Spread the love

IS THE “FIX” ALREADY IN FOR LT. COL. LAKIN?  IF SO, WHAT DO WE DO?

by James H. Roberson

The position of Judge Advocate General is appointed and provided for by Title 10 of the U.S. Code

(Sept. 23, 2010) — Folks, we may be getting close to Civil War II.

Lt. Col. Lakin (M.D.- Active Army) – first asked the Army to affirm that Obama was constitutionally eligible to serve as President, and when his chain of command refused, he then refused to deploy to Afghanistan until “eligibility” was established (to force the issue to a head).   Lakin’s argument is simple and direct:  a soldier must not be compelled to obey an “unlawful order”; an “ineligible person” cannot serve as President and Commander-in-Chief and, thus, cannot issue “lawful orders.”  He has thereby laid his liberty and whole career on the line  in order to honor his Oath to Support and Defend the Constitution (especially Article II, Section 1, Clause 5), which must not be violated!

In preparation for his court martial, scheduled for October, his defense counsel asked the Judge Advocate General (JAG) court to authorize “discovery” of Obama’s birth records in order to prove Lakin’s innocence. Col. Lind, Presiding JAG Judge, has recently ruled that LTC Lakin can’t depose (question under oath) the Hawaiian Custodian of Birth Records, nor view any of their documents.  The judge claimed that birth records might contain “embarrassing information” about the putative President.  The judge further ruled that it is “irrelevant” for the military to prove that Obama is constitutionally eligible to serve as Commander-in-Chief.  She said that LTC Lakin’s deployment orders came from the Pentagon and, “on its face,” that’s all he needs to know.  In other words, along with her Commanding General, Col. Lind has just decided that the chain of command originates at the Pentagon, and the President is NOT an integral part of  it. Both Lind and her commanding general have now violated the Constitution’s clear specification that the “President is the Commander-in-Chief.

Col. Lind is either a disgrace to the uniform, or a coward who has just covertly handed LTC Lakin’s defense team a “home-run” issue to be decided by the U.S. Supreme Court!  A lengthy but very insightful interview with a legal military justice expert explains the background and history of the Uniform Code of Military Justice and WHY we must never give Obama an opportunity to declare “martial law,” which is brutal and NOT civilized, constitutional law as we normally comprehend it.

So far, three generals, all retired, have offered support for Lt. Col. Lakin.  Retired Air Force Lieutenant General Thomas McInerney, the highest-ranking officer yet to lend public support, has supplied an affidavit “in support of defense request for discovery/motion to compel.”  The affidavit acknowledges widespread concerns over the putative President’s constitutional eligibility and demands that he release his birth records or the court authorize discovery.  Lakin faces trial on October 13-15.

Extracts from the affidavit include:

The President of the United States, as the Commander in Chief, is the source of all military authority. The Constitution requires the President to be a natural born citizen  in order to be eligible to hold office. If he is ineligible under the Constitution to serve in that office that creates a break in the chain of command of such magnitude that its significance can scarcely be imagined.

As a practical example from my background I recall commanding forces that were equipped with nuclear weapons. In my command capacity I was  responsible that the personnel with access to these weapons had an unwavering and absolute confidence in the unified chain of command, because such confidence was absolutely essential — vital– in the event the use of  those weapons was authorized. I cannot overstate how imperative it is to  train such personnel to have confidence in the unified chain of command.  Today, because of the widespread and legitimate concerns that the presumed President is constitutionally ineligible to hold office, I fear what would happen should such a crisis occur today.

