IF TERRY LAKIN IS DENIED JUSTICE, WHAT ABOUT ALL OF YOU?
by Natural Born Citizen
(Nov. 27, 2010) — When you take office as a public servant you swear an oath before God and man. This oath you take is a sacred trust. It is your word and your honor spoken in public for all to bear witness. Your adherence to your oath is the measure of your integrity.
Your solemn oath of office is to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States of America against all enemies foreign and domestic. God has surely taken note of your oath and will judge you according to the integrity of your soul.
As a natural born citizen of this great nation that I love, I request that you honor your word by protecting and defending Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution you swore before God that you would defend. The aforementioned article has come under attack from within. And as a result, the freedoms to which your oath applied are all at risk of disappearing, including the very Constitution you swore to protect.
Millions of brave Americans gave their lives for the freedoms that our Constitutional rule of law has provided and has sustained us through the years as the greatest nation the world has ever seen. They also swore the same oath and their honor and integrity are intact without question. Let not their sacrifices be for naught.
Our brave men and women of the Armed Forces today go into harm’s way without the assurance that the orders coming down the unified chain of command are legal and lawful because there are lingering questions as to the eligibility of the Commander In Chief to issue them. One brave soldier, Lt. Col. Terry Lakin, has tried to get an answer through normal military channels without success. He finally made the distasteful choice to invite his own court martial in order to get an answer to the question to finally put an end to the doubts and concerns of his fellow soldiers in arms. In this action he is doing exactly as he was trained to do.
Lt. Col. Terry Lakin is an 18-year, highly-decorated Bronze Star recipient who served tours in Bosnia and Afghanistan. He has the support of three Generals, Army Major General (Ret) Jerry Curry, U.S. Army Major General (Ret) Paul E. Valalley and Air Force Lieutenant Gen.. (Ret) Thomas McInerney. Gen. McInerney has submitted to the court an affidavit of support for discovery and a full hearing. In spite of the plea from Three-Star Lt. Gen. McInerney, Lakin is being denied due process by Judge Lind who has ruled that Lakin cannot defend himself in any way whatsoever because she will not “embarrass the President” to show his vital records, and prove his eligibility under Article II, Section 1. As a result of that ruling Lt. Col. Terry Lakin faces years at hard labor because he might expose high treason against the people of the United States of America and the Constitution you swore to protect and defend.
If ever there was a time for you to honor your oath with appropriate action, it is now. And there is an easy answer for your personal concerns about your oath and your integrity. If Obama is truly eligible to hold office and can prove it, your honor and integrity are intact, because you have done your duty to your word and your honor while performing a service to end the lingering doubts as to the lawfulness of orders coming down the unified chain of command. If, on the other hand, Obama cannot produce proof of eligibility, then you have exposed and rescued the nation from acts of high treason, and your honor and your integrity will be intact. Either way you come out of it a hero and with your integrity intact. I ask you to be reminded of the courage and bravery of the millions who died to protect and defend our Constitution, and in that, find within yourself the courage to act with the same bravery and conviction of those who paved the way for the very freedoms you enjoy today.
Remember, if due process can be denied Lt. Col Terry Lakin, it can be denied you also.
Sincerely,
A Natural Born Citizen of the United States of America
Great letter! I hope it does some good, though I suspect they all know Obama is ineligible and have somehow been warned or threatened (in the good ole Chicago thug way) not to discuss or acknowledge it. The Canada Free Press put out an article (called Media Blackout) that Obama met with SCOTUS either shortly before or shortly after he took office and the subject of that meeting isn’t known. Obama (& others like Murdock) also met with the press around the same time and those in the room were warned not to bring up the subject of the birth certificate (one talk show host, unnamed in the article for his/her protection, was threatened at the time). Would love to have been a fly on the wall in both of those meetings. They must have been doozies to keep so many people silent on the subject.
Sharon, could we possibly set up a section on your website for a running list of people to contact? If you need help compiling the list of names and numbers, I would be happy to help. People could refer to it and use it as a point of reference as word continues to spread about this case. Just a thought!
—————-
Mrs. Rondeau replies: Yes, good idea. I’ll work on that tomorrow. Most of the recent Monroe County articles have links to the various people to be contacted, but yes, it’s nice to have them all in one place.
