If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my free Email alerts. Thanks for visiting!
“HIGH CRIMES AND MISDEMEANORS”
by Robert DeBeaux
(Jul. 29, 2011) — It has become evident that the Congress (Both the House of Representatives and the Senate, 435 members strong) are knowledgeable in the crimes of the usurper-in-chief’s illegal tenure in the People’s White House, and these elected buffoons consider themselves immune from any repercussions of the law or failure to uphold their Oaths to defend the Constitution.
They are wrong.
Every House member represents a district. They must live in that district (or maintain a residence). Therefore they are subject to the Grand Jury of the county they reside in. That is where you put legal pressure on them. The Fifth Amendment gives the Grand Jury “Presentment” authority totally separate from the Indictment process the prosecutor holds.
This procedure is cemented not only in common law but Justice Scalia in 1992 with his infamous ruling about the Grand Juries decreed:
Rooted in long centuries of Anglo-American history, Hannah v. Larche, 363 US 420, 490 (1960) with J. Frankfurter concurring in result, the Grand Jury is mentioned in the Bill of Rights, but not in the body of the Constitution. It has not been textually assigned, therefore, to any of the three branches described in the first three Articles. It is a constitutional fixture in its own right.
To be crystal clear: The Grand Jury is a constitutional fixture in its own right. The Grand Jury is not a tool of government to use against its citizens. Justice Scalia determined further, to reinforce that there is no question as to the purpose of the Grand Jury:
In fact, the whole theory of its foundation is that it belongs to no branch of the institutional Government, serving as a kind of buffer or referee between Government and the people. Although the Grand Jury normally operates, of course, in the courthouse and under judicial auspices, its institutional relationship with the judicial branch has traditionally been, so to speak, at arm’s length. Judges’ direct involvement in the Grand Jury has generally been confined to the constitutive one of calling the Grand Jurors together and administering their oath of office.
Further, in United States District Court for the District of Columbia, Chief Judge Royce Lamberth (in case Misc. No. 09-346(RCL) Jul 2, 2009) (A petition from the American Grand Jury for the consideration of a “Presentment”) stated: “…and although presentments are constitutionally permitted…”
This is clear and convincing evidence that the Grand Jury can and SHOULD bring a case on its own.
We “The People” have clear evidence of crimes being committed by Barack Obama. His hiding behind the constitutional mandate that only the Congress can impeach him is totally accurate. However, Obama has committed high crimes and misdemeanors. There is no clear definition of the term “High Crimes,” but I reason that if misdemeanor is included, then any crimes above a misdemeanor are also the subject of this statement.
Since 2008, there have been serious allegations of criminal activity against the Constitution by Barack Hussein Obama to be eligible for the Presidency of the United States of America.
Time has shown our fears to be correct, and further investigations have uncovered a complicit Congress and Judiciary. Unfortunately, most of these officials are out of our reach; I said most, but not all…
The Congressperson for YOUR district, and the Senators for YOUR State are subject to laws of the local People. My representative knows about the following crimes:
A person who knowingly uses a fake Social Security number is guilty of Social Security fraud. Depending on the details of the situation, this crime can be considered a misdemeanor or felony.
18 U.S.C. Part 1, chapter 47 § 1028 : US Code – Section 1028: Fraud and related activity in connection with identification documents, authentication features, and information
I have sent a notarized, certified return receipt letter to my congresswoman and to both of my Senators clearly stating the crimes of Social security fraud and forgery being committed and the penalty for not bringing it to a proper judicial body. Further investigation of the crime of Misprision of a felony REQUIRES the subject to KNOWINGLY ignore it and decide to do nothing about the crime. Failure of that requirement renders the charge impotent. I reasoned that since I sent copies of a true statement (notarized) of the crimes, and I sent them delivery confirmation (so I know they got there), and I have the return receipt (So I know who accepted them), I am certain that their offices (for which they are responsible for) do in fact KNOW about the crimes and so far are deliberately ignoring the situation, I can safely take to a Grand Jury in their district a crime of “MISPRISION OF FELONY.”
This is the crime of Treason as defined in the Constitution itself (Article 3 Section 3). Representative Granger in one of her monthly new letters states clearly that Mr. Obama has given aid and comfort to a terrorist organization (Hamas) and goes on further to state that we are still at war with terrorists (*1). If Congresswoman Granger sees it, there are undoubtedly many others who do as well. In or for a treason charge to be valid, the treasonous act must be witnessed by two (2) person to the same act. I really do think there are more than two. This requirement is STRAIGHT out of the constitution and requires NO interpretation.
The issue of standing is already resolved by the 10th amendment and a recent Supreme Court decision Stated:
Supreme Court decision Bond v. United States, June 16, 2011, Tenth Amendment, Standing, Eligibility cases
The states had an obligation to enact legislation and did not. The states have not exercised their inherent power and duty to require proof of eligibility. Therefore, by virtue of the powers reserved for the people of the US in the Tenth Amendment to the US Constitution, US citizens have the power and obligation to demand proof of eligibility from Obama.
As such, every Member of Congress unless they are a deaf/mute, should be aware of the criminal trespasses of the alleged President of the United States; Mr. Obama/Sotoero and the crimes committed by him and the supporters who aided and abetted him to conspire for the Office of President.
This legal enforcement has finally come full term from the 2008 Common Law Grand Jury inquiries in Georgia by Carl Swensson that were denounced by the States attorneys General, and the Courts both State and Federal. Further all of the brave Patriots who filed petitions in prejudicial courts should re-file based on the new Supreme Court decision giving EVERY citizen standing to defend the Constitution.
I am compiling the necessary documents for presentment to the Grand Jury of my County, and I urge every concerned citizen to use due process to put considerable legal pressure on those who can do something about the destruction of our beloved Constitution.
Most Grand Juries have 20 or so members, (call your courthouse and find out, mine has only 12 members and 2 grand juries) prepare copies for each grand juror and address them “Grand Juror 1,” “Grand Juror 2” and so forth. Have the constable deliver them, (that is his job), hold him to it. Giving a copy to every juror is paramount, as no single juror may opt out by not bringing the matter to a vote. It only takes 4 jurors out of the assembly to consider for “presentment.”
Also please go to www.fija.org to learn more about the responsibilities of the Grand Jury. The package I am composing will have these instructions, and I hope to assemble them in a zip file for anyone to copy.
Thank you for your time, and I hope to see our Constitution restored. Even if these proceeding do not achieve fruition until after the 2012 elections, this will cement the “People’s” show of force to the Congress and the rest of the government that “We The People” are the Masters of our Government, not the other way around.
Referrences; (1*) http://kaygranger.house.gov/index.cfm?sectionid=150§iontree=4,150 e-newsletter dated May 27, 2011
The contents of this document are my own words except where the Supreme Court decisions are public record. The reference provided for congresswoman Granger is sent out in her e-mail newsletter and is not stipulated to be private.