In refusing to obey orders because of his doubts as to their legality, LTC Lakin has acted exactly as proper training dictates. That training mandates that he determine in his own conscience that an order is legal  before obeying it…

For the foregoing reasons, it is my opinion that LTC Lakin’s request for discovery relating to the President’s birth records in Hawaii is absolutely essential to determining not merely his guilt or innocence but to reassuring all military personnel once and for all for this President > whether his service as Commander in Chief is Constitutionally proper. He is the one single person in the Chain of Command that the Constitution  demands proof of natural born citizenship. This determination is fundamental to our Republic, where civilian control over the military is the rule. According to our Constitution, the Commander in Chief must now,  in the face of serious– and widely held– concerns that he is ineligible, either voluntarily establish his eligibility by authorizing release of his  birth records or this court must authorize their discovery. The invasion of his privacy in these records is utterly trivial compared to the issues at stake here. Our military MUST have confidence their Commander in Chief  lawfully holds this office and absent which confidence grievous consequences may ensue.

The second general, Maj. Gen. Paul E. Vallely (Ret.) was less subtle when he said:  “We need to demand resignations of Obama, his cabinet, and members of Congress.”  He also stated that Obama is both “incompetent” and “ineligible.”  Further,  “The fix is in” and “The damages have been so great that we can’t afford to wait until the 2012 elections.”

The third General, Army Major General (Ret.) Jerry Curry, a decorated combat veteran, has issued a statement indicating that he agrees with Lakin that the (putative) President should provide proof of eligibility. Curry served as Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for the Carter administration, as Press Secretary to the Secretary of Defense for the Reagan administration, and has worked in international relations, public affairs, management, aviation, and research and  development.

Folks, I’m terribly concerned about the future of our Republic.  It is disgraceful that nearly every member of Congress knows Obama  is ineligible.   What are they afraid of?  Are they are all afraid to act for fear that this will cause more racial uprisings — with big cities looting and burning  — as happened before, following the Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and Rodney King events?  Or is there some other powerful force keeping them — and major media — silent about this matter?  When people like Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh, Bill O’Reilly, Neal Boortz, and Sean Hannity are all afraid to discuss the matter, there is cause for real alarm.  Even the U.S. Supreme Court is afraid to address the issue.  Justice Clarence Thomas, testifying before Congress, stated, “We (the Supreme Court) are “evading that issue.”  At the 1:00 min. mark of this 1:17 min video, Justice Thomas “spills the beans” — and then tries to act as if it were a joke.

Attorney General Eric Holder (a demonstrated racist) was talking about  our fears of honestly discussing racial issues when he asserted, “We are a nation of cowards!”   He was indeed correct.   Nevertheless, as a Citizen, you do need to understand this important issue of  “eligibility” if you don’t already.  Every patriotic citizen has a positive duty to understand the limitations imposed on our governments by the Constitution so that our liberties can be protected.

A five-minute video clearly explains why Obama is ineligible under the U.S. Constitution to be President (Article II, Section 1, Clause 5).  Please view it.  You will then understand why he is a bold Usurper.

Some Closing Thoughts

Knowledge will forever govern ignorance, and a people who mean to be  their own governors must first arm themselves with the power that knowledge imparts. — James Madison ( “father of the U.S. Constitution”)

Hold on to the Constitution…and the Republic for which it stands — what has happened once in 6,000 years may never happen again.  Hold on to your Constitution. — Daniel Webster

We must not let an audacious, clever, glib Marxist subvert it, nor diminish it.  “Native born” (born in the land), is NOT the same as “natural born” (both parents must be U.S. citizens at the time of birth).  Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 makes clear that the Founders recognized that there were various categories of “Citizens.”  They decided that only  “natural born” met the strict criterion of  undivided allegiance needed for the President.

“Remember in November.” We must settle this with ballots; otherwise, bullets may be the ultimate solution.

Please, pray for our Republic.

Subscribe
Notify of

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

63 Comments
Newest
Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
johnny says
Monday, September 27, 2010 11:19 AM

to bob 1943— that is exactly what i keep saying. the senate will not remove obama from office but gen.vallely floyd brown and many others keep beating the drums for impeachment. that will allow obama to stay in and get elected again.

endowedbythecreators
Reply to  johnny says
Monday, September 27, 2010 8:39 PM

Obama will not even run in 2012, let alone be reelected. For one thing,, his White House is a mess with people jumping off like it’s a sinking ship.

