Spread the love


contributed by Neil Turner

Snapshot of the flyers distributed at the Oceanside, CA tea party as well as in other venues across the country

(Apr. 30, 2010) — The Oceanside, CA Tea Party on April 15 was a huge success, with signs advertising the Columbia Sedition and Treason Trial to be held in New York City from May 14-19, 2010, prominently displayed.

After meeting “America’s Sheriff” Joe Arpaio-endorsed candidate for San Diego Sheriff, Jay LaSeur, I had the opportunity to tell LeSeur of the evidence (repeated often throughout the evening) to be presented at the trial.  When I asked Jay if he would prosecute Obama when the Grand Jury returned indictments against him, San Diego’s next Sheriff responded, “Absolutely!”

I distributed many flyers and sent several photos to radio show host Roger Hedgecock, who had asked for photos from tea parties around the country.

Finally, I asked a question of CA Gubernatorial Candidate Larry Naritelli:

As Governor and Commander-in-Chief of the CA National Guard, would you be willing to follow the lead of several other near and border-state candidates and demand that Mr. Obama, as Commander-in-Chief of our military, show proof that he is Constitutionally eligible to be Commander-in-Chief, and if he is not, then  will you return all of our National Guard troops to California and deploy them on the border to defend us from the illegal alien invasion?

“Absolutely!” said Candidate Naritelli.  “Not only that, but I will secure our borders, and will even call out the local ‘Minutemen’ to help in this endeavor.”

An ABC reporter was handed a copy of the C.I.A. COLUMBIA OBAMA Sedition and Treason TRIAL flyer and then asked if ABC would be covering the trial in New York City in May.  She said “Absolutely,” then looked in greater detail at the flyer and said: “I don’t know about that one.”

The evidence which I have been told will be presented at the trial in New York is as follows:

  • Barry Soetoro was recruited, as a foreign student at Occidental College in CA, by the C.I.A., who was looking for Arabic-speaking, Muslim, non-U.S. citizens to go to Afghanistan to assist the Mujahedeen in driving the Russians out of the country;
  • They arranged with Columbia University to act as a “cover” (and to give him a “Degree”) while he was working for them  in Pakistan and Afghanistan;
  • Saudi money then got him into Harvard, but when he got his “law degree” there, he couldn’t get a job with any major law firms because he couldn’t pass any “vetting”;
  • He went to Chicago where he met attorney Michelle Robinson (working with the now convicted and imprisoned Tony Rezko), who married him – and she “arranged” for his “U.S. citizenship.”

It is expected that additional evidence about Obama’s true past will be presented by Dr. Manning and his associates.  Further information can be found here.

A video presentation of the tea party can be found here.

UPDATE, May 2, 2010: The following email has been sent to Greta van Susteren of Fox News regarding the Columbia trial:


Near the end of your show tonight (4-30-10) you played the clip of Jay Leno with Governor Schwartzenegger and said: “The Constitution will have to be changed if Schwartzenegger wants to be President” (or words to that effect).

Since ‘Ahnold’ has lived here in the U.S. for over 14 years, and is over 35 years of age, one can only assume that you were referring to the requirement that, according to Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the Constitution, one must also be a Natural Born U.S. Citizen, not just Naturalized, to be President.

Since this criteria would also apply to Barack Obama, I, and millions of your viewing public, would like to know why you would make a news item of this incident relative to the ‘Governator’, but show no interest in applying this criteria to the Usurpation of our Presidency by a complete unknown who, by his own admission, fails to meet the criteria of being a Natural Born citizen (his father was never a U.S. Citizen).

Your reasons for not addressing this issue are a puzzlement to many of us, and so, on behalf of Dr. James Manning, I would like to invite you to appear as a witness at the C.I.A. COLUMBIA OBAMA Sedition and Treason TRIAL (see below) so that you can explain to the American public why you and the MSM refuse to apply these Constitutional standards to a by now obvious – ‘Enemy of the State’.


1.   Will you explain to me and your viewers why you refuse to report on this most newsworthy of Constitutional issues?, and

2.   Will you be willing to contact Dr. Manning to arrange for your appearance as an expert witness at the trial?, and

3.   Will you be willing to give this trial the kind of coverage you gave to the Natalie Holloway disappearance issue not long ago?


Neil B. Turner

Join the Conversation


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. 12th Generation AMERICAN says:
    Saturday, May 1, 2010 at 8:29 AM
    “Your misinformed, uneducated, emotional , hysterical STUPID electorate…..” We just refer to them as “Democrats”!!!
    WOW!!!!! Brilliant comment my friend.
    You deserve a standing ovation for that one!!!!
    You know……….I just cannot believe that soooo many voted for that POS.
    There we go, another acronym POSPOTUS………..

  2. Who wants to play the acronym game with me?
    I’m trying to come up with a new one for POTUS applied to AKAObama
    and get people to recognize, talk about and maybe isolate, ridicule and chuckle about this fool
    who was elected as Resident of Our White House.

    How about ROTUS where R=Resident?
    Or UPOTUS where U=Usurper?
    MCPOTUS where MC=Mack Daddy?
    BSPOTUS where BS=Barry Soetoro?

