Who is the Felon: Romney or Obama?

CRIMES OF IDENTITY FRAUD, TREASON, AND FORGERY?

by Sharon Rondeau

(Jul. 13, 2012) — An article in The Boston Globe dated July 12, 2012 asserts that Mitt Romney remained involved with Bain Capital, an investment capital firm he helped to found in 1984, longer than Romney has publicly stated.

Romney insists that he left Bain Capital in 1999 and held no position in the company thereafter.

The writers, Christopher Rowland and Callum Borchers, cite “government documents” and “financial disclosure documents” which demonstrate that Romney had not been honest about when he left the firm, suggesting that “If someone invested with Bain Capital because they believed Mitt Romney was a great fund manager, and it turns out he wasn’t really doing anything, that could be considered a misrepresentation to the investor,’’ she said. “It’s a theory that could be used in a lawsuit against him.”

Do the two reporters possess the legal expertise to make such a determination?

In an SEC filing dated July 13, 2000 linked to by TPM‘s Josh Marshall, it states, on page 13 of 22:

Mr. W. Mitt Romney, in his capacity as sole shareholder of Bain Investors VI and Bain Capital, may be deemed to share voting and dispositive power with respect to the 3,612,122 shares held by the Reporting Persons by virtue of their membership in Samantha Investors. The filing of this statement by Mr. W. Mitt Romney shall not be construed as an admission that he is, for the purpose of Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act, the beneficial owner of such shares held by the Reporting Persons.

The Obama campaign has attempted to characterize any misrepresentation which Romney might have made about his years at Bain as a “felony.”  At issue is whether or not Romney had any management responsibilities over the company between 1999 and 2002 of which investors should have been informed.

Does a “sole shareholder” mean that Romney ran the company?  Fortune Magazine and CNN state that they obtained evidence which supports Romney’s position that he had no management control over Bain Capital after 1999.

Dan Primack of Fortune states that Romney’s departure from Bain was “fairly sudden” in that Romney assumed the responsibility of the 2002 Olympics nine days after it was first reported that he had been approached.  Primack links to a press release dated July 19, 1999 which states that Romney would be taking a “part-time leave of absence” to manage the 2002 Olympic games in Salt Lake City.

Writer David Corn, whom Primack contends has misinterpreted the SEC statements regarding Romney’s role in Bain after 1999, stated in his article in Mother Jones that Romney “has yet to be fully vetted.”

Romney has stated that Obama’s attacks on his truthfulness are “reckless and undignified campaign tactics” and that Obama should apologize for insinuating that Romney was a “felon” or a “liar.”

Despite more than four years of attempting to obtain documentation on Barack Hussein Obama II, the American public does not know if that is even his original name.  He has reportedly been known by “Barack Hussein Obama Jr.,” “Barry Soetoro,” and perhaps “Bari M. Shabazz.”

Although claiming a birth in Honolulu, HI, at Kapiolani Medical Center, no hospital in Hawaii, including Kapiolani, will confirm that Obama was born there.

Obama was formally accused of treason by a retired military officer and did not address the accusation by either charging the officer with mutiny and jailing him or proving the officer wrong.

Obama claims he attended Columbia University from 1981 to 1983 but has never revealed a transcript, letter of recommendation, thesis or diploma that he was there.  Earlier this year, he had insisted on displacing another speaker who had been scheduled to address the graduates from the all-women’s Barnard College, which is a part of Columbia University.  A photo allegedly depicting Obama with his grandparents in New York City has been labeled a forgery.

While Columbia officials affirm that Obama graduated from the institution, 400 students who attended during the same time frame say they do not remember him there.

Dr. James David Manning of Atlah Ministries gathered evidence which he claimed showed that Obama never attended Columbia.

This writer watched the live feed of Obama’s time at Barnard, particularly his affect while waiting for his turn to speak.  He frequently looked down, stroked his chin, and appeared distracted.

