“DIRECTIVES DO NOT TRUMP LAW”
May 8, 2012
Dear Editor:
The following letter has been delivered to Enotah District D.A. Jeff Langley.
May 7, 2012
Jeff Langley, District Attorney
Enotah District, by hand carry
I allege that Secretary of State Kemp has committed an unlawful act by placing candidate Barack Obama on the Georgia ballot. My rationale’ follows:
O.C.G.A. 21-2-5(a) requires, “Every candidate for federal . . . office . . . who files a notice of candidacy shall meet the Constitutional . . . qualifications for holding the office being sought.”
O.C.G.A. 21-2-5(c) states, “The Secretary of State shall determine if the candidate is qualified to seek and hold the public office for which such candidate is offering.”
Secretary Kemp did not! Secretary Kemp has committed an unlawful act. His transgression is against the codes (laws) of Georgia and as such is criminal in nature. This is not a civil matter.
My open records request, pursuant to Georgia’s Title 50 codes, dated November 28, 2011, enclosed and Secretary Kemp’s Deputy General Counsel Cam-Anh Le’s response dated December 19, 2011, enclosed with attachments; show that Secretary Kemp had no bona fides with which to make his determination of candidate Obama’s qualifications. The conclusions of a recent investigation by the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office show that no credible qualifications for president of the United States exist for candidate Obama (certified copy of report transcript enclosed). Secretary Kemp committed the unlawful act of placing Obama on the Georgia and Union County ballot without qualifying him. Note that the (two) documents provided by Attorney Le are irrelevant to the U. S. Constitution Article II qualifications.
It is important to address the issue of “standing” before proceeding to the greater issue of interest, i.e. “jurisdiction”.
I have standing to approach the District Attorney and grand juries because I am a citizen, registered voter, and property owner in Union County. My injuries come from the fact that an alleged unqualified candidate has been placed on the ballot for consideration by the electorate of Union County and elsewhere, thus putting those who have been duly qualified at a disadvantage. The electoral process that our Founders put in place for my eventual use is skewed to my disadvantage and detriment. I have sustained lasting injury through frustration from having all my efforts thwarted in complying with the Oath I swore before God to defend the Constitution. All veterans and those on active duty who have not been blown to bits on God forsaken sand dunes are offended and hurt by the transgressions taken with the Law and the Constitution by those elected officials.
The Enotah District Grand Juries have standing because Secretary Kemp has caused an unqualified candidate to be placed on the ballot in that jurisdiction. The Grand Juries sit to protect the Rights and well being of the citizens of the Enotah District.
The issue of jurisdiction must now be addressed.
This is not a “federal matter”. Secretary Kemp is a duly elected official in the State of Georgia. You now need to understand why you should be involved in a “state matter”. Quite simply, you must get involved because the state is not and will not. The ultimate venue for redress of grievances is through the citizen’s grand juries. You represent the State and prosecute all those who commit crimes in the State, including state officers, through grand juries, as per OCGA 45-15-11. Read the following to see who is responsible for redress of these issues on the state level, but will not act or respond.
My letter dated December 12, 2011, enclosed, to Secretary Kemp’s elections director goes unanswered. However Investigator Harvey from that office is on the case but said not to “expect any different results”. Attorney Le for Kemp says, quote: “The Secretary does not qualify candidates” and “The parties qualify candidates for president and vice president”. Attorney Le’s response is beyond unethical! I only ask that Obama be removed from the ballot until he is qualified, as required by Law.
My letter to Governor Deal, dated January 10, 2012, enclosed, requested an O.C.G.A. Title 45 investigation by Attorney General Olens, went unanswered but one of the Governors aides found a note relating to the letter and informed me that, “he isn’t going to do that”. And, of course AG Olens has never responded to any correspondence on this matter except for acknowledging receipt of registered mail asking for his action on the matter.
Judge Barrett informed me correctly so, that Union County is not authorized to seat a Special Grand Jury due to population constraints. However, there is no caveat in the Constitution that governs grand juries based on population.
Judge Malahi did not address the issue of Secretary Kemp’s unlawful acts in his OSAH (mis)trial in January, Judge Wright did not consider Kemp’s transgressions in her dismissal of the case in Superior Court, nor did the Georgia Supremes when they made their inevitable end run on the Constitution.
But county government still has sovereignty, temporarily, and can act on its own behalf. The state in or with all its agencies has not acted, and will not act, obviously. The state, therefore, has abdicated its jurisdiction. Jurisdiction in this matter now rests with the counties in their grand juries. An unlawful act has been committed; it is now the responsibility of the Grand Juries in the counties to address it.
This is clear in our Founding principles, the U. S. Constitution, the Georgia Constitution, and Georgia codes written pursuant thereof. Judicial directives, policies, procedures, letters, etc. are not law and do not take precedent over the law that flows down from our Constitutions to the Official Codes of Georgia Annotated. There are no caveats in the Constitution. Directives do not trump law; law comes from Congress by way of the Constitution and The People, not from “the bench”.
You will find merit in my accusations so I ask that you include two issues in your charge to the Grand Jury:
Secretary Kemp must remove Obama from future ballots until the Secretary sees and approves valid qualifications for candidate Obama and,
Secretary Kemp must be directed to answer for his unlawful criminal act of placing Obama on the ballot in the first place.
I am always available to address any questions and furnish any additional documents that you or your juries may require. I may be contacted at: [Redacted]
For the Republic,
_____________________ Witness my hand and seal:
M. J. Blanchard
_____________________ _______
NOTARY PUBLIC DATE (seal)
My commission expires:__________
cc:
DA Hendricks & Rickman
AG Olens
Secretary Kemp
media,
grassroots
“When law ends, tyranny begins.” John Locke. The Second Treatise of Civil Government
Kemp, Deal, Olens, and Malahi are all symptoms of a non-responsive and corrupt regime. Very interesting, and quite typical of this bogus regime is also Eric Holder’s not being forthcoming with the required information on Fast and Furious, nor is he co-operating in any way, which makes the reason become even more obvious… This was a scheme developed by Obama and Holder themselves, personally, to enable them to enforce stringent gun laws and restrictions on law abiding American citizens. Plain as day, and in keeping with the standard corruption and abuses of any bogus regime – such as what we now have in America. It is going to get much worse from here-on-in, IF WE LET IT… http://www.amazon.com/Life-on-Planet-Earth-ebook/dp/B007DNNADQ
What is needed here is to get about 30to 50 citizens to join this lawsuit. I believe this would help very much.
We really need a lot Army men to join in this, if they did this would e over fast.
Tom
I applauded M. J. Blanchard’s efforts because if he does get someone to do something then we know there is hope!
If M. J. Blanchard does not get what he is asking for then everyone should understand that he does not have Standing because the governments, state and Federal are no longer controlled by ‘We the People’ as this phrase meant within the ‘Constitution for the United States of America’. http://www.constitution.org/constit_.htm
A clue is provided within the SEVENTH EDITION of Black’s Law Dictionary, page 703 – De facto government. 2. An independent government established and exercised by a group of a country’s inhabitants who have separated themselves from the parent state. Internet source – http://www.citizensforaconstitutionalrepublic.com/Which_Dictionary_should_we_use.html
Everyone must realize the fact that ‘The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America’ where it states, “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, —” no longer means anything within the de facto. http://www.ushistory.org/declaration/document/
If M. J. Blanchard does not get what he is asking for then maybe everyone should consider that the truth is that a group of inhabitants have separated themselves from the parent state and has taken over the current government in power. What other reason can there be?