If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my free Email alerts. Thanks for visiting!


January 23, 2012

John Jay wrote a well-known letter to George Washington in which he stated that only a "natural born Citizen" should be President

Dear Editor,

The nation appears to be catching on to the fact that they were duped by the Democrat National Convention (DNC), through dissembling and deceit, nominating a candidate that was not eligible to be on the 2008 presidential ballot. The forces that worked to keep the fraud concealed are now using the entire power of all branches of the federal government to keep a never-vetted and unqualified putative president in office by whatever means necessary.

There are 9 types of citizen in the United States. “U.S. Citizen” and “Natural Born Citizen” do not equate yet liberal propagandists “dumb-downed” Americans through the decades to believe both types of citizenships are the same. It has been a deliberate plan to marginalize and/or silence the Article II, Section 2.5 Constitutionalists by calling them “birthers” and “racists.” The majority of Americans believe one only needs to be born in the United States to run for president. This misconception is the handiwork of anti-American entities who have worked diligently to shred the Constitution and usher in a different form of government.

All eyes and ears will be focused on an Atlanta courtroom on January 26, 2012 to see if Barack Hussein Obama will appear as a private citizen and prove his eligibility to be on the state ballot as compelled by subpoenas issued by Administrative Judge Michael Malihi. Obama’s counsel in Atlanta, Michael Jablonski, filed a Motion to Dismiss attorney Orly Taitz’s challenge to Obama’s eligibility to be on the GA ballot and for the first time in three years a judge denied an Obama request/motion in a court of law and the case moved forward. Then Obama’s counsel filed a request to quash the subpoena compelling Obama to attend the hearing complaining that [His] duties as president of the United States would be interrupted and that the subpoena was, “on its face, unreasonable.” Ironically, the motion was filed the day after Obama sang a solo at a fundraiser at the Apollo Theatre in Harlem. Again, request DENIED.

Contrary to popular opinion Obama’s eligibility to be president has never been heard on merit in a court of law. Until now all lawsuits filed against Obama had been dismissed for “no standing” or “wrong jurisdiction.” The decisions came from federal judges under the auspices of Eric Holder’s Justice department and Elena Kagan, Obama’s pre-election counsel and now, of course, sitting Supreme Court Justice.

There are many of us ‘birthers’ living in fear because we never fell for what we knew was brain-washing and propaganda being fed to the American people for generations. But we ‘birthers’ never forgot the words of a letter dated 25 July 1787 from John Jay to General George Washington as the Constitution was being drafted: “Permit me to hint, whether it would not be wise and seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of foreigners into the administration of our national Government, and to declare expressly that the Command in chief of the American army shall not be given to, nor devolved on, any but a natural born Citizen.”

On January 26th, 2012, will Obama again defy the will of the American people and maintain his status quo of living above the law or will we, the Article II Constitutionalists, have our day in court? Judge Malihi will consider the Supreme Court ruling in Minor vs. Happersett establishing the definition of ‘natural born Citizen’ as born in the United States of parents who are themselves United States citizens. The ruling is binding precedent as to the Constitutional definition of a natural born Citizen. Constitutional attorney, Mario Apuzzo at puzo1.blogspot.com in my opinion has the most consistent and well-documented papers on the eligibility issue where I suggest is the place to go to for back up.

Obama is also compelled to produce his historic documents including but not limited to his birth certificate, adoption papers and Indonesian school records. Should he not comply with the subpoena to appear or present his papers he will lose anyway because his name will not be put on the GA State ballot and the plaintiffs in the three cases to be heard will submit evidence of Obama’s deception and fraud not the least of which is lying on his application to the Illinois Bar. In the space asking for other names used by the applicant Obama entered “none.” Add to this his use of a CT social security number that was never issued to him and fails the E-Verify check. Intriguingly, the social security number is shared by a Harrison J. Bounell from CT, long since deceased but at one time a roomer/tenant in a home owned by the Robinson family. Now that’s just too speculative, too coincidental to be Michelle Robinson Obama’s CT relatives. But then there’s the selective service record that ties to the social security number but is so fraught with anomalies that taken with the recent problems of a suspicious “Frankenstein” document posted on the WhiteHouse.gov website on April 27, 2011, the whole business reeks of ineptitude or is it deliberate subversive activity.

I for one will be all eyes and ears on Jan. 26. A decision one way or another will help me in my plan to form a coalition of Oklahoma Ballot Challengers to take our case to the Oklahoma House of Representatives. We have been rebuffed by gatekeeper, “Fran” on the election board [who says we have to be a presidential candidate from Oklahoma to file a complaint] and by the Attorney General’s office who will only take cases from the FBI and the FBI that says, “Its been settled” and by our own Sen. Tom Coburn who says “Its a non-issue” to Sen. James Inhofe who says “Its a non issue” but co-sponsored a bill to change the definition of natural born Citizen to mean born anywhere as long as one parent is a citizen. Thank God and the wisdom of our founding fathers the bill failed as did the other eight or so attempts in congress between 2004-2008 during Obama’s rise to political power.

Respectfully submitted,

Miki Booth
Former Congressional Candidate D2-OK

Join the Conversation


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. Leo Donofrio is the most competent and knowlegable attorney in the entire country on this subject. He filed a case before the election in New Jersey to have all three candidates removed from that state’s ballot, later proving he was correct in all three instances, since John McCain’s mother chose to give birth to him in the city of Colon, Panama, rather than the Naval Base in the Canal Zone. Donofrio is also the only attorney who has gotten two cases to conference in Supreme Court. Both failes to get the four votes required to go before the entire court. I would love to know which of the conservative members is keeping it from going to trial.

    Donoftio is also the attorney who first warned everyone that Obama can not be impeached, and that a case of “quo Warranto”, only brought in the U.S. District Court of D.C. Is the only way the legislative branch can remove him ftom office, particularly since the judicial branch has been so averse to even giving the cases any credence.

    Thank God for Judge Malihi !!!

    Publius II

  2. NBC is already defined:
    “One born in a country of citizen parents”

    In plainer English

    You have to be born here in the USA and your mom and Dad must have both been Americans when you were born.

  3. There are, actually, at least five SupremeCourt decisions, plus scores of quotes from dozens of the founders about the term originating from de Vattel’s “The Law of Nations”, lest anyone think the evidence is just based on a single case.

  4. As a registered elector, you are Constitutionally guaranteed the right to challenge any candidate on the grounds of that candidate’s questionable eligibility. Under Article II section 1 there is no distinction made between an elector involved in the popular vote and one assigned by the popular vote to vote in the Electoral College. It sounds as if “Fran” of the Election Board, the Attorney General of OK and your elected Representatives are all INTENTIONALLY denying your Constitutional right to vet the candidate as a registered elector. THAT makes it justicable. Not that they are doing it, but that they are intentionally denying you a Constitutional right under the Constitutional Republic form of Government.

    Would be something to look in to.

    All you can do right now is document where the corrective feedback loop fails for challenging ineligible candidates, fronted by criminally corrupt Private corporations masquerading as a political party, in order to prevent the nullification of YOUR State granted voter franchise. Now all you need is a dollar amount to attach to that frachise. I believe time, travel and effort trying to vet the candidate and being intentionally disenfranchised at every turn, would get you started. Then you need a remedy, which is the actual vetting of Obama per the only definition of natural born citizen that makes sense, the one found on Minor v Happersett. For that you need three documents, the Candidate’s BC and the US citizenship documents of the Candidate’s parents. Now you have covered personal, tangible value and a redress for the greivance. THAT gives you standing per SCOTUS.

    Those chickens will come home to roost.

    Good luck.