WHAT WILL HE SAY NOW?
by Butterdezillion, ©2011
Last week in an on-air debate with Donald Trump, Bill O’Reilly based his entire case for Obama’s supposed Hawaii birth on newspaper birth announcements.
With new information emerging now, O’Reilly may be interested to learn that the announcement images that were posted online cannot be from the microfilms we were told they were from. This article documents that the stories we were told were a well-orchestrated lie, which raises serious questions about the microfilms O’Reilly says he has found, since those lies back in 2008 would not have been necessary if the microfilms O’Reilly relies on today had actually been in the libraries in 2008.
Who orchestrated those lies in July of 2008, and why? O’Reilly might want to send his investigators out to find the answers to those questions, since it is his credibility – not Trump’s – which is on the line now.
Sorry to make you click an extra time, but the only way I know to post the images effectively is in a PDF.
obama crimes.com / phillip berg calls on donald trump to have obama arrested. article at top of page on his website. we all have to do the same by reaching out to trump the same way.
Thinkwell’s post brought this thought back to the front of my mind. When you connect the dots it gives you another possible explanation to the obvious. It is going to sound like a conspiracy theory but, as Fox says “you decide”.
Who could/would create … contemporaneous fabrications that have only recently been inserted into the microfilm records… archived locally and in about a half a dozen other libraries… besides Obama’s minions? Consider, why would the establishment (various branches of government including the two Bush administrations) want to hide all of this from the American public? We all know that the CIA is in the practice of co-opting some of the most unsavory characters for agents. As Stanley Ann Dunham was a known “Alinskyite” radical (baby Barak was raised in that environment) would it be inconceivable that he could have been enlisted as a radical teenager, like his mother, as a window into that world to work for the CIA? His citizenship would not have mattered but may have been used to co-opt and keep him in line. GHWB as former head of the CIA and President knew all about this? GWB is protecting his Dad? Did the CIA pull all the strings, fabricating his history, controlling him, until they had no use for him? Does this provide an explanation of his multiple SSNs, his trip to Pakistan, his various university claims? When he worked his way into the public spotlight through politics they could then do nothing but hide the truth? Then Obama began doing what he was trained to do just like Osama Bin Laden once out from under their control. Is it possible Obama’s arrogance comes from the fact that he knows the CIA must cover up his past? And yes the Government has all of the resources necessary to find and change every instance of a published article.
Like I said, you decide.
Lloyd… I agree that nobody likes to go down the conspiracy road, but we live in nefarious times where when it comes to the US federal government “question everything” should be the mantra of Obama’s opponent in 2012.
Watching the MSM news outlets, at many times get the feeling that the they are not just providing the news, but attempting to shape the minds of those receiving the information.
O’Reilly comes off as a regular American “just looking out for us,” but has anyone else ever considered that Oreilly is a propaganda media operative being fed information directly from the CIA? I find it hard to believe that a someone who relies on credibility for survival would place so much trust in a newspaper announcement to answer such an important legal question regarding our constitution.
I’ve thought the same thing on a couple of occassions but have never come up with a good reason why the CIA, or anyone else, would want to keep what he did for them hiden while he intentionally destroys this country.
More sensical to me is that Obama is hell bent on destroying this country as pay-back for England destroying his father’s country.
Jon said: “I stopped watching O’Reilly and Beck years ago realizing they were protecting Obama.”
How do you know so much about what is going on on Reilly’s show if you’re not watching it?
The problem with not watching Fox News is that then you have NO news source. Fox, for it’s problems, is the nearest thing to the truth that you have.
No, I’m not a true believer in all they do. I think Fox is completely attempting to dodge the Obama is not legit issue. I don’t know why. Maybe it’s the Saudi connection, maybe not.
All of them, Beck, Hannity, O’Reilly proclaim their belief in the Constitution, but want to ignore the part about Natural Born Citizen.
I get most of my news from the internet, but Fox is the only Tv source.
Beside these obvious problems, let’s see what the announcements say:
Where was the place of birth? DON’T KNOW!
What was the mother’s name? DON’T KNOW!
What was the birth name of the “son” ? DON’T KNOW!
Was the Mrs. Obama from Kenya or Hawaii? DON’T KNOW!
Why use an unknown address of the couple? DON’T KNOW!
Who placed the announcement? DON’T KNOW!
Was Mrs. Kenya Obama in Hawaii in 1961? DON’T KNOW!
I don’t see any information that says obama was born in Hawaii and who may have been the birth mother.
Just Thinking.
Obama was born GOVERNED as a Brit and can never be LEGIT!
O’Reilly is a liar having lead his audience to belive he had seen the Obama birth certificate and Obama was born in HI. When he recently said that he totally relied on the newspaper birth announcements he had no remaining credibility. I stopped watching O’Reilly and Beck years ago realizing they were protecting Obama.
“Oh what a tangled web we weave when first we practise to deceive”-Sir Walter Scott
Hello bdz,
Glad to see you spreading truth and enlightenment here at The Post & Email. Mrs. Rondeau and company have created a much needed, undistorted vital news conduit directly into the hearts and minds of concerned citizens all across America.
I know that the news you are providing us today comes at the cost of much personal sacrifice, so I hope the readers here pay close attention to your report, for it is based on painstakingly meticulous research and born of much labor picking through the almost certain baldfaced fraud perpetrated by Obama and/or his army of flying monkeys. Your original work is much more significant than the usual buzz of mere opinion here, albeit very welcome opinion that echos of patriotism and love of Constitution and America’s true core values.
