Spread the love


by Sharon Rondeau

Stanley Ann Dunham's photo from her 1981 passport application

(Aug. 1, 2010) — The U.S. State Department has released 14 pages of documentation in response to a Freedom of Information Act request made by Mr. Christopher Strunk dating back to October 2008.

Strunk was originally directed to make his request to the Bureau of Customs and Border Control, which is part of the Department of Homeland Security.  He did so and stated that the records he had requested “do not fall within any of FOIA exemptions items” (page 7).

He also claimed that “The above requested documents are extremely critical and important to Petitioner as well as the general public and are of substantial public interest” (page 8).

Strunk stated that Obama was born in “Mombasa, Kenya” and, citing the 1940 Nationality Act followed by the 1952 Nationality Act, claimed that his mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, “did not meet the citizenship requirements to register Barry Soetoro’s birth as “natural born…” (page 11).

He further contended that Obama, aka Barry Soetoro, was registered as an Indonesian citizen to attend the Fransiskus Assisi School in Jakarta, and that “The Indonesian  school, upon registration of a new student, verified the citizenship status and name of the child with the Indonesian Government; moreover, Indonesian Immigration and police checked all public schools on a weekly basis to ensure the only students attending were in fact Indonesian citizens” (page 12).

The  original response letter to Strunk from the State Department is as follows:

Undated letter from the State Department in response to Christopher Strunk's Freedom of Information Act request for the travel records of Barack Hussein Obama and Stanley Ann Dunham. The letter is stamped "January 12, 2009"

Strunk was denied the “expedited processing” he had requested and access to Obama’s records because Obama had not granted permission for them to be released.  Strunk then filed a lawsuit dated November 26, 2008 in which he suggested that Barack Hussein Obama might be an illegal alien based on the school registration form from  his former elementary school in Indonesia designating his citizenship as “Indonesian.”

Alleged school registration form which indicated that Barry Soetoro was an Indonesian citizen

Strunk also alleged that it appeared that someone was using Stanley Ann’s social security number illegally while working for the Ford Foundation in New York (page 7).

Strunk had claimed that none of the information he had requested should qualify for the government to refuse to release it.

On April 23, 2009, the named defendant, the Department of State, denied most of Strunk’s allegations and filed a Motion to Dismiss.  On page 2, the respondents claimed that the plaintiff was not “entitled to relief.”

A judge’s decision of March 16, 2010 is here.

On July 29, 2010, 14 pages containing passport applications were released to Strunk, who had requested records from 1960 and onward.  In its letter, shown below, the State Department said that “Many passport applications and other non-vital records were destroyed during the 1980s in accordance with guidance from the General Services Administration.”  However, the General Services Administration website produces nothing when a search for such “guidance” is requested.

Dunham seems to have applied every five years for a passport for international travel.

She provided two different birth dates for Lolo Soetoro:

Full page of passport application where Lolo Soetoro's birth date is listed as Jan. 2, 1935

Lolo Soetoro's birth date is given as Jan. 2, 1935

His birth date is stated as Jan. 2, 1936 on a subsequent passport application:

There are two locations  and dates given for her marriage to Lolo Soetoro:

Passport application which states Stanley Ann Dunham's marriage to Lolo Soetoro was March 15, 1965

Passport application which cites marriage date as March 5, 1964. Why would there be two different dates and locations?

and a missing social security number:

Passport application box for social security number was left blank

After her 1980 divorce from Soetoro, she evidently reverted to using her maiden name:

1986 passport application for Stanley Ann Dunham. On the records released, Dunham used three different names: Stanley Ann Dunham; Stanley Ann Dunham Soetoro; and Stanley Ann Soetoro.

Although little has been reported about any of Obama’s family members, news reports during the 2008 presidential campaign stated that Madelyn Payne Dunham, Stanley Ann’s mother, worked at the Bank of Hawaii.  However, on one of her passport applications, Stanley Ann stated that it was her father who worked there:

Stanley Ann Dunham (or whomever completed the application) indicated that it was her father who was employed at the Bank of Hawaii, not her mother.

News reports had stated that Stanley Armour Dunham was a furniture salesman.

On her 1986 passport application pictured above, Stanley Ann listed an address of 1512 Spreckels, Apt. 402, Honolulu, HI  96822, but it is crossed out with a handwritten note which reads:  **4/9/86 – ppt mailed to perm. address per her written request – attached.”  Lower on the form is her parents’ address, 1617 S. Beretania Street, although she mistakenly wrote their names as “Stanley Ann Madelyn Dunham.” She indicated that she would be traveling to the Philippines for a week.

A handwritten note seems to imply, however, that 1512 Spreckels St. was her permanent address:

Did Stanley Ann Dunham ever have a permanent address?

Neil Sankey, a private investigator, developed a list of names and addresses which appear to relate to Stanley Ann Dunham from Hawaii to New York City.  She has been known by many different names.

The State Department employee who wrote to Strunk upon release of the documentation suggested that Stanley Ann Dunham’s passport records prior to 1965 were destroyed.  However, the National Archives states that passport records from 1795 and forward have been maintained and that “Passport applications can be an excellent source of genealogical information, especially about foreign-born individuals.”

Is that the reason why the State Department refuses to release Obama’s passport information?

First page of letter releasing certain documents to Christopher Strunk

Second page of letter from State Department to Christopher Strunk

A 1971 application states that Dunham’s passport “is not valid.”

Why was Stanley Ann Dunham's passport "not valid"?

The wording reads:

I have been informed that my passport is not valid and that a valid passport is required by law to enter the United States.  I request that an exception be granted to me, as provided in Section 53.2(h), Title 22 of the Code of Federal Regulations.  I understand that a fee of $25 is required under Section 53.2(h) and I will remit such fee to the Passport Office, Department of State, Washington, D.C., 20524, within 30 days.

Is that because she became an Indonesian citizen or dual citizen?  Why could she not obtain a “valid” passport at that time?

