cards obtained from staffers, one of which was Mr. Pfaff’s.  The kit contained a presentation made by Cold Case Posse lead investigator Mike Zullo explaining how the posse reached its conclusions of forgery and fraud with regard to the birth certificate and Selective Service form.

My question is this:  Did the congressman receive the kit and view it, or was he never made aware of it?  Is he aware of the Cold Case Posse investigation but chosen not to “follow” the developments which are coming?

While the congressman continues to fight Obama on his policies, is it possible that the real issue is Obama’s very legitimacy if his documentation is fraudulent?

Thank you very much.

Sharon Rondeau, Editor
The Post & Email
P.O. Box 195
Stafford Springs, CT  06076

Our email was sent at 4:20 p.m. EDT.

At 4:28 p.m., we received the following response from Jackson:

Thank you for your request I will see what I can do.

At 4:30, we received another email from Jackson:

We won’t be able to do anything due to scheduling. Thanks

We did not receive a response from Pfaff.

Since we were not asking for a place on the congressman’s schedule, The Post & Email will be following up on Monday to ask for clarification of the responses.

Join the Conversation


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. From New York State comes some news from a constituent of Senator Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) who called the senator’s office and spoke to a staffer.

    The constituent, an octogenarian and a WWII vet, told the staffer in unmitigated terms, “We have a dictator in the White House who is forcing Americans to buy ObamaCare and who is telling businesses what to do in ordering them how to pay overtime” (a reference to Obama’s ordering of overtime rule changes).

    It seems even Democrats are not willing to put up with the ineptitude and Constitution-bashing of Mr Soetoro-Obama-Dunham.

    Said the staffer to the constituent, “YOU ARE RIGHT!”

    Amen! This IS progress!

    1. I wonder what else the staffer said. A simple answer like “Yes you are right” could also mean yes and they like it that way!