If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my free Email alerts. Thanks for visiting!


by Doretta Wildes, ©2013, blogging at DorettaWildes

(Jan. 1, 2013) — I have always been an avid reader of mysteries—from a very young age, I have been a devotée of Christie, Sayers, James, Rendell, Doyle and others. More than mere popcorn pulp, which invites the reader merely to chew (usually with his/her mouth open), a good mystery invites the reader to think along with the detective.

In a well-written murder mystery, once the weapon is found, the action is driven by the character of the suspects and, often, that of the detectives. Unearthing a motive or, at least, a reason for the murder becomes the driver of the plot. The weapon may be a major clue, but it is not the solitary focal point. Motive, character, conflict and gradual psychological unraveling are. In other words, just as in the real real world, the story hinges on the people in it, not their modes of execution. Otherwise, the story would not be credible or even interesting.

To compare a murder event such as Sandy Hook with fiction may appear superficial. It is not my intention to trivialize the horrible loss—both personal and societal—that a killing of this scale represents. But I think it’s worth noting that official stories of high profile murders in the past century are more likely to conform to agendas than to truth. The murders of John Kennedy, Robert Kennedy, Martin Luther King, and the victims of the 9-11-11 collapses are just a few examples. Recent shooting rampages, particularly that of James Holmes, have been full of inconsistencies, with the trail of second shooters memory-holed and the role of psychiatric drugs minimized or ignored by a media that is largely funded by pharmaceutical giants.

In the Newtown murders, the methodology of determining who the killer(s) was/were and what motivated him/them appears so irregular and insufficient, that if Sandy Hook were a fictional mystery, this reader would give it a mighty thumbs down.

Clearly, the investigation as reported has been more about the alleged weapon(s) than the character and motive(s) of the alleged murderer. Little to nothing has been released, for instance, about Adam Lanza’s psychiatric medications. Who was his doctor? I don’t think this critical fact has been ascertained. This is odd. Very odd. But in light of all that has happened beforehand and since, perhaps not so very odd.

Something is very wrong with the Sandy Hook story. Even if you swallow the official story whole, it has a distinctive, artificial under-taste. Where the mainstream media has failed, the alternative media and citizen reporters are revealing inconvenient truths. They can do so because there are no government agencies or profit-driven sponsors sitting in their directors’ chairs. Some take a lot of heat as a result, and it is for them that the first amendment was drafted.

Here is a sampling of videos on the subject of Sandy Hook from which I think at least some of the truth—including the bankrupt state of our culture—can be gleaned. All but the first are by alternative and citizen videographers and reporters:


This video of Obama, who pauses dramatically and wipes at his eyes, is 50% North Pole, 50% D.C. Obama is known for his cool and reserved demeanor, and this attempt to mimic genuine sorrow falls flat and down a few flights. Had I been one of the parents, I would have been deeply offended by the fakery.



An article that examines a strange phenomenon: The connection between the Batman movie, “Dark Night Rises,” to the Sandy Hook murders. A press kit sent out last year to advertise the movie contained a map with a targeted area named “Sandy Hook” which was labeled as “Strike Zone 1.”  The impulse to ascribe this to coincidence would seem logical had the Sandy Hook murder not been preceded by the Aurora shooting—at the premiere of the same movie. As E.M. Forster wrote, “Only connect.”



In this video, a Connecticut policeman—Mark S. Mann (a pseudonym and a pun)—is interviewed. In addition to pointing out several gaps in the media’s coverage of Sandy Hook, he asserts that Connecticut’s gun laws (which include an assault rifle ban from the 1990s, still in effect), as well as those in surrounding states are stricter than the expired ’94 federal assault weapons ban. Yet these laws failed to prevent the murders. He warns that societal and cultural violence cannot be legislated away. One of his more convincing points is that firearms prevent violent crimes, but these incidents are buried by the media under the gun control agenda. (Read about one such incident here. http://www.prisonplanet.com/media-ignores-shooting-stopped-by-law-abiding-gun-owner.html)



I find the background music in this video distracting and mildly irritating, but the soft-spoken videographer has spliced together good evidence that the mainstream media is covering up the real story. Notably, his video includes:

  • Raw footage showing that the Connecticut police apprehended another suspect (wearing camouflage pants) and took him into custody.
  • Testimony from a little boy who saw a suspect pinned to the ground with handcuffs on near the area fire station.
  • Police scanner audio in which it is revealed that a teacher saw “two shadows” running past the school gym.
  • Audio testimony from eyewitnesses of the Aurora and Sikh temple shootings, who allege the presence of more than one shooter/participant.
  • A list of discrepancies in the media’s version of the Sandy Hook murders. These are rolled toward the end of the video. Among those listed: A rifle was found in the trunk of Lanza’s car, while his body was found with handguns. (Two? Four?)  This does not explain how the victims’ bodies showed evidence of multiple long-rifle shots.