Directly below her signature is the text:  “Report – Pursuant to Section 215 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952”.  However, lower on the form, in response to “Identity Documents Presented” are the words “Passport as shown above.”

The space for an official stamp has a handwritten date of October 21, 1971:

Date stamp on "invalid" passport statement is handwritten

The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 established U.S. citizenship for those born in Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands.  It deals primarily with immigration of foreign-born individuals to the United States but defines both “aliens” and “citizens.”

Her “Date and Place of Entry” were indicated as “October 21, 1971, Honolulu, Hawaii,” and at the bottom of the form, a note was written in what appears to be purple magic marker:  “Bill Sent – 11/29/71”.

The form also states:  “Identity and citizenship established.  Exception granted under 22 CFR 53.2(h)”.

There is one reference to one of Stanley Ann’s alleged children on the released records.  On page 4, in the area designated “Amend to include (exclude) children,” the name “Barack Hussein Obama” appears with “(Soebarkah)” below it, but the entire text is crossed out:

Was this a reference to the man who now occupies the White House or someone else? What does “Soebarkah” mean?

“Soebarkah” appears to be a common Indonesian name. However, it does not appear in the Indonesian dictionary, of which The Post & Email checked three.  The last name “Soetoro” also yields nothing.

If it is a surname, does this mean that Obama was adopted by Lolo Soetoro?

A warning appears on some of the passport application pages which reads:

False statements made knowingly and willfully in passport applications or in affidavits or other supporting documents submitted therewith are punishable by fine and/or imprisonment under the provisions of 18 USC 1001 and/or 18 USC 1542…

If Stanley Ann Dunham was Obama’s mother, what did he learn from her?

Join the Conversation


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. The LEGAL FACTS that prove Obama is NOT eligible to be President is in the new book: “Obama – Ineligible To Serve – Lies, Crimes and Deadly Ambition” — get it at Amazon and other sellers — no matter what party you are affiliated with — this book explains all the legalities of his usurpation of the Presidency.

  2. Reagrding Obama’s release of his current passport in August, 2010: It is COMMON KNOWLEDGE that “obama” has a US passport. A passport was issued to him AUTOMATICALLY when he became Senator. There were no background checks required or proof of citizenship required at that time, since he had been in the State Senate, then US Senate. It’s diplomatic. Vetting a Senator is never done. If they have redacted the date it was issued – that tells you everything. The new book: “Obama-Ineligible to Serve – Lies, Crimes and Deadly Ambition” is available at Amazon and other sellers–read it no matter what party you are affiliated with. It explains ALL the legal facts as to why Obama is NOT ELIGIBLE under the Constitution to be President.

    1. It doesn’t matter, except perhaps to Oilbama and the surviving members of the X family. Legally, citizenship is inherited from the parents named on the BC issued at birth. So, for example, if X was his biological father but Barack Sr. was named on the original BC, Oilbama, at birth, inherited British citizenship from Barack Sr. and, arguably, due to her age at the time, US citizenship from his mother.

      The rest is speculation and good for nothing more than fueling the rumor mill.

  3. The whining voice gets louder, ooooh, it’s just Racism. Obama was never eligible, as he is not an NBC. They see the curtain closing and now they will get desperate. Be prepared for anything.

    1. Yeaa, did you watch Caroline Heldman from the Occidental College on O’Reilly yesterday? She would not listen to anything and just yell racism, racism! This is the college where Obama was supposedly studying as a foreign student but they would not release the records… He was probably taught by many Heldman-likes. Do they have other-likes there?

  4. With the judges like the one in California, one wonders why Obama would not tell us the truth about his origin – the government does not fear the people any longer anyway, anything goes, they can do to us nearly anything…

  5. Super! Super! Super video on RCP!
    Chris Matthews, this inexhaustable sleaze ball enters in a long rant about birthers – apparently the yesterday CNN poll that found that a majority of Americans had suspicions regarding Obama’s (il)legitimacy has spooked the liberals and Mathews is out to dispell this view – and hysterically clumsy and counterproductive so –
    Love it –

    Link below to the Mathews/ RCP video –

    1. Uh Oh, Snopes says this one isn’t true….and it looks like WND has taken it off there site.

      Probably should go into the uncertain category, rather than false, until someone Snopes Snopes.

  6. Unbelievable the amount of (suspicious) inconsistencies that are continually found whenever ANYTHING has to do with OBongo. I’m with you Auntie M., little OilBama SAYS his daddy, OilBama Sr. is from Kenya, the rest is speculation or rumor. Albeit interesting, but let’s stick with what (little that it is) we do know & do all we can to oust this damn usurper! The entire lot of them: White Trash Gma+Gpa Dunham, Skanky S.A.Dunham, Frank Marshall Pervert Davis, LowLow Soetoro & Michelle No Class Big Butt were/are a bunch of grifters! As far as OilBarry & Big Butt Michelle’s daughters go, to heck with them! That’s what their parents said when they signed on to dupe & deceive the American people. Can you tell I’m sick about it?

    1. “Grifters” is a good label for them. That’s what they were/are: grifters. And, for what it’s worth, there’s the answer to the question of what Oilbama learned from his mother. She taught him to be a grifter.

      As for his kids, I feel some sympathy for them. Being a forgiving bunch, for the most part, so will the rest of the country when their parents are at GITMO awaiting execution. No doubt, some nice families will extend their homes and hearts to those girls and, should the girls accept the offer, what they do with their lives – become grifters or true Americans – will be up to them.

  7. …… Chance said: — “Obama looks very much like his mother, who very much looks like her father.”

    Which begs the question: —

    Is Mr. Stanley… Soebarkah’s actual father?

    Obtaining Mr. Stanley’s Passport File documents could reveal if — and when, between 1955 and 1961 — he may have visited Hawaii, other Pacific islands, Indonesia, S.E. Asia, Africa, etc… where he could have fathered Soebarkah, together with a non-European mother… Where subsequently, Mr. Stanley arranged for his daughter to “adopt” — as if she were the actual birth mother.

