College Student Responds to New Hampshire Representative Who Defends Obama’s “Presidency”

DESPITE EVIDENCE OF FRAUD AND FORGERY, STATE REPRESENTATIVES CONTINUE TO STONEWALL

November 27, 2011

Are there only a handful of state-level representatives who will call for an investigation into Obama's documentation?

To: Shawn N. Jasper
Deputy Majority Leader
New Hampshire House of Representatives

From: Chris Farrell
College Student
New Orleans, LA

Sir, you said, referring to the patriotic fight of many American citizens to defend the Constitution, “I am sure that the President loves this stupid fight; it keeps his opposition fighting among ourselves, instead of focusing on his failed presidency and focusing on why it would be suicidal to re-elect him.” In that statement, it is clear that you consider yourself among “his opposition” who, you assert, are “fighting among ourselves.”

Whereas, in the same letter you say, “To think that we can deny the President of the United States access to our ballot is beyond belief. Take your fight to the Federal Courts and leave us alone”, making your best effort to protect the illegitimate fraud and forger, the criminal illegally occupying the Oval Office from ABROGATION. You, sir, are a hypocrite, a coward and a liar. (In view of your writing you’re not very well-educated, either.)

You said, “To think that the Ballot Law Commission, the Secretary of State or the State Legislature can declare his Presidency to be illegal is to say the least delusional.” That very statement is delusional because nobody ever suggested that any of those government entities do such a thing! For you to have cast the demands of the citizens at the historic Nov. 18th Anno Domini 2011 meeting in New Hampshire in such a false light and intentionally mischaracterize their plea for justice in defense of the Constitution of the United States of America – the very same constitution that you have taken an oath before God to defend – is deplorable and deserving of address by ‘We the People.’ I’m sure that the citizens of New Hampshire have a patriotic militia not unlike the volunteer citizen soldiers who rowed out to the boat in Boston Harbor and put the crates of tea to the axe. We call ourselves the Tea Party today.

How dare you deny those citizens at the New Hampshire meeting their constitutional right of redress of grievance!

Allow me to assist you in achieving a firmer grasp on reality:

a.) Barack Hussein Obama, a.k.a Barry Soetoro, was born to Ann Dunham

b.) Ann Dunham was a promiscuous tramp, a known ‘bar-fly’, whose grandparents in Hawaii were politically active with organizations of the extreme far left.

c.) There is no evidence that Ann Dunham ever married the supposed father from the British Protectorate of Kenya. Pregnant in 1961 with a presumably biracial child in Hawaii, Ann Dunham and her grandparents decided on a course of action. The course that they chose, to send their daughter to Africa to have the baby, may have seemed logical to them under the circumstances as the well-educated “Kenyan” “father,” a Muslim, appeared to offer the baby the best chance for a secure future.

d.) There is no reasonable, rational explanation for the maternal “grandmother” in the British Protectorate of Kenya to have lied and stated on the record that she was present at the birth of her grandchild from Ann Dunham. Such an event, a white woman giving birth to one’s supposed grandchild, at that place and time for the old African woman, would have been a momentous occasion that would certainly leave a lasting impression. It is inconceivable that the woman would have made it up. What reason would she have had to do so?

If Obama is ineligible for the presidency based on his British-citizen father, why will no one in government take action?

e.) Barack Hussein Obama was later adopted by an Indonesian Muslim and his name was presumably legally changed to Barry Soetoro; at any rate, that is the name that the young boy went by in Indonesia. He attended Muslim madrassa schools for 6-8 years. A more specific length of time we are unable to say with certainty. Indonesia’s particularly vehement sect of Islam is responsible for the massacre of Christians in recent years, if you’ll recall.  Muslim madrassa schools have one book: the Koran. Students bow down on their prayer rugs several times each day in the direction of Mecca and pray to the historic Muslim Moon-god, Allah. The name “Allah” may sound familiar to you if you have been unfortunate enough to witness any Islamic jihadist detonate himself or open fire on unarmed bystanders.

f.) “Even Senate Resolution 511, passed in 2008 to declare that John McCain was a natural-born citizen, specified a natural-born citizen would have to be born of two U.S. parents. McCain’s birth in the Panama Canal Zone was regarded by the Senate as an exception that the Founders would have supported. The Senate reasoned that a person should not be disqualified from running for president because the parents were serving in the defense of the nation,” Corsi said.

