Letter to WA State Sheriff Calls for Obama Election Fraud Investigation

WILL THESE LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS RESPOND AS SHERIFF JOE ARPAIO HAS?

November 10, 2011

Thurston County, WA was created out of Lewis County in 1852, when Washington was still a territory

Dear Editor:

The following letter was sent to Okanogan County, WA Sheriff Frank Rogers; Sheriff M. L. Kline of Adams County; Sheriff Ozzie Knezovich of Spokane County; Sheriff Sue Rahr of King County, and Sheriff Daniel Kimball of Thurston County on November 8, 2011, Election Day:

November 8th, 2011

Sheriff  Frank Rogers

123 5th Ave. N Room 200

Okanogan WA 98840

Re: Forgery and Prevention of Election Fraud

Dear Sheriff  Rogers,

I believe there is enough evidence to warrant a law enforcement investigation in to the use of a fraudulent birth certificate by Barack H. Obama. Obama is using this document in order to gain access to the ballot in Washington State in the upcoming presidential election. This constitutes election fraud and is a criminal act. This criminal act occurred on April 27th, 2011. Washington State law provides law enforcement agents and citizens with the ability to investigate forged documents used to qualify as a candidate and to prevent election fraud. (RCW 29A.68.011)

Crime that has been committed: The use of a federal computer to publish a fraudulent birth certificate in an effort to deceive the American people in to thinking Obama has met the legal qualifications to be a presidential candidate.

Crime that can be prevented: The placement of Barack Obama’s name on the Washington State presidential ballot as a legally qualified candidate when the document he is using to “qualify” his candidacy is fraudulent.

Washington Administrative Code (WAC) requires that a candidate “possess all qualifications of the office at the time of candidate filing, a candidate must satisfy this requirement at the time of candidate filing and can not rely on possessing the qualifications at a later time…”(WAC 434-215-170)

RCW 29A.20.021 (1) requires that “ A person filing a declaration of candidacy for an office shall, at the time of filing, be a registered voter and possess the qualifications specified by law for persons who may be elected to the office.”

The Secretary of State processes all applications and documents submitted on behalf of candidates for the offices of President and Vice President of the United States. (RCW 29A.56)

Secretary of State Sam Reed relies on the Democratic National Committee to supply him with the official Certificate of Nomination for the office of President and Vice President. This document states that the candidates they put forward have been “duly nominated” by the party at their National Convention. (a) The term “duly nominated” has legal connotations and means that the candidates meet the legal and constitutional requirements for the office.

The qualifications to be President of the United States are found in the United States Constitution.

Article II, Section 1:

No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty-five years, and been fourteen years a resident within the United States.

On the Washington State Secretary of State website under Descriptions of Elected Offices: President/Vice President it states: “The President must be at least 35 years of age and a natural born U.S. citizen.”

RCW 29A.84.311   Candidacy declarations, nominating petitions.

Every person who:

(1) Knowingly provides false information on his or her declaration of candidacy or petition of nomination; or

(2) Conceals or fraudulently defaces or destroys a certificate that has been filed with an elections officer under chapter 29A.20 RCW or a declaration of candidacy or petition of nomination that has been filed with an elections officer, or any part of such a certificate, declaration, or petition, is guilty of a class C felony punishable under RCW 9A.20.021. [2004 c 271 § 185.]

Problem at Hand: Barack Obama has never shown Democrat Party Officials, Secretary of State Sam Reed or the American people any acceptable documentation that would reveal and confirm his citizenship status or age. Obama proffered a birth record on April 27th, 2011 that he said was a photocopy of his original Certificate of Live Birth.  It was not.  It was a computer generated document and, experts believe, a forged one at that.

Statement of Fact

The evidence concerning Obama’s use of a fraudulent identification document and the commission of election fraud is straightforward and compelling.

1. The Social Security Administration lists documents that are acceptable for proving citizenship status and age.  “Citizenship or immigration status: We can accept only certain documents as proof of U.S. citizenship. These include a U.S. birth certificate, a U.S. passport, Certificate of Naturalization or Certificate of Citizenship. Age: You must present your birth certificate… All documents must be either originals or copies certified by the issuing agency.”  (http://www.ssa.gov/pubs/10002.html)

2. In 2008 Obama posted, on his campaign website fightthesmears.com, what he said was a copy of his short form Certification of Live Birth from the State of Hawaii. (b) (http://www.fightthesmears.com/articles/5/birthcertificate)   Obama re-posted that same document on the White House website on April 25th, 2011. (c) That short-form Certification of Live Birth is a computer generated document which contains some of the information found on the original long-form Certificate of Live Birth.

