If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my free Email alerts. Thanks for visiting!
FAUX FIRST LADY USES “NORMALLY DIGNIFIED” ROOM IN PRESIDENTIAL RESIDENCE TO VIDEOTAPE “COMEDY” SHOW
by Sharon Rondeau
(Feb. 8, 2012) — What would our Founding Fathers think if they could see the wife of the de facto President of the United States utilizing various rooms in the White House to promote a fitness program which included a tug-of-war in the historic Blue Room?
The Blue Room is oval-shaped and was the location of President Grover Cleveland’s wedding in 1886. It has been called “the choicest room in the palace.” Do the Obamas respect this place with its rich history? Even though the Blue Room “has been the customary place for presidents to formally receive guests,” Michelle’s tug-of-war, recorded for her appearance with Jimmy Fallon, found a place there.
What would George Washington think if he could see how Michelle Obama behaves and how she makes use of the people’s house, the White House? Who is winning her game of tug-of-war, and why? What is the significance of the red tie marker on the tug-of-war rope? And who is winning?
Michelle has shown a willingness to “make a complete fool out of” herself to allegedly battle childhood obesity. But is that really necessary? Is it expected of a “First Lady?”
Do Michelle Obama’s exercise routines and photo-ops have to be done in formal rooms in the White House? Cannot games of catch and sack hop races be done in a more fitting place such as a recreation room?
Where does Michelle normally “work out?” Does she carry herself with the dignity befitting a “First Lady,” or would she rather look “ridiculous?” Nevertheless, “it matters” to Michelle whether you win or lose a fitness challenge.
Besides appearing on late-night TV shows, what else is Michelle doing in the interest of the United States? She has more staff than any other “First Lady” in the history of the United States, so perhaps she has spare time.
While Michelle claims that she “left a job at a big law firm for a career in public service,” she might not have had a choice about leaving the legal profession.
Michelle Obama founded the “Let’s Move!” initiative two years ago which includes a contest complete with a reported $500,000 in prizes to be awarded. And who could resist an award for adhering to a challenge posed by the “President?” After all, even “educators” are rewarded by the Obamas!
Does anyone know how Obama and his friends celebrated his alleged birthday last summer?
As reported in USA Today, Obama and his famous guests “did the Electric Slide” barefoot in the Rose Garden after “sending the White House press corps home early.”
One researcher claims that Obama’s birthday did not actually occur last summer, but rather, in the fall, and that his real name is not “Barack Hussein Obama,” but Bari M. Shabazz, born October 28, 1959. Does Obama bear a resemblance to this woman, or this man?
Are the Obamas’ programs all about helping America, or all about how much of the spotlight they can have? Does Obama fulfill his duties or simply “hang out with America?” Is he capable of actually leading the country?
Who is paying for Michelle’s three-day tour which begins on February 9 and includes “guest stars” and “sports celebrities?”
Who is actually running the country as Obama has lunch with his fans? Why has his schedule been filled in only day by day for the last several weeks? What is he really accomplishing? And why are so many items on his schedule “closed press?”
Now the East Room is a place where Obama enjoys shooting marshmallows with an air cannon at a science fair.
The Senate has effectively been in recess for weeks, and is expected to remain in recess for weeks. In an overt attempt to prevent the President from exercising his authority during this period, Republican Senators insisted on using a gimmick called “pro forma” sessions, which are sessions during which no Senate business is conducted and instead one or two Senators simply gavel in and out of session in a matter of seconds. But gimmicks do not override the President’s constitutional authority to make appointments to keep the government running. Legal experts agree. In fact, the lawyers who advised President Bush on recess appointments wrote that the Senate cannot use sham “pro forma” sessions to prevent the President from exercising a constitutional power.”
Even the Los Angeles Times, which refused to release the video of Obama and Rashid Al-Khalidi allegedly at a dinner where they denigrated Israel prior to the 2008 election, is asking “Just what is going on at the White House these days?”
And what else are the Obamas doing both inside and outside of the White House? What else do the American people not know about them, and how much has the mainstream media protected them? How much information was hidden before the 2008 election?
Will that information emerge before the 2012 election, or will Obama and his wife Michelle “win” again?
Editor’s Note: The printer-friendly icon in the top right corner of each of our articles can be used to print and distribute information to those without internet access. Is the mainstream media going to inform Americans of what is really going on in the White House?