RE: JUDD V. OBAMA
by Sharon Rondeau
(Oct. 5, 2012) — Earlier today, Atty. Orly Taitz received a call from an attorney in the Georgia Secretary of State’s office who told her that she should be expecting a call from Asst. Senior Attorney General Russ Willard of the Georgia Attorney General’s office. The communication was made regarding her case, Judd v. Obama, which names Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp and 29 others as defendants.
The lawsuit was filed in California,and plaintiffs include New Hampshire State Representatives Lucien and Carol Vita and Laurence Rappaport; Presidential Candidates Keith Judd and Thomas G. MacLeran, and Taitz herself. Taitz has sent a DVD of sworn testimony from witnesses and video of one of the press conferences given by the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office to all 30 defendants.
Sheriff Joe Arpaio and his Cold Case Posse have determined that Obama’s long-form birth certificate and Selective Service form are forgeries.
Taitz named the defendants, which include the Secretaries of State in Georgia, West Virginia, New Hampshire and California, as having been “complicit in a racketeering scheme by Obama.” On October 2, 2012, the case was scheduled to be heard on November 5, 2012 by Judge David O. Carter, who had presided over a previous case of Taitz’s and concluded that his court did not have jurisdiction.
Taitz also received a phone call from Ms. Lynmarie C. Cusack, assistant attorney general of New Hampshire, with whom she had a “meet and confer.” “Her position was that the plaintiffs were awarded due process and a hearing during the hearing in New Hampshire before the primary. My response to that was that there was no hearing on the merits of to the Ballot Law Commission and be fine,” Taitz said.
Ms. Cusack told Taitz that the Ballot Law Commission “did not have jurisdiction” to review the case beyond the “four corners of the form,” to which Taitz responded, “This is not true, because there were two other candidates who were removed from the ballot by the Secretary of State and the Ballot Law Commission. They were Sal Muhamed and Abdul Hassan. “She claimed that they had admitted that they were not ‘natural born Citizens’ and not eligible. One of them proceeded to challenge the eligibility requirement and there was a recent decision on it. I told her that they were checking information in the application forms of those candidates but when they were presented information that Barack Obama is using a name that’s not legally his, that on his mother’s passport records he is listed under the last name ‘Soebarkah,’ and that is reason enough that he should have been removed. He has committed fraud. He is using a stolen Social Security number and a forged ID, and nothing is being done.”
Taitz additionally told Ms. Cusack, “This is not being filed in order to make money. The plaintiffs are not gold-diggers; the plaintiffs are just trying to stop treason to the United States of America by elected officials. They are trying to stop fraud. I would like to have a meet and confer with your client to see if they would be willing to stay the certification of the vote for Obama pending adjudication on the issue of fraud and forgery in his identification. So she is supposed to check on that.”
On November 18, 2011, Taitz had appeared before the New Hampshire Ballot Law Commission to present evidence of fraud and forgery in Obama’s documentation prior to the two press conferences held by Arpaio’s office on March 1, 2012 and July 17, 2012, respectively.
Sharon Rondeau has operated The Post & Email since April 2010, focusing on the Obama birth certificate investigation and other government corruption news. She has reported prolifically on constitutional violations within Tennessee’s prison and judicial systems.