3. A computer generated, short-form Certification of Live Birth (COLB) issued in Hawaii is not acceptable as conclusive proof of birth in Hawaii. (see 4 below) Under Hawaiian law in 1961 a child could be born anywhere in the world and, after returning to Hawaii, the mother could register the birth in Hawaii, in a number of different ways and receive a COLB. Information provided by the mother did not have to be independently verified. See links for relevant Hawaii law (d): http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/hrscurrent/Vol06_Ch0321-0344/HRS0338/HRS_0338-0017_0008.htm http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/11/why_the_barack_obama_birth_cer.html

4. In 2008 The Hawaii Department of Home Lands required the original Certificate of Live Birth when filing an application. From their web site:  “In order to process your application, DHHL utilizes information that is found only on the original Certificate of Live Birth, which is either black or green. This is a more complete record of your birth than the Certification of Live Birth (a computer-generated printout). Submitting the original Certificate of Live Birth will save you time and money since the computer-generated Certification requires additional verification by DHHL.”

5. Several lawsuits were filed in attempts to require Obama to prove he was qualified to be President and/or a presidential candidate by producing his original long-form Certificate of Live Birth. (e)  (http://conservapedia.com/Obama_birth_certificate_lawsuits)

6. For three years, 2008 to 2011, Obama has been in court, on multiple fronts, refusing all demands to release his original, long-form Certificate of Live Birth. I believe he has spent close to a million to keep this original birth certificate hidden, (WND, ‘Is Obama campaign cash quashing eligibility suits?’ 10/19/11) (f)

7. On April 27th, 2011, Barack Obama revealed another birth record from the state of Hawaii. Obama said it was a photo copy of his original, long-form Certificate of Live Birth. (g) (http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-long-form.pdf)

8. This, purportedly, was the same certificate that the Governor of Hawaii, Neil Abercrombie, said he could not find. (‘Hawaii governor can’t find Obama birth certificate’, WND, 1/18/2011) (h)

9. Obama and White House General Counsel Robert Bauer (a Seattle based Perkins Coie lawyer) both made public statements at a press conference on April 27, 2011, attesting to the steps they took in order to attain two certified photocopies, from the Hawaii Department of Health, of Obama’s original long-form Certificate of Live Birth. Bauer explained, in detail, the difference between a short-form computer generated Certification of Live Birth (what Obama posted in 2008 and again in 2011) and what they say they revealed on April 27, 2011, a photo copy of Obama’s original, long-form Certificate of Live Birth.  Bauer stated that this 1961 original Certificate of Live Birth was kept in a “bound book” at the Hawaii DOH. (i) (j)

10. These documents were posted on the White House Website on April 27, 2011, as evidence of the steps Obama took to attain copies of his original long-form Certificate of Live Birth;

1. In a letter to Hawaii Director of Health Loretta Fuddy, dated April 22, 2011, Obama asks for “two certified copies of my original Certificate of Live Birth”. (k)

2. That same day Obama’s lawyer, Judith Corley (from Perkins Coie), writes to Fuddy . Corley says she understands that it is the Department’s policy and practice “to only provide the “short-form” version when a certified copy of a birth certificate is requested”  but that she is requesting “a waiver of the Department of Health’s policy, so that my client can obtain two certified copies of his original, “long form” birth certificate”.  (l)

3. On April 25th Fuddy responds to Obama.  “I have the legal authority to approve the process by which copies of such records are made….I am making an exception to current departmental policy which is to issue a computer generated certified copy.”  (m)

(Note: The exception to the current department policy to only issue a computer generated short-form Certification of Live Birth is to make photo copies of the original long form  Certificate of Live Birth.)

Fuddy continues, “Enclosed please find two certified copies of your original Certificate of Live Birth. I have witnessed the copying of the certificate and attest to the authenticity of these copies.”

11. On April 25th, 2011, the Governor of Hawaii, Neil Abercrombie, put out a press release supporting Fuddy’s actions: “In 2001, the Hawaii State Department of Health began computer-generating vital statistics records. Since then, its longstanding policy and practice has been to issue and provide only the computer-generated Certifications of Live Birth, and to not produce photocopies of actual records to fulfill requests for certified copies of certificates. ….Director Fuddy made an exception for President Obama by issuing copies of the original birth certificate…”  (n)

12. In the Press Release Hawaii Attorney General David Louie stated that, “The exception made in this case, to provide President Obama with a copy of his original Certificate of Live Birth, was done according to the letter of the law.”

Analysis and Concern

Obama, Corley and Bauer all stated that what was requested from the Hawaii DOH were certified photocopies of Obama’s original, long-form Certificate of Live Birth.

Fuddy, Abercrombie and AG David Louie, all say that an exception was made for Obama and instead of giving him a computer generated document, a short form Certification of Live Birth, he was given certified photocopies of his original, long -form Certificate of Live Birth.