A University of Chicago retired professor stated that Obama was attending a training program for community organizers in 1982, one of the years he allegedly attended Columbia.  After The Post & Email contacted the professor, he stated that he did not have the level of detail about Obama’s participation in the program and referred us to Prof. Jerry Kellman.  Kellman refused to communicate with us and had a third party refer us to two people who allegedly worked with Obama in the Chicago area during the 1980s.  Neither of those individuals responded to our requests for an interview.

While pundit Ann Coulter has derided questions over Obama’s constitutional eligibility to serve in the office of president, she maintains that Operation Fast & Furious is “the most shockingly vile corruption scandal in the history of the country.  As a result of the disastrous gunwalking program, Obama’s attorney general, Eric Holder, has been held in contempt of Congress both civilly and criminally, and the House intends to file a lawsuit against Holder in the near future.

If Romney was born to a father who was a U.S. citizen, he is arguably constitutionally-qualified under Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution, whereas Obama is not.  Extensive research shows that it has been understood throughout American history that the citizenship of the father, or both parents, determines the citizenship status of the child.  The mainstream media has represented that the place of birth determines constitutional eligibility, which is not supported by our founding documents and historical understanding of the term “natural born Citizen.”

The birthplace of the father or parents of the candidate is not the issue, but rather, whether or not the parents became U.S. citizens, renouncing allegiance to their country(ies) of origin, prior to the birth of the child.

Obama claims to have brought “transparency to government by putting federal spending online.”  However, the Patient Protection & Affordable Care Act, known colloquially as “Obamacare,” was not placed online before Congress voted on it in 2010, authorizing the takeover by government of one-sixth of the U.S. economy.  Rather, then-Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi stated that they had to “pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it.”

On June 28, 2012, U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts appeared to cast the deciding vote upholding the individual mandate in the bill as a constitutionally-allowable tax.  Constitutional attorneys disagree.  In his opinion, Roberts made an unusual political statement, suggesting that if voters do not like the policy set forth by the law, they should “throw out” their elected representatives.  Roberts is rumored to have authored both the dissenting and majority opinions, fueling speculation that he was pressured or coerced into changing his vote, as reported by CBS News.

During the presidential campaign, Obama did not make public his membership in the New Party in the 1990s in Chicago.  The New Party’s goal was to pull the Democrat Party leftward and embrace a socialist agenda.

Obama issued an executive order to allow young illegals to remain in the country under certain conditions with the knowledge that he is not constitutionally allowed to do so.

In an act which many named as treasonous, Obama chaired the United Nations Security Council, the first time a sitting president of the United States has ever taken such action in violation of the U.S. Constitution.  Obama’s defense secretary and Joint Chiefs chairman have declared that they take their orders for going to war from the “international community” rather than Congress as stipulated in the U.S. Constitution.

If Obama ran for public office multiple times using a “synthetic identity,” including a false social security number, “computer-generated” birth certificate and Selective Service registration form, how many felonies might he have committed?  Even his claimed birth date has been questioned by a professional investigator working to uncover the truth about his past.

Obama’s GSA, Secret Service and Treasury Secretary are guilty of betraying the public trust.  Obama has befriended the Muslim Brotherhood, a radical Islamic group, and placed Muslim activists in positions of national security.  Leaks of national security information jeopardizing the safety of U.S. troops and civilians around the world have occurred in an unprecedented manner in recent months.

In violation of his purported oath of office to uphold the U.S. Constitution, Obama has allowed Christmas decorations with the likeness of communist dictator and murderer Mao Tse Tung to hang on the White House Christmas tree, arguably another act of treason.

How will the FBI and other “law enforcement” entities react if Obama is proven to be a fraud?

On July 17, the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office is promising new “shocking” information about Obama’s background at a second press conference.  Attendees are limited to “major media only.”

But is “major media” asking the above questions about Obama?  Are their minds open to what they are about to hear?