“LIBERTY IS WORTH THE INCONVENIENCE”
by KrisAnne Hall, blogging at KrisAnneHall, ©2012
(Mar. 17, 2012) — Sections 1021 and 1022 of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) has caused a great deal of controversy. Congressmen all over the nation have defended their vote in favor of these sections in spite of the criticism that these sections allow the President to detain US Citizens indefinitely. These Congressmen have said over and over again, with great vigor, that these sections specifically exclude US Citizens. They justify their position by quoting language from these sections that many experts, from all across the political spectrum, believe to be vague and potentially dangerous.
In an effort to shed light on these highly controversial sections, I have created a video presentation that will walk the viewer through these sections.
I am hoping that We The People will become better informed about these potentially dangerous sections and in turn, educate our elected representatives so that we can all work together to secure the blessings of Liberty for our Posterity.
Many have said that these provisions are necessary to fight terrorism. Terrorism or not, Americans are entitled to Constitutional protections and simply invoking the term terrorism should not nullify the age-old right to due process. We should never trade Liberty for security. In the words of William Pitt: “Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.”
Please stand for Liberty. Share this video with all who will hear and even with those who appear disinterested. Liberty is worth the inconvenience. It is not our Liberty, it belongs to our future.
——————–
Please view the video here.
“WE the People” SHOULD REQUIRE this Video as MUST SEE material, the Attorney making the Presentation is VERY Clear and Concise and your “Full Attention to Detail” is required!! Excellent Viewing~~
Very good explanation of the most questionable parts of the NDAA. Well worth the time to watch the video (which is about 34 mins in length) and I highly recommend people do so, as well as share with everybody they can.
But, what do you say to people who say, “well, if you’re not doing anything wrong, you don’t have anything to worry about”? How about, “yeah, but just WHO gets to decide whether or not you are doing something wrong?”
NDAA makes it pretty arbitrary and gives just ONE person ie The President (or he who occupies that position, whether legally or not) sole authority to decide just WHICH Americans ARE terrorists (or engaging in subversion of the illegal de facto government?) which would mean “ANY PERSON” so designated would NOT be eligible for the rights we have, AS Americans, as set down in our founding documents.
Watch the video. KrisAnne Hall explains it very well.