How should those who have failed to fulfill their oaths to uphold the U.S. Constitution be punished? Shouldn’t the question be….Why did WE THE PEOPLE allow them to betray us for so long?
Get ALL the legal facts on Obama’s Ineligibility — read the new book: “Obama – Ineligible to Serve – Lies, Crimes and Deadly Ambition”. (at Amazon). It proves why Obama is ineligible under the U.S. Constitution to be POTUS.
Excellent letter. Thank you
Obama lovers don’t care who Obama’s father is just as long as Obama’s mother was a natural born citizen. Lt. Lakin should be the commander in chief.Think about this,a community organizer is in charge of our military. God help us.
> Lt. Lakin should be the commander in chief.
A member of the military who disobeyed orders from his immediate superior in a time of war? Who disobeyed direct deployments orders from his superior?
You wouldn’t want someone like that in charge of the armed forces.
I agree the Lakin case was a useful attempt to expose the Obama fraud (and for that he is to be commended), but from the perspective of the military, it was dishonorable. We cannot allow our forces to stop obeying orders and questioning the chain of command in times of war.
What if, hypothetically, China attacks us tomorrow? Do you want our soldiers to defend our lives or to lay down their guns and say “I ain’t gonna do nuttin’ until the usurper is removed”? Get a clue, will you?
Get a clue?Are you kidding me ?Do you think Obama is qualified for that position? In the military you take an oath to defend the Constitution, not the president. It is your duty to refuse an illegal order. Obama is an illegal leader. You are a typical Obot.
stand up and fight, you are so correct. one of the first things we are taught in the service is the Duty to disobey unlawful, unconstitutional orders. In this case not only is the order unlawful simply because the one giving the orders is holding office unconstitutionally. There comes a time in everyone life when standing on truth and principle far outweighs the fears of prison life. I have been targeted for standing up and speaking so loudly about the eligibility issues of our current president. I would have done the same thing if it were Clinton, Bush, Abraham Lincoln for that matter.
Americans today are far to concerned about beer and football on their weekends off from work. I have placed my entire future on standing against the unlawful actions of those trying to silence Americans who insist that Those who hold office, take the oath of affirmation and betray it are held accountable. I started my campaign a few years ago to expose the corruption of our elected representatives. Now I am fighting a battle for my freedom as well. I was targeted, setup, enticed, and entrapped by the FBI. My crime? Speaking out against the political corruption and the cheats who are stealing our Nation right out from under our noses because to many are sleeping a the wheel,. refuse to get involved, to afraid their reputation maybe affected, may be put on a list, or what ever else they are afraid of.
This nation has lost it’s way and far to many people have lost sight of how important it is to stand and say “Give me liberty, or Give me Death” I choose freedom of my conscience over freedom to watch a ball game on the weekend. Because I am not afraid to speak up and be heard I am now facing prison time because of a corrupt legal, political system bend on the destruction of this nation and our freedoms. Soros and the rest of the anti-American gangsters have seized control by lies, fraud, deception, cheating, and other corrupt methods to steal our futures and the futures of our posterity. Unless the sleeping masses wake-up soon, this is the end of our Republic.
Well, SCOTUS will issue their conference on Kerchner v O’Bama/Congress @ 10:00A.M. Monday, 11/29. Any bets that the will issue the well-worn “Refusal to consider, because “The People have NO Standing” Opinion??!! Then in the near future they will “Conference” as to the VALIDITY??!! of the “Constitution of the United States of America!”
How Dare they consider themselves Worthy of receiving the “Rights and Privileges” to offer a Ruling on the most Powerful Legislative Document in the History of the World, and the “Law of the Land” for 234 years!!
DISGUSTING!!
Larry, I have heard that it might be as late as Wednesday when they publish their decision to hear the Writ or not. If they don’t refer it to the NJ Federal Court or, hear it themselves, then they have, in essence, declared the Constitution “NULL & VOID”. There won’t be a need to “Conference” about the validity of our founding document and law.
However, should they not hear the case, what they have done is invalidated the three areas of government, including SCOTUS and, thus, have declared themselves to be a “Rogue Element” and in fact their existence will not have any basis in Law or in fact. We will, as of that moment, be in a totalitarian state.
Aye, Aye, Sir: I am watching this from on high on the mainmast!! I fear that SCOTUS will Refuse any or all of the Cases listed in the Lakin article and indeed, declare the Constitution Irrelevant after considering the “VALIDITY??” of “The Law of the Land”!
