WHY NOT SHERIFF ROBERT M. HUSTON?
by Michael D. Jackson
(Nov. 1, 2011) — The following letter was sent by certified mail, #70110470000241166831, to Tazewell County, IL Sheriff Robert M. Huston on October 31, 2011:
Mr. Robert M. Huston
Tazewell County Sheriff
101 S Capitol Street
Pekin, IL 61554
Dear Sheriff Huston,
I am contacting you for the fourth time now asking only that you protect the citizens of your county and uphold your oath to the Constitution. It is your responsibility to make sure the laws of this county are upheld. The people that love this country cannot afford to have the ongoing crimes not prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. I have sent your office with enough irrefutable evidence of laws being broken and to this day this lawlessness is being allowed to continue. I am sharing with you another example of a citizen going to their local chief law enforcement officer asking them to do their job. This letter is published on the internet and can be found at the Postemail.com as well as others, including the last letter I sent your office. You are my Sheriff and have supported you in all your elections. How can I have any confidence to know my own chief law enforcement officer will do his job and protect me from election fraud being committed by Barack Obama et al’ when all my previous cries for help have been ignored to this date by your office? Please read and know that there are many other law abiding citizens of this Republic that are fully aware Mr. Obama is unconstitutionally qualified to hold the office of the presidency and that he and others have committed a multitude of cover up crimes along the way. This is lawlessness that is completely unacceptable and our country is headed towards destruction because of this. Here is the voice of another concerned patriotic citizen of America.
For Christ and Country,
Michael D. Jackson
And to the responses of Mrs. Rondeau and “challenger” I would like to add that if said best evidence is not forthcoming from the State of Hawaii or Obama, it would be incumbent upon Sheriff Joe Arpaio to demand that Arizona State’s Attorney General file:
a) Federal document and/or election fraud charges against Nancy Pelosi (2008 Chair of the Democratic National Convention) and Alice Travis Germond (2008 Secretary of the Democratic National Convention) for signing then submitting a 2008 DNC “Official Certificate Of Nomination” (“OCON”) lacking the required eligibility phrase “under provisions of the United States Constitution.” and;
b) Dereliction of Duty/Malfeasance in Office charges against Janice K. Brewer (2008 Arizona Secretary of State/Chief Elections Officer and every 2008 Electoral College member from Arizona for either not noticing or ignoring the lack of “under provisions of the United States Constitution>” on the DNC’s 2008 OCON.
To Ms Rondeau and Challenger,
The statute that you are referring to that amends Section 338-18, Hawaii Revised Statutes to authorize the Hawaii department of health to provide certain public health records to law enforcement officers to facilitate criminal investigations is Hawaii State Senate Bill 1237.
However, if you read section 3 of the bill you will discover that it does not take effect until July 1st of the year 2050.
Pursuant to current Hawaii law, Hawaii will not release the Birth Certificates of any of its birth subjects without the express permission of the birth subject absent a court order.
So far,no Hawaii Court or US Federal court has issued such an order and there is no indication that any court intends to issue such an order to allow Sheriff Arpaio or any other law enforcement officer access to the Birth Certificate.
According to todays WND, Sheriff Arpaio”s Posse has determined that in order to come to any conclusion, they must first obtain Obama’s original Birth Certificate or a Certified copy from the State of Hawaii.
Since Hawaii will not release the Birth Certificates of any of its citizens without the permission of the birth subject and since neither Sheriff Arpaio nor his posse have no authority whatsoever to force Hawaii to release Obama’s Birth Certificate, what WND is saying is that Sheriff Arpaio’s investigation is dead in the water.
Knowing this, what real difference other then making you feel better are you claiming that will be served by having Sheriff Huston go through the same process and come to the same conclusion?
——————-
Mrs. Rondeau replies: There is a Hawaii statute which grants permission to any law enforcement officer in the country requesting documents in the course of a criminal investigation: http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2007/bills/sb1326_sd1_.pdf
I would add to Mrs. Rondeau’s response that if Sheriff’s Arpaio’s demand for the best evidence is not forthcoming from Hawaii, it is not likely the State of Arizona’s Secretary of State is going to certify Obama’s name on their 2012 ballot.
You are right. Sheriff Joe can keep him off the ballot. He is my Sheriff and a great man. I am a member of the Surprise Tea Party and signed the petition for Corsi to take this to the Sheriff.
Mrs. Rondeau: I’m not an attorney but I was quite involved in the state legislative process (not Hawaii). When I went to the Hawaii webpage for SB 1326, I noticed that the bill never made it out of Hawaii’s Senate. So it was not passed nor signed by the Governor. Assuming that the current version of HRS 338-18 Disclosure of Records, is online, then this is it: http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/hrscurrent/Vol06_Ch0321-0344/HRS0338/HRS_0338-0018.HTM . I won’t attempt to interpret this law, but with regard to law enforcement access to records, but there is at least one possibility: 338-18 (b)(9) A person whose right to inspect or obtain a certified copy of the record is established by an order of a court of competent jurisdiction. Possibly Sheriff Arpaio could get an AZ judge to assist.
I would also note that I am concerned about some of the statements that WND has attributed to Sheriff Arpaio, such as: “”The president should want to put this issue to bed once and for all for the good of the country, Obama can end the controversy with one stroke of his pen…” And “Sources close to the investigation say the posse has decided it needs to see original birth records before it can conclude whether Obama should be eligible for the presidential ballot in 2012, not an electronic file or scanned copies.” Just the tampering with the registrar’s stamp is prima facia evidence that Obama’s birth certificate is forged, plus myriad experts have also said it’s fraudulent. So why can’t Sheriff Joe go forward without the microfilm?
And even more important, even if Obama was born on the White House steps, he is still not an Article 2 “natural born citizen.” He can never be a natural born citizen since his father Obama Sr was a British subject, and so are Obama Sr’s children. I don’t believe Obama was even born in the US because in 2004 Sherman Skolnick outed Obama as a Kenyan-born British spy. But even if Sheriff Joe were to somehow conclude that Hawaii had a birth certificate for Obama/Soetoro, it’s not sufficient. It is by no means over. Obama is still a usurper who is ineligible to be the President. Sheriff Arpaio should arrest Obama for being a usurper no matter where he was born.