    For example: — Mr. Stanley may have knocked-up the daughter of a Communist Party official, somewhere in the Third World… Then when he subsequently returned home, he was still under the Party’s one-world jurisdiction, where he was responsible for the expenses of Soebarkah’s upbringing… something that his daughter Stanley-Ann may have volunteered to help in… so her father could afford to send Stanley-Ann to college, instead of having to make child-care payments.

    If Mr. Stanley did father Soebarkah sometime between 1955 and 1961, he could have then waited until Stanley-Ann and Obama Sr. were in-place in Hawaii, before the alleged Hawaiian “home birth” of Soebarkah was registered — which then would have generated the “normal” newspaper birth announcements.

    This would also explain why: — “S. Ann’s father was very fond of Obama Sr.” — because Obama Sr. didn’t knock up his daughter — rather, he (Mr. Stanley) knocked up an unknown Third World daughter, and Obama Sr. (a fellow Communist) was conveniently helping to “make lemonade from a lemon”…

    1. Drew, just remember that as it affects Oilbama’s citizenship at birth, it doesn’t matter who his biological father is. Legally, citizenship is inherited from the parents named on the BC issued at birth. So, for example, if Davis was his biological father but Barack Sr. was named on the original BC, Oilbama, at birth, inherited British citizenship from Barack Sr. and, arguably, due to her age at the time, US citizenship from his mother.

      The rest is speculation and good for nothing more than fueling the rumor mill.

  8. You ask what did he learn from his mother???

    Clearly he picked up a very clear understanding of how easy it is for someone with no morals and no basic honesty in their person how to cheat, lie, and “game the system” … and he’s continued doing that all the rest of his life (so far).

    Time to end all that NOW!!!

  9. Happy birthday, Barry Soetero!
    Oooops – is this this guy’s real name?
    Wait – is this this guy’s real birthdate?
    Heck – what’s this – his wife is in Spain with a daughter to tend her migraines, and he’s going to Chicago with the other daughter? What’s going on?

    Fresh from CNN Ticker:

    “TRENDING: CNN Poll: Quarter doubt Obama was born in U.S.”

    1. This is good news. No matter how the CNN and the rest of the lamestream media spin it and even lie about it, the truth is making its way to more and more people every day.
      Mrs. Rondeau replies: I believe you’re right.

      1. If you ever think about giving up on the eligibility battle, (which I know you won’t), just go to the CNN poll website and read the comments…..it will renew your energy.

        I’ll be doing whatever I can to expose the truth on this issue until my last breath…………

        They actually have a picture of the Cracker Jack box online COLB, which just happens to contain zero traceable information, no Drs. name, no hospital name, etc., etc., etc., and the two newspaper articles which mention no baby’s name…….and that is suppose to prove that Obama in a Constitutionally required natural born citizen? The idiots keep saying that we are saying Obama’s usurpation of the presidency was planned from his birth….they are great examples of what happens when you only get your information from the lame stream media and journalist on the journoList.

        Those folks are brainwashed, and/or just stupid, beyond redemption.

      2. If every msm outlet has banned this discussion. If FOX will not even allow comments about it on their website. If every major newspaper in the country will not cover this story. If every major radio show will not talk about it,


        This has been polled several times now.

      3. Joe, the poll is a non-issue because it gives the so-called journalists and their readers another go at one of their favorite pastimes: Insult The Birthers and TEA B*****s.

    2. I wonder if his daughters know who their paternal grandparents were. Also, if they do know the truth, how was it presented to them and how do they live with it at their tender young age?

      1. I doubt they know. They’re close to their maternal grandmother and, with their alleged paternal grandparents dead long before they were born, there’d be no reason to tell them anything other than the story as per their dad’s alleged autobiography.

  10. SapphireSunday: The 1 May 74 “O’Shea” ltr (page 12 of the Lolo file) is clearly in a proportional font. Pages 21 and 24 look like proportional font as well, dated 18 July 72 and 6 Aug 68 respectively. High end typewriters did exist that could do this at the time. I also looked quickly for evidence of kerning and found none. see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kerning thus am now thinking this was not a problem. Ok for the moment.

  11. Circa 1982 color photos were required for passports. Not any resemblance between high school Stanley Ann and the passport Stanley Ann.

    I put her handwriting samples from high school days on a webpage with her high school photo:
    She makes a closed small t in high school writing samples while signatures on altered docs have a large loop in the small t.

    On a linked page, Polarik, the document expert, comments on the writing on the divorce papers.

    None of the early ‘Obama’ photos is legit. Stanley Ann photos after high school are mismatches for the real thing. Everything out there is altered or forged or missing. The first family is a bunch of orphans!

    Polarik says:
    March 11, 2009 at 10:15 am
    “All Ann Dunham signatures a total mismatch for Ann Dunham writing samples circa high school days. View the samples with source links.”

    When I first viewed the signatures on the divorce papers, I had not seen Ann’s writing on her photo and in the yearbook. Those would be typical samples of a left-handed writer — but, in a much later photo of Annas an adult, she has a pen or pencil in her right hand.

    The only way for the divorce signatures to match those on the photo and yearbook would be if (a) Ann had an injury or neuromuscular disorder to her writing hand, and/or (b) she switched from writing lefty to righty.

    However, even with people who are ambidextrous, signing with either hand produces similarities in the structure of the handwriting.

    When I first viewed the divorce paper signatures, I found them to be very deliberate in their execution, with the Soetoro signature seeming even more forced.

    In contrast, there is an even and consistent flow in her writings on the photo and yearbook.

    The basic structure of a person’s handwriting at 18 would be the same at 28, especially one’s signature. Signatures are very resistant to change unless a person deliberately wishes to change them and spends several hours per day until he or she can write it without thinking about it.

    Personality changes can also affect handwriting just as physical changes can.

    The most notable discrepancies are in the way she signs “Stanley.”