Second, word is getting out about BO’s lack of ability and will to do the job. (Those vacations all the time? He avoids work by getting out of town.) The only time he is animated, says an insider, is when the subject is sports. He’s no intellectual and doesn’t care.

Third, when the Repubs sweep in November, investigations will be held — Sestak, stimulus money unneeded and used as a slush fund for “friends,” the Black Panther debacle, voter fraud (especially in caucuses, but also fake registrations)

And finally, just like Nixon, when people finally hate him enough (and except for one group, they do), impeachment procedings will begin, based on Obstruction of Justice. The NBC matter may or may not come up; if not, in a few years, everyone will agree they knew all the time that he was not eligible. (His many hidden records — the faulty ss#, college grades, law decisions written,etc., will be dribbling out for years to come.) He’ll go down in the history books as the biggest fraud ever perpetuated on the American people.

Chester
Sunday, September 26, 2010 11:56 PM

There is a parallel between Mexico’s media not reporting drug-cartel atrocities and the US major media’s silence on the Lakin case.

“…..A small army of bloggers and tweeters is filling the gaps left by traditional media in Mexico that are increasingly limiting their coverage of the country’s drug wars because of pressure from the cartels. ….”

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/sep/26/twitter-blog-mexico-drug-wars

Question: Is the US major media any better than Mexico’s major media?

Sunday, September 26, 2010 9:45 PM

All the congress and senate are guilty. They know that they can be charged. That is why they are avoiding it.

Annabel Leasowe
Sunday, September 26, 2010 1:24 PM

All the lawsuits re: Obama’s birthplace have been thrown out by the courts. Check the dockets and see who was Obama’s attorney on every one of them? Why none other than Elena Kagan! He owed her big time and now he has got her on the Supreme Court ready to throw out anything regarding his actual birth or even more important, his citizenship.
He has gone to great lengths NOT to divulge his citizenship which in itself is suspicious. WE NEED TO KNOW when he renounced his Indonesian citizenship? At the time he hated the U.S. which leads any thinking person to believe he would not wish to become an American citizen.
I came here LEGALLY and resent anyone who did not!

Donna
Sunday, September 26, 2010 10:49 AM

We, THe People HAve EVERY RIGHT TO SEE O’s records! I remember the news in 1961! The Truth Is Out There!!

tess
Saturday, September 25, 2010 6:46 PM

I MUST HAVE AN ANSWER PLEASE!

If we teach our students that our president, righ now it is
President OBAMA is the COMMANDER IN CHIEF……..
What does the jag judge mean when she says that orders
do not come from the COMMANDER IN CHIEF, THEY
COME FROM THE PENTAGON.

We understood that the Pentagon was somewhat of a
logistics area that also housed many military men that
carried out the COMMANDER IN CHIEF'[S ”’…DESIRES…”’!

Now if President OBAMA does not want nor like the idea
of being the COMMANDER IN CHEIF, we, the voting public
should be told about this immediately.
REMEMBER THERE IS AN OATH TO BE
SWORN TO WHEN ACCEPTING THE JOB
AS PRESIDENT!

thinkwell
Saturday, September 25, 2010 6:35 PM

The Post & Email poster, Miriam Mata found an interesting military law website that has a rather well mannered thread about the Lt. Col. Lakin case. She posts a reference and link to the Post & Email here:

http://court-martial-ucmj.com/ltc-lakin-trial/comment-page-2/#comment-1222

My comments in defense of the true meaning of “natural born Citizen” follow several messages below hers. This site is featuring Lt. Col. Lakin’s case and the 0bots are trying their best to put a negative spin on his patriotism, his chances and the eligibility issue in general. Might be worth a look-see and leaving a positive comment or two.