Obama and Bauer state that they received certified photocopies of Obama’s original, long-form Certificate of Live Birth from the Hawaii DOH on April 25th, 2011.

However, what was posted on the White House website on April 27th, 2011, was a computer-generated document with multiple layers.  It was not a scanned photo copy.

Many document experts have provided a detailed analysis of the documents multiple layers, proving it was computer generated. It is irrefutable. One of the clearest is available on YouTube for your review. (n)  (Albert Renshaw review of tampering and layers of Obama long form BC: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7s9StxsFllY)

Making a photocopy of an original document does not turn it in to a “computer generated document” and scanning a photocopy into a computer does not turn it in to a computer generated document with multiple layers.

The document posted on the White House website on April 27, 2011 around 6:00pm, clearly has multiple, layers.  Because of these many layers, we know it is a fraudulent document. It was not what Obama and Bauer said it was, a photo copy of Obama’s original, long-form Certificate of Live Birth picked up in Hawaii on April 26th, 2011 by Obama’s lawyer Judith Corley.

The posting of this document and the ensuing Press Conference, on April 27th, 2011, was fraud. A false representation of a document and a continued concealment of what should have been disclosed—Obama’s original long-form Certificate of Live Birth. The related crime of uttering a forged document has also occurred because Obama posted an inauthentic document with the intent to pawn it off as a genuine photocopy of his Certificate of Live Birth.

The fact that this document has many manipulations, originating from several different sources, in addition to the several layers, raises credible evidence that it is also a forged document.  Where Obama got the fraudulent document and who forged it is a separate question.

The criminal act that is staring us right in the face is the fact that on April 27th, 2011 Barack Obama posted a computer generated document of unknown origin on a government website and attempted to pawn it off as a photocopy of his original long-form Certificate of Live Birth from the Hawaii DOH.

A Deliberate and Planned Election Deception.

Obama’s past actions, concerning his original birth certificate, convince me that in the present instance Obama posted or had someone post a fraudulent birth certificate on the White House website with his full knowledge. Obama participated in the Press Conference with the full intent to help pawn off the fraudulent document as his real original, long-form Certificate of Live Birth.

Let’s not forget that, just 4 months earlier, rather than release his original birth certificate, Obama callously watched a man who had served the military honorably for 18 years, be court marshaled and sent to prison. (Lt. Col Terry Lakin, ‘Birther’ Dismissed from Army for Refusing Deployment, Sentenced to Six Months in Prison’, ABC News, 12/16/2010)

Let’s not forget all the various stories Obama came up with over the last three years as to why he could not reveal the original document; the copy he had was burned in a fire, the Hawaii DOH no longer had it, the Hawaii DOH would not give anyone photo copies of their original certificate.

Let’s not forget the three year, million dollar, multiple court battles Obama has waged in order to keep the document hidden.

Now, all of a sudden, Hawaii does have a copy and Obama can get a copy and he has no objection to revealing a copy?

Obama has released this document now because his re-election campaign is upon him and questions about his constitutional legitimacy are growing. This was a deliberate attempt by Barack Obama to defraud and deceive the American people and Secretary of State Sam Reed. His intent was to convince us that he meets the legal and Constitutional requirements to be President and/or a presidential candidate.

By posting this fake birth certificate Obama hopes to encourage Washingtonians to act upon it, in the voting booth. A vote based on this fraudulent document would result in legal injury. The placement of Obama’s name, on the presidential election ballot in Washington State, based on this fraudulent document, would result in legal injury.

This is election fraud on a massive scale; a slight of hand should not go un-noticed by those charged with up-holding the law.

While this alleged crime took place in Washington D.C. on Federal property it was a deception perpetrated against every voter in every state.

I believe a Sheriff from Washington State would have the legal authority to investigate and confirm if the document posted on April 27, 2011 was a computer generated document or a scan of a photo copy of Obama’s original birth certificate.  If it was deemed necessary I believe that a Sheriff would also qualify under Hawaii DOH regulations 8B 2 as having the legal authority to examine Obama’s original, long-form Certificate of Live Birth which purportedly is in a “bound book” in Hawaii at the DOH.

Public Health Regulations, Department of Health, Hawaii, Chapter 8B 2(1-2) states:

(1) Authorized agents of the Federal Government whose responsibilities require verification of information from vital records may be permitted to inspect the vital records and transcribe information other than “confidential information.”

(2) Such agents must request written permission in advance and must present a list of names of individuals whose records they desire to inspect and the purpose of such examinations.