    In her photo and yearbook signatures, the “S” is always disconnected from the rest of the name. There is also evidence of separating initial capital letters from the small case letters in her yearbook comments.

    The second most distinguishing feature is found in how she writes a case “t” in lower case. In the high school samples, the upper part of the “t” has no loop, but is a solid line, with the base being an inverted “v” shape.

    In all of the divorce paper samples, all of the “t’s” have large loops their upper part.

    All of the capital “S’s” in “Stanley” are separate in her high school signatures, but connected as a continuation to the loop in the “t.”

    The other striking think about the divorce paper signatures are their similarities. No two signatures by the same person are ever identical. These signatures are way too similar to have been made freely and normally.

    Couple that with my initial impressions of the divorce paper signatures looking “slow, deliberate, and forced,” and what you get are enough signs to suspect that forgery was involved.

  12. I just read some of the comments on Am Thinker site. Different scenarios of who O’s father is.
    Information revealed that S. Ann’s father was very fond of Obama Sr. Strange? My father would have been ready to kill a guy that just got his 18 year old daughter pregnant! My guess is this. Obama looks very much like his mother, who very much looks like her father. Father used to drug and drink alot with Frank Davis. Is it possible that Ann was raped by her father in one of his drugged up stupors. It could be possible and if it is true, is Obama then an NBC would have 2 citizens parents!!! Why else would Stanley like his son in law so much. It could only be b/c O Sr married Ann to give the kid a name and take the heat off of him.

      1. “Stanley is white” – sure thing, but I don’t think Chance has got it right from Jack Cashill’s articles in American Thinker –
        What Cashill’s discussing there is whether Stanley had a boy with one of the many girls working in the houses he used to go for some wildin’ with Frank –
        Then, he might have persuaded Stanley Ann (poor Madlyn! in all this rubbish, she is indeed a saint!) to claim the boy as hers, and go ahead with this scheme –
        … ’till she got tired of her little brother and shipped him back to Honolulu –

        In a previous post I mentioned Stanley Ann’s quite unnnatural disconnectedness from her offspring – i.e. her little brother she had to pass as her son –
        I remember also that for observers, Stanley Ann was a strangely incompetent mother – women generally acquire motherhood skills immediately after giving birth – no news here –

        No birth, no motherhood skills –

        What a birthday you have, Barry – hehehehe –

    1. As William commented, if Stanley fathered him, Oilbama would be white.

      As for Oilbama’s citizenship at birth, it doesn’t matter who his biological father is. Legally, citizenship is inherited from the parents named on the BC issued at birth. So, for example, if Davis was his biological father but Barack Sr. was named on the original BC, Oilbama, at birth, inherited British citizenship from Barack Sr. and, arguably, due to her age at the time, US citizenship from his mother.

      1. I agree.

        It does not make any difference as to the real parentage of Obama, because Obama Senior claimed him as a product of the marriage. In the time of our Founding Fathers, all that was necessary was for the father of record to claim he was the father in actuality, which Obama Senior did in the divorce papers. In the time of our Founding Fathers there was no way to test (such as with DNA) for paternity. If a man claimed to be the father of a son, then that was good enough for all legal purposes of identity, passing on of inheritance, land grants, and especially citizenship.

    1. Moderator, I prematurely submitted my other comment befiore I was done. This is what I would like to submit:
      This is 2nd page of Form DSP-19 (7-64 version) which was a request for a passport renewal. It appears the renewal was approved (issued) on July 19, 1965. The 1st page is at http://www.scribd.com/doc/35161730/Stanley-Ann-Dunham-Obama-Soetoro-Passport-Application-File-Strunk-v-Dept-of-State-FOIA-Release-FINAL-7-29-10

      Section H being left blank should mean that no new child is being added by the amendment. A child may have been on the original passport that “presumably” was “..destroyed during the 1980s..” and this renewal could have retained that child, but the instructions near the top of the form indicate that if this was the case Section G needed to be filled out and it is blank, so this should mean that she did not include a child on her original passport and is not including a child on her renewal.

      Could the child have a separate passport and and not including that child on this passport only means that she is not planning to travel with the child? Was the father the custodian during travel?

      Also, when it comes to forms, local offices may have adopted local practices where they might not require all data to be filled out (or the main “office” in this case Dept. of State) may have varied the procedures on what needs to be filled out.

      I also noticed that there was another renewal which she submitted and had notarized on August 13, 1968 (Form FS-299 (7-64 version) for another renewal approved through Jul.18, 1970. It is interesting that in the “Amend to Include (Exclude) Children” block on page 2, the child’s name with Soebarkah in parenthesis is written in and then crossed out. This could simply mean that she misunderstood the instructions. Perhaps she was trying to say that her child was being excluded, but forgot that her child was already excluded. Perhaps she slipped up and didn’t recall whether her son was on her previous passport? Perhaps the child was traveling as an Indonesian citizen and wouldn’t be eligible for a U.S. passport.

    2. This is page 2 of a form. You are reading the section header at the top of the second page rather than the title of the form itself.

      1. Just think about it. We don’t know anything about Stanley’s parents. It has been said they could be illegal aliens as well. For all we know, they have black relatives in them. Dick Cheney has a black relative. Somewhere there Father could have been fooling around too with a black women or dark women..

        In my family, all of my cousins children have red hair. All of them. We are Italian Americans. It is said my paternal grandfather had red hair. You see how the genes work. Every generation is different! a long shot I know but.

  13. Has any one tried to check out the phone numbers that his mother used to see if they checked out under name or place. Two numbers that I saw.



    Would they be under some real old records keeping with the phone company? Back then it would had only been South Western Bell.

  14. There are still only 78 people interested in having a naturalized citizen be president. C:\Documents and Settings\eric\My Documents\Naturalized Citizen eligibility for Office of President – Signatures.htm

    Is it social justice that they get their dream? I’ll bet Charlie Rangel and Maxine Waters do. We know Nancy Pelosi and Claire McCaskill went beyond the wish to make it reality. I wonder when one of these selfish two bits will throw their pals under the buss and admit what they knew, when they knew it and who schemed it all up.

