Spread the love

OBAMA MUST BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY

by Victor Smith

Does this document mean anything to those who are sworn to uphold it?

(Dec. 19, 2010) — The Constitution theme is universal for all political parties, liberals, conservatives, moderates, and all religious groups.

As Members of Congress, you are sworn by oath to defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, sworn without ANY mental reservation or purpose of EVASION. The incontrovertible act of failure to comply with ONE basic requirement of that Constitution by all branches so created, Legislative, Executive, and Judicial, destroys the whole document.

Violation of the Constitution, Article II, Section 1, must cease.

The current resident of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue boasts his father is Kenyan and he was a British citizen at birth. You need go no further to determine he is not born of U.S. Citizens (definition of natural born Citizen as he acknowledged in early 2008 while a Senator considering qualifications of another candidate). He cannot ever be constitutionally qualified for the office of President.

The DNC Chairwoman confirmed this in 2008 by certifying candidates to various states and omitting a declaration of Constitutional qualification to all states except Hawaii, which requires “constitutionally-qualified” wording.

The Judicial Branch is unwilling to defend the Constitution against domestic enemies.

Under the Constitution, Article I, Section 8, Congress is charged with providing for the common defence. Since Article II, Section 1 directly bars the installation as President of a person who has ever owed allegiance to another nation, it is the duty of Congress to insure that only a natural born Citizen be installed as President.  Article II, Section 4 REQUIRES removal of Obama for high crimes and misdemeanors, which crimes reasonably include usurpation of office without qualifying in accordance with the Constitution.

Impeachment will not work because that initially accepts the accused is qualified to hold office, ignoring the fact that he is not.

From Your Constituent:

Date:

Join the Conversation

22 Comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. Exactly, jtx. None of this will change unless Americans realize that the ONLY reason for voting to keep an incumbent in office is that he faithfully executed his oath of office – according to each voter’s judgment. No supreme court, no legislature, no cop, no cop with a baton can tell anyone how to vote.

    As to Obama and his birth status, it has never been in doubt that a child born to two US citizens on US soil is natural born – but there is, so far, nothing in law that says this is the *only* way to be a natural born citizen. So, at best, people who promote this argument are doing exactly that – they assert an a-r-g-u-m-e-n-t, and nothing more. The law on that issue just isn’t settled enough. It is settled law, however, that Obama does not qualify if he really was not born in Hawaii or any other state of the union. Once that is recognized, it all becomes an issue of challenging alleged evidence of his US birth or of presenting evidence of his foreign birth to either a court or to Congress for proper vetting under the federal standards of evidence and the federal rules of civil procedure, with discovery and all the bells and whistles. The battle, therefore, is to find a proper plaintiff with standing who can properly present that point of law to a competent court – or to literally assail our congresswieners with letters, faxes, emails phone calls, and picket lines until they give in. It also takes a well thought-out advertising campaign that goes beyond the “where’s the BC?” billboards. They are a good start – but not enough. The most important thing is *funding*, so all of us need to put our money where our mouth is and focus on nothing else. As another poster stated: everything Obama ever did will be null and void if he is removed for ineligibility. That must be every patriot’s goal. We must “Unbama” this government.

    1. Alex makes some very valid points, but is mistaken that “the law on that issue just isn’t settled enough.” It has been settled international law for hundreds of years,pertaining to ALL NATIONS. It originated in British Common Law relating to the bloodlines necessary to perpetuate the Crown, etc., and was further codified by the Swiss philosopher, legal scholar, international diplomat of the time, Emerich de Vattel in his book “The Law of Nations,” which is also referred to in our Constitution by the Founding Fathers. In ~212, Vattel states that “…the native or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights. …That, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country.”
      So it really doesn’t matter if he was born in Hawaii or Timbuktu. His father was and always was a Kenyan, which at the time of Jr.’s birth was a British colony and by bloodline clearly established by international law, a British subject. And yes, we must “unbama” this government. It’s been argued this would precipitate a constitutional crisis.

