The Ramifications of an Illegitimate President

WHAT WILL BE THE FALLOUT?

by David LaRocque

Is every member of the U.S. House and Senate guilty of treason for failing to expose Obama's fraud?

(Mar. 18, 2011) — The Hawaii Petition letter is a definitive and comprehensive statement of the constitutional concerns we all share with respect to the actions of the State of Hawaii and its officials in the matter of the apparently fraudulent 2008 U.S. presidential election.

Perhaps a similar letter should be directed to the President of the United States Senate and the Speaker of the United States House of Representatives, including a copy of this letter, laying out the specific constitutional concerns of the people relating to the federal government in this matter.  This would include the apparent corruption of the federal judiciary which has repeatedly denied to the people their vested legal right under the provisions of the United States Constitution to have a constitutionally-eligible individual serving in the office of president.

According to Chief Justice Marshall in Marbury v. Madison: “The government of the United States has been emphatically termed a government of laws, and not of men. It will certainly cease to deserve this high appellation if the laws furnish no remedy for the violation of a vested legal right.”

The people of this great nation have unarguably been denied a remedy in the laws to the denial of one of the most fundamental of our constitutionally-vested legal rights – the right to have legally-admissible verification that the person elected to serve in the office of president is, in fact, eligible to serve in that office under the terms of the United States Constitution.

Among the related subsidiary concerns raised by this matter at the federal level are the following:

1. An increasingly persuasive body of evidence has been accumulated indicating that the putative President of the United States has a history of membership in, and association with, entities known to be front organizations for the Communist Party of the USA, as well as long and frequent association with individuals known to be past or present members of radical terrorist organizations which are dedicated to the overthrow of the American constitutional republic form of government. Furthermore, a number of these individuals have been appointed by this putative president to high-level positions in the government of the United States; while certain passages in his autobiography Dreams from My Father, together with numerous public statements made by Mr. Obama, indicate clearly his strong affinity to a Marxist political philosophy which is incompatible with the American system of government.

2. The putative president of the United States has admitted to a history of the use of illegal drugs. Circumstantial evidence exists indicating that this drug use continued to a time much later than previously admitted.

3. Documented evidence of long-standing Social Security fraud by Barack Obama, involving the use of a false Social Security number, provides overwhelming indications of felonious illegal activities on the part of Barack Obama. These activities may, in the best case, represent attempts to cover up a lack of documentation of U.S. citizenship. In the worst case, they could represent the tip of an iceberg of massive and serious financial fraud, as well as participation in fraudulent political candidacies and fraudulent oaths in connection with service in the Senate of the State of Illinois as well as the United States Senate.

Any one of these concerns, if raised in connection with a background investigation for a standard security clearance for access to classified information, would be disqualifying. Taken in combination, it is inconceivable that a person with these issues in his background, and one who objects vigorously to any attempt to seek additional information or to gain access to original documentation about his origins and background, could be allowed to serve in the highest office in the United States government.

4. The status of military operations conducted without proper legal authority should be a matter of the most serious concern at the highest levels, and in all branches, of the United States Government.

5. The status of high level appointments, including appointments to the United States Supreme Court, by an ineligible president, are of the most serious and urgent concern.

6. The fact that a decorated U.S. military officer was denied his constitutional rights to a fair trial and subjected to a kangaroo court-martial in order to preserve the cover-up of the constitutional ineligibility of the putative president of the United States is an alarming testament to the apparent corruption which has infected the United States Armed Services, and represents an outrageous affront to every person who has ever served in the uniform of a U.S. military service. This cannot stand.

The national security issues raised by these concerns are monumental and of the most urgent character.

Further delay, or continued failure, by the United States Congress to address this matter constitutes nothing less than the crime of treason by the entire United States Congress.

7 Responses to "The Ramifications of an Illegitimate President"

  1. suzanne armstrong   Wednesday, April 13, 2011 at 1:34 PM

    I hope there is another cure besides impeachment. Look how long it took to impeach Clinton. In that amount of time Obama could cause even greater destruction to our country.

    He’s needs to be arrested. One way to find out if Obama is Osama Bin Ladin would be through a blood test. Sample of Obamas blood and sample of one of Osama Bin Ladin’s children blood would show DNA similarities.