      1. SS, this is a repost of my reply to you about the “xxxxxxxxx”, which is now under “older comments”. Below is what I said.

        The “b” and “k” of soebarkah fit the pattern of tall letters behind the 4th “x” and 7th “x”. But if it is soebarkah that is crossed out, you would think that we would see a tall capital “S” behind the 1st “x”.

        I don’t think the crossed out word could be “currently” as the there is nothing hanging below the last “x”, as you would expect with the letter “y”.

  15. In shades of RatherGate it appears Ann used the same magic typewriter in her letter to Mr O’Shea dated 1 May 1974. Tiz a proportional font. So the DoS is fudging the FOIA output. This should be fuel for Strunk to challenge their output as dishonest.

    1. Checklt: Can you explain how you can tell this was proportional font? Is it because certain letters are squished or widened, as necessary, to make the line of type consistent in width? Therefore, it was produced on a computer (likely impossible in 1974)?

      I noticed that page 79, the second page of a three-page letter written by Lolo, looks different from the other two pages. My untrained eye tells me it’s different, but maybe it’s not. Can you hazard an opinion?

      Back to that letter of May ’74: S. Ann wrote that Lolo’s tax return was enclosed, but the tax return is noticeably absent from the released documents.

      She was responding to a letter from the government that implied that Lolo improperly filed as a non-resident in order to get government benefits. SAD claimed that he filed as a resident; Lolo previously had told Mr. O’Shea that he didn’t know that he filed incorrectly–he had relied upon the help of a “friend” who worked at a bank. (Stanley or Madelyn?)

      Ten days AFTER SAD’s letter to O’Shea, he wrote a letter to Lolo, in which it sounds as if he never received SAD’s letter “correcting” his mistake about Lolo’s filing status.

      So one has to wonder if the letters crossed in the mail or perhaps there really was no letter written BY S. ANN SOETORO and sent by her to Mr. O’Shea on May 1, 1974. Note that both S. Ann Soetoro and Mr. O’Shea were in Hawaii, in the same city, while Lolo was in Djakarta.

      btw, doesn’t S. Ann Soetoro’s signature on that letter look computer generated, too?

      In any case, why did they redact Lolo’s tax return? Privacy? He’s deceased. As is S. Ann.

      What government benefits was Lolo trying to receive? Could these be benefits for his non-resident alien “child”? Would it matter for tax purposes whether Lolo and/or Soebarkah was considered a permanent resident alien versus a non-resident alien?

      Are they protecting the “privacy” interests of said child by redacting Lolo’s tax return? Did Lolo claim Soebarkah as his child on that tax return? Under what name was that child claimed on the tax return? Barack Hussein Obama II? Wanna make a bet?

      1. Lolo’s tax return was redacted because he was paying/ arranging for Soebarkah’s tuition at Punahou prep school. Maya Soetero also went to the same school. Both alledgedly attended on scholarship, there is no evidence of this.
        Most likely Lolo was paying tution for both his adopted son Soebarkah (aka Barry)and his own daughter.

  16. Mr. Strunk, wow thanks for the additional info. You say definitively that Obama was born in Kenya. Do you have absolute proof of this? If so, please share it with us. It would be a monumentally important finding.

    You have done incredible work with your FOIA requests. We all owe you debts of gratitude. And I wish you continued good fortunes in your current and future endeavors along these lines.

  17. I notice that Mr. Strunk refers to the name as Saebarkah, and not the spelling Soebarkah, which a variant spelling would be Subarkah.

    How many names does BO have anyway? This is very interesting.

  18. I was reading an economics blog today and I realized how the same MO is used in almost every area. No matter whether it’s obama eligibility, global warming, evolution, or the success of the bailout/stimulus.

    1 They produce a paper or document that purports to “prove” their side.
    2 All facts and/or supporting documentation/assumptions behind the proof is hidden. At all costs. And I do mean at ALL costs.
    3 Someone of high authority and/or academic standing states that the proof is in, there is a consensus, and virtually all sane people believe it.
    4 Those who don’t believe it are to be ridiculed.

    Evolution, global warming, keynesian economics, obama eligibility; all use the very same methods.

  19. Strunk is in opposition to a summary judgment filed by the DOJ in my case Strunk v DOS et al. DCD 08-cv-2234 seeks further disclosure in regards to DOS spoliation of documents in regards to my request under FOIA the passport and related records of Stanley Ann Dunham et al.. I have been awaiting these records and more since October 2008 when I first filed a FOIA request related to my active case in New York Supreme Court where the records will be used when the disposition of the Summary Judgment is complete; Hopefully, I will receive the additional records that exist from 1960 onward too. Clearly when the DOS release is combined with the US Customs and Immigration service release to Ken Allen amounting to about 90 pages shows that Lolo Soetoro and Ann Soetoro were having difficulties that would only explain the removal of BHO from her passport in 1968 especially since the Indonesian Government in Soetoro’s words, any American, was in jeopardy there in Indonesia due to the anti-American feelings” is shown at page 103 of http://www.scribd.com/doc/35245956/Strunk-s-DOS-and-DHS-FOIA-Responses-DCD-08-Cv-2234-and-Ken-Allen-s-DOS-and-DHS-Responses-AZDC-09-Cv-373 attached to the U.S. Government memo of January 12, 1966 with pages marked 000077 through 000080 therein at page 000078 regarding Lolo Soetoros request for a INA section 212(e) waiver and two year extension for his stay in the USA with Ann Soetoro, (that according to the US Government document of August 6, 1968 all three returned to Indonesia on July 20, 1966); Soetoro states:

    “Most importantly, anti-American feeling has reached a feverish pitch under the direction of the Indonesian communist party, and I have been advised by both family and friends in Indonesia that it would be dangerous to endeavor to return with my wife at the present time. Of secondary importance is the fact that my wife does not yet speak Indonesian, Not only would she be forced to cut short her college education, but she would be left in a position of isolation in the community,”

