REMINISCENT OF ROBERT GIBBS, FORMER WHITE HOUSE PRESS SECRETARY
by Sharon Rondeau
(Mar. 3, 2012) — On March 2, 2012, following the press conference held by the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Department which declared Barack Hussein Obama’s “birth certificate” and alleged Selective Service registration card forgeries, The Post & Email began contacting state Democrat Party leaders or spokesmen.
Our project is not complete, but the results to date are below. We will be publishing additional research in a subsequent article.
We began in the New England region by calling the Maine Democrat Party, where we left a message in a general mailbox for lack of a better contact. We stated who we were, identified our online publication and reported the findings of the Cold Case Posse, asking for comment from a spokesperson. Our call was not returned. Maine Democrats have declared as part of their platform that they desire to maintain “the integrity of the Maine and U.S. Constitutions by strengthening the separation of powers and by requiring executive, legislative and judicial accountability” (page 3).
We sent an email to the main headquarters for the Vermont Democrat Party containing the same information and received no response. We left a voice message with the New Hampshire Democrat Party, whose site was functional then but not today, with the same result. We were clear to state that we take no position on the results of the Maricopa County investigation.
The Connecticut Democrat Party, which promotes something called “The Truth Team” as “A network of supporters of President Obama who are committed to responding to unfounded attacks and defending the President’s record…” followed suit by not responding to our voice message.
We contacted the Democrat National Committee in Washington, DC next, whose home page shows a photo of Obama saying, “This nation is great because we get each other’s backs.” The DNC slogan is “Change That Matters.”
But who has Obama’s back? Did the death of “Uncle Fred” leave Obama vulnerable to having his true background exposed? Was “Uncle Fred” the one who “had Obama’s back” during the 2008 campaign? Fred Newman had run other political campaigns with far-left candidates before, and many candidates for office donated money to gain Newman’s expertise.
Is that how Obama was catapulted from a virtual unknown in 2004 at the DNC to President of the United States in 2008 with almost no vetting by the media? At that time, was he truthful about “his background?” Was someone “getting his back” so that no one would know details of his life story? What do we actually know of him now, four years later?
A courteous man with a British accent told us that the DNC media person was busy, but the person on the phone stated that he was aware of the press conference, listened to our question and said he would relay it to the proper person. However, we did not receive a return call from them, either.
We then called the Massachusetts Democrat Party and were able to speak with a live person named Kevin. When we stated that we were calling from The Post & Email, he replied, “I’ve never heard of it.” We said, “That’s understandable, as we have been online just a couple of years.” When we described Arpaio’s press conference of Thursday and asked for a response, he said he had “no comment.” However, he stated that he had been aware of the investigation and press conference but said he “wasn’t aware of the results.” He then laughed out loud. We then asked him, “Why are you laughing?” This is a serious phone call, and we are asking about serious allegations made about both Obama’s long-form birth certificate and Selective Service registration.” We added that we had just spoken with a very polite man at the Democrat National Committee who had apparently handled our phone call professionally and seriously. Kevin then said, “I’ve got nothing to say about it. Good luck calling the other state parties.”
One might say that Kevin was snide in response to our questions.
In 2009, former White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs had also laughed off questions about Obama’s birth certificate, stating that “we put it on the internet” in 2008. However, there is no proof that anyone from the Obama campaign posted anything official about Obama’s birthplace or parentage.
As stated in his book “Dreams From My Father,” if Obama had found his “birth certificate” with other personal papers while he was in high school, why was there a need for a forgery to be presented to the public on April 27, 2011? Why didn’t Obama simply show the document he claims to have had in his possession? Is it because there is something “potentially embarrassing” and revealing about Obama’s parentage? Would it show that Stanley Ann Dunham and Barack Obama Sr. are not his parents?
What else could Obama be hiding? While he stated on April 27 that “We’ve had every official in Hawaii, Democrat and Republican, every news outlet that has investigated this, confirm that, yes, in fact, I was born in Hawaii, August 4, 1961, in Kapiolani Hospital.” Then why will Kapiolani Hospital not verify that fact? How many news outlets actually investigated anything about Obama’s origins? Why did one say he was “born in Indonesia,” while reports of his birth at both Queens Hospital and Kapiolani surfaced?
The news agency WorldNetDaily investigated Obama’s birthplace and declared it to be Kenya, not Hawaii.
Following the above New England calls, we turned our attention to the southern states, beginning arbitrarily with Alabama.
The man who answered the phone said that the Alabama Democrats did not have a media contact person. When we stated who we were and the reason for our inquiry, citing that a claim of “forgery” had been made by the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Department, the man said, “Well, I think it’s really a moot point. We know that Republicans will continue to try to discredit President Obama. He’s our president, and his background has been gone through with a fine-tooth comb.” We asked if claims of “forgery and fraud” were of concern to the party, and he answered, “Ma’am, the only reason you and I are having this conversation is that President Obama is black.” We then responded, “You don’t know what color I am,” to which he had no response. The Democrat Party member then said that the examination of Obama’s documentation would “only further fragment the American people” and suggested that we should “all work together to make things better.” He also said that Alabama Democrats were “more state-focused” on such issues as gas prices and the economy, but when we asked if they were supporting Obama as their presidential candidate, he said, “Of course.” He stated that he believed that Maricopa County, AZ had its own problems and Alabama Democrats were concerned with problems locally. We then asked if he had been aware of the press conference on Thursday, and he admitted that he had not.
Alabama Judge Helen Shores Lee recently dismissed a ballot challenge to Obama by charging the objector with racism. When ballot challenges were filed against Obama in Georgia, the state Democrat Party claimed that “political tricks” were being carried out against him by Republicans.
If Obama’s documentation consists of forgeries, against whom have “tricks” been played, and how many participated in the conspiracy to defraud?
Both citizens and document specialists have declared Obama’s long-form birth certificate a forgery and asked the FBI to investigate. It is unknown if the FBI has taken any action to date.
While the Associated Press has claimed that Sheriff Arpaio has sought to “grab the spotlight” in requesting the help of the Cold Case Posse, the posse performed its own research and has stated that a criminal investigation should be launched in response to its revelations.
To date, officials in Hawaii have been uncooperative and its statements about Obama inconsistent. The U.S. Department of Justice led by Eric Holder, an Obama appointee, protects “his people” from prosecution. It has been reported that someone within “the White House” may be responsible for creating the forgery or forgeries.
And where is the big media in regard to possibly the biggest story in American political history?
——————-
Editor’s Note: The Post & Email will continue its investigation into state Democrat Parties’ knowledge of and responses to the Cold Case Posse’s investigation. We will also be contacting the same number of Republican state parties and reporting those findings.