  2. Carlyle   Monday, March 21, 2011 at 9:08 PM

    Thank you so much. I am so frustrated lately that it is all too easy to be cranky.

    If you can find the original comment, I would really like to see what people think. Rather than putting it “out there” as a finished and definitive “piece”, perhaps it could be posted as a “what do you think of this” kind of OpEd and see if your intelligent readers can add and subtract so as to make a polished gem.

    I really think that until we tackle THE REASON nobody will touch this issue, we will not get it resolved. It seems to be far bigger and far deeper than “simple corruption”, or “typical conspiracy”.
    ——————
    Mrs. Rondeau replies: I will look to see if the original exists anywhere, and our webmaster will be finished with his work in about two days.

  3. Carlyle   Sunday, March 20, 2011 at 1:21 PM

    I posted an important comment on this editorial when it was fresh. Perhaps I could have worded it better, but I am not an OBOT.

    The thrust of my comment was that while there are indeed Ramifications of an illegal president BEING in office, there are also severe Ramifications for REMOVING him and declaring him as having been illegal.

    I believe these ramifications totally petrify the Powers That Be (PTBs) and is the leading reason they will not deal with this issue.

    I posted my comment because WE – all of us – need to discuss this. We need to put our expertise together and see if we can help explain to the PTBs a scenario that does not have such frightening downstream implications. Or, failing to do that, we need to (like with Al Capone) refocus our energies to get The Won impeached for other reasons.

    Rather than being an OBOT comment, this is probably one of the most critical issues we need to face and address. I believe it is bad enough and deep enough that our collective insight and wisdom is necessary. Therefore, trashing my comment only hurts our cause. Instead, maybe you could feature it in some way and ask for the community’s help in working through this.

    It is THAT important.

    (you also have my email address, so you could respond and ask clarifications, etc. – but please don’t just summarily dismiss this again)
    ———————-
    Mrs. Rondeau replies: We are having trouble with the Comments function, and not all comments are coming through properly. Nothing was “summarily dismissed.” Our webmaster is checking into this now. Please don’t jump to conclusions!

  4. Bob1939   Friday, March 18, 2011 at 12:10 PM

    Time for the People to abolish that which is taking America down; and we must do it NOW. To wait any longer would be exceptionally foolish.

  5. Harry H   Friday, March 18, 2011 at 9:57 AM

    Sad to say, David LaRocque is absolutely correct. Our entire government is a criminal enterprise. What a pathetic bunch of moral cowards we have ruling over us.

  6. RacerJim   Friday, March 18, 2011 at 9:07 AM

    “Any one of these concerns, if raised in connection with a background investigation for a standard security clearance for access to classified information, would be disqualifying. Taken in combination, it is inconceivable that a person with these issues in his background, and one who objects vigorously to any attempt to seek additional information or to gain access to original documentation about his origins and background, could be allowed to serve in the highest office in the United States government.”

    Add to that the fact that during his campaign he repeatedly LIED about the true extent of his past and current associations with many of the most radical Communists, Marxists, Socialists and Black Ideologists in America. The plain and simple fact of the matter is that there’s no way in hell Obama/Soetoro should be anywhere near the Oval Office but, rather, kept as far away from same as possible.

  7. Larry M. Meyer   Friday, March 18, 2011 at 8:11 AM

    In a word, YES, 535 “Representatives??” of the Citizens of this Nation ARE GUILTY of Treason!! Their excuse being that the ALL swear Diligence to the “Corporate Constitution” and NOT the “Organic Constitution”,~WHAT?? SCOTUS, in three separate Dockets DENIES their Swearing and Affirming to the “Constitution!?” The Congress reads into the Congressional Record, a REDACTED Version, the “Birther Issue” is a NON-Starter, O’Bama was born in HI.??
    ALL of Government is GUILTY of Violation of their Fiduciary Responsibilities to “The Public Trust” and the “Constitutional Oath as it was presented to the Citizens by the “Founding Fathers”.
    America is “The Land of Laws”, but without “LAW” there is NO SCOTUS, Federal Judiciary, Military, or Law Enforcement that “Preserves, Protects and Defends the Constitution from ALL Enemies both Foreign and Domestic”~SOoo, Without Law, is the Nation a: TOTALITARIAN STATE, a DICTATORSHIP, an OLIGARCHY, a COMMUNIST GULAG~OR???

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.