Breaking: Orly Taitz Shows Congressmen Evidence of Obama Fraud at CPAC

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

by Atty. Orly Taitz

Atty. Orly Taitz, who has been challenging Obama’s eligibility for more than four years, attended CPAC to speak with congressmen about evidence of forgery and fraud in Obama’s identification documents

(Mar. 15, 2013) —Dr. and Attorney Orly Taitz is currently a VIP attendee of CPAC convention. She personally talked to Member of the Judiciary Committee Congressman Lou Gohmert, Senator Jim Inhofe, Congressman Steven King and retired Senator and current president of the Heritage Foundation Jim Demint.

During the conversation with Congressman Gohmert Taitz was surrounded by multiple reporters, who took pictures and recorded on  video tape the conversation. Taitz showed Gohmert Obama’s tax returns with CT SSN 042-68-4425 and SSNVS and E-verify, showing that Obama failed E-Verify and SSNVS, that he is using a stolen SSN. Taitz advised Gohmert that in January Department of Justice appered before Judge England, stating that they represent the US  Congress and on behalf of the US Congress they opposed the injunction of the certification of Obama’s electoral votes. I asked, if he as a US Congressman and member of the Judiciary committee indeed felt that it is proper for Obama to use the SSN that was not assigned to him, whether he indeed directed the US Department of Justice to represent him and oppose the injunction. Gohmert stated in front of all the reporters that he did no know anything about this and that the Department of Justice never gave him any papers.

Later reporters, who witnessed te conversation took more in depth interviews, among them reporters from US News and World Report, National Review and a reporter from Australian TV.

Senator Inhofe similarly did not know anything about it. The conversation took place in front of the talk show host Rusty Humphries. Taitz talked to Congressman Steven King. He said that if Department of Justice were to give him any papers he would remember it.

He stated that his staff will review all the info and will prepare an executive report for him. He should have an answer in 1 week. LT. Zullo and talk show host Carl Gallos stood next to Taitz during this conversation and witnessed Taitz giving the documents to King.

As of now the picture is such that the Department of Justice went behind the backs of the U.S Congressmen and never gave them any pleadings or documents and did not act as an attorneyor the US Congress, but raher as a private criminal defense attorney for Obama.

Currently Taitz has problems connecting to the control panel of her web site and asking the supporters to spread the word. If Department of Justice went behind the backs of the US Congress, this is a scandal much bigger than the Watergate.

Additionally Taitz did some 10 interviews to different stations and reporters. Those interviews should be on line shortly.

Dr Orly TaitzESQ
29839 Santa Margarita pkwy, ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688
ph 949-683-5411  fax949-766-7603
orlytaitzesq.com

8 Responses to "Breaking: Orly Taitz Shows Congressmen Evidence of Obama Fraud at CPAC"

  1. Martha Trowbridge   Saturday, March 16, 2013 at 10:29 AM

    Great pun!

  2. TalkingMonkeyNOT   Saturday, March 16, 2013 at 2:08 AM

    Mayhap Dianne Feinstein believes the 14th amendment qualifies Obama because of the 5th paragraph in the quote below (in my earlier comment) which begins as follows “President Lincoln was assassinated before he could complete plans for reestablishing constitutional government in the Southern States…” It is also possible that the reason those in the federal government behave as if we were all serfs, vassals or even enemies is precisely because of what that entire quote says. That WOULD explain the seeming lack of regard for what “we the people” want or think. If the below quote IS true, “we the people” ARE the enemies of the United States Government Inc. And when enough of us find out what was done and how those who have been elected to high office have conspired to keep it all quiet and hidden from the general public, there COULD, in fact, there most certainly WOULD be H E double L to pay. At any rate, there is definitely something fishy about the disappearance of the original 13th amendment and the establishment of the current 14th amendment. Instead of just freeing the slaves, it put us ALL into the same category as the newly acquired citizens ie ex-slaves. So now, instead of there being plantation slaves, as we generally think of the people who were brought here for that purpose back then, we are all now economic slaves or assets – ie property – of the United States Government Incorporated. I’m afraid it’s much, much worse than what most of us ever dreamed.