AttilasDaughter
Saturday, September 25, 2010 4:24 PM

the testimony of Christopher Coates:
http://www.usccr.gov/NBPH/TestimonyChristopherCoates_09-24-10.pdf

You know, I am really convinced that Obama is ineligible and there is a cover up going on.
But the longer I think about it, this might fit the circumstances much better.
An inpeachment regarding the dismissal of the New Black Panther Party voter intimidation case.
Who is going to scream “racist” now?

AttilasDaughter
Reply to  AttilasDaughter
Saturday, September 25, 2010 4:44 PM

and here is the CSPAN video

http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/295638-1

Bob1943
Reply to  AttilasDaughter
Saturday, September 25, 2010 8:30 PM

I guess I should be happy if Obama goes, whatever the reason. However, unless impeachment leads to an uncovering of the massive fraud associated with his ineligibility, such that the many enablers who are assisting in the cover-up go to jail along with Obama, this will have been the biggest travesty of justice in history.

Also, impeachment ain’t gonna happen. The Senate is not going to have 67 Senators who will vote to actually remove Obama from office, even if he was impeached by the House.

AttilasDaughter
Reply to  Bob1943
Sunday, September 26, 2010 1:10 AM

hmmm, details….

But I still have a good feeling about this.
I heard that this is the first time since Watergate that an active government employee comes forward.

RacerJim
Reply to  AttilasDaughter
Sunday, September 26, 2010 10:45 AM

The testimony of Christopher Coates adds covert RACISM to the long list of Obama’s impeachable high crimes and misdemeanors.

johnny says
Saturday, September 25, 2010 11:05 AM

all these people have committed treason. what are we going to do about it? we cannot rely on a new congress in 2011to take action. i have left messages with gen. valleys phone contact expressing the urgent need to go eligibility/ birth certificate viral immediately and i get a run around conversation and then an excuse to terminate the conversation. congressman ISSAdoes not have obama eligibility on the list to deal with. there will be more stonewalling.

Fred Mueller
Saturday, September 25, 2010 7:10 AM

Mr. Roberson says: “Nearly every member of Congress knows Obama is ineligible.” (I think that goes for the Supreme Court, most of our military leaders and all our liberal judges, too.) Roberson then asks: “What are they afraid of?” Probably their lives! Let’s stop kidding ourselves, it’s obvious Obama is in deep with unions and organized crime. He’s no Democrat. Neither are his 40 thieves (“czars.”) They’re not even liberals. They’re way beyond that. And Republicans aren’t far behind. The Republican Party is gradually being taken over by these same far-left loons. Criminals have taken over our government and our nation, folks, but there are still far more of us than of them! KYPD.
——————–
Mrs. Rondeau replies: Congress and the military may be afraid, but I am not. The Post & Email has been exposing the fraud perpetrated by Dick Cheney, Nancy Pelosi, Obama and his minions as well as corrupt judges and grand juries since its inception last year. I boldly say that if anyone should threaten my family or me, I will call a press conference and several retired military allies as well as report it to the FBI (not that they are good at doing anything anymore). I refuse to live my life in fear because I am reporting on the crime that you correctly say has overtaken our government. If these injustices are not reported, we will all be sentenced to a lifetime of serfdom, and innocents will be thrown in or remain in jail.

Bob1939
Reply to  Fred Mueller
Saturday, September 25, 2010 12:48 PM

Mrs. Rondeau, I am 100% with you, and also quite ready to make a bold stand against all evil, because that is the only logical thing to do, and besides, they don’t have a clue of who they are dealing with because we are solidly supported by a much higher Power!!! Thank you for all that you do. “God Bless”.