    It appears from the cross comparison on both the Customs and DOS FOIA released documents that on October 20, 1971 Stanley Ann Dunham Soetoro (SADS) and BHO (a.k.a Saebarkah Soetoro) together boarded Pan Am Airlines Flight 812 unaccompanied by Lolo M. Soetoro in Djakarta Indonesia and arrived in Honolulu Hawaii on October 21, 1971 and sought entry into the USA on an expired Passport issued July 19, 1965 according to the DS 1423 Form for REQUEST BY UNITED STATES NATIONAL FOR AND REPORT OF EXCEPTION TO SECTION 53.1, TITLE 22 OF THE CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS with use of the expired Passport of July 19, 1965 shown as page 6 of http://www.scribd.com/doc/35245956/Strunk-s-DOS-and-DHS-FOIA-Responses-DCD-08-Cv-2234-and-Ken-Allen-s-DOS-and-DHS-Responses-AZDC-09-Cv-373.

    It is important to discover whether or not based upon SADS’ August 13, 1968 Passport Renewal Application to DOS shown as page 3 and 4 of http://www.scribd.com/doc/35245956/Strunk-s-DOS-and-DHS-FOIA-Responses-DCD-08-Cv-2234-and-Ken-Allen-s-DOS-and-DHS-Responses-AZDC-09-Cv-373 SADS excluded Saebarkah Soetoro (BHO)from her Passport of July 19, 1965; and therefore, left no way for BHO who is presumed to also have the right to an Indonesian Passport under Lolo Soetoro to reenter the USA with SADS except by use of the expired July 19 1965 passport.

    That Declarant among other items of interest in the analysis presented by Dr Corsi in his Worldnet Daily Article (WND) takes issue with the insinuation that the 1965 edition of SADS passport was only good for 3 years when in fact it was to expire July 18, 1970 according to the actual reference by the US Government shown in the upper right corner of the application located at page 3; however in August 13 1968 SADS made an early application to renew the 1965 to remove BHO (a.k.a. Saebarkah Soetoro) from her own passport.

    At that time, Lolo Soetoro was in a difficult effort with the State Department and US Customs and Immigration to obtain reentry into the USA and needed to reflect Saebarkah Soetoro (BHO) as an Indonesian for his own safety. That Saebarkah Soetoro (BHO) according to his own writing in 1971 would re-enter back into the USA to live with his Grandma Madelyn Dunham

    Except for the fact that the Exception request for use of the expired July 19, 1965 passport without use of an American passport as Saebarkah Soetoro as an Indonesian citizen which he was also entitled to an Indonesian Passport made without being on SADS renewed Passport of August 13 1968 made it easier for Saebarkah Soetoro / BHO to travel and obtain a renewed Indonesian Passport, rather than a British or even Kenyan passport that would be more difficult to explain or obtain to the Indonesian Government (having a USA passport there in Indonesian would dangerously expose Lolo Soetoro to government scrutiny since BHO was born in Kenya not the USA was adopted by Lolo Soetoro as a Indonesian citizen).

    Thereafter 1971, Saebarkah Soetoro living in the USA went to the Indonesian Embassy in Hawaii to obtain or renew the Indonesian passport as part of his college funding program and that in 1981 through 1984 was then used while attending Columbia University to enter Indonesia, Pakistan and Afghanistan while working for Zbigniew Brzezinski then of the Scholl of Foreign Affairs and the National Security Council with the Carter Administration and Reagan Administration transition.

  20. OK, you guys just have to read the American Spectator article “The American Ruling Class” as it explains a lot of why we-all are having so much difficulty with this issue. Simply put, we are not part of the ruling class, and because of our attitudes, they will never let any of us in.

    This article is 14 pages long, and includes history as well as keen observations. Take your time, and think about what the author (Angelo M. Codevilla) is writing.


  21. Sharon, for all you and others do… thanks a TRILLION
    this is my take so far? take it or leave it… food for thought.
    “BARAK HUSSEIN SOETORO” does that fit?
    558 days o has usurspered us all …when can we stop it?
    my arrow loves to hit the target …done and over….
    how much longer will this slow death take?

  22. KISS, It is impossible for him to meet art2, sec 1 but is without even the recognition of a legitimate court, qualified under art3 sec3. Treason being satisfied.

  23. There is also plenty of information uncovered by a Harlem reverend Dr. James Manning (church ATLAH). He dug up some incredible links and data regarding the cloak and dagger life of Obama and his mother. He found that no one at Columbia remembers Obama during his studies and that BHO was probably used for CIA operations in Pakistan and Afghanistan. This report can be found online and can best explain why Obama and his mother used several SSN and are guarding or destroying records to cover the past.

    1. Interesting you speak about the cloak and dagger life of Obama and his mother. This from yesterdays Little Rock, Arkansas newspaper:

      “President Barack Obama, and his wife Michelle, and daughter Sasha made an hour-long visit to the privately run International Spy Museum in downtown Wasington, where an interactive experience uses special effects to take each “visitor” into the role of a U.S. intelligence officer on an action-packed international mission.”

      It’s a quote, so please forgive the use of the word, “president.”

  24. …and to add to the passport intrigue, CIA Columbia trial uncovered Stanley Ann’s 5 year stint in Karachi, Pakistani working at the Asia Development Bank while staying at a five-star hotel. That record is obviously scrubbed by the CIA as well since she was involved in laundering money to fund the mujahadeen and taliban push back in Afghanistan against the Russian invasion. BO/BS travelled to Pakistan during the same time frame 1981-83 on a KENYAN passport posing as a businessman. He was NOT at Columbia University – they gave him cover.

    Keep up the good work, Sharon, let us never stop probing!

  25. Do you know how many people have to be complacently involved in this conspiracy? At first I couldn’t believe it, but it is hundreds if not thousands! How many are involved in this Communist coup trying to destroy our America? How can we OUT them all? Fight the Evil wherever it hides and destroy it forever.

