If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my free Email alerts. Thanks for visiting!


October 15, 2011

Image released by the White House on April 27, 2011 purported to be a certified copy of Obama's original Hawaii birth certificate. There is no embossed seal and the word "THE" is misspelled as "TXE" in the registrar's stamp.

Dear Editor:

This is a letter that I am sending to my two Senators (Rubio and nelson) and Representative (West). I don’t expect any responses.

I realize that you, and Congress, have no interest in addressing the matters of Obama’s ineligibility, fraudulent use of a SSN and allowing two forged birth documents to be posted on line. Nevertheless, I will just share the following which is so typical of the treatment received by attornies trying to get a court to hear the plethora of evidence supporting these claims. (Actually, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals heard arguments back on May 2, 2011, but has yet to render a decision. What do you suppose is taking them so long?)

Remember back in January 2011 when Hawaii Gov. Neil Abercrombie said he would settle the dispute over Obama’s birth certificate by doing the research himself? Well, he tried and all he could come up with was, “something written down in the archives” and concluded that “there is no Obama birth certificate in Hawaii.” Surely the Hawaii Department of Health (HDOH) knew that he was making this search so why didn’t they just tell him that they have it but can’t release it because of privacy? Then there was Tim Adams, the senior Hawaii elections worker who has sworn by affidavit that, according to his supervisors (and Gov. Abercrombie) there is no Hawaiian birth certificate for Obama. And we musn’t forget former HDOH Director, Chiyome Fukino, who said that she had seen Obama’s birth certificate and that it is “half written and half typed.” Then came the big day on Apr. 27, 2011 when Obama showed the world his birth document – A FULLY TYPED FORGERY.

I should also include the Hawaiian birth certificates of the Nordyke twins, Gretchen and Susan, born on Aug. 5, 1961, and whose certificate numbers (10637, 10638) were lower than  Obama’s certficate number (10641), yet he was born one day before them on Aug. 4, 1961. How does Obama get a higher number being born a day earlier?

In the District Court of Hawaii, on Oct. 12, 2011, attorney Orly Taitz sued to have Obama’s “vault sealed” birth certificate produced for comparison with the one he showed the world last April. She was also prepared to produce evidence showing that “expert after expert” examined Obama’s birth certificate and that every one of them concluded it is a forgery. The attorney arguing for Obama, Jill Nagamine, told the court that the new Director of HDOH, Loretta Fuddy, has “verified” that Obama’s BC is on record. That was the substance of her argument. So the American people only need to trust Director Fuddy and take her word that Obama’s fully typed and forged birth certificate does exist in the HDOH records. And what was Judge Nishimura’s ruling? “Case dismissed!”

Is Congress to stand idly by again and allow Obama to run for re-election without bringing up his ineligibility and criminal acts? Does the Constitution matter?

Orly Taitz has two more cases pending (Taitz v Astrue – CV-11-00402/Taitz v. Ruemmler 1:11-cv-01​421). I see no reason to expect justice from these either.


J. Black

Join the Conversation


Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. As far as I am concerned these people need to be arrested for treason along with the media and judges who use the foolish standing excuse. I demand rebellion to enforced the Constitution.

  2. It appears to me that we have a ‘representative’ crises in this country. The crises is that we elect fellow citizens to work for us in local, state, and federal branches of government, and they just don’t do the legal job we ask them to do. Think about it.

    We, the people, never ask our elected representatives to either ignore our constitutions, nor do we ask them to violate our constitutions. We simply want them to represent our interests in a lawful fashion in the various bodies of government. Some do, and some don’t, but none of them appear to have morals nor do any have brass cajones. When our representatives see crime and corruption in government, they appear impotent to either 1) sound the alarm, or 2) stop the criminal activity. Does this make them all complicit by their silence? Why do none of them appear to do the right thing? Is our system of government hopelessly corrupt?

    All that aside, the question remains: how do we get honorable, lawful, and functional representatives of the people into our government? Must we bribe them to do the right thing? Must we threaten them with prison and/or fines if they don’t do their jobs? And if we have to arrest and punish them, exactly how do we arrest them, try them, and imprison them if the system we have created is corrupt and does not perform?

    Do republics only work when there is a moral people and a moral government? Have the progressives so destroyed our people’s morality that we will perish as a country under the weight of our own corrupt government representatives? Sad.

    Maybe no government is the best government after all. The law of the jungle. Yeah, that’s it. Darwin had it right all along.

  3. This is a Constitutional issue that must matter if our Constitution is to have any validity at all. If it does not matter to politicians, then I would argue that they have violated their oaths of office and must be punished and banned from holding public office for life, and forfeit all benefits to which a public official accrues.

    Sadly, I have yet to hear of a single member of congress who has the courage to stand up and demand this issue be openly settled in court. Therefore, it is up to We the People to enforce our Constitution. If we do not, then we are part of the problem and do not deserve the right to call ourselves US Citizens.