AttilasDaughter
Friday, September 24, 2010 10:07 PM

just for fun

kim
Friday, September 24, 2010 9:56 PM

I agree with the people who think 2012 is too late. According to officials in Kenya and Egypt and all over he is a Muslim who was paid for by Saudi to get our WH. The Islamic webs say we smile at your face and curse you in our hearts. they are duty bound by allah to take over the world. the top Imam said there is no such thing as moderate Islam. our marines said, you can rent them but not buy them. When obama did not show his birth certificate ,he should not have been voted in. he is a ilegal immigrant. our army needs to go in and clean up wash DC and even in the states. now the old dog Rep, there are some there too who need to be removed. paid for by commie’s to vote or not to vote so the left can win.We need new judges, leaders who realize WE THE PEOPLE are the Gov. they are to serve us. where were all the voices back when on closing the borders for our protection. I never heard or saw it happen, I saw Bush build a Six billion dollar embassy in Iraq, obama is building mosques here and around the world on our unconstitutional taxes. how many have read the constitution ,,taxes is against it. all this crap has been going on for yrs..and FOX. Islam owns cnn and lots of Fox..I have no reason to think there will not be a revolution. and that is what the left especially want. with their over 400,000 Islamic foot soldiers here and more coming in on the border and visa. Obama wants a reason to start shooting. They are like a cancer that has all but killed us all. this is our last chance PERIOD. obama no passports came an became a CIA agent then a senator and then the upsurper in our white house. If he gets a hold on medical like old hillary wanted we are done. like he said we have had it too good to long. he overlooks how we worked hard for it. Robin hood..the new movie coming out, the 501c churches will loose their tax credit if they don’t invite Islam. the prosperity gospel. ONE big tink lock up the FED, throw out the UN. we voted them out. but they are still here and want to rule the world. It is overtime to fight the good fight, and we are training to do just that. don’t be afraid, Islam is not the only ones with weapons and all else. Saudi is afraid Iran will take mecca and they are so right. to bad the aligator always comes back to bite. WE need to do whatever we are doing Now, and votes never did the trick. once the new faces get in. the old dogs on both side will heckle and make them bow. just like always. we need a real clean up. now.G-d bless America

thinkwell
Reply to  kim
Saturday, September 25, 2010 1:29 AM

Kim,

First off, you really need to learn to use paragraphs. :-) That said, except for formatting, I agree wholeheartedly with almost all that you wrote.

Whatever actually is Obama’s private religious belief is immaterial, really. Personally, I think he is most likely an atheist in his heart of hearts, but the bottom line is that at his core he is undeniably an unrelenting Islamophile. It is an expected natural consequence of his upbringing and just plain common sense that his familiarity and comfort level should be aligned by his formative years with Islam and counter to Judeo-Christian thought. He, himself, tells us this is so again and again in so many small but unabashed ways. Only those in complete denial are unable (or unwilling) to see it. Functionally, he is an anti-American Islamo-Marxist enemy of our way of life as a free people.

Obama himself makes no bones about it, he clearly sees himself as a citizen of the world /NWO and exemplifies everything the Founders were so wisely trying to exclude from our Commander in Chief. Obama has knowingly and with full malice of forethought illegally usurped the Presidency. In my opinion, this is an unforgivable act of high treason deserving of (if the rule of law so agrees) the commensurate highest level of punishment, i.e., death. Justice, the rule of law and the affirmation of the Constitution demand no less.

As “little people”, it is easy to slip into a complacent and benumbed sense of impotence, but we must fight such impulses and force ourselves to think and act in whatever small ways we can to unseat this evil fraud and restore the rule of law and the primacy of the Constitution. I sincerely believe the “buzz” we collectively generate matters, that the meme of patriotism launched into the nation’s collective thought by The Post & Email matters, and that the combined power of our unrelenting voices will encourage those few in positions to directly make a difference to act. We are duty bound to make it so.

Chester
Reply to  thinkwell
Sunday, September 26, 2010 1:10 PM

RE: “Whatever actually his private religious belief is immaterial, … but the bottom line is that at his core he is undeniably an unrelenting Islamophile.” – thinkwell.

There are two aspects to this:

RE: What’s in his heart?

Physiatrists tell us that childhood experience and exposure to religion stays with us. He studied the Koran in Indonesia. In his own book he declares that he would prefer to side with Moslems.

RE: How is he regarded in the Moslem world?

