If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my free Email alerts. Thanks for visiting!


by Chris Farrell, ©2011

The Badshahi Mosque in Lahore, Pakistan allows non-Muslim tourists inside

(Dec. 6, 2011) — “The jihad conception classifies infidels under three categories: 1) those who oppose the Islamic call with arms; 2) those who belong to the countries of truce; 3) those who have surrendered to Islamic domination, exchanging their land for peace; they become “dhimmis,” “protected” from the ongoing jihad war against non-Muslims by a treaty of subjection and protection (dhimma)” — Bat Ye’Or, Eurabia:  The Euro-Arab Axis.

“The infidels of the first category are called “harbis,” which belong to the dar al-harb, the region where warfare is mandatory as long as they refuse to recognize Islam’s supremacy.” (Links defining terms added by the author)

“The infidels of the second category are in a situation of respite between two wars since, in principle, the truce with infidels cannot exceed ten years, after which jihad must resume. They live under the regime of dar al-sulh, the land of temporary truce. There are two possible motivations for Islamic authorities to conclude a truce with infidels: 1) Muslims are too weak to win the war; 2) the infidel leaders agree to pay a tribute…” (the jizyah), “…to the Muslim ruler to obtain the cessation of hostilities, those latter including rampages, abductions, enslavement, and killings.8 The countries of dar al-sulh must also abstain from hindering the development of Islam in their lands.”

Does this sound familiar?

“In the event of war, they should provide military contingents to the Islamic armies.9 Moreover, only the treaties that conform to the stipulations of Islamic jurisprudence are valid, and they must be renewed every ten years. If those conditions are not fulfilled the treaties are invalidated. THE REFUSAL TO ALLOW THE PROPAGATION OF ISLAM IN THE LANDS OF TRUCE IS TANTAMOUNT TO A CASUS BELLI, AND JIHAD CAN RESUME.” (emphasis mine)

“The infidels of the third category are those who have surrendered without fighting to the Muslim ruler. Their lands are integrated into the dar al-Islam, the territory of Islam, and their non-Muslim vanquished inhabitants are protected from the jihad onslaught by a treaty, the dhimma, which establishes their rights and duties. They become dhimmis, whose dhimma protection pact safeguards them as infidels against the rules of jihad targeting non-Muslims.”

“Hence it was within the religious, political, intellectual, and economic domains of the Christian world that the system of dhimmitude developed and grew.”

“Now in the twenty-first century, we again live in a context of jihad, and the Islamists have made it clear that they still subscribe to the traditional classification of the infidels into these three categories, jihad is being waged today on all continents through terrorist activities, abductions for ransom, the indiscriminate killing of civilians and, in Sudan, ongoing slavery. While some countries — America, India, Israel, Russia, the Philippines, Sudan, Kenya, Nigeria and now Spain — are directly targeted by jihadist forces, others are considered to be dar al-sulh, countries of temporary treaties. In the Islamic view of international relations, the European Union can today be placed in the category of “lands of temporary truce,” as Osama bin Laden implied in his summer 2004 message.” (All quotations taken from the book Eurabia by Bat Ye’or. Associated University Presses. Cranbury, NJ 08512. 2006. ISBN 0-8386-4076-1. Pp. 32, 35 and 36.)

“The ideology, strategy, and tactics of jihad have constituted throughout history a fundamental part of Islamic jurisprudence and literature, since it is through jihad that the Islamic community developed and expanded. Muslim theologians explained that jihad is a collective religious duty (fard al-kifaya) binding the entire Muslim community and each individual (fard al-ayn) in certain situations and circumstances. THE COLLECTIVE EFFORT CAN BE PURSUED BY MILITARY MEANS OR PEACEFUL METHODS — PROPAGANDA, SPEECH, OR SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES — WITHIN A NON-MUSLIM NATION.” (emphasis mine) “Subversive activity” is usurping the political authority of the office of President of the United States of America and the concomitant military authority of Commander-in-Chief, then proceeding in the deceptive Islamic tactic known as “taqqiya” with the advancement of the multi-faceted Islamic agenda of dhimmitude within the society under siege.

The Declaration of Independence begins with a preamble under the heading ‘The Unanimous Declaration of the Thirteen States of America,’ and continues, “When in the Course of human events, It becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the laws of Nature and of Nature’s God…”, the Lord Jesus Christ, “…entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.”

Said preamble needs now in our time at the helm of our ship of state to be amended by the following sentiments inserted after the words ‘which have connected them with another’ by extending the wording to address the enemy we face today, the murderous cult of Islam, and read as follows: “…which have connected them with another even to the degree of tolerating intolerable ideological or religious beliefs which have and do define themselves through the actions of their adherents as the enemy of the liberty which with we are endowed by our Creator, the Lord Jesus Christ.”

Since the murderous cult of Islam has, throughout its history to the present time, explicitly held to doctrines of world domination and the dhimmitudinization of non-Muslims, ‘We the People’ must recognize that those values espoused in the teachings of Islam are incompatible with a free society and that the murderous cult of Islam cannot – must not – be tolerated in the United States of America or any of her territories.