I fear for the Safety of the Nation and her Citizens if these Corrupt entities rule in this manner!!
May GOD Protect U.S. All!!
> Then in the near future they will “Conference” as to the VALIDITY??!! of the “Constitution of the United States of America!”
Where did you read that? I’d like to research that in more depth.
Regrettably, I, through inattention to my files have deleted this information and cannot recall where it was posted, for that I am sorry! I will attempt to contact a friend to whom I forwarded the Post, and provide an address. I was very disturbed when I read the article, it seems possible if was on Daily Caller?
Has this letter been sent to each member of congress? Can we fax a copy to them as well so that they know how many are aware of this and want action?
—————–
Mrs. Rondeau replies: Anything from this site is available to the public to print and distribute in any manner you wish. I would strongly encourage every reader to print it and fax it to every member of Congress. Use the printer-friendly icon at the top right of the article. The exception is someone reposting our material without permission or attribution.
Sharon, As I have communicated before to you, I have sent many email, faxes and made many phone calls to Senators Chambliss and Isakson, along with Rep. Broun regarding this sublect and a number of others. I have talked with their staff members and received the same non-responses – “We have seen his birth certificate.” Charlie Harmon, Sen. Chambliss chief of staff hung up on me last time I tried to raise the subject. I hand delivered the same letter three (3) times to Rep. Broun’s office and discussed the Lakin situation in detail with thye staff. No response has ever been received. I will print this letter and see that my representative receive a copy of it. It might be helpful if everyone who reads the letter send a copy to Chambliss Isaksson and Broun. That might get their attention.
At Brouns’ office I explained to their staff to relay to Broun that the American People (“We the People) will consider his inaction to be one of a violation of his oath and is tantamount to Treason. I also explained that what I have observed on the net is a growing preponderance that, if things don’t change, there will be an open revolution and that all members of the administration , congress and the judiciary will be found guilty of treason.
I cannot fathom why these people refuse to recognize the “elephant-in-room”. Tom the Vetran and Kevin are right on. So far I have found that these people have no honor and think they are our betters and that we should be in awe of their superiority.
Next week may see a very historic event depending on what SCOTUS decides to do.
A thief was caught on the security tape. The tape can’t be shown in court because it would “embarrass” the thief. Would this happen? NO! The laws are only inforced on the citizens that are not part of the ruling class.
This is BS and has to stop.
Sharon: I have read that Obama forced private divorce papers released to the public back in his Senate race in Chicago, to get rid of his competitor through aggressive humiliation. His argument to the court was “the public’s need to know exceeded the defense’s right to conceal.”
That seems to be the perfect argument now for Lakin. What Obama forced onto his competitor, embarrassing him publicly, and not showing respect for that perons’s private divorce papers, is really the same situation now.
The Public’s need to know his private birth papers exceeds his right to conceal.
If he is not man enough to handle embarrassment, why did he put himself into this embarrassing situation? He has only himself to blame. Embarrassment is not a very strong legal defense for criminal concealment.
It is an Alinsky tactic to use the idealism of the adversary against him…Obama appeals to the decency and fair-mindedness of others, using their decency against them, to make them feel guilty, so that he can overpower them by their own guilt, and he can continue to be indecent and criminal.
Pidgeon could have fun with that! Case closed.
ch: The Chicago Tribune finally admitted that it was Axelrod and the Obama campaign that brought pressure on the itself and WLS-Channel 7 TV to file suit demanding the unsealing of M. Blair Hull divorce records, which had had their contents leaked to media outlets by the Obama campaign even earlier. The Obama campaign also helped orchestrate a demonstration by women’s groups demanding Hull’s withdrawal from the race. Coincidentally, this was the same weekend Obama’s first commercials hit the airwaves. Interestingly (or maybe not), the same exact thing happened to another of his rivals–Jack Ryan.
It has long past time to appeal to these peoples honor and itegrity,(judges, congress-
men, senators, and all). They have already proven they have none.
It is time to speak to them with the same contempt they are showing to the true American Citizens.
Only the ignorant,liars, and cowards will refer to obama as president.
First we elected corrupt politicians. Now we have corrupt judges. These are profound steps in the fall of the nation. Our days are numbered before we are in chains.