According to Sharia law if you father is a Moslem you are one forever – no way out. Both the father and the stepfather were Moslems. Consequently, the millions of Moslems who are under Sharia law have to consider him a Moslem. There are no ifs and buts about that. Therefore, in the eyes of these people, he is a Moslem. If this is good or bad is debatable, but that he is a Moslem under Sharia law is not.

Beepster
Reply to  kim
Saturday, September 25, 2010 12:30 PM

I agree with most of what you say. The Saudis funded him at the onset when he returned to the U.S. from Indonesia on a “foreign student” loan (and I doubt it’s been repaid). Then the Muslim Brotherhood helped finance him. George Soros found him, and found him to be a perfect puppet. Soros was the leading factor for his election, but the Muslim Brotherhood wasn’t far behind.

My biggest fear, as was touched upon in the article, is that this imposter will help instigate riots in cities and towns in late October. He will then declare a National Emergency, Martial Law, and postpone elections indefinitely. That’s when Hell will break loose, and the people with take back America. The military will not fire on citizens in most cases but will help in the insurrection/revolution. It’s coming, folks. Be armed and prepared.

B. Johnson
Friday, September 24, 2010 9:36 PM

Expose the Radical Communist Muslim Usurper B****** now so he can be removed to PRISON for treason & fraud with Pelosi & Reid

johnny says
Friday, September 24, 2010 9:25 PM

limbaugh and hannity and others decided to put money before country. they are all traitors and need to be widely labeled as such. they are big phonies.

johnny says
Friday, September 24, 2010 9:17 PM

to anon . 33 — then limbaugh hannity and all the others have succumbed to tyranny and are living under tyranny. they have allowed themselves denial of their first amendment rights.

anon.33
Reply to  johnny says
Sunday, September 26, 2010 1:50 PM

@Johnny— then limbaugh hannity and all the others have succumbed to tyranny and are living under tyranny. they have allowed themselves denial of their first amendment rights.

We are not in disagreement. They are just humans. They will not risk the $Ms are making as someone pointed out. They are definitely not heroes. Any one of them you mentioned, single-handedly, through their listeners, could force SCOTUS to define nbc.

It is frustrating to hear Rush and the others talk endlessly about issues that may be important but are trivial in comparison to the eligibility. It is however obvious that the avoidance of this issue is not entirely voluntary.

Will this stay under the rug? Or the new Congress will act, is anyone’s guess. All Congress would have to do is force SCOTUS to define nbc. That is not very radical, is it? That will not cause riots, right? Yet it is doubtful that they will do it – most of them, including the GOP, don’t give rat’s ass about the Constitution.

MadeinAmerica
Friday, September 24, 2010 8:10 PM

If we can’t resolve this matter peacefully, there is only one other option. The clock is ticking, patriots.

Osceola
Friday, September 24, 2010 4:59 PM

Friday, 24 September 2010 at 10:37
Review the events:

Obama does not come clean during campaign trail and always attacked his semingly hostile apponents in the audience. E.g., Joe the Plumber.

He is elected and on day one issues a Gag order on all of his history records.

The GAG order is faulty because it only covers immediately prior to taking office and after taking office records generated by the President for the Archivist to protect.

Hawaii records are state records and hospital records and not OBAMA records. However, a Governor, ahead of time, freezes his records on her own. (In military intelligence, a conspiracy is being hatched). Obama knows that there is a ghost in his past that disqualifies him from office (Was he a CIA Operative and his past generated from smoke an mirrors as usual, or was he a criminal, or was he a true Jihadist?) These issues are not relevant. What is relevant is the fact that his Father was a British/Kenyan Subject and his Mother from Kansas per the Law of Nations! If LAKIN is not permitted to use these facts, he is in a kangaroo court and must set the stage based on facts for appeal all the way to the Supreme Court.

In the interim, The President has issued an Executive Order 13552 with hidden controls. For instance, in one instance a long standing “legal officer” becomes a “legal advisor”. Since Obama is the Head Judge in this case as the Commander in Chief, he has inserted undue influence on the lower Court Judge Lind simply by signing the EO. She definitely could be influenced by an OBAMA (Her big, big BOSS) advisor in her due process. I say due process because I do not believe due process will ever occur in this case.