    1. Those are the generations of progressives and communists educated by our schools and colleges! And the indoctrination is going on. It will get worse until it exhausts itself. It always does because this road is unsustainable. But it unravels as a wrecking ball until it swings back.

    2. old1, the number of people that must be involved in this is mind boggling. It seems that with so many having a hand in it, someone would have blown the whistle by now. That no one has yet suggests that there’s some fact to the spiritual war being waged. We can’t see it but it all of these crooks and liars are the pawns used in the other-worldly game.

  26. Page 46 of the released Lolo documents has a “memorandum to file” which is signed by W. ? Mix. The typewriter used was very poor, so it’s hard to read certain characters.

    This memo of Sept. 14, 1967 reads:

    “Pursuant to inquiry from Central office regarding the status of the applicants’ spouses’ (sic) child by a former marriage. The person in question is a united states (sic) citizen by virtue of his birth in Honolulu, Hawaii Aug. 4, 1961. He is living with the applicants’ (sic) spouse in Honolulu, Hawaii. He xxxxxxxxx (word was typed then x’d out, 9 x’s) is considered the applicants step-child, within the meaning of Sec. 101(b)(1)(B), of the act, by virtue of the applicant to childs’ (sic) mother on March 15, 1965.”

    Signed by Mr. Mix. I can’t make out his middle initial. The typewriter messed up 1’s and l’s.

    What’s interesting is that the marriage date has been misreported somewhere else within these documents as March 5 and THIS memo appears to read March 5, until you realize that the 1 was jumped up above the line, and can cause someone to read the marriage date as the 5th, not the 15th.

    So several questions arise:

    Where else was the date mistakenly written as March 5?

    What is Sec. 101(b)(1)(B) of the Act?

    What was the word that has been x’d out? If it read “currently,” then might this imply that applicant was in the process of adopting the child?

    Why isn’t the “person in question” named anywhere?

    These files, imho, appear to also have been cauterized of embarrassing information. If someone requested information about the citizenship of a child, wouldn’t some evidence other than a typed memo be presented? What did Mr. Mix see that caused him to determine the citizenship of “the person in question?” If it was a birth certificate, then wouldn’t a copy have been included?


    That’s the link to the entire 97-page file. The numbers on the documents may not correspond to the numbers on the pages.
    Mrs. Rondeau replies: Thank you. This story is on our list of things to do.

      1. You know, that’s a good guess about the x’d out word because, if I remember correctly, a couple of the letters in the word rose up above the others. Could Soebarkah be a first name? Soebarkah Abdallah Hussein Soetoro. Rolls right off your tongue.

      2. The “b” and “k” of soebarkah fit the pattern of tall letters behind the 4th “x” and 7th “x”. But if it is soebarkah that is crossed out, you would think that we would see a tall capital “S” behind the 1st “x”.

        I don’t think the crossed out word could be “currently” as the there is nothing hanging below the last “x”, as you would expect with the letter “y”.

    1. I remember now where the other date, March 5, 1964, is found: On one page from Stanley Ann’s passport file. The TYPEWRITTEN application that she signed on 4/27/81 has the 5th and the wrong year, ’64. This was the timeframe when she was allegedly in Pakistan.

      The previous application, handwritten and signed by her on 6/2/76, has the March 15, 1965 date. That’s the same date as on page 3 of her amendment to her ’65 passport. So she did at one time know the correct date but inexplicably forgot it by 1981. Hmmmm.

  27. Most probably her passport was invalid, as if she took INDONESIAN citizenship, she could NOT BE DUAL!

    INDONESIA then and now only allows for ONE CITIZENSHIP…THEIRS!

  28. One thing we can all agree that Barry learned from his mother is how to LIE. I’ve read in one article “The Obama Timeline” I think it was, that S. Ann Dunham was a habitual liar too.

  29. It looks like we all are sharing a bad dream with a man from nowhere serving as our president and with no justice except for the social justice. Just like in the new movie Inception. Everything is unstable and surreal. To understand what is going on we need to remember how we got here.

  30. Mrs. Sharon Rondeau, I just visited http://www.CitizenWells.wordpress.com and I read these interesting comments here regarding this subject that perhaps you and your readers should see:

    (1) “Sharzie // August 2, 2010 at 9:22 am

    I am doing some family genealogy research and I just got a copy of my grandmother’s passport application from 1927. They keep these applications forever. There is something on this “destroyed” one that they don’t want us to see!!!!”

    * * * *

    (2) “Pete // August 2, 2010 at 9:22 am

    They don’t want us to see the truth. The truth would set this people and this nation free. Funny how the Elementary School records for Obama registration–which are public record-are ‘destroyed’ or ‘missing’ as well.


    * * * *

    (3) “Pete // August 2, 2010 at 9:56 am


    I don’t know why I didn’t catch this before. The Federal government just made a statement that Obama’s mothers old passport records were destroyed in the 1980′s.


    Now, why on earth would they destroy the passport records in the 1980′s of someone whom was still ALIVE AND TRAVELING OUT OF THE UNITED STATES. This is an ACTIVE file, they don’t destroy active passport records on live people, they don’t even destroy them on dead people.


    * * * *
    Mrs. Rondeau replies: Of course, because the records would most likely show that she was out of the country before and after August 4, 1961. Then Obama’s cover would be blown.

  31. Sharon please read page 48 at the botton of Soetoro’s papers dated Ausut 1967 they mention something like this:

    There is nothing in the file to document the status of the spouse’s son. Please inquire in his citizenship and residence status and determine wheter or not he is tthe applicant’s child within the meaning of Section 101(b)(i)(6)of the Act?

    If that was the case why no other document was provided after that date?
    Mrs. Rondeau replies: Can you provide a link to these documents?

      1. Sharon

        Please notice on Scribd page 10, document has number 1, and then there are 23 missing pages and one blank.



        Total 23 pages missing plus one blank.

