by Sharon Rondeau

(Jul. 28, 2012) — A search for the whereabouts of Barack Hussein Obama II today yields no current results other than “No public events scheduled.”

A second search engine reveals the same results.  Obama often does not appear in public on weekends.

Lynn Sweet of the Chicago Sun-Times says that Obama is “attending meetings” and campaigning next week, while the White House schedule shows “no public events.”

This afternoon at 1:16 p.m., Mark Knoller of CBS News tweeted, “Pres Obama spent better part of 2 hrs this morning playing basketball at FBI gym. Now back at WH.”  At which FBI gym did Obama allegedly play?  Where was the Secret Service?

Obama reportedly declared the Commonwealth of Virginia a disaster area today from severe storms “a few weeks ago,” but from where the statement was made is unknown.

His weekly radio/internet address was broadcast as it is every Saturday, but it is pre-recorded.

An email purportedly from the British Embassy in Washington, DC stated:

Dear Sharon,

Please see our below public statement regarding the bust(s).  If you have further questions please refer them to our Press Secretary James Barbour 202-588-6595.

We prefer any quote be attributed to a “British Embassy spokesperson” :

“The bust of Sir Winston Churchill, by Sir Jacob Epstein, was lent to the George W Bush administration from the UK’s Government Art Collection, for the duration of the Presidency.  When that administration came to an end so did the loan; the bust now resides in the British Ambassador’s Residence in Washington DC.  The White House collection has its own Epstein bust of Churchill, which President Obama showed to Prime Minister Cameron when he visited the White House in March.

That’s not really what’s important here.  Both President Obama and Prime Minister Cameron have repeatedly underlined that our two countries remain the closest of allies.  The Churchill Bust story is a silly diversion – let’s get on and focus on seeing who wins most medals in the Olympics.”


White House Communications Director Dan Pfeiffer, whose photo also appears next to the long-form birth certificate on the White House website, alleging its authenticity, claimed that the bust of Sir Winston Churchill “[is] still in the White House.  In the Residence.  Outside the Treaty Room.”  Then the story about there being two busts of Churchill emerged, allegedly from the British Embassy.  Pfeiffer wrote his post while Mitt Romney was visiting Great Britain and said that he would like to return the bust of Churchill if he is elected president in November.

The email from the British Embassy refers to Cameron’s visiting the United States in March, but the photo shown on Pfeiffer’s blog post refers to the date of July 20, 2010.

Pfeiffer claimed that the birth certificate was “a fake issue,” but Maricopa County, AZ Sheriff Joe Arpaio says it is “definitely fraudulent” and has asked Congress to investigate.

Is it likely that a spokesperson from the British Embassy would editorialize and tell Americans while a guest in their country, “That’s not really what’s important here.  Both President Obama and Prime Minister Cameron have repeatedly underlined that our two countries remain the closest of allies.  The Churchill Bust story is a silly diversion – let’s get on and focus on seeing who wins most medals in the Olympics.”

What else has been called “a diversion?”  Who else has used the word “silly?”  Is “diversion” the same as “distraction?”

Is there something strange about the photo which purports to show British Prime minister David Cam eron and Obama peering at a bust of Sir Winston Churchill?

The relationship between Great Britain and the United States was not in question; rather, Pfeiffer’s truthfulness or lack thereof was.  Following the press coverage of Pfeiffer’s misstatements, he was forced to issue an update which continues to insist that columnist Charles Krauthammer was incorrect in asserting that the bust of Churchill had been returned to Great Britain.  Like everyone else in the media, Krauthammer had relied upon the reports of major media regarding the return of the bust in February 2009, including the British press.

On July 27, ABC News reported that President Nixon had acquired a bust of Churchill in apparent agreement with the purported statement from the British Embassy that there had been two Churchill busts.   Obama had reportedly decided to return the bust before he entered the White House, and no one contradicted the statement by the White House curator William Allman then.  It was also reported to have been replaced by someone with the last name of “King,” not Lincoln, as Pfeiffer claims.  CBS News reported:

Some Britons took offense when Winston Churchill’s bust was replaced with King’s. But the decision to return the Churchill bust to the British – it had been presented by former Prime Minister Tony Blair to Bush on loan – had been made before Obama even arrived.

“It was already scheduled to go back,” Allman said.

Pfeiffer now claims that “The White House has had a bust of Winston Churchill since the 1960’s.”  On Fox News last evening, Krauthammer accepted the premise that there were two busts of Churchill.  But were there?

A New York Times editorialist has accused Pfeiffer of lying, as have other news outlets.

Join the Conversation


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. to Gigclick:

    the DOCUMENTARY Channel will have its work cut out for them when they attempt to do Obama’s documentary someday!

    Thanks for all that insight!

  2. Once children played with a toy called MR POTATO HEAD.

    Now America IS PLAYED (for fools) by MR TAQIYYAH HEAD.

    The only people left in America who are still gullible are his sycophants.

    Everyone else has become like the audience in the recent MADONNA concert in France.

    They are not amused, and feel they were taken.

  3. Bari Malik Shabazz, Muslim son of Black Radical and white hater Malcolm X, son of Ann Newman of the Bronx/daughter of American Communist Atheist Radical Dr. Fred Newman, is a “synthetic identity” as discussed by Martha Trowbridge, carved out of DNC agenda and radical American Communist Party/Black Muslim-Malcolm radicalism of the 60’s. The Muslim Agenda/American Communist Party Aganda is “clear”. Every day in America, Hillary has enabled obfuscation of the Constitution so that Criminals Presentments against them will be obfuscated and that Muslim Aganda will be enabled in America at maximum speed. People have no idea what is being done. Walt Fitzpatrick tried to save America and was ignored by the press/media, America and the Judicial along with several other outstanding Military Officers who were jailed, beaten, careers illegally ruined, dragged through the courts on phony case charges and are still tied up in litigation ordered by Bari Malik Shabazz the usurper who has refused to release his papers and documents from Perkins Coie the Seattle DNC Law Firm run by many DNC Radicals/Power Brokers that have been paid about $3 million with taxpayers money to keep the lock on the goods! Bari is GOING DOWN, it’s just a matter of time until the entire sham is revealed and hopefully prosecution will move forward if we find any dedicated people left that are being payed to work in the government. There may be many people working in “broadcasting” that will be embarrassed or indicted for not revealing the truth about what has been done, at least they have been very good up to this point at covering it up. Treason, Perjury and Election Fraud for Pelosi/Shabazz is still the Criminal Grand Jury Presentment that is awaiting the “no standing rule” that Hillary illegally enforced on the Judicial to not allow any Criminal Presentments to get to Discovery to take down this usurpation of America to be REMOVED! Who will prosecute the Judicial????????????????? First we have to get the “first line” of criminals in Discovery.

  4. The entire platform of barry soetero is lying continually. Truth has been absent from the start of his entire life, his life narrative, and present life facade.

    Any historical, reportable, events of his life are questionable. The odds of every past trace of record being lost, non-filed, unavailable, undocumented, destroyed … are roll-your-eyes ridiculous.

    Same here, why did the Churchill bust removal even appear as a story if wasn’t a story?