Breaking: New Jersey Court Denies Plaintiffs’ Appeal in Obama Ballot Challenge


by Sharon Rondeau

The New Jersey ballot challenge appeal was heard in the Richard J. Hughes Justice Center in Trenton, NJ on May 30

(May 31, 2012) — A New Jersey appeals court has ruled against two plaintiffs’ argument that Barack Hussein Obama must prove his eligibility to be on the ballot for President of the United States.  The results of the hearing on May 30, 2012 appeared to mirror a decision by an administrative law judge on April 10, 2012 stating that although no proof existed of Obama’s birth in the United States or that he meets the eligibility requirement of “natural born Citizen” as stated in Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution, his name will be placed on the ballot for November.

Judges Clarkson S. Fisher, Linda G. Baxter, and Philip A. Carchman presided.  The motto of the New Jersey courts is “Independence-Integrity-Fairness-Quality Service.”

The Post & Email had reported on the initial hearing with Administrative Law Judge Jeffrey Masin on April 10 and subsequent developments in which the new attorney representing the Obama campaign was seeking to have video footage of the hearing removed from the internet.  Of Masin’s decision, one of the plaintiffs, Nicholas Purpura, said, “The courts have gone wild.”

Similar to a ballot challenge in Georgia held in January of this year, following the April 10 ruling, the New Jersey Secretary of State had accepted the administrative law judge’s decision to place Obama’s name on the ballot. Atty. Mario Apuzzo, representing the plaintiffs, filed his brief with the Appeals Court on May 14, 2012.

Originally the arguments heard yesterday were scheduled to be conducted “telephonically,” but in an email earlier this week, Apuzzo stated that the hearing would be held in a traditional open courtroom.

Of the judge’s decision, Purpura told The Post & Email:

I’m going to write an article on it.  The decision shows that there is no sovereignty, no due process, and no proper procedure in the state of New Jersey.  I’ve never seen such a ridiculous decision in my life.  They confirmed the administrative law judge’s decision that Obama was born in Hawaii and that he is a “natural born Citizen.” They affirmed that the Secretary of State and the administrative law judge were correct.  It’s on page 3 of the decision.

Never before in American jurisprudence, as far as I’m concerned have we seen courts ignore the main fact that there was no evidence.  They testified that there was no evidence, and their ridiculous statement that even Mickey Mouse could run without proof of eligibility shows just how Mickey Mouse these judges are.  They’re out of their minds.

The Supreme Court of the United States has stated affirmatively that for a decision to qualify as proper due process, one must base it on evidence, and in the decision, said evidence has to be listed.  I want to know where his eligibility is.  I want to know where the evidence is.  There is none!

They’re saying he doesn’t have to prove who he is.  Wait a minute…that’s absurd!  You have to read the decision.  I”m going to go a little deeper when I write my article. But I’m not going to write it today.  I was angry yesterday to see their behavior, which was disgraceful.  When the judge walked in, his robe was open, as if to say, “I don’t want to be bothered with this.”  In my opinion, this decision was written prior to his hearing of this case.

We’re going to appeal this, because as far as I’m concerned, where is the rule of law?  Can they just disregard it and create their own law?  Can they decide that a person is born in a state without evidence?  Can they prove that Mickey Mouse could be on the ballot?  Is that true in New Jersey?  That just shows the need for judicial reform.

We have standing rules in law, and I have yet to see them applied in this particular case.

If they were jurists, they would have had to say, “Where’s the evidence that he was born in Hawaii?”  They said there’s no evidence; they testified that the document on the internet could not be be used as evidence of his eligibility, so then where is the eligibility?  Personally, to me, the director of the election commission here in New Jersey stated, “Oh, no, we don’t even have proof from 2008 that he was eligible.”  So then it was true what they said:  even Mickey Mouse could be on the ballot.

New Jersey state law says that a person can’t be on the ballot for a national election unless he is eligible.  There’s no proof of eligibility here.  It’s a contradiction of the law, and it tells me there is no law.

How are these judges leaving this country to their children and grandchildren?  It’s time for judicial reform.  If you violate the Constitution, you should be removed from the bench.  If you violate that oath, you are committing treason.

We’re looking at a constitutional issue here, whether or not our Constitution has any meaning.  There are numerous types of citizens:  Article I citizens and Article II citizens, and Obama is certainly not an Article II citizen by his own admission.  So what do we have here:  he can change the law?  This matter can never end until we know because every law that he passed and every regulation will be nullified if he’s not a legitimate president, and that will protect our country.  He has already destroyed it.  This has to be settled, and they have to stop running from this issue.

Even if he loses the election, the issue must be addressed, not about Mr. Obama holding the office, but for what he did while holding office, legally or illegally.

A video of the appeals hearing is here.