Caution: The author of this video states that the father of Adam Lanza, as well as the father of James Holmes, were both scheduled to give testimony against banks involved in the Libor scandal. This statement is false as far as I am able to discern. It is apparently a rumor that has been spread by Internet bloggers. See: http://planet.infowars.com/worldnews/2-mass-shootings-from-colorado-and-connecticut-connected-to-the-libor-scandal



This video is by someone who doubts the event was real. (It is not my intention to promote this opinion, simply to note it. I think it is significant that things have come to such a pass in our country that this degree of cynicism is evoked by such events.)

The first to step up to the microphone is Rob Parker, ostensibly the father of deceased Emilie Parker. Parker is laughing at first, then does what actors do before a performance: he affects a sad face, sighs repeatedly, and works himself into a semblance of grief commensurate with the loss of a child. It is one of the most bizarre transformations I have ever seen. The ‘70s expression “unreal” comes to mind. There is also something disturbingly  “Stepford” about the facial expressions and reactions of other family members in this video—and a peculiar old man who rambles about his desire to be an “uncle” to the schoolchildren. My Danger-Will-Robinson alarm was screaming halfway through it.

One would hope after the loss of so many children, the media would not be allowed to fluff up the hair of the bereaved and broadcast the show. But in these cases, the 15 minutes of fame would appear to be the inevitable “reward” of tragedy. You want the exploited, bereaved parents to scream with rage, to tell the media to go to hell. But it never comes. One can only react with dismay at how plastic and stage-managed our culture has become. Is it any wonder that Americans no longer treasure privacy and genuine feeling? It has been devalued and stolen by a corrupting mass media and a groping techno-surveillance culture.





In this set of (3) videos, Daniel Freeman offers his opinion of the Sandy Hook tragedy.  Like the little boy in the story, “The Emperor’s New Clothes,” Freeman says that something is missing, describing a strange artificiality of feeling in our president’s (emperor’s) reaction and that of many others, including the coroner and certain parents. Of note, he points out that:

  • An R.I.P. Facebook page for Victoria Soto (deceased teacher) was created four days before her alleged death. (The page was ostensibly taken down and replaced.) While there could be a reasonable explanation for this, the timing is suspicious. More here: http://sgtreport.com/2012/12/why-was-victoria-sotos-rip-facebook-page-created-4-days-before-the-sandy-hook-shooting/
  • In less than a week, gun control became the big story, supplanting the actual tragedy.
  • Hollywood, the media and the government whipped up a well-coordinated TV ad supporting gun control in the span of a few days. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=64G5FfG2Xpg(It normally takes many weeks, sometimes months, to film, edit and perfect this kind of ad—something I know from my own professional experience.)
  • One of the photos from the family album of Victoria Soto—aired by the media—shows an elderly man, seated in the background, lifting his hand up in the sign of Baphomet, a well-known Masonic-Satanic hand signal. Odd, yes. Surprising, no.

Freeman believes that the Sandy Hook event (which he calls Operation SHH, an acronym for “Sandy Hook Hoax”) is a bigger psyop on the American people than 9-11-11. A Christian, he echoes C.S. Lewis, warning that something wicked is afoot. I’m afraid I have to agree with him.



This video turns the guns around, so to speak, and aims them at the real culprits. It takes the recent celebrity anti-gun ad and transforms it into a plea to ban weapons from the government, using actual war footage. Good exposé of celebrity, mass media and government hypocrisy.



This article from WND points out that Lanza, according to classmate Trevor Todd, worshiped the devil and had an Internet page dedicated to Satan. The article goes on to examine multiple instances of this phenomenon in the profiles of other mass killers, such as James Holmes (Aurora), Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold (Columbine).


To sum up, the Sandy Hook murder incident has been turned into yet another revolting media event involving a blood sacrifice, a Satan-worshiping shooter and inconsistencies so numerous that only a pathological liar could keep track of them all. These facts alone would send fictional and real detectives directly into the heart of darkness where the real culprits lurk. Instead, we are being told that the real culprits are lawful American gun owners who must be disarmed.

There is a point at which controlled reality rears up and backs its way through the wormhole into the world of pulp fiction. Very bad pulp fiction with a very big, bad agenda. We’ve reached that point.



Join the Conversation

1 Comment

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


    1) As yet, we have not seen any concrete evidence that any child died.

    2) As yet, parents have not been allowed to see their children. (Photoshopped pictures do not count.)

    3) As of now, I have seen only one unambiguous statement from a grieving parent (Robbie Parker).