Using a fraudulent and most likely forged birth certificate to qualify as a candidate for the ballot is election fraud which is a criminal act.  Using a government computer, the official White House Website, to facilitate that fraud is also a crime. 18 U.S.C. §1028 : Defines the knowing production, transfer, or possession of false identification and false documents as a crime. I believe the evidence would show that Obama knew the birth document he had posted was false and that he intentionally used, or allowed to be used, the White House Website in order to transfer that false identification document to millions of Americans.

If an investigation confirmed my allegations about the document it would confirm the violation of federal laws concerning the use and transfer of a fraudulent identification document. It would also confirm the violation of election laws in Washington State and  allow us to prevent a future crime, the placement of an illegal, unqualified presidential candidate on Washington State ballots.

In Closing.

While this request for a legal investigation focuses on one document, the fraudulent birth certificate Obama posted on April 27, 2011, I also want to draw your attention to very recent revelations that 2008 presidential nomination forms for Obama, submitted by the Democrat Party, contained forged signatures. (‘Suspicious petitions got a stamped signature: Former Gov. Kernan, 12 others come forward to say they didn’t sign’, southbendtribune.com, Erin Blasko, 10/12/2011) (o)

Our Secretary of State relies completely on the validity of nominating documents provided to him by the Democrat Party when determining the legal eligibility of a candidate. The Democratic Party has made it clear that we can not trust the validity of their nominating documents.

Also, the worst case of voter registration fraud in Washington State history, was committed by an organization called ACORN during the Obama 2008 presidential election campaign. (p)

Obama has longstanding ties to ACORN, a leftist organization found guilty and/or investigated in 17 states for voter registration fraud.  In 2007 the Obama campaign gave ACORN $800,000 to “get out the vote”. (q)

During the 2008 presidential campaign, when it became clear that ACORN would be investigated for election fraud, Bob Bauer, at that time lawyer for the Obama for America Campaign, wrote a seven page letter to Attorney General Michael Mukasey in a clear attempt to bully and threaten him in to dropping any investigation of ACORN. (r)

This week, November 2, 2011, the Wall Street Journal reported that Bob Bauer is at it again, trying to intimidate anyone who attempts to curb ever increasing instances of voter registration fraud. Particularly the kind of fraud ACORN engaged in on Obama’s behalf with their 2008 “get out the vote drive”.

“CHICAGO—The Obama re-election campaign has quietly opened a counteroffensive against Republican-backed changes to election laws that Democrats say will suppress votes for their candidates and limit their get-out-the-vote drives. The effort, led by former White House counsel Robert Bauer, prompted the suspension of an Ohio law limiting early voting….By this spring, the Obama re-election campaign will mount what Mr. Bauer called an unprecedented “voter protection” effort ….“ (‘Obama Aims at Election Laws’ by Jonathan Weisman and Carol E. Lee)

These repeated revelations of proven fraud and forgery, relating to Barack Obama and the 2008 presidential election, can not be ignored.  This history reveals a clear pattern of illegal activity in the political life of Obama.  It lends substantial weight to my present claim that forgery and election fraud are, once again, being perpetrated during Obama’s current campaign for re-election.

Same players, Obama and Bauer, same illegal activity, fraud and forgery.

I respectfully submit this request for a law enforcement investigation in to these allegations and look forward to your reply.

Sincerely,

Linda Jordan

 

Sharon Rondeau has operated The Post & Email since April 2010, focusing on the Obama birth certificate investigation and other government corruption news.  She has reported prolifically on constitutional violations within Tennessee’s prison and judicial systems.

5 Responses to "Letter to WA State Sheriff Calls for Obama Election Fraud Investigation"

  1. Chris   Friday, November 11, 2011 at 10:37 AM

    Really good letter. Ms. Jordan should send this to the SOS of her state to demand soetoro/obama’s name not be placed on the ballot unless the DNC provides irrefutable evidence of o’s natural born citizen status, or soetoro/obama himself provides the hard-copy certified true docs that prove his place of birth and his father’s citizenship at time of his birth!

    Everyone should challenge their state’s SOSs to keep o’s name from the ballot!
    Forget about the courts! Until soetoro/obama is kicked out, no judge will rule on the merits of the elig lawsuits!

  2. California Constitutionalist   Friday, November 11, 2011 at 1:05 AM

    Ow, all this evidence hurts my head. Great job in making it difficult for the sheriff to ignore this unless he foolishly chooses to be derelict in his duty to defend the Constitution.

  3. Kevin J Lankford   Thursday, November 10, 2011 at 6:34 PM

    After all the crimes listed, I did not see mention that he does not qualify as
    natural born because of the citizenship of his bigamist father.

  4. BobSR   Thursday, November 10, 2011 at 4:08 PM

    I hope I am wrong, but my guess is the Sheriffs respond with deafening silence.

  5. John Sutherland   Thursday, November 10, 2011 at 11:04 AM

    Excellent letter. Let’s see how the sheriffs respond.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.