WHAT IS THE CONSTITUTIONAL MANDATE FOR REMOVING A USURPER?
by Jesse T. Mims, ©2014, from Facebook
(Feb. 27, 2014) — There is no doubt Obama has committed numerous crimes which meet the criteria of “impeachable offenses;” however, the Constitution provides the remedy of impeachment only for certain legally elected or appointed government officials. While presidents are included, Obama has never been legally elected president. Therefore, he cannot BE president and that makes him Constitutionally exempt from being impeached.
He is a usurper, nothing more; and the Constitution provides no means for impeaching an illegally ‘elected’ usurper. He’s an illegally ‘elected’ usurper because he was never at any time in his life a natural born citizen; and, according to the Constitution, one must have attained that status in order to be eligible for the office of president. Since the only time one can attain that status is at birth and Obama was not born with it, he can never attain it.
Even if impeachment were an option to remove Obama, that would not be the best way to do it. That, in and of itself, would do nothing to negate anything Obama has done. On the other hand, having him removed for the reason that he was never eligible to become president to begin with would accomplish something that even a successful impeachment could never do. The courts would be forced to rule that Obama was never legally capable of carrying out the duties of president nor signing any legislation into law; therefore, everything he has done would immediately and automatically be subject to nullification.
Additionally, even if impeachment were legally possible, it would be unwise to start the proceedings until it is a certainty that the GOP will be in control of both the House and the Senate. That is because the impeachment and conviction process is a joint effort between both houses of Congress. The House can vote to impeach a president; but… the Senate has to then try and convict him of the charges brought by the House in the “Articles of Impeachment.” At this time, no Democrat-controlled Senate will convict Obama.
However, the Democrats would love for the House to vote to impeach while they control the Senate so they could go through the motions of a trial and end up voting to not convict Obama, thereby leaving his usurpation intact. Not only would Obama’s ‘presidency’ be legitimized by the very fact that impeachment proceedings that were meant only for a legally elected president were initiated by Congress, but a failed effort to impeach and convict would greatly hinder any future attempts to remove him by any legal means!
For more details from a Constitutional attorney as to why Obama is not president and why impeachment is not legal, please read Dr. Edwin Vieira’s detailed article here: http://www.newswithviews.com/Vieira/edwin84.htm
That’s a pretty long article; but, if you have time, I believe you will find it both interesting and informative. However, if you want to just read what strictly applies to the impeachment process, just scroll down to where it asks the following question: “What are some of those consequences?” That refers to consequences and dangers of having a usurper acting as president and what can and cannot be done about it.
Also note that the article was written prior to the 2008 election. However, the fact that Obama was subsequently allowed to illegally occupy the office of president makes most of the author’s comments and conclusions much more valid and relevant today.
Despite all of the above, references to “impeaching” Obama continue to be heard frequently. However, the process of impeachment is governed by the Constitution; and, that document offers no provision for impeaching a usurper such as Obama. The broadest description of officials who can be impeached is found in Article II, Section 4 where it says,
“The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.”
“If, at the time fixed for the beginning of the term of the President, the President elect shall have died, the Vice President elect shall become President. If a President shall not have been chosen before the time fixed for the beginning of his term, or if the President elect shall have failed to qualify, then the Vice President elect shall act as President until a President shall have qualified; and the Congress may by law provide for the case wherein neither a President elect nor a Vice President shall have qualified, declaring who shall then act as President, or the manner in which one who is to act shall be selected, and such person shall act accordingly until a President or Vice President shall have qualified.”
“…if the President elect shall have failed to qualify, then the Vice President elect shall act as President until a President shall have qualified; and the Congress may by law provide for the case wherein neither a President elect nor a Vice President shall have qualified, declaring who shall then act as President, or the manner in which one who is to act shall be selected, and such person shall act accordingly until a President or Vice President shall have qualified.”
1. Since Obama has always been, and still is, in a state of being unqualified, he should be promptly removed and VP Biden should take his place as acting president until a President shall have qualified.1. (a) Subject to Congress finding that both Obama AND Biden are unqualified (possibility as a result of Biden becoming the VP elect as a part of the same fraud through which Obama became the President elect), Congress COULD dispatch with them BOTH.2. “Congress may by law provide for the case wherein neither a President elect nor a Vice President shall have qualified, declaring who shall then act as President, or the manner in which one who is to act shall be selected, and such person shall act accordingly until a President or Vice President shall have qualified.”
For the latest on Sheriff Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse investigation, see https://www.dropbox.com/sh/4m1835gn4hftkjc/4WIGvgHkHe and http://www.birtherreport.com/2014/02/team-arpaio-drop-bombs-on-white-house.html.
Sharon Rondeau has operated The Post & Email since April 2010, focusing on the Obama birth certificate investigation and other government corruption news. She has reported prolifically on constitutional violations within Tennessee’s prison and judicial systems.