    4) According to the official story, Adam Lanza was found with his older brother’s ID, and it was not stolen. However, older brother Ryan–who officials say is very cooperative–claims not to have even seen his brother since 2010. Where would Adam get this ID? And why does such use not qualify as a theft?

    5) According to the official story, Adam Lanza was wearing a black outfit with a mask and bulletproof vest. Why would he want to hide his identity, and why would he wear a bulletproof vest, if he planned to kill himself?

    6) The medical examiner asserts that all wounds were caused by a rifle or other long weapon, and police/FBI say that the school was littered with .223 (rifle) casings. But Adam Lanza was found dead in the school with only handguns–a rifle was found in the trunk of his car. But then he could not possibly have been firing the rifle, and could not have committed the murders. Who did?

    7) According to the official story, the killing was tightly confined to two classrooms. But then why were so many children told to close their eyes while leaving the building?

    8 ) Joanne Didonato, the principal’s secretary, called in sick on Friday–something she rarely does. So presumably, she must have been awfully ill. Yet she then felt well enough to give an interview. “Of all days,” she said, emphasizing the strange coincidence.

    9) The hospital went into lockdown and cleared four trauma rooms, but received only three patients, two of them dead children (according to the official story) and one mildly wounded adult.

    10) Why were there such persistent reports that Mrs. Lanza was a kindergarten teacher, and that she died at the school, when the new official story is that she was not connected to the school and was killed at home?

    11) What happened to the report that Adam Lanza’s girlfriend and another friend were missing in New Jersey?

    12) What happened to the woodsman in a black jacket and camo pants who was arrested and handcuffed outside the school? He actually shouted to parents, “It wasn’t me.” Who was he and what was he doing there?

    13) What happened to the dark van or SUV that the police surrounded in the parking lot, or the maroon sedan with a blown-out back window they were on the lookout for?

    14) The official story is that Nancy Lanza was a gun collector who obeyed the law. But since 20-year-olds are not permitted to buy guns or ammo or carry guns in Connecticut, why would she give her “autistic” son access to both guns and ammo?

    15) Why were parents told on Friday that “if you haven’t been reunited with your child by now it’s already over”? Does anyone imagine that real parents of real children would simply say, “Okay, the show’s over, let’s go home now”?

    16) Would real parents of real children really be satisfied with (possibly photoshopped) pictures of their children? Wouldn’t they demand to see their children one last time firsthand?

    17) According to the official story, 28 people died but only 1 was wounded. The dead included 20 small, squirmy children–difficult targets even for professionals. How could Adam Lanza achieve such amazingly deadly accuracy, in such a short length of time?

    18 ) A child asserts that he/she heard someone say, “Put your hands up,” followed by the reply, “Don’t shoot.” This indicates that the police took a suspect into custody inside the school. But if that was Adam Lanza, how did he kill himself after that point?

    19) Another child asserts that he/she saw a man pinned down to the ground with handcuffs on. Again, this indicates that the police took a suspect into custody. If that was Adam Lanza, how did he then kill himself?

    20) When Ryan Lanza was falsely identified as the shooter, who deleted his Facebook profile and created many others in his name?

    21) Is it reasonable for a geeky 20-year-old to carry two pistols and hundreds of rounds of ammunition while wearing a bulletproof vest and a mask?

    22) Why did the police say on Friday that they were going to leave the bodies rotting in the school until Sunday, then Saturday morning announce that they had spirited the bodies away in the middle of the night? Perhaps to ensure that the transport, if any, would go unrecorded on photos or video?

    23) Why won’t police tell us where they found the Henry repeating rifle, the Enfield rifle, and the shotgun?

    24) Did the school have one or more security cameras? What do they show?

    25) Why did a police officer specifically mention, on radio, that “they’re coming at me through this wood,” followed by a fellow officer saying, “This is it”?

    26) One officer in the school said, “We’ve got one suspect down.” Who was that? Down in this situation generally means in custody (on the ground and cuffed), not dead.

    27) Why didn’t Adam’s uncle see anything out of the ordinary in Adam when the two saw each other in June?

    28 ) Why is Adam Lanza reported to be a loner when a teenager said (oxymoronically), “[Lanza and his friends] always gathered alone in a corner in school”?

    29) Why did police assign an individual state trooper to every grieving family, whether the family wants such “protection” or not?

    30) Why are Ryan Lanza and his roommates still in custody, and why are the police pretending that it’s for their own benefit?

    31) Is it a coincidence that Nancy Lanza’s brother is Kingston Police Officer James Champion, who lives next door to the former Lanza home?


    As a mother, grandmother and great-grandmother I can assure you they would DEFINITELY have to show me the body of any of my children! Or shoot me to keep me from seeing them in the flesh!!