  3. phrowt   Friday, March 15, 2013 at 8:22 PM

    No, Rose, Congress needs to read and understand the Constitution and that with a little backbone will lead to impeachment and hopefully much jail time for all traitors involved.
    Semper Fi

  4. phrowt   Friday, March 15, 2013 at 8:20 PM

    I thought I would share a response letter from Senator Feinstein, who as of yesterday told Senator Cruz of Texas that she was educated and appreciated his lecture.
    Well, check this out on the education bit, when I write a response it will certainly point out that she has been indoctrinated and NOT educated as her letter to me indicates. She says it is the 14th ammendment that qualifies Obama to be President AND she points to the birth certificate on the White House website that has been proven to be a forgery. I have so many response like this one it is past the point of trying to educate the mental midgets that have managed to get elected in California. She offers other methods to communicate with her but left our “sledge hammer”.

    Here is her letter.

    Dear Mr. Carter:

    Thank you for writing regarding President Barack Obama’s qualifications to be President. I appreciate this opportunity to respond.

    Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution specifies the qualifications for this executive office. It states that no person except for a natural born American citizen is eligible to run for President of the United States. Also, the candidate must be at least thirty-five years of age and have resided in the United States for at least fourteen years.

    President Obama meets these constitutional requirements. If you were not already aware, on April 27, 2011 the White House released a copy of President Obama’s long form birth certificate. He was born in Honolulu, Hawaii, on August 4, 1961. According to the Fourteenth Amendment, all persons born in the United States are considered citizens of the United States. Under these criteria, President Obama, a 47-year old U.S. citizen, who has resided in the United States for longer than fourteen years, is eligible to be President.

    If you are interested in viewing the President’s birth certificate, it is available on the White House’s website at http://www.whitehouse.gov.

    Once again, thank you for writing. If you have any further questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact my Washington, D.C. staff at (202) 224-3841.

    Sincerely yours,

    Dianne Feinstein
    United States Senator

    Further information about my position on issues of concern to California and the nation are available at my website, Feinstein.senate.gov. You can also receive electronic e-mail updates by subscribing to my e-mail list. Click here to sign up. And please visit my YouTube, Facebook and Twitter for more ways to communicate with me.

  5. Neil SANKEY   Friday, March 15, 2013 at 1:10 PM

    Would it not be nice (and appropriate) for some of our appointees stand up and get some principles. This IS the time.
    Time also to make those cowardly slime bag attorneys who constantly berate Orly eat their words and start on years of a “Crow” diet.

  6. TalkingMonkeyNOT   Friday, March 15, 2013 at 1:05 PM

    Think those in high places don’t know what they are doing or what is going on? OR – WHY Obama can hold the office he currently holds. There are FAR more nefarious things going on than what the majority of the population has any idea!

    QUOTE:

    The Introduction to Senate Report 93-549 (93rd Congress, 1st Session, 1973).

    When the Southern states walked out of Congress on March 27, 1861, the quorum to conduct business under the Constitution was lost. The only votes that Congress could lawfully take, under Parliamentary Law, were those to set the time to reconvene, take a vote to get a quorum, and vote to adjourn and set a date, time, and place to reconvene at a later time, but instead, Congress abandoned the House and Senate without setting a date to reconvene. Under the parliamentary law of Congress, when this happened, Congress became sine die (pronounced see-na dee-a; literally “without day”) and thus when Congress adjourned sine die, it ceased to exist as a lawful deliberative body, and the only lawful, constitutional power that could declare war was no longer lawful, or in session.

    The Southern states, by virtue of their secession from the Union, also ceased to exist sine die, and some state legislatures in the Northern bloc also adjourned sine die, and thus, all the states which were parties to creating the Constitution ceased to exist. President Lincoln executed the first executive order written by any President on April 15, 1861, Executive Order 1, and the nation has been ruled by the President under executive order ever since. When Congress eventually did reconvene, it was reconvened under the military authority of the Commander-in-Chief and not by Rules of Order for Parliamentary bodies or by Constitutional Law; placing the American people under martial rule ever since that national emergency declared by President Lincoln. The Constitution for the United States of America temporarily ceased to be the law of the land, and the President, Congress, and the Courts unlawfully presumed that they were free to remake the nation in their own image, whereas, lawfully, no constitutional provisions were in place which afforded power to any of the actions which were taken which presumed to place the nation under the new form of control.