It was the contention of the signers of the Declaration of Independence in recognizing the entitlement of separate and equal station availed by the laws of Nature and Nature’s God, the Lord Jesus Christ, unto a free nation that any such nation’s citizens should rightly exercise the action of decently respecting the opinions of mankind in the Course of human events by declaring the causes which impel them towards separation in the trial of their time, separation from Great Britain.

Americans today should respect the opinions of mankind in the Course of human events and declare, as we face the trial of our time – the worldwide expansion of the murderous cult of Islam; an enemy as seemingly insurmountable in view of its dimensions as Great Britain seemed unto our founding fathers – the causes which impel us now unto the separation, rejection and exclusion of the murderous cult of Islam from among us. America must determine to defeat Islam. Nothing short of unconditional surrender will suffice; for to permit Islam within a society is an invitation for the viral spread of the cult which holds fundamentally to aspirations of world domination under a one-world Islamic Caliphate.

Holding truths which are self-evident as did our founding fathers denies the toleration of any encroachment upon those same truths by erroneous ideologies which deny the Creator, the Lord Jesus Christ, from Whom we are endowed with ‘certain unalienable Rights.’ The truth that ‘…all men are Created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness’ rings familiar and true in the hearts of all those who would call themselves Americans. Those words are the very tintinnabulation resounding for generations within ‘We the People’ of the United States of America of the Spirit of ’76’, the American Spirit of Liberty, revered and saluted symbolically in America’s Liberty Bell which, though cracked and silent, still loudly rings in the hearts of all those who assent to the truth that all men are, in fact, endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights.

The Declaration of Independence continues, “That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from CONSENT OF THE GOVERNED, –that whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light or transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. BUT WHEN A LONG TRAIN OF ABUSES AND USURPATIONS, PURSUING INVARIABLY THE SAME OBJECT EVINCES A DESIGN TO REDUCE THEM UNDER ABSOLUTE DESPOTISM, IT IS THEIR RIGHT, IT IS THEIR DUTY, TO THROW OFF SUCH GOVERNMENT AND TO PROVIDE NEW GUARDS FOR THEIR FUTURE SECURITY.” (emphasis mine)

The freedom of religion determined by and for ‘We the People’ in the First Amendment to the Constitution needs not be extended unto adherents to the murderous cult of Islam for the words, ‘…a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object…,’ provide a working definition for Islam’s doctrinal strategy – that is to say, ‘design’ – of DHIMMITUDE. Islam advances an invariable pursuit of an object: namely, a one-world Islamic Caliphate, and evinces a design, the strategy of dhimmitude, to reduce America under absolute despotism. It is our right and duty to throw off and throw out such a murderous cult as Islam as sure as it would be to throw off any government that would arise which so clearly met the description of such a government as that of which our forefathers warned us.

It is our duty to provide a new Guard for our future security: a new, legitimate president who will lead us in the war in which we are engaged with the murderous cult of Islam. Our enemy, Islam, reduces all non-Muslims unto the status of dhimmi, a status with no rights under the absolute despotism of Sharia law.

The words written to protect America from abuses and usurpations by an hypothetical derelict American government apply equally, indeed more so, as instruction as to how to proceed against any foreign enemy which meets the description in the warning from our founding fathers so precisely as does the murderous cult of Islam.

It is the right and duty of those who would defend the constitution and American Liberty to exclude the murderous cult of Islam from the religious freedoms bought with the blood and toil of Americans and throw out of our country adherents to such a murderous cult which espouses an agenda of world domination through terror.

America must expel all Muslims in order to guard her future security. If we do not take this drastic step now, future generations of Americans shall suffer the same fate as the citizens of all non-Muslim countries Islam has conquered in its recorded history. Future generations of Americans shall have to take up the fight under far worse conditions wherein the murderous cult shall have entrenched itself more deeply within our borders. THE PRESENCE OF ISLAM IS AN INVITATION TO JIHAD.

No free society should tolerate Islam. America must determine to defeat her enemy and demand nothing less than unconditional surrender. History clearly illustrates that compromise with the murderous cult of Islam inevitably leads to subjugation.

Join the Conversation


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. Mr. Farrell, my compliments on a well-done and forcefully argued column. The following passage is especially apt, “‘We the People’ must recognize that those values espoused in the teachings of Islam are incompatible with a free society and that the murderous cult of Islam cannot – must not – be tolerated in the United States of America or any of her territories.” Islam is not a relgion, strictly speaking, it is totalitarian system of governance and conquest, disguised as a religion. During the height of the Cold War in the 1950s, communism was declared an enemy ideology; we should do the same concerning Islam, and enact an immediate moratorium on Islamic immigration. Obviously, this cannot and will not happen under the lawless Obama regime, but at the first opportunity, such a measure should be passed. As for the expulsion of Muslims, it will probably demand wartime presidential emergency powers to enact.

    In a few carefuly-chosen words, you state what our position must be, “No free society should tolerate Islam.”

  2. Bottom line? You can’t trust them, just look at the Christians in Egypt,
    they thought they were dhimmis with dhimma protection and they’re getting killed,
    while the police and the military look on, if not actually doing the murders.