If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my free Email alerts. Thanks for visiting!


by Sharon Rondeau

What was Obama planning to do when he took the oath of office to serve as President and Commander-in-Chief?

(Sep. 1, 2013) — After threatening military intervention in Syria resulting from a chemical weapon attack allegedly launched by Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad, de facto president Barack Hussein Obama backed down on Friday, acquiescing to demands that he confer with Congress first.

On Saturday, Obama asked Congress to vote in favor of action on Syria so that “the President and the people’s representatives stand together.”

Obama ignored Congress when he ordered military intervention in Libya in 2011, a nation which had not allegedly used chemical weapons and did not pose a threat to the United States.  After Arab Spring protests arose in numerous Middle Eastern countries, Obama took action to “authorize military intervention beyond a no-fly zone after concluding that such a limited mission would not be enough to slow Libyan leader Moammar Gaddafi’s forces.”

Obama claimed that intervention in Libya “prevented a massacre” there.  On March 28, 2011, The Guardian quoted Obama as having said:

Gaddafi declared that he would show “no mercy” to his own people. He compared them to rats, and threatened to go door to door to inflict punishment. In the past, we had seen him hang civilians in the streets, and kill over a thousand people in a single day. We knew that if we waited one more day Benghazi … could suffer a massacre that would have reverberated across the region and stained the conscience of the world.”

Obama called U.S. involvement in Libya “limited” and “as part of an internal effort to protect Libyan citizens after Muammar Qaddafi refused to pursue an immediate cease-fire.”

But was it the United States’ place to interfere in a sovereign country’s politics?

The invasion of Libya with the professed purpose of converting its government to “democracy” allowed Gaddafi’s forces to lose custody of at least 10,000 shoulder-fired missiles from “warehouses” which the CIA later began to track down.  One of those killed in Benghazi on September 11 last year, Glen S. Doherty, had been tracing and destroying such weapons.

At Hillary Clinton’s admission, weapons from Libya made their way to Algerian fighters, who then handed them to Syrian rebels.  Obama is now openly supporting the rebels despite reports that they were the perpetrators of the chemical attack in Syria on August 21.  Al Qaeda members are present among the Syrian rebels, as they were with the Libyan rebels, who Obama also supported.

After being deposed, Gaddafi was executed in October 2011, and in November, an interim government was formed.  Even as violence increased, particularly in the eastern section of the country, and protests against the interim government abounded, Libyans went to the polls on July 7, 2012, for the first time in decades.

The September 11 Benghazi attack targeted a “CIA safe house” in addition to a diplomatic mission building which was not a full-fledged “consulate.”  Following the Benghazi attack, protests across the Middle East arose to ostensibly decry the video, “Innocence of Muslims,” which was first identified as the cause of the violence in Benghazi and the protest at the U.S. Embassy in Cairo, Egypt, where the American flag was torn down and replaced with an Islamic one.

On July 7, 2012, The Huffington Post reported that despite the Arab Spring protests, “Islamist parties also have gained influence in Libya and other nations following the ouster of authoritarian regimes run by strongmen like Gadhafi and Egypt’s Hosni Mubarak.”

Mubarak was also deposed in 2011 and a new president, supported by The Muslim Brotherhood, was elected.  However, Mohamed Morsi began seizing unconstitutional powers last fall and was ousted by the Egyptian military on July 3 of this year.  Mubarak has since been freed from prison, while Morsi has been imprisoned and accused of kidnapping, murder, “conspiring with Hamas,” and accepting bribes from none other than Barack Hussein Obama involving Hamas.

Less than a year into his de facto presidency, Barack Obama was said to be “mentally ill and getting worse” by Pastor J. Grant Swank Jr. and later, by an Israeli psychiatrist reportedly specializing in Narcissistic Personality Disorder.

The Obama regime has systematically engaged in vilifying its enemies, paralyzing its political opponents, intimidating media intent on asking tough questions, and reportedly threatened several for researching and reporting on Obama’s fraudulent documentation.  An image uploaded to the White House server on April 27, 2011 purported to be his long-form birth certificate has been debunked as a “computer-generated forgery,” with both the regime and Congress refusing to respond or investigate.