    President Lincoln knew that he had no authority to issue any executive order, and thus he commissioned General Orders No. 100 (April 24, 1863) as a special field code to govern his actions under martial law and which justified the seizure of power, which extended the laws of the District of Columbia, and which fictionally implemented the provisions of Article I, Section 8, Clauses 17-18 of the Constitution beyond the boundaries of Washington, D.C. and into the several states. General Orders No. 100, also called the Lieber Instructions and the Lieber Code, extended The Laws of War and International Law onto American soil, and the United States government became the presumed conqueror of the people and the land.

    Martial rule was kept secret and has never ended, the nation has been ruled under Military Law by the Commander of Chief of that military; the President, under his assumed executive powers and according to his executive orders. Constitutional law under the original Constitution is enforced only as a matter of keeping the public peace under the provisions of General Orders No. 100 under martial rule. Under Martial Law, title is a mere fiction, since all property belongs to the military except for that property which the Commander-in-Chief may, in his benevolence, exempt from taxation and seizure and upon which he allows the enemy to reside.

    President Lincoln was assassinated before he could complete plans for reestablishing constitutional government in the Southern States and end the martial rule by executive order, and the 14th Article in Amendment to the Constitution created a new citizenship status for the new expanded jurisdiction. New laws for the District of Columbia were established and passed by Congress in 1871, supplanting those established Feb. 27, 1801 and May 3, 1802. The District of Columbia was re-incorporated in 1872, and all states in the Union were reformed as Franchisees of the Federal Corporation so that a new Union of the United States could be created. The key to when the states became Federal Franchisees is related to the date when such states enacted the Field Code in law. The Field Code was a codification of the common law that was adopted first by New York and then by California in 1872, and shortly afterwards the Lieber Code was used to bring the United States into the 1874 Brussels Conference and into the Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907.

    In 1917, the Trading with the Enemy Act (Public Law 65-91, 65th Congress, Session I, Chapters 105, 106, October 6, 1917) was passed and which defined, regulated and punished trading with enemies, who were then required by that act to be licensed by the government to do business. The National Banking System Act (Public Law 73-1, 73rd Congress, Session I, Chapter 1, March 9, 1933), Executive Proclamation 2038 (March 6, 1933), Executive Proclamation 2039 (March 9, 1933), and Executive Orders 6073, 6102, 6111 and 6260 prove that in 1933, the United States Government formed under the executive privilege of the original martial rule went bankrupt, and a new state of national emergency was declared under which United States citizens were named as the enemy to the government and the banking system as per the provisions of the Trading with the Enemy Act. The legal system provided for in the Constitution was formally changed in 1938 through the Supreme Court decision in the case of Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins, 304 US 64, 82 L.Ed. 1188.

    On April 25, 1938, the Supreme Court overturned the standing precedents of the prior 150 years concerning “COMMON LAW” in the federal government.

    THERE IS NO FEDERAL COMMON LAW, AND CONGRESS HAS NO POWER TO DECLARE SUBSTANTIVE RULES OF COMMON LAW applicable IN A STATE, WHETHER they be LOCAL or GENERAL in their nature, be they COMMERCIAL LAW or a part of LAW OF TORTS.” (See: ERIE RAILROAD CO. vs. THOMPKINS, 304 U.S. 64, 82 L. Ed. 1188)

    The significance is that since the Erie Decision, no cases are allowed to be cited that are prior to 1938. There can be no mixing of the old law with the new law. The Common Law is the fountain source of Substantive and Remedial Rights, if not our very Liberties.

    In 1945 the United States gave up any remaining national sovereignty when it signed the United Nations Treaty, making all American citizens subject to United Nations jurisdiction.

  7. The Obama Timeline author   Friday, March 15, 2013 at 11:16 AM

    Eric Holder = Epic Holdup

  8. RoseC   Friday, March 15, 2013 at 9:17 AM

    Eric Holder is the keeper of the gate. He needs to be removed from office immediately and the Congress should appoint the new attorney.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.