6 Responses to "Breaking: New Jersey Court Denies Plaintiffs’ Appeal in Obama Ballot Challenge"

  1. Slamdunk   Sunday, June 3, 2012 at 6:57 PM

    Obama has to be on edge. If we find one Judge who will rule with integrity and on merits, and that Judge is upheld by another honest Judge, Obama could be headed for jail. He will not let that happen even if he has to cause some kind of crisis or national emergency.

  2. gigclick   Friday, June 1, 2012 at 2:11 AM

    Ta,ta,ta. Fast rewind to 3.5 years ago when LTCDR Fitzpatrick served all government offices to warn of usurpation. The Democrats did everything in their power to block any attempts to expose this sham and they still are working 24/7 in every area. American Grand Jury Online had all this information on servers untill the Democrats hacked relentlessly to make it more trouble to keep it available to the public than it was worth. Suddenly everyone is discovering that we’ve been duped by this criminal association of Bari Shabazz and all the criminal associates have full freedom as they destroy day by day. Any attempt to prove Obama’s forgery is met with swift counter attempts and carefully orchestrated posturing in flim flam routines. I really beleive America enjoys this type of foolish pseudo intellect. “No Standing” false judicial rules were demanded in the Judge Carter case with Taitz in California by Hillary Clinton in reference to any attempts to expose Obama and eligibility. Stealing files from a Law Firm is kid stuff, pulling illegal “no standing” classifications on Criminal Grand Jury charges and Treason, Perjury and Election Fraud cases is kid stuff too! WHERE’S HIS CITIZENSHIP PAPERS? Lets ask the real questions on Bari Malik Shabazz!

  3. Victoria   Thursday, May 31, 2012 at 11:54 PM

    Apuzzo should use the video as a lawyer training tape. If being placed on a state ballot for president because some party told them to, then why didn’t the feds come up with a national ballot, and national application? What is the State’s role on placing a candidates name on a state ballot and who is liable for the truth in completing the application and vetting accuracy? I watched the NJ video and I am appalled at the lack of knowledge regarding the law and the constitution by so called judges. This is a disgrace. The court prevails by ignorance, the defense (Obama or whatever his name is) wins by saying and producing nothing. What country is this, I do not recognize it. I think Mickey Mouse would make a better candidate, at least we know who he is and it is that dumb.

  4. Terence Brennan   Thursday, May 31, 2012 at 10:06 PM

    The word for these courts is “perfidy”.

    It is time to look past the symbolic ‘scales of justice’. Isn’t it now evident what these judges are doing? It is not stupidity. The reality now is a widespread cabal of judges engaging in intentional, faithless betrayal of their trust.

    What the courts have done in Hawaii, Tennessee, Georgia, New Hampshire, New York and now New Jersey is significant and dangerous. It is the wholesale, deliberate, corruption of the judiciary.

    The courts will be respected only if they are honorable. When that respect is lost the courts become irrelevant. Without trusted courts our nation is lost.

    The judges are not stupid, they are openly betraying us all.


  5. meyerlm   Thursday, May 31, 2012 at 8:42 PM

    WELL, I am thinking that “Enough, is Enough, IS, ENOUGH!!
    There will NEVER be found anywhere in the Judiciary, at any level, a Judge that has NOT either been Threatened, or Bought and Paid For and/or is willingly participating in the U.S.A.’s largest and most well planned-(after 140yrs.)–Criminal Fraud, Forgery and Presidential Conspiracy ever perpetrated against her Citizens!!
    Regardless of the Preparation, Knowledge, Legal and Factual Arguments presented by hundreds of Excellent and Constitutional Attorneys participating in hundreds of Cases at all “Levels of the Law” there has been “0”, productive Gain! Seems to me that there is enough factual material out there that means “Absolutely Nothing” simply because there is NO JUDGE willing to “Preserve, Protect and Defend the Constitution of the United States of America from Her Enemies, both Foreign and Domestic, SO Help them, GOD!!”
    Unfortunately, this also includes 535 TRAITOR “People’s Representatives???” and Law Enforcement at ALL Levels!!
    IT is Time to STOP the “Poli-Tix, Vitriol and He said, She Said” and either provide incontrovertible, irrevocable, LEGAL Proof of Fraud, Conspiracy, Citizenship, and all of the rest?? of the supposed Evidence against the USURPER and issue Affidavits, Warrants, Arrest and Incarcerate until Trial for “Treason and High Crimes and Misdemeanors against the United States of America and all of the Inhabitants, Therein”, OR Surrender and become: “‘Da United SOCIALIST States ov AmeriKa!!”

    1. bridget zegers   Thursday, May 31, 2012 at 11:33 PM

      I could not have said it better myself!!!!! It is getting to the point…….The tipping point…. and NEVER underestimate the American people! We the people…… We know the difference between good and evil.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.