CDR Kerchner Pounds New Hampshire Legislator About Obama’s Eligibility

STATE DECLARATION REQUIRES AFFIRMATION OF “NATURAL BORN” STATUS

21 November 2011

The state of New Hampshire borders Massachusetts on the south, Vermont to the west, and Maine to the northeast

Subj: Ballot access challenge in NH regarding Barack Obama.  Please stand with the U.S. Constitution and your oath to it.

Dear NH Rep. Bettencourt:

Please stand with the U.S. Constitution and your oath to support and defend it. Your loyalty must be to the Constitution and the Citizens of New Hampshire and not to the establishment Republican Party bosses in DC who wish to use the Constitution when it suits them and ignore it when it suits them. The Constitution is the fundamental law of our land.  It needs to be enforced and protected equally for everyone. Does your bottom line loyalty to the party trump your loyalty to the Constitution?  Search your conscience after reading the rest of my email and the attachments.

Never before in the history of our country have the major political parties allowed a person whose father was a foreign national and not a Citizen of the United States into the office of the Presidency and to gain command of our military.

Obama’s father was a foreign national and never was a U.S. Citizen or even wanted to be one. In fact, Obama’s father was not even an immigrant to this country nor was he even a permanent resident.  Obama is not a “natural born Citizen of the United States” to constitutional standards. He is NOT constitutionally eligible to be President of the United States per Article II, Section 1. He should not be allowed on the ballot in New Hampshire since your 2010 election law requires the candidate to be a “natural born Citizen.” That was added to your laws since the 2008 election due to the Obama fiasco.  Enforce your new 2010 NH election law change.

To be a natural born Citizen of the United States the person must be born in the USA to two (2) U.S. Citizen parents. That is the law of nature and said laws were referred to in our founding documents. That definition comes from natural law, the legal treatise The Law of Nations or Principles of Natural Law, Vol. 1, Chapter 19, Section 212, U.S. law via the Supreme Court decision of Minor v Happersett (1875) which was never overturned and other SCOTUS decisions as recent as 1939, and international law. Wong Kim Ark (1898) only decided who is a born “Citizen of the U.S.” under the 14th Amendment, not who is a “natural born Citizen of the U.S.” under Article II. The words “natural born” do not appear in the 14th Amendment and only appear in the Constitution in Article II as to who can be the President, and then later per the last sentence of the 12th amendment who can be the Vice President.

Obama’s father was a foreign national and never a U.S. Citizen so Obama is born with dual Citizenship and dual allegiances and is NOT a natural born Citizen of the USA.  Why both major political parties allowed this to happen in 2008 is beyond comprehension. But for the Republican Party to allow it to happen again in 2012 is completely unfathomable given how much more we have learned about the lack of Obama’s true legal identity and that he is using a forged, digitally-created birth certificate and a Connecticut SSN not legally issued to him.

Images on the internet are proof of nothing, especially when digital image and typography experts say the images are digitally-created forgeries and not scans of real paper documents.  Read the attached essays and reports for more information on this subject.

It is time for you to stand up for your sworn solemn oath of office to support and defend the Constitution of the United States.  It is time for you to stand up for your duty to protect the Citizens of New Hampshire from a person, Barack Obama, who is committing election fraud and identity fraud in your state.  His signing the application to be put on the ballot in your state has created a legal NEXUS between him and the Citizens of your state and your state now has jurisdiction to investigate his election fraud and identity theft and fraud. He is perpetrating a false identity and documents on the Citizens of New Hampshire.  Your state now has jurisdiction to investigate this man … Barack Hussein Obama II, or whoever he really is and whatever is real legal name is.