The U.S. military has refused to take action or learn more about the forgery and fraud which maintain Obama in the White House as their phony commander-in-chief.

Obama’s most ardent supporters have alternately lamented Obama’s preparation and lack of decisiveness, provided excuses for his poor performance, and wailed that Obama’s critics claim he is not a legitimate leader.

Over the August recess, members of Congress began to mention the possibility of impeaching Barack Hussein Obama in the House of Representatives.  On August 22, Sen. Tom Coburn stated that Obama was reaching “the Constitutional standard for impeachment.”  On August 19, Rep. Kerry Bentivolio described the hypothetical writing of Articles of Impeachment against Obama as a “dream come true,” although he claimed he lacked sufficient evidence to do so.  In July, Rep. Tom Marino said he planned to pursue criminal charges against the Obama regime up to and including Obama himself.

While saying that he will wait for Congress to return from its recess and vote on the question of embroiling the U.S. in Syria, Obama reportedly may “defy” Congress and “the will of the American people” by ordering military action anyway.  At that point, reports OpEd News, “the issue of possible impeachment will immediately rise to the surface.”

Obama might be supporting murderers by taking the side of the Syrian rebels.

In January, Rep. Steve Stockman pledged to draft Articles of Impeachment if Obama changed firearms policies by executive order.  On Thursday, Obama issued two executive orders which “ban Americans from buying weapons that the US military has provided to foreign governments.”  Because of Obama’s perception that Congress has “failed to act” on stricter gun control, Obama said he plans to issue additional executive orders, which historically were intended only to clarify existing laws passed by Congress.

Stockman has reportedly said he is in the process of drafting legislation to launch a congressional investigation into the forgery of Obama’s birth certificate as well as to probe whether or not Obama is constitutionally eligible to serve as president and commander-in-chief.

It is suspected that the Obama regime employs people to spread government propaganda and dissemble about Obama’s political opponents.  Under Obama, IRS employees have admittedly targeted those it deems as oppositional to Obama’s policies by demanding their bylaws, prayers, minutes of meetings, and members’ eligibility while working under a likely-ineligible occupant of the White House themselves.  Obama first said he was “angry” about the illegal practice, but later called it “a phony scandal.”

Obama called the Benghazi, IRS and Justice Department’s collection of phone and email records from journalists “sideshows,” just as he did the issue over his long-form birth certificate in April 2011.  At that time, he said that the distraction over his birthplace amounted to “sideshows and carnival barkers.”

If he was first angry but then claimed the actions of the IRS were “phony,” is Obama emotionally stable enough to lead the nation?  Can he lead?

Some constituents at town hall meetings, including young people, do not think so.

Obama’s whereabouts during the Benghazi violence have never been made public, but he spoke at a campaign fundraiser the following day in Las Vegas, calmly referring to the deaths of his ambassador to Libya and the three other Americans killed as “an attack.”

Since taking office, Obama has arguably been friendlier to Islamic nations than to Americans.  His executive orders which allow young illegal immigrants brought to the U.S. by their parents have resulted in a very high percentage having been allowed to stay amidst concerns of “fraud.” Illegal aliens kill thousands of Americans each year by murder, drunk driving, and other violent crimes.

The regime has sued sovereign states for passing voter identification and immigration laws.  It has labeled military veterans and Christians “sovereign citizens” and “domestic terrorists.”  Obama has failed to pursue the identified terrorists who carried out the attack in Benghazi, with the military team tasked with capturing them making its exit from Libya last month.

Obama has fomented racial prejudice and hatred by taking sides in crimes which may or may not be racially-motivated.  He has proudly claimed that if he had a son, that son would resemble a juvenile delinquent, drug dealer and violent school truant.  After defendant George Zimmerman was acquitted of second-degree murder in the case of Trayvon Martin, Obama’s Justice Department began a defamation campaign against him by soliciting “tips” on Zimmerman’s alleged “racist” behavior.