AMONG THE SPONSORS OF THAT STATEMENT WAS A JUNIOR SENATOR NAMED OBAMA. The resolution includes two references to “Americans” or “American Citizens” AS PARENTS.” (Statements Suggest Doubt About Obama Growing. By Bob Unruh, 07/02/11. wnd.com.)

g.) Information derived from the congressional records reveals a treasonous conspiracy to contravene the Constitution of the United States of America. Carl Gallups, host of several radio programs and with a long history of law enforcement involvement, exposes in a 9:25 video appearing within Mr. Unruh’s above-mentioned article the eight proposals since July 11, 2003 targeting the constitutional requirement that an American president must be a natural-born citizen. Mr. Gallups’s information was derived from congressional records. The organized strategy to contravene the Constitution revealed in Mr. Gallups’s investigation is nothing less than a conspiracy. (I wonder now if the Deputy Majority Leader of the New Hampshire House of Representatives, Shawn N. Jasper, participated in any of the eight proposals since July, 2003? If he has, I would advocate tar and feathers.) “Gallups reports that finally, on April 10, 2008, “unable to alter or remove” the requirement, the Senate changed the focus of the issue, with Senate Resolution 511, which addressed Sen. John McCain’s qualifications as a “natural-born citizen.” OBAMA’S QUALIFICATIONS NEVER WERE REVIEWED.” (wnd.)

h.) Obama has been using FRAUDULENT SOC. SEC. NUMBERS under different aliases for years.

I.) Obama has produced UNQUESTIONABLY FORGED birth certificates. The analysis by a multitude of experts of the electronically-produced documents that Obama has issued reveals that they are poor-quality forgeries.

j.) Dr. Charles Rice, Professor Emeritus at the Law School of Notre Dame, determined that “An investigation into Obama’s eligibility by a committee or subcommittee of the House could have several legitimate objectives, including among others: One, to ascertain the facts, compelling by subpoena the production of all the available records relevant to Osama’s eligibility, including the complete Hawaiian records of his birth; His passport records to ascertain whether he traveled to Pakistan in 1981 on an American or other passport; the records from Occidental College, Columbia University and Harvard Law School to determine whether Obama described himself as a foreign student; and such other records as may be relevant. The disclosure of such information to the public would be an appropriate exercise of Congress’ ‘Informing function.’” (worldnetdaily)

PETITION TO ABROGATE:

TO: CONGRESS AND THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
FROM: ‘WE THE PEOPLE’

I, the undersigned American Citizen, demand that the unconstitutional, illegal election of an ineligible candidate to the office of President of the United States of America fraudulently representing himself as a natural-born citizen be ABROGATED forthwith in accordance with Article I pursuant to Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States of America. God Bless America.

Signed: Christopher Thomas Farrell
26, November, Anno Domini 2011
New Orleans, Louisiana.
U.S.A.
VICTORI TE SALUTAMUS

Sharon Rondeau has operated The Post & Email since April 2010, focusing on the Obama birth certificate investigation and other government corruption news.  She has reported prolifically on constitutional violations within Tennessee’s prison and judicial systems.

4 Responses to "College Student Responds to New Hampshire Representative Who Defends Obama’s “Presidency”"

  1. doxie9   Sunday, November 27, 2011 at 6:57 PM

    thank you. I received similar responses from Mr. Jasper, all of which show his blatant disrespect and disregard for his sworn duties.

  2. Lucas D. Smith   Sunday, November 27, 2011 at 3:46 PM

    Christopher,

    Spectacular letter! Please keep us update regarding any replies that you might receive from the Office of Shawn N. Jasper.

    Additionally, I’d like to know if your letter was sent via postal mail or electronically.

    Thank you!

  3. Kevin J Lankford   Sunday, November 27, 2011 at 10:35 AM

    As well written and factual as your statements are, those to whom you speak are
    as closed minded to the truth as a duck’s back to water.

  4. OPOVV   Sunday, November 27, 2011 at 10:02 AM

    **** 4 (four) star letter to a person who is obviously on edge.
    Poor Mr. Jasper, displaying the classic signs of someone who is a paranoia scitzophrentic.
    One would like to think that every American citizen would want to know it their President is eligible to hold the office, and for Mr. Jasper stating publically that he doesn’t give a hoot, sure doesn’t say much for how much he cares for the Constitution, America and for the good citizens of New Hampshire, who must be very disappointed that they elected such a looser.
    I wrote Jasper a letter stating that he get with the program, or resign. Two bits he does neither.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.