If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my free Email alerts. Thanks for visiting!

AND ARE THEY CONSTITUTIONAL?

Dear Editor:

The attached letter was FAX’d to the north Georgia U.S. Reps last night.

There are two basic “issues” in this letter.

The first is that a subset of Executive Orders (EO’s) has surfaced (to my knowledge).  These are Presidential Directives; in Obama’s case Presidential Study Directives.  Nixon started using PD’s as directives to National Security Counsel policy.  Obama has spun the directive to create legislation that dictates issues governing national security.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidential_directive
http://www.fas.org/irp/offdocs/psd/index.html

The second issue is what PSD-10 actually did other than make an end run on the congressional enumerated power of committing the  U.S. military to combat situations.  This PSD targeted a muslim terrorist  very specifically, who is threatening a sitting ruler sympathetic to the Muslim Brotherhood.  There are more details of this in the letter.  Several investigative journalists have traced the roots of the Arab Spring initiatives back to the current administration. But it did not reach north Africa; now PSD-10 has!
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204774604576631223688817698.html
http://www.newswithviews.com/Kincaid/cliff600.htm

Both these issues point to crimes against the Constitution on the part of Obama.  First for ignoring the responsibilities of Congress and secondly for supporting the Muslim Brotherhood, who are self declared enemies of the United States.  Crimes against the Constitution are acts of treason.   When will our elected leaders bring Obama up on charges of treason?

March 29, 2012

Representative Graves, by FAX:

Presidential Directives (PD) date from Nixon and are a form of Executive Orders (EO) issued by the POTUS with the advice and consent of the National Security Council.  The NSC was created by the National Security Act of 1947 (PL 235-61).

PBO calls his version “studies” or PSD’s, as he has apparently decided that he will issue them without help from the NSC but rather direct them to the NSC, or some of the members, as he sees fit.  Now legislation has been created with the issuance of PSD-10 on August 4, 2011.  This latest end run on the Constitution authorizes “combat military actions” and interacts with foreign nation’s armed services.

And so on October 12, 2011, as authorized by his PSD-10, PBO committed United States Armed Forces to North Africa in direct violation of Art. I, Sec. 8, cl. 11 of the U. S. Constitution and the unconstitutional War Powers Resolution 50 USC 1541 (c).  The stated purpose of this adventure was to take out Joseph Kony, the barbarian leader of the “LRA” who is challenging the equally barbaric and also indicted by the ICC (whose treaty the U. S. Senate has never ratified), President of North Sudan, Omar Al-Bashir.  But Al-Bashir was conspicuously missing from the hit list.

Background.  Although the Arab Spring initiative was not a total success, the effects, with our “international partners”, did result in the Muslim Brotherhood gaining significant political ground in the Arabian Peninsula.  Please refer to my eight letters dated March, 2011 to current, concerning PBO’s treasonous acts committed in his Arabian Peninsula adventures.  So the Arab Spring did not extend to North Africa but PSD-10 did.

And according to a July 20, 2008 entry on IKHWANWEB, the muslim brotherhood web site, Al-Bashir got good grades from the MB for firing Dr. Al Turabi for Turabi’s anti-MB “ideas and personal views”.

On the Global Muslim Brotherhood Daily Report of February 19, 2010, it was reported that the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood (now out of the closet and legal in Egypt) is backing Al-Bashir.

The Yemen Times reported on March 12, 2012 that,“ . . . Al-Bashir . . . is thought to be a member of the Muslim Brotherhood, . . .”

So removing one barbarian to further the interests of another barbarian who is sponsored by the Muslim Brotherhood does not, “ . . .further U. S. national security interests and foreign policy . . .” as promised by the POTUS.  The MB is not a peaceful branch of islam that will embrace and assimilate into American society.  The Muslim Brotherhood according to their “Memorandum” authored by Mohamed Akram in 1991, does in fact, intend to change America into a muslim society.

So PBO continues his march deeper into tyranny with even more treasonous acts.  And congress continues the process of watchful waiting, much like an old man with an enlarged prostate.  Congress is “concerned”.  Congress will be “monitoring the situation”.

But April 12, 2012 is PBO’s next report due date on the North Sudan adventure according to the unconstitutional War Powers Resolution.  Will you stand up and not grant an extension of this very dangerous situation?  Or will you blow it off as you did in Yemen?

Please respond with an affirmative answer.  The time for soft shoe has long past.  Our Constitution is fighting for its very survival.  You are its elected keeper, or not.

                                                                                                                     For the Republic,

                                                                                                                     M. J. Blanchard

cc:  GOP 9th District

media

grassroots

Representatives Broun, Gingrey, Scott, Woodall

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.