So, with the level of undue influence (or call it superior influence; it is Unlawful Command Influence – CINC), and printed words such as, “the Judge said she would not let LAKIN “embarrass the president”, he as several appeal routes already established to go to the Supreme Court. By the way, the unspoken words in the case sofar is that the president is already embarrassed.

Keep in mind that Lakin’s beef is with OBAMA, not LIND, not the Pentagon, not any one else. Obama has chosen bullying methods to secure his background. The constitution clearly states that when an Ambassador or Minister (Obama as head of state is a minister) it becomes a direct Supreme Court case (similar to a State having an Issue with the Federal Government such as Arizona). Obama injected very irrational reasoning through AG Place Holder with neither ne nor holder reading the Arizona law. This irrational reasoning already demonstrated by OBAMA should be prima facie evidence (enough) that he is capable of “Unlawful Command Influence” on a courtmartial under his chain of command and through EO 13552, already began that influence the outcome with his “legal advisor”; one that has not been around for 200 years.

I find it appalling that the Supreme Court has not already intervened under Constitutional Law and demanded a change of Court to their Jurisdiction which is the true Jurisdiction per the Constitution.

However, we will have to watch Kagan and Sotomayor (and possibly Ginsberg) who should be ecused from the review.

Strange how quick we can go from a country of strength to a country of imbiciles so quickly (no appology, imbiciles includes all those in Sleep Hollow Congress).

Will LAKIN get a fair trial — NO NO NO.

Reply

troy
Reply to  Osceola
Saturday, September 25, 2010 8:05 AM

Thanks, Osceola, for the shedding an intelligent light on this matter for me. I have found only one website that says it has Obama’s birth certificate…..turns out to be a computer-generated document, not a copy of the original. The website says that it is proof of Obama’s birthright for office.
I also agree wholeheartedly that Col. Lakin will not get a fair trial. I would like to add that I believe Col. Lakin is a true patriot of our great country. My hat’s off to him for taking a stand (a stand that very few are willing to take) that will have a severe effect on his and his family’s lives.

johnny says
Friday, September 24, 2010 1:04 PM

to megan— rush limbaugh sean hannity glen beck bill oreilly neil boortz and others are phony armchair patriots. they are not real patriots. they are there for the money first.

Megan
Friday, September 24, 2010 11:23 AM

The question as to why Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, Bill O’Reilly, and Sean Hannity will not address this trial and judge’s ruling is the one I want answered. What power and consequences are they so afraid of that they won’t go after Obama on his eligibility? Are we so afraid of some of our own black citizens that we ignore the Constitution? Then, let the country become afraid of both black and white Americans who still adhere to it!

Anon.33
Reply to  Megan
Friday, September 24, 2010 12:39 PM

RE: “why Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, … will not address ?”

Because they are not allowed to.

b fuller
Reply to  Megan
Friday, September 24, 2010 1:13 PM

Let me help with some numbers – Beck, $10,000,000 annually, Hannity, $35,000,000 annually, Limbaugh $100,000,000 annually. These are estimates that have been thrown around since no one can say for sure but they are well in line with other entertainers and that is what they are, entertainers. Ask yourself if you would kill the golden goose if she was laying those kind of eggs. Unfortunately, $$ are more persuasive than country, freedom and liberty.

Bob
Reply to  b fuller
Saturday, September 25, 2010 9:12 AM

I agree to a certain extent but at the moment they are all we have to give us the true news and not just what the dems want told. They don’t report on the eligibility because the saudi’s own a large chunk of fox and the big owner is mostly a liberal. The saudi’s want obama in the white house, they want islam to take over our country.

We won’t be able to clean up the news media until we get the usurping traitor criminals out of our government, both federal and state. They won’t leave without a fight. Just look at Crist in Fla, Murkoski in AK and the other one in Delaware. Look at all the voter fraud. We ARE in for a fight.