Please do the right thing by your oath and lead the effort in your state to call for a full and thorough investigation of Obama’s true legal identity, to conclusively determine it, under oath with sworn testimony, subpoenaed witness testimony including, if necessary, Obama himself, and certified true and correct paper documents with raised seals DIRECTLY from the original issuing authority (not Obama’s campaign or team) and subjected to forensic analysis by document experts.  The Obama fraud and charade and deception of the electorate must be stopped. The ongoing constitutional crisis created by Obama must be ended.  Please stand for the U.S. Constitution and the New Hampshire Citizens who are looked to vet candidates for President as an early primary state and demand an investigation immediately into the charges of election fraud and identity fraud perpetrated by Obama on the Citizens of New Hampshire.  Do NOT allow the election fraud of 2008 to be repeated in 2012.

CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)
Lehigh Valley PA  USA
http://www.protectourliberty.org
http://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com

Attachments:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/32538320/
http://www.scribd.com/doc/69405732/
http://www.scribd.com/doc/69182957/
http://www.scribd.com/doc/59624694/

——————–

Email addresses for the New Hampshire House of Representatives are here.

2 Responses to "CDR Kerchner Pounds New Hampshire Legislator About Obama’s Eligibility"

  1. MinutemanCDC_SC   Sunday, November 27, 2011 at 9:15 PM

    Chris, N.H. Secretary of State Bill Gardner, a Democrat, has held that office for 35 years. He is neither a man to be pushed around nor one who pays much attention to demands. Although N.H. law requires that there be ten Commissioners, he had only three Democrats and three supposed Republicans from whom to compose a Ballot Law Commission of five members and five alternates.

    N.H. RSA 665:7 Filing Disputes. – The ballot law commission shall hear and determine disputes arising over whether nomination papers or declarations of candidacy filed with the secretary of state conform with the law. The decision of the ballot law commission in such cases shall be final as to questions both of law and fact, and no court shall have jurisdiction to review such decision.

    On Nov. 18th, the BLC members obviously had been prepped and provided a “plausible alternative” to fulfilling their responsibility to vet any candidate who encounters a challenge. The N.H. Attorney General’s office advised them to operate as if “the law” regarding vetting elections included only the requirements that the application be filled out properly and that the filing fee of $1000 be submitted before the filing deadline.

    This was obvious obstruction, because in 2008, the BLC omitted the name of Egyptian-born Sal Mohammad from the ballot for President for not being a natural born Citizen, and in 2006, the BLC omitted eight names from the ballot for State Representative for various disqualifications.

    The Ballot Law Commission is the election-governing arm of the Secretary of State’s office. Someone (or ones) ordered the Commissioners to give Mr. Obama a pass. The decision of the BLC cannot be appealed to any court.

    What we have here is a closed ballot vetting process controlled by Democrats and RINOs, and not subject to appeal. “Demand”, “inspect”, “use the nomination paper,” “challenge”, “object”, “no placement,” are strong words which lack any power to enforce them.

    N.H. RSA 665:17 Enforcement of Orders of Ballot Law Commission. – The superior court shall have jurisdiction in equity to enforce any order of the ballot law commission issued hereunder.

    The superior court has jurisdiction to enforce the orders of the BLC. But who is going to force the BLC to fulfill its responsibility to fully vet candidates for office?

  2. Chris   Tuesday, November 22, 2011 at 7:57 AM

    Thank you Cmdr Kerchner.
    We should make it simple.
    The burden of proof is not on us. It is on obama/DNC!

    Demand the SOS to secure proof from DNC or Obama of his constitutioal elligibility or his name won’t be placed on the ballot!

    DNC is the entity that has the responsibility of vetting the candidates. The SOS relies solely on DNC’s ‘nomination paper’.
    So inpsect DNC’s nomination paper and go from there –

    Use what is or is NOT on the nomination paper to challenge/object to the placement of obama on the NH ballot!
    The paper must certify obama meeting the US constitutional requirement, if it doesn’t, then it does not even meet NH’s own constitutional requirement, and the SOS can reject the paper!
    If the paper certifies o meeting the constitutional requirement, then the SOS can/should demand DNC to show proofs. (People demand SOS to demand proofs from DNC!) Until there are proofs, no placement of obama name on the ballot!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.