    2. I would like to add that an argument deserves an ending! Particularly when the argument is about Constitutional Law in America! In this case the argument is about Article 2 Section 1 and it’s Supreme Law of the Land term ….NATURAL BORN CITIZEN! OK there is an argument…so be it. One group says one thing while the other group says something else! Until that argument is settled there should be no action one way or the other! What we have here with Obama is democrats and republicans blatantly and intentionally exercising mass and gross contempt and ignorance to Article 2 Section 1 by just simply ignoring the term Natural Born Citizen and pretending that it doesn’t apply to Obama. This matter should have been brought before the people for civil discourse back in 2007 but wasn’t! Then was the time to end this argument! That didn’t happen either. The democrats and republicans just proceeded on to allow a disputed candidate to run for the office of president and unfortunately win! It’s a funny thing though, they did question the eligibility of McCain! I can’t help but think now that that was a dog and pony show for our benefit to throw Constitutionally concerned citizens like us off the trail of the true and Constitutional dispute which is Obama’s father! Either way, when they (the democrats and republicans) moved forward with this (at he very least) disputed course of action they demonstrated a very obvious act of contempt to the United States Constitution and a very obvious act of contempt to the American People! If the American People allow this act of contempt to be gotten away with then as I said before…The U.S. Constitution is dead and America as we know it has died!

      1. Bravo! Very well said and I agree completely. This issue must be resolved one way or another — and not just for Obama, but for our Constitutional integrity. McCain’s eligibility was challenged when he ran in 2000 also; why wasn’t natural born citizenship status discussed, debated and defined then? Or when Goldwater’s eligibility was challenged?

        And you’re right about their contempt for all of us, the Constitution and the rule of law. They are practically flaunting it now, ramming thru so much legislation after we fired them!!!

  2. Well, perhaps not all Congreemen and women know about the NBC issue, how about sending packets of info to the newly elected who take office in January. The political climate is better, now that they know Obama is more vulnerable…, but I agree with the publicity campaign…let-s push to educate the nation, before the know-nothings ruin us completely

  3. I have contended for a long time that there is really no difference between Republican and Democrat. And actually both parties no longer stand for what they did when they were created. The response, or lack there of, we are receiving from the representatives (they certainly don’t represent us) proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that there is no difference between parties.

    With the passing of DADT I believe that the military personnel are getting exactly what they deserve. If every military member that believes there is a question about his eligibility were to demand proof, this issue would be resolved.

  4. It now appears we may already be a military dictatorship, the U.S.Constitution is temporarily null and void, potus is a covertly inserted illegitimate usurper, scotus is blatantly corrupt and in the tank bought and paid for, the mainstream propaganda are all a slimy pack of self-serving prostitutes (including faux) bought and paid for, we may be in a bigger **** storm than anyone could have imagined…Thank God we’re AMERICANS!!!
    Hopefully, we can force the eligibility issue when the new sheriff comes to town in Jan., otherwise, it’s time for an Orange Revolution!!!

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orange_Revolution

  5. I am becoming convinced that the problem cannot be solved by trying to break down the wall (direct contact to the Courts, Legislature etc.,) rather it may have to be by an end-around action. That is by a publicity campaign directly aimed at the population in general-radio ads simply stating the facts ie; Constitution requires natural born….natural born defined by the Senate in SR511 as born to American citizens…. Obama admits to a dual citizenship and Kenyan father….Our government is illegitimate in the eyes of the world with significant potential consequences may result with each day it persists…..The people must act to reclaim and demand a legitimate government…Our fighting men and women who risk their lives daily deserve no less.. Now!

  6. Every “Representative??” and Government Official is completely aware that they are in “Contempt of the Constitution” but it Matters, NOT, because our CORRUPT SCOTUS, on 11/29/10 EFFECTIVELY made that “Legislative Instrument NULL and VOID!!-(Kescher vs O’Bama/Congress!!)- The Military “Chain of Command” is GUTLESS, WORTHLESS and Corrupt, i.e. “GAYS in the Military?? Everybody is aware of the Sections of the Constitution that Applys~~NO, Guts, NO Courage, NO LAW!!!
    It is time to “STORM the BASTILLE!!!

  7. There is not one person with the power who will bring the attention and action this issue deserves because they will not put their careers in peril. People in power will do whatever it takes to keep their power. They would turn their backs on their own family if that is what it takes to keep their power. They are all evil and corrupt. PERIOD!

