If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my free Email alerts. Thanks for visiting!

WILL ATTORNEYS PROTECTING OBAMA’S DOCUMENTATION OR LACK THEREOF CONTINUE TO STONEWALL?

by Sharon Rondeau

The Social Security Administration has not released a copy of Obama's original social security number application. At least two private investigators have stated that the number he is using was not assigned to him originally.

(Jul. 1, 2011) As part of the discovery phase of her lawsuit to obtain the social security number application for Barack Hussein Obama II, Atty. Orly Taitz has sent the following request to three Justice Department attorneys currently acting as defense counsel for the Social Security Administration (SSA).  The Post & Email previously covered the case here and here.

DR. ORLY TAITZ ESQ

29839 SANTA MARGARITA STE 100

RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA CA 92688

Ph.949-683-5411 fax 949-766-7603

07.01.2011

Att Tony  West

Assistant Attorney general

Elizabeth J.  Shapiro
Deputy director

Federal Programs Branch

Patrick Nemeroff

Trial Atty, U.S. Dep’t of Justice

Civil Division, federal Programs branch

20 Massachusetts Ave, NW

Washington, DC 20530

Fax 202-305-8517

Phone 202-305-8727

Patrick.g.nemeroff@usdoj.gov

Request to stipulate to production of the application to SS_5 application to SSN 042-68-4425

Taitz v Astrue 11-cv-402 RCL

Dear Ms. Shapiro, Mr. West and Mr. Nemeroff

While FOIA legal actions do not require meet and confer, I am extending this letter as part of meet and confer and request to stipulate to production of the requested SS-5 application to SSN 042-68-4425, which is used by Mr. Obama since around 1980, but was  shown by the SSN, as one, never assigned to Mr. Obama.

Documents provided in this case, as well as additional documents, provided with this  letter show, that Mr. Obama is defrauding the whole nation and illegally occupying the position of the President and Commander in Chief, while using a cheap forgery instead of a valid birth certificate, invalid Social Security number  and forged or fraudulently obtained other vital records.

I would like to reiterate, that If you and your client, commissioner of the Social Security administration Michael Astrue, who happen to be a licensed attorney and an  officer of the court as well, refuse to stipulate and produce requested application, you and your client become complicit to the  crimes committed by Mr. Obama against 311 million American citizens, and a formal complaint will be forwarded to the Attorney’s bar of the District of Columbia, as well as Inspector General of the Department of Justice, House Judiciary Committee and House oversight committee.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ

—————————–

Of this most recent action, Taitz stated that she has addressed both Michael Astrue, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, and his agency’s defense attorneys: “You people are complicit in all the crimes committed by Obama.  We have a forged birth certificate and a criminal in the White House.  You are engaged in a cover-up.  You either stipulate that you will release the documents or you will be prosecuted together with him, and I’m going to the House Oversight Committee, the Department of Justice, and the Bar of the District of Columbia.  It’s horrible.  I’m keeping their feet to the fire.”

A statement of facts “not in dispute” filed today by the defendant’s attorneys provides a timeline of events in the case.

Update, July 3, 2011: Taitz provided The Post & Email with the following update:

On Friday night, July 1, 2011, the Department of Justice filed a motion for summary judgment in Taitz v Astrue.  Since I was able to overcome the standing and jurisdiction issues, they came up with a motion for summary judgment, which is usually filed when the case moves close to trial.
The DOJ came up with two excuses:
a. they are saying that they looked but could not find the applications for 1958, 1959 and 1977
How convenient; Ann Dunham supposedly filled out her application in 1959 and Obama’s SS application was filled out in and around March 28, 1977
b. again, they are claiming this bogus argument that the expectation of privacy of the holder of SSN 042-68-4425 outweighs the right of the public to know.