PERPETUA
Friday, September 24, 2010 11:22 AM

Seems the whole “SCHEME” at NWO, usurpation, ad infinitum has hit a fatal snag…INCOMPETENCE which has been met with UNRELENTING INVESTIGATION (thanks in great part to Mrs Rondeau!), reporting, networking and GROWING UNDERSTANDING Of CONSTITUTIONAL principals which have been MISTAUGHT or UNDERTAUGHT in Public schools and scoffed at by elected officials who are about to get their comeuppance!

natural born citizen party
Friday, September 24, 2010 10:35 AM

why not ask for a special three judge district court (USDC-DC) panel to hear this election eligibility related case to ensure jurisdiction of UCMJ in this constitutional matter?

kenneth
Friday, September 24, 2010 10:13 AM

While I agree 100% with this article I am not so sure that elections will have any result. There will be enough of present office holders still in office who are covering now who will still be in office and continue to stonewall this issue.
The courts both civil and military continue to try and sweep this under the rug so to speak and do nothing but cover up issue.
I think in the end only armed rebellion will solve this issue, as they leave us no other choice. This issue will NOT STAND AT PRESENT SITUATION. IT WILL BE CORRECTED BY HOPEFULLY BALLOT BUT IF NOT BY BULLET. THEIR CHOICE!

Mia
Friday, September 24, 2010 10:00 AM

I’m not convinced it’s fear which is silencing Beck, Limbaugh, Hannity, etc. At least not fear for their physical safety and well being. If anything, their high profile, very public presence in and of itself gives them far more protection than most who have loudly and publicly challenged Obama (including the good patriots here at The Post & Email — and I thank you all for continuing to fight the good fight). Rather, I suspect either blackmail or bribes are keeping them quiet. Or it’s all part of the party-first “I’d rather let Obama win and ruin the country for four years so conservatives can take it back in 2012” and screw the little people in the process — that’ll teach ’em! No matter how you look at it, they are protecting their own selfish interests. Period.

Anon.33
Reply to  Mia
Friday, September 24, 2010 12:47 PM

Yes they are – but you would too in their shoes.

Bill from Laos
Reply to  Mia
Friday, September 24, 2010 7:57 PM

Nobody seems to realize that we cannot wait until 2012 – there will
be no country, as we know it, left to save if we allow this Usurper, this
Resident in Chief, to continue. Look what he and his pinko commies
already have done in 18 months!!! If this slime can’t be removed by
the ballot, and We The People, then it will be done by the gun & sword!

Garacka
Reply to  Mia
Friday, September 24, 2010 9:56 PM

I got a slightly different slant on Beck from his comments either wednesday or thursday. He was talking about the progressives development of the technique of labeling things as conspiracy theories and even starting them so they can discredit and distract. If he really doesn’t understand the 2 citizen parents part of NBC and is only focusing on birth place, he may genuinely think it is a potential planned conspiracy theory, that can be used to discredit and he doesn’t want to get discredited. I think the blackmail theories are much to speculative, because that is all they can be until there is some evidence. Sometimes simple answers are the likely ones. BTW, i am not trying to defend beck, just speculating.

Bob1943
Reply to  Garacka
Friday, September 24, 2010 10:10 PM

If Beck is even a tiny bit of the Constitution expert he pretends to be, he knows for sure that a native born citizen, (if Obama was actually one), and a natural born citizen are not the same thing.

David B
Friday, September 24, 2010 9:33 AM

The Justice Thomas video has been scrubbed. “You can no longer watch this video” is the error message I got.

ilene g
Reply to  David B
Friday, September 24, 2010 3:02 PM
Friday, September 24, 2010 9:06 AM

Amazingly written depth piece. Clearly a piece worth keeping and reading again as a resource. The comments above about a nuclear launch are so right. Thanks for leading the charge in bringing down a failed presidency.