  8. it is going to take relentless pressure on issa and the republicans to get them to remove obama and more than likely a massive assault on washington because the republicans are also complicit in this treason and fraud which was perpetrated on us citizens. they do not want to be exposed as part of the crimes.

  9. Thinkwell, I agree totally in principle, but not in practice. We’ve all written our congress critters, and called their offices, and otherwise demanded they act. They refuse. Every one knows exactly what Obama is, and every one has refused again and again to do anything about it. We keep beating our heads against the wall, and they keep laughing at us all the way to the bank.

    What am I missing? This is an excellent letter, presents the facts and the principles very well, etc. But it’s all old news. Why do you think any of them will pay any attention now?

    1. Mia:

      They won’t – certainly not!! They are, after all, the Oligarchs and to alter things such as that would be dimish their power and privelege (not to mention their $$$).

      Let’s remember that each and every CongressCat recently got a package contrining a copy of Obama’s Kenyan BC along with a statement sworn under penalty of perjury and supporting documentation about the origin of the material. Even if a pol does not ascribe to the validity of the Kenyan BC it should certainly have formed the basis for Congregational “hearings” into the matter.

      Let’s face it, all of these Oligarchs swore an Oath to uphold and defend the Constitution yet are clearly not doing so – no more so than the functionaries in the MSM (including Fox). Inastead, they are doing what years ago Chief Justice John Marshall described as “Treason to the Constfitution”.

      Shouldn’t everyone wonder why that might be so??? Clearly it is because we no longer have a Constitutional Republic!!

      1. “…Clearly it is because we no longer have a Constitutional Republic!!…”

        I’m so sorry to disagree, Jtx, and maybe it’s just semantics, but if we no longer have a Constitutional Republic than we’re fighting for nothing… I’d rather think that we do have a Constitutional Republic, and we’re acting according — THEY are not. That’s on them, not our Constitutional Republic, and that’s why THEY need to go (some to prison!).

  10. When applying for a passport, if you or I were to submit as proof of birth and citizenship, a link to an unverifiable digital image of something resembling a short form COLB uploaded to a paid lackey’s website, we would be laughed out of the building and probably be put on the short list for investigation of immigration fraud.

    If Obama were a bigamist instead of a usurper, upon discovery of his preexisting wedded allegiance, his subsequent fraudulent marriage would immediately become null and void and all children issued forth be immediately declared as illegitimate. When Obama’s preexisting foreign allegiances are finally “officially” discovered and he is recognized for the political “bigamist” usurper that he is, all his acts, appointments and decrees issued forth should immediately be declared illegitimate as well. All his fraud and all its issuance should become null and void on the spot.

    When the Founders added the modifier “natural” to the phrase “born Citizen”, they did so for a reason. Words mean things.

    Clearly being merely born a Citizen is not enough to qualify one to become Commander-in-Chief. In their contemporaneous writings, the Founders spelled out quite well what their reason was: that they wanted to ensure against foreign influence within the Presidency. Even without refeing to Vattel, they told us why the extra qualifier “natural” was added to the eligibility language, i.e., to further limit the pool of Citizens who might become President in order to protect the nation and the interests of We the People.

    Just being born a Citizen was simply not enough – one had to be a true “natural born Citizen,” that is., born completely free of foreign allegiance by virtue of being born to parents who themselves were U.S. Citizens.

    Mr. Smith’s well crafted letter is short enough not to tax the typical politician’s attention span, yet hits the most essential points. I like it and plan to put it to use. Everyone should.

  11. Maybe they’d get the message if we all took a tax holiday… even just for a week… we all change our payroll tax withholdings to something like, oh, say 215 dependents? (As in Article 2, Section 1, Paragraph 5. That should be enough to make sure no payroll taxes are withheld from our paychecks…)

    And if enough people did it, how could they not get the message?

  12. I concur fully with the statement, “Impeachment will not work because that initially accepts the accused is qualified to hold office, ignoring the fact that he is not.”

    Our Congressional representatives need to have their mailboxes filled with this letter, or one very much like it.