While on Saturday, Obama called the U.S. Armed Forces “my military,” his Selective Service registration form is an unexplained forgery.  After an Islamic fanatic who showed warning signs of hating America killed 13 fellow soldiers at Ft. Hood, TX on November 5, 2009, Obama refused to term the attack terrorism, but rather, “workplace violence,” thereby denying survivors benefits and Purple Hearts.

Also on Saturday, former United Nations Ambassador John Bolton told Greta van Susteren that Obama is “not a real president.”  Obama began his first term in the Oval Office by stumbling on the presidential oath, as did U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts.  The second-term oath also was not stated correctly.

Why is Obama not able to say the oath properly?

The U.S. Constitution provides for impeachment of the chief executive by the House of Representatives, with the Senate then acting as the jury.  Article I, Section 3 states:

6:  The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments.  When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation.  When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside:  And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present.

7:  Judgment in Cases of impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States:  but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law.

Rep. Blake Farenthold said that “there are enough” votes in the House of Representatives to impeach Obama over the “birth certificate” issue following a town hall meeting in which a constituent referred to evidence that “Obama’s birth certificate was faked.”

Some scholars affirm that Obama cannot be impeached because he does not meet the requirements of Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the Constitution, which states:

5:  No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

Obama’s fraudulent documentation and inconsistent life story have obscured whether or not he meets the constitutional eligibility criteria for the presidency.  Until very recently, members of Congress were unwilling to recognize and address the question.

A national movement which holds campaigns for Obama’s impeachment on overpasses across the country has grown exponentially over the last few months.  Books have been written about Obama’s allegedly impeachable offenses.

Additional to the impeachment question is whether or not Obama can be charged with crimes for allegedly working with The Muslim Brotherhood through Mohamed Morsi and Obama’s half-brother, Malik, who reportedly operates The Brotherhood’s financial apparatus.

Obama has repeatedly been accused of treason.

The Cold Case Posse, which conducted the criminal investigation into Obama’s documentation and found it fraudulent, is in the process of identifying persons of interest in the case.  Lead investigator Mike Zullo has described the evidence in his possession as “overwhelming and undeniable.”

Join the Conversation


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. Unfortunately, Obama knows exactly what he is doing! And yes, his title should be “Traitor”. Just remember his mentor, his attitude, his blaming, and his open arrogance! These are NOT the traits of a person who took the Oath to be President of the United States! He definitely should be impeached, but I don’t think Republicans have the guts to really go after anything he does! What a shame!

  2. High Treason, Perjury, Election Fraud, Identity Fraud, Murder, Theft Of Trillions Of Taxpayer’s Dollars On Phony Stimulus/Aid Programs, Sabotage Of The U.S. Military Command, Murder Of U.S. Military And Spec. Op. Personnel, Disclosure Of SEAL TEAM 6 And Their Operating Classifieds, Misuse Of Taxpayer Funds For Personal Gains, Deliberately Keeping Obama’s Background And Eligibility Status From The Citizens, Illegal Subjugation And Threatening Of The U.S. Judicial To Not Allow Any Criminal Presentments Through Any U.S. Court To Prosecute Them Through Discovery On ANY Crimes Of This Administration, Criminal Operations In Fast And Furious/Benghazi And Refusal To Allow Prosecution, Complete Negligence In All Constitutional Laws, On And On.

  3. Sharon, it has been a long time since I began using words like revolution, civil war, treason, illegal occupant and very few of my friends thought I was sane. Isn’t it interesting how all of those words are becoming common everyday words in the conversations we have around the kitchen table and in the internet social sites and finally are bubbling up in some of the media. I pray, as I have many times, Obama and the destruction he causes won’t continue for another day. Maybe our prayers will be answered soon. It is too bad Congress has no concept of “We the People” unless it is for votes to keep them in the plush job they have created for themselves.

    Your continued publishing of the facts is heartening and I thank God for your tenacity and clearness of thought. May God be with you and bless you and your family.

    Semper Fi
    Mrs. Rondeau replies: Thank you, sir.