No doubt, the jigsaw puzzle of lies that is Obama’s life story is missing many pieces and is only tediously reconstructed at the cost of many, many hours. No doubt, too, those hours bring a familiarity with a subject that may make it difficult to realize how confusing and convoluted that subject can be to the casual reader. For all these reasons, perhaps you might provide a short summary of the major findings of your research and any conclusions you have been able to draw from it.
My interpretation is that it seems increasingly likely that the birth announcements might be completely contemporaneous fabrications that have only recently been inserted into the microfilm records. I understand that you and Ladysforest have found that the two Hawaiian newspapers were only archived locally and in about a half a dozen other libraries around the country, so that it’s not unthinkable that Obama’s minions could have gotten to them all (hopefully some reader may eventually provide you with an original paper copy). It seems you have documented otherwise inexplicable anomalies on all these films that strongly point to this conclusion. Certainly Obama’s machine is arrogant, unscrupulous and lawless enough to believe they could get away with something like this.
Take care and thanks for what you do.
> Certainly Obama’s machine is arrogant, unscrupulous and lawless enough to believe they could get away with something like this.
First, I think the announcements’ authenticity issue stands and falls with the probability someone will unearth an original issue of one of the papers from April 8th, 1961.
Either the ad is in there or it isn’t. I don’t think anyone has the resources to destroy all such original issues, it’s just very unlikely someone has kept an issue from precisely that day for 50 years.
Second, however, I think the announcements are a red herring anyway. Even if they were in the papers in 1961, that doesn’t mean anything if the underlying data (the birth reported to the Hawaiian DoH) already was wrong or inconclusive (e.g. an alleged home birth to cover up a foreign birth etc.).
Surely it would blow a massive hole in the Obama/Soetoro story if we could prove the ad was never in the original issue to begin with. I just think it’ll be very difficult to do that.
What butterdezillion did was finding issues with people reporting on the microfilm copies, that however is “only” the smoke, but we’d need to find the fire.
Just like proving the Obama/Soetoro COLB to (very likely) be a forgery does not prove his foreign birth, just that there’s something to hide about the original, something which might be highly embarrassing (like being the son of Frank Marshall Davis and a prostitute) but not necessarily a legal disqualification from presidency.
“Just like proving the Obama/Soetoro COLB to (very likely) be a forgery does not prove his foreign birth, just that there’s something to hide about the original, something which might be highly embarrassing (like being the son of Frank Marshall Davis and a prostitute) but not necessarily a legal disqualification from presidency.”
Would not knowingly saying you are someone you are not legally disqualify Barry from being president?
These are really good. ‘the Manchurian Candidate’ comes to mind, again.
Don’t count on this O’Reilly guy to ever set the records straight because he’s always looking out for “himself.”
This appears to be a GREAT piece of detective work.
I’d like to know the answers to where the images did originate?
And exactly how the Advertiser and Star Bulletin obtain and print their
Birth Notices ACTUALLY!! Together from a single source?
Separately from a single Source? Separately from multiple sources?
GREAT work.
ELmo
I don’t See the Point. Butterdezillion Shows a copy of the original Mikrofilm
in her comparison that also contains the Obama announcement.
So we are still in the Dark As to whether and how the microfilm was forged.
Or Why soneone would post a forgery of an already forged document.
I was expecting more…
Never mind. I finally got it, and I hope that Butterdezillion sent it to Fox News, to Bill O’Reilly, and also give one to Glen Beck. He needs it to. They hold the birth announcements up as some kind of legal document, which it isn’t.
Why isn’t the absurity of accepting an newspaper “birth announcement” as proof that Obama was born in Hawaii and is a natural born Citizen so great that it doesn’t even matter if it’s real of not?
What kind of idiot would consider the newspaper articles enough to prove Constitutional eligibility?
O’Reilly??
For some reason, I can’t seem to get this to work: Attention Bill O’Reilly – The Rest of the Story
I would be interested in reading it.
Please check on it….thanks
——————-
Mrs. Rondeau replies: It worked for me just now. It could have been that many people were trying to pull up the article at the same time.
It will not matter. O’Reilly is an Obot and one of the “social elite club”. He is already talking Nobama will win re-election in 2012 because there’s no Republican that can win against the Obummer. His slogan of “The spin stops here cause we’re looking out for you” does not mean you and I. It means he’s got his elite buddies back.
Based upon failure of DNC/RNC to verify NBC eligibility of POTUS candidates in 2008 and prior presidential elections
Just as the federal civil rights act created DOJ “covered” pre-clearance jurisdictions in the 1960’s and recently reauthorized, the new NBC Eligibility Act will require pre-clearance of POTUS candidates in such problem states/jurisdictions as States of Hawaii, California, New York, Illinois, including counties with Chicago, New York City, Washington DC, etc.
See latest draft of Strunk’s recusal special writ being submitted to SCOTUS linked to 10-1170 Loeber v Spargo.
I’m terribly sorry for being so dense, and I am just getting over pneumonia which may be making my mind slow, so please be patient. Could you please summarize for me the conclusions that can be drawn from the findings in this research, and the specific findings that point to each conclusion? Just identify the “dots” and then connect the dots for one of your reader-dolts. THANK you.