Esquire and CNN Suggest that Boston Bombings were Work of “Right-Wing Extremists”

WHY THE PROPAGANDA?

by Sharon Rondeau

A CNN video in which national security analyst Peter Bergen suggested that “right-wing extremists” might be responsible for the Boston Marathon explosions has been removed in at least one place

(Apr. 16, 2013) — As pundits and anchors debated whether or not to call the explosions at the Boston Marathon on Monday “terrorism,” a CNN analyst has suggested that “right-wing extremists” planted the explosives which killed three people and injured more than 170.

National security analyst for CNN Peter Bergen raised the possibility of Al Qaeda being responsible but specifically mentioned “right-wing” extremists because of the type of explosives used.  He did not mention “left-wing” extremists, which included Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn during the 1970s, a fact obscured by Barack Hussein Obama’s campaign in 2008.

Sources report that a Saudi Arabian national is under guard as a suspect at a Boston hospital, while the Boston police commissioner and Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick deny those claims.

The Washington Post is reporting that the “Saudi national” is a witness, not a person of interest or a suspect and that “he is one of two Saudi citizens who were injured in the attacks,” quoting unnamed “officials.”  The Post also said that the Sauid “volunteered” to have his apartment searched.

Fox News reported that the man had been under guard at the hospital but reportedly removed its story.

The video in which Bergen discusses the possible perpetrators of the explosions has been removed from one report, while it remains in place at Breitbart.

In recent weeks, there have been reports of veterans having their firearms confiscated without cause and warnings from propaganda outlets such as MSNBC of the dangers of “anti-government hate groups” who oppose Obama.  A U.S. Army training program contained evangelical Christians and Catholics as potential domestic terrorists.

Esquire’s Charles F. Pierce’s brief editorial links to an article on the Oklahoma City bombing carried out by Timothy McVeigh, who is identified as a “supporter of right-wing militia groups.”  Pierce described McVeigh as having viewed himself as a “waterer of the tree of liberty and the like.”

Nida Khan, a writer for The Huffington Post suggested that an “anti-government group” was responsible for the Boston tragedy.  Khan’s top blog entry is titled, “Al Jazeera America:  The Newsroom We’ve Been Waiting For.”  The second entry down is titled, “The Truly Frightening Power of the Right-Wing Mainstream Media.”

McVeigh killed 168 people, including children, at the Alfred P. Murrah Building in Oklahoma City, OK on April 19, 1995 for which he was executed in June 2001, three months before the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on New York, Pennsylvania and Washington, DC.

ABC News pointed out that the Oklahoma City bombing; the shooting of the Branch Davidian compound in Waco, TX; and the carnage in Boston on Monday “happened in April.”

The Colombine High School and Virginia Tech shootings also occurred in April.

The MSNBC episode of “The Ed Show” highlighted Barton Gellman, who had written a lengthy article dated September 30, 2010 which focused on alleged “extreme militias” and misrepresented events involving Walter Francis Fitzpatrick, III and Darren Huff on page 2.  Without ever having spoken with Huff or Fitzpatrick, Gelllman described Gary Pettway as the “real grand jury foreman” when Pettway had in fact been serving illegally for more than 27 years.  Various propaganda websites continue to report false information about the event.
Ed Schultz, host of “The Ed Show,” claimed that “the NRA” is responsible for the alleged rise in “anti-government hate groups.”
Obama propagandists have demonstrated a connection between local public officials in Madisonville, TN and themselves in libeling Fitzpatrick and Huff by claiming that they were members of an organized militia which had set out to “take over the Monroe County courthouse” on April 20, 2010.  Huff is now serving a four-year sentence in federal prison in Texarkana, TX after several Monroe County, TN officials and local media perpetrated inaccuracies about why Huff was there that day.

After a former Marine was arrested and forced into a psychiatric hospital last August, The Rutherford Institute reported that hundreds of other military veterans had experienced similar treatment from the FBI and local officials after protesting the actions of the Obama regime.  In April 2009, the Department of Homeland Security issued a “MIAC” report which revealed that returning veterans were viewed as “potential domestic terrorists.”

Right-wing extremists” tie into the FBI’s “Sovereign Citizen” program, which include Bible believers, those who quote from U.S. Supreme Court cases and the Constitution, and parents who homeschool their children.

Propaganda assisted Adolf Hitler in taking over Germany and exterminating more than 6,000,000 Jews and others he believed were unworthy of living.

While the American press appears to dread the thought that an Islamic radical could be responsible for the Boston attack, Islamic radicals are reportedly “hoping” that “jihadi terrorism” is to blame for the deaths of an eight-year-old boy and a reported 11 others as well as traumatic injuries to 170 more.

4 Responses to "Esquire and CNN Suggest that Boston Bombings were Work of “Right-Wing Extremists”"

  1. Loggia   Tuesday, April 16, 2013 at 7:54 PM

    Napolitano’s version (fairy-tale?) is at odds with the story at http://www.debka.com which states that it was a Saudi terror cell (possibly Al-Qaeda), so why would she tell the Nation such nonsense so quickly? She cannot herself be sure who the perpetrators are.

  2. Loggia   Tuesday, April 16, 2013 at 7:36 PM

    Janet Napolitano says there is “no broader plot.”

    That makes no sense, if Al Qaeda is involved.

    One wonders if she has all her wits about her??

  3. Fran   Tuesday, April 16, 2013 at 7:30 PM

    “Anti-Government” means just that. No “Anti-Government/right-wing” group would target innocent citizens. An “Anti-Government/Right wing” group would attack what the are against (ie. “anti”).

    Yes my friends, it is as simple as that.

  4. OPOVV   Tuesday, April 16, 2013 at 3:19 PM

    The limits of stupidity has taken new and (as yet) unexplored vistas of the human imagination.
    But we’re getting there, fast.
    To name someone who is “anti Obama” as being “anti American” is the same thing as someone being “anti Hitler” and being accused of being “anti Germany”, when the opposite is the Truth (anti Hitler means to be pro-German).
    But we’re used to things being “opposite” these days, aren’t we?
    They put they FBI in charge of the investigation, which means, what? They’ll determine that Obama is an illegal immigrant and ineligible to be POYUS? Maybe come to the conclusion that the murder of Ambassador Stevens in Benghazi wasn’t the result of some ridiculous film on the internet but rather a well planned coordinated attack on the United States, an act of war?
    No chance. Incompetent Federal employees in charge of “Political Correctness Spin”, which the worthless mainstream media will embrace as if the word of God is spoken.
    I’m sorry, but I don’t trust the government, which is made up of low life traitors, worthless human beings deserving none of our money and certainly none of our respect.
    The FBI, once an respected law enforcement agency but, nowadays, nothing but just another Goon Squad acting on orders from the White House, and the heck with their Oaths to the United States Constitution.
    For shame, in infamy.
    OPOVV

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.