IS IT ALL ABOUT THE MONEY?
February 11, 2012
Dear Editor:
The following letter was sent to Mr. Jeffrey Kuhner, author of an article entitled “End of the Constitution” which appeared in The Washington Times on February 10, 2012.
Dear Mr. Kuhner,
Very worthwhile piece! I pray that readers take it to heart.
As a boy, this octogenarian remembers the speeches of Hitler and the “Fireside chats” of FDR, before the days of “instant media” when we had radio and the weekly newsreels at the “movies”. But when Obama came upon my view during his campaign for the White House (I missed his 2004 convention speech), I immediately recognized that this guy was an ANTI-American character. When he spoke of “remaking” this country, I realized you do not “remake” something until AFTER it is destroyed. Expressing my concerns to my elected representatives went for naught.
The thing that HAS amazed me is that Obama/Soetoro/etc., has undertaken his campaign of destruction of our Constitution WITH THE FULL COOPERATION AND SUPPORT OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY!
As a Washington observer (if NOT an “insider”) do you have ANY idea as to WHY the RINOs have been so submissive to this guy? I realize that we have (or at least HAD) THREE branches of government; but I know of nothing that PREVENTS Congress from engaging in acts of support of that oath that members ALL swore; yet are now choosing to ignore! I may not be the sharpest knife in the drawer, but my “Webster’s” defines “enemy” as “one who seeks the injury, overthrow, or failure of an opponent; something harmful or deadly; a hostile unit or force. One who shows hostility or ill will”. If THIS does NOT express Mr. Obama/Soetoro/etc’s. position regarding our Constitution, I don’t know what does! EVERY member of Congress has sworn to “support and defend the constitution of the United States against all enemies foreign AND DOMESTIC” yet I do not see a ONE of them rising to do so. Oh yes, they all pontificate regarding their “grave concern” (but send donations) and whine about the “President’s agenda” (but contributions for my reelection are welcome) as they tinker about the edges, but there is NO attacking this onslaught at the SOURCE! Therefore, my question to you is:
As this observer and commentator, do YOU have any idea WHY there is NO opposition to this assault on our Constitution, our Nation AND our People? I will truly appreciate any information you may provide, and I’m sure there are many of your readers with similar questions.
Sincerely,
Richard H. Irish
“I’m sure there are many of your readers with similar questions.”
You certainly have that right, Mr. Irish. In fact your entire letter is right on the money. Unfortunately, there seems to be no one willing to uphold their oath of office and even fewer who are willing to challenge them on it.
Here’s another dictionary definition to consider:
Treason –
1. the offense of acting to overthrow one’s government or to harm or kill its sovereign.
2. a violation of allegiance to one’s sovereign or to one’s state.
3. the betrayal of a trust or confidence; breach of faith; treachery.
If that is not the definition of what we are witnessing on a daily basis, I do not know what is.
Jedi, you’re correct. It was all a smoke and mirrors deal. The dimocrats pretended McCain was illegal so they took action to divert attention from Soetoro, the really ineligible one. We don’t need Rubio or Jindal, there are plenty of eligible persons available if they will just step up.
Dear Mr. Irish, What we have here is a classic example of a Ship of State being hijacked by greed (payoffs by the Federal Reserve Bank), goons (Eric Holder and his Department of “Justice”), thugs (New Black Panther Party), ignorance (NOW’s silence on “honor killings”), anti-Constitutionalists (Homeland Security targeting Americans while ignoring illegal immigrants), steerage class supporting the elimination of freedoms and civil rights that their forefathers, and all of our ancestors, strived so desperately to achieve, and by the news media that are deficient in, not only basic reasoning skills, but in the ability to recognize the truth over dishonesty.
The courts are corrupt; election boards, from the county level to the state and federal levels, are corrupt; the Joint Chiefs of Staff are corrupt; caucuses are corrupt; the Electoral College is corrupt.
The Ship of State is on a collision course, and the reef that it’ll hit is Obama’s name on the ballot for this year’s election, and if that happens be assured that the Constitution will be run aground and sInk, never to rise again, unless it’s with the blood of Patriots. Mark my words.
A republican who is unwilling or afraid to challenge a democrat is worthless to the party. Fence sitting is for moral cowards.
THE ARE AFRAID OF THE TRUTH…ITS GOING TO BE WIDE OPEN WHEN ANYONE
RUNS FOR CONGRESS OR SENATE WHEN THEIR ELECTIONS COME UP. ”WE THE PEOPLE” WON’T FORGET WHAT THEY HAVE DONE TO OUR COUNTRY.
THEY HAVE HELP OBAMA FROM DAY ONE, NO EXCUSES FOR WHAT THEY DID.
GOD BLESS AMERICA, GOD BLESS ALL.
With the Republican Party it is also about them wanting to run their choice non natural born Citizens too … like Rubio, Jindal, and McCain who they ran last time. Both political parties have been trying to abrogate Article II Section 1, the presidential eligibility clause in congressional attempts for over 10 years preceding the 2008 election cycle. Not being able to get anywhere with amending the constitution, they simply chose to ignore it with the help of an enabling media in 2008. Read my essay on The Perfect Storm – The Fix Was In for the 2008 Election — the 3rd link in my blog post at:
http://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2011/09/24/even-republicans-rejected-info-about-obamas-past-by-john-drew-americanthinker-com/
CDR Kerchner (Ret)
http://www.protectourliberty.org
Mc Cain qualifies. He was born to citizen parents. My belief is that your place of birth is irrelevant. Read Vattel past the second sentence of section 212 and section 215, he makes this clear. How can anyone learn what natural born members of society are if they just take one sentence in the beginning of the discussion out of context and then stop reading the rest of the explanation of what it means to be a natural born member of society? Can you learn math by reading one sentence taken out of context in a math book and then just stop reading the rest? Same with Vattel.