Spread the love

IS THAT WHY THE MEETING WAS CANCELED?

by Sharon Rondeau

What will Obama have to say to the state of New Hampshire today?

(Nov. 22, 2011) — The man known as Barack Hussein Obama II will be in the Granite State today following a meeting last Friday, November 18, of the New Hampshire Ballot Law Commission at which Atty. Orly Taitz presented evidence that he is not eligible to be placed on ballots and may be guilty of fraud and forgery.  Taitz stated in her complaint that Obama is using a social security number which was never assigned to him through legal means.

Obama is scheduled to visit Central High School in Nashua, a city close to the Massachusetts border, and is expected to talk about his proposed “jobs” bill.  Obama won the majority of votes in New Hampshire in 2008, although the mainstream press is now calling voters there “skeptical.”  The same article is reproduced in various newspapers on the topic, although The Modesto Bee had an original report, as did Bloomberg News.

None of the articles mentioned the question of Obama’s constitutional eligibility to serve as president or to run again, nor do they mention the hearing of the Ballot Law Commission last Friday which raised the issue.  A meeting of the New Hampshire Speaker of the House and several representatives had been scheduled for today but was canceled last night allegedly for “schedule conflicts,” although a later email stated that Speaker William O’Neill would be cooperating with an investigation of several representatives’ “conduct” during the Commission’s hearing.

There were no reports of anyone being hurt or threatened before, during or after the Ballot Law Commission hearing, but the commissioners who decided that Obama’s name would remain on the ballot by virtue of his completion of the required form and payment of the requisite $1,000 fee were called “traitors” by some in attendance.

New Hampshire Attorney General Michael Delaney had been made aware of questions surrounding Obama’s eligibility three years ago but chose to do nothing about it.  Likewise, Secretary of State William Gardner, who has held his position since 1976, stated that “his authority to act had lapsed after an election.”

But what about the upcoming 2012 election?

Mitt Romney, one of the Republican presidential candidates, will launch television advertisements today in advance of New Hampshire’s primary on January 10, 2012.  Two Democrat pollsters have suggested that Obama should drop out of the presidential race so that a more favorable Democrat candidate might win.

Subscribe
Notify of

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

4 Comments
Newest
Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
John Sutherland
Wednesday, November 23, 2011 2:42 PM

If money, fear, and embarrassment are the only motivators of people in government, what was obama bringing with him. I have the same ill feelings about this visit I had when obama visited SCOTUS right after he was elected.

Short of rebellion, how do we stop this madness? (rhetorical question, by the way).

unbontir
Wednesday, November 23, 2011 11:09 AM

N.H Speaker of the House, William L. O’Brien, is defending an egregious contravention of the Constitution of the United States of America. His attack upon the patriots who demanded that the Constitution be adhered to at the Ballot Commission Hearing on 18, Nov. is unquestionably TREASONOUS. The eligibility issue is not going away. Administrators at Harvard Law School, Occidental and Columbia should be held accountable for their refusal to release records on Barry Soetoro, a.k.a. Barack ‘King Hussein Obama’; the financial aid records will surely show that Islamic interests funded the ‘Manchurian’ Muslim from Mombassa’s education. Hospital administrators and Gov. Abercrombie in Hawaii should be held accountable for their participation in establishing the falsified chain of custody for the forged birth certificate. Many Americans such as those in New Hampshire who attended the Ballot Commission Meeting on Nov. 18th would like to see a peaceful resolution to this catastrophic contravention of the constitution. The possibility of a peaceful resolution appears less and less likely as further assaults upon our liberty unfold such as Speaker O’Brien’s deplorable, un-American actions.

A pen
Tuesday, November 22, 2011 5:55 PM

“schedule conflicts” = fear ? or were there several paper bags distributed with thanksgiving gifts?

California Constitutionalist
Tuesday, November 22, 2011 2:07 PM

Calling out the brownshirts to deflect the cloud of illegitimacy hanging over your ugly-scarred noggin, eh, Bari Shabazz?