If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my free Email alerts. Thanks for visiting!


by One Pissed-off Vietnam Vet, Presidential Candidate

Does Congress pass "transparent," constitutional legislation, or does much of its work need to be undone?

(Feb. 1, 2012) — Knock-knock, Reality Check here. When I was a little tyke, eight and a half, I remember my first Cub Scout Jamboree when I was looking forward to my first night away from home and my first night in a sleeping bag. Very exciting, and I wanted everything to go as smoothly as possible.  So when I was checking my equipment the night before, I noticed an annoying tag on the outside of my rolled-up sleeping bag, or in today’s PC jargon, REM inducer unit, that proclaimed the removal of the tag was “Punishable by Law.”  My brother said, “You better not! You’ll get in trouble!” at which point I ripped the tag off and waited for the retribution. And I waited. After around five minutes I figured the authorities planned to ambush me when my guard was down, but I never let my guard down, and here it is, 50+ years later, and I can testify that if you never let your guard down, it’ll be okay.

There are some things that can be corrected, and then there are the things that can’t be corrected. A “can’t be” example would be when I was driving to the store and my kid was riding shotgun, in the baby seat, and his window was opened a little and he took the pacifier out of his mouth and held it out the window.  He looked at me and I said, “If you drop it, it’s gone.”. Well, any experienced parent would tell you, “Of course he’ll drop it,” but this was my first time, and that’s what I said, and he dropped it, at 45 mph on a four-lane road. That’s gone. That’s an action that can’t be taken back. History. No correction possible.

Then there are some things that can be corrected, and often times should be. An example is having an unqualified employee in a job slot. Maybe this employee lied on his application, and, upon further examination, it was discovered that he or she had a history of identity theft: using multiple aliases with accompanying addresses and Social Security numbers. Maybe this employee was given a position of policy-making decisions that had a demonstrably adverse effect on the economic health and safety requirements of the enterprise that was affected. What to do? It’s called a “No-brainer.”  You fire the lying employee, in this case the person who calls himself “Obama,” and eliminate and reverse every decision, regulation and law that was enacted while he was in office.

Furthermore, there are loans approved that, upon last-minute consideration, are rejected: maybe the wife said we can’t afford it, or that’s a bad risk. Maybe the money was a grant that was pulled because certain performance conditions weren’t met; maybe the 2.0 average wasn’t achieved. And then, perhaps money was given and the desired result wasn’t delivered, such as money paid out to a business with the expressed expectation of expansion and success, rather than the officers of the board splitting up the stimulus money and retiring with a golden umbrella, thereby doing the exact opposite of the stated intent: putting people out of work instead of hiring more. The so-called “stimulus” money was, from its inception, really a payoff and kickback payment scheme and does not mean that ALL of the “stimulus” monies can’t be collected by the U.S. Treasury, every red cent. There was never any “stimulus,” just as there was never any “transparency.”

Every law that the 111th and 112th Congress has passed, every ruling by the Federal Courts, any regulation from the Executive branch of government, since January 20, 2009, SHALL BE NULL AND VOID. Simply put, it’s time to undo the harm. If we do not, then it is we who have failed our country.


Join the Conversation


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. Hello my brother. I was 11 Charlie and I’m pissed off just like you. You got it right again. 0bama is a bigger crook than Nixon ever thought about being. According to constitutional law expert Dr. Edwin Vieira, if Obama can’t prove that he is a natural born citizen he is simply not eligible for “the Office of President” (Article II, Section 1, Clause 4). That being so, he cannot be “elected” by the voters, by the Electoral College, or by the House of Representatives. “Obama will be nothing but an usurper, because the Constitution defines him as such. And he can never become anything else, because an usurper cannot gain legitimacy if even all of the country aid, abets, accedes to, or acquiesces in his usurpation.” And with his oath of office “being perjured from the beginning, Obama’s every subsequent act in the usurped “Office of President” will be a criminal offense under Title 18, United States Code, Section 242. Dr. Vieira states, “Congress cannot even impeach him because, not being the actual President, he cannot be “removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors” (see Article II, Section 4). In that case, some other public officials would have to arrest him—with physical force, if he would not go along quietly—in order to prevent him from continuing his imposture…. Just about everything that was done during his faux “tenure in office” by anyone connected with the Executive Branch of the General Government, and quite a bit done by the Legislative Branch and perhaps the Judicial Branch as well, would be arguably illegitimate and subject to being overturned when a constitutional President was finally installed in office. ”


  2. Just like attempting to Fire a Tenured Professor or attempting to find a Judge that can read and understand the Constitution without “Legislating from the Bench”, or injecting “Personal and Opinionated” Rulings~Rots ‘O Ruck!!