    1. Corazon7,
      If they have indeed inquired into his citizenship/residence status… they must have his bc or other doc on file to show he was born in USA (what doc could it possibly be that shows birth in USA?)
      If they do have his real bc or other docs showing US birth, they won’t hesitate to release it.
      If they didn’t have it or other conclusive doc, they wouldn’t have determined that he was a USA citizen stepchild to Lolo S and would not have let him in USA.
      But they obviously let BO back into USA!
      They did not bother to check his citizenship? (maybe the powerful grand-parents got to them?) or
      They approved the ‘waiver’ i.e let them in with the expired or ‘invalid’ passport where soebarkah was embedded? (I do remember seeing a letter that grants the ‘waiver’)

      See even back then his citizenship was in question. Probably all he had was that old US passport with his mother. All passports he ever had were non-USA passports until perhaps when he became a senator.
      When will the traitors in congress. media, courts look at these mountains of evidences?

  32. Dr. Orly Taitz has written on her web site
    that he has been issued 39 SS numbers.

    She has some documents on her site
    about his mother’s passports.
    Someone wrote that they think one file
    is missing.

    Comments indicate that it is suspicious
    that some of the info was scratched
    out by his mother. It is all like a spy novel.
    Mrs. Rondeau replies: Absolutely, and we are writing it.

  33. Now, why on earth would they destroy the passport records in the 1980′s of someone whom was still ALIVE AND TRAVELING OUT OF THE UNITED STATES. This is an ACTIVE file, they don’t destroy active passport records on live people, they don’t even destroy them on dead people.

    The lies just keep coming.


  34. The news also revealed that all information in her passport file about her comings and goings during 1961 have been destroyed by the state dept.

    I’ve said all along that if it ever comes down to it, they’ll just destroy the info.

  35. wow, and yet the media, politicians and judicial members all turn a blind eye to all of this information. Everything uncovered about Obama just leads to more questions.

    1. There is no blind eye being turned from all this information. They all know the truth, and knew the truth before the election in 2008. This has been documented before. The Clintons, the McCains, and the rest of Congress already knows the truth.

  36. Could Soebarkah be Obama’s real last name? I recall that Miss Tickly theorized that Obama had been adopted as an infant by Ann Dunham. And then subsequently either she or one of her bloggers put up some photos of Indonesian men who resembled Obama.

    1. I was always intrigued by this possibility – and comparing photos of Stanley and dba Obama at different ages I wasn’t able to detect any of those “family” things that generally can be found in children/ parents pictures, even in diluted form (other that their shoe-sized chin) –

      And today, while going through the web, I found in the WND story covering this issue a photo with Stanley in Indonesia, dressed, in a long shot –
      And what is interesting here is that Stanley (in her 40-s) appears a rather short, stocky type – none of her physical features having transferred to dba Obama whose physique has been always of a lanky boy, and later man –
      Very interesting photo, indeed, and if Stanley’s and Barry’s juxtaposed photos would be shown to a neutral, unsuspecting party, I’m 100% certain that the hypothetical person would not infer from the photos any blood relationship between the two –

      The adoption theory also can explain Stanley’s disconnectedness as “mother” – hasn’t she dumped Barry in a few years, continuing her existence alone, with not much curiosity for her “child”?

      1. Oilbama looks like his grandfather, Stanley Dunham, Stanly Anne’s father. She looks like her father, too, in the face, but she didn’t inherit his long, lean build.

      2. It would indeed help explain the mother’s disconnectedness.

        The passport files show Ann Dunham to be 5’6″. Obama is 6’1″. Do we know how tall Obama Senior was?

      3. There are two photos of Oilbama’s grandfather, Stanley Dunham, embedded in this article at American Thinker. http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/02/another_look_at_obamas_origins.html

        In the group photo embedded in this AM article, you can see that Stanley Dunham was a tall man. Barack Sr is the man wearing the Hawaiin leis and the white man standing next to him is Stanley Dunham.

  37. There are as many inconsistencies and mysteries within the many pages of immigration information that they released for Lolo Soetoro. These are at Scribd, too. Since they did cough up this info for Lolo, albeit with some redactions to protect Soebarkah’s privacy, why can’t the same information be requested for BHO Sr.’s travels and encounters with the immigration service? He had to have had the same types of visas and travel documents and permissions as Lolo needed. So why hasn’t someone asked for those documents? Or have they? Read the Lolo files. Interesting stuff.
    Mrs. Rondeau replies: We have. The Identity and Passport Service in Great Britain claims they have a record of applications for passports, but they will release no paperwork whatsoever.

    1. But wouldn’t our immigration service have the same kind of information for BHO Sr. as they released for Lolo Soetoro? Like the “Certificate of Eligibility for Exchange Visitor Status”, which is page one of the data released for Soetoro. Both of her husbands were exchange students, so wouldn’t both have the same type of records here in the US?

  38. […] Strunk also alleged that it appeared that someone was using Stanley Ann’s social security number illegally while working for the Ford Foundation […]

    Curiouser and curiouser –
    ’cause it was Peter Geithner, father of our Treasury guy, Timothy Geithner, who ran the Ford Foundation’s Indonesia Microcredit program, and who met Stanley Ann several times in Djakarta when visiting there.
    Also, from the – not yet clarified – Occidental College/Obama affair, it appears that it was Mr. Geithner Sr. who arranged for the young and promising Barry Soetero from Djakarta a Fullbright Scholarship in the USA, a first step in the nurturing lefty university fold that further allowed Barry Soetero to morph gradually into Barack Obama, mystery Columbia U graduate, mystery Harvard Law graduate, mystery… etc., etc., … everything leading to our current, and equally mysterious US putative president, still dba Obama.

    And since we are talking about SSN – apparently the Dunham/Obama family has a thing with these unique numbers. It is clear now that dba Obama has used through his American existence at least four different SSNs, fact which, I think, is a felony, isn’t it?

    Great job, mrs. Rondeau – congratulations –