  3. I still have a hard time believing that the one was a cia opperative. i hope the dr. has not been deceived because he is really trying to do the right thing for this country. there is some confusion for me in that the dr. also made the statement that the one actually went to school in russia at some marxist academy. would the cia fund this??? the enemy of your enemy is your friend??? i can only hope they eat their own. wouldnt that be fun to watch?

    1. Plain Jane this is a fact. I’m not sure of exact dates or time but I have read that on a trip to Russia Obama was detained by Russian Authorities as being a spy and even though he was a Senator at the time. There is alot more than meets the eye with this guy. I beleive him and all who support Obama are the “enemies from within” that is talked about in the oaths that these traitors took upon entering their offices. The other thing is that Obama is just a shill for the other US government. There are two USA’s one run by the “corporation” and the other is the soveriegn run by the Constitution. We need to get back to the real Constituional law of the land and stop being used by the Corporation who has us as slaves. Each and everyone of our birth certificates were put up as collateral thereby making us slaves. See the RestoreAmericaPlan.net

    2. “I still have a hard time believing that the one was a cia opperative.”

      That one is a little hard to believe….but, he apparently was somewhere else when he was supposed to have been at Columbia….and, does he really have a bunch of different SS numbers?

      Nothing is impossible with Barry, and I wish Rev. Manning the best.

  4. Hi TexomaEd!
    No, Tulsa is in dist 1 but nearby Catoosa and Claremore are in my dist. The dividing lines are very close. My campaign has taken a backseat to the battle against the long legged mack daddy. I’ll be in NY to march with Rev. Manning and be there for the verdict.

    1. I see. Well, I will check with him nonetheless. He may actually live outside of Tulsa, perhaps east of the city. Have fun at the trial. It could be big news.

      1. Thank you TexomaEd.

        I must admit I found this descriptive term humorous until I viewed the link. I appreciate any chuckle whenever possible these days; however, I now recognize a startling accuracy not so haha worthy.
        Thanx again for the info.

    1. Amber, I read the article on exposeobama.com. The author presents some good information but he gets other things wrong. For example, he says this:

      “The Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, adopted on 9 July 1868, furnishes a rather broad definition of who qualifies as a “natural born citizen.”

      That is not correct. In fact he contradicts himself by mentioning the 1874 Supreme Court case of Minor v. Happersett, which occurred 6 years after the 14th amendment. In Minor, the court said this “The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that.” In 1874, the 14th amendment was a part of the Constitution.

      He also makes the following statement:

      “… subsequent rulings by Congress and enacted by federal statute affirm that children born abroad by parents who are both U.S. citizens are not only U.S. citizens themselves, but are recognized as “natural born citizens.”

      In the 1790 Naturalization Act, Congress said that children born abroad to US citizens were to be considered as natural born citizens. But 5 years later Congress removed the words “natural born” in the 1795 Naturalization Act, saying that children born abroad to US citizens were “citizens”. Federal statutes, such as Title 8 Section 1401 do not use the term natural born citizen.

  5. Good link Joey. I just read it and I think this story was also touched upon by Rush Limbaugh today, but of course, it’s nice to read it in its entirety. There are some great writers on American Thinker.

    1. Joey, I read the article you linked from the American Thinker and the comments. One of the comments to the article, though perhaps a bit strong, summed up why we have Barry pretending to be president quite well:


      “Posted by: Pragmatist Apr 29, 07:43 AM
      Speaking as a non American who has watched this DISASTER from afar for over three years now I can only say. What the hell did you think you were getting America when you elected a document HIDING, communist, terrorist and criminal associating , radical anti American anti White RACIST Church going , RACIST speaking , LYING Mohammedan as President about whom you know absolutely NOTHING. Your misinformed, uneducated, emotional , hysterical STUPID electorate have got just you what they voted for and what was SO OBVIOUS to anyone with even half a brain long long before you committed NATIONAL SUICIDE by voting for “.

      1. “Your misinformed, uneducated, emotional , hysterical STUPID electorate…..” We just refer to them as “Democrats”!!!

  6. It’s hard to get people past the stigma of thinking that if they want proof of Obama’s eligibility, they are some kind of kook. I don’t know where all this started (maybe with the media?), but hopefully many more are getting braver about speaking out and doing their own research. I have close friends who are tea party participants, but who won’t speak about Obama’s ineligibility, like it’s a plague of some kind. I have very high hopes on this upcoming trial.

    1. It’s from Alinsky’s “Rules for Radicals” book that the extreme radical left loves so much. You isolate, mock, and ridicule those who threaten you, and some of them will then be quiet for fear of what others may think. The people who are affected by Alinsky don’t even know what’s happening to them. It’s worked pretty well for Obama and his minions, especially with Fox News and their supposely conservative talking heads joining in to protect Obama.

      However, it’s not working on millions who really don’t care what they are called for searching for the truth. In the case of Obama’s eligibility, it doesn’t take a rocket surgeon to figure out there is a big problem with Obama’s eligibility, or lack thereof. From the hidden records and long-form real birth certificate, to the way Obots go ballistic when eligibility is mentioned, they telegraph their fear.

      Keep up the pressure, do not give up……we will win.

    2. It is maddening that the ‘tea partiers’, especially the ‘leaders’ and many so-called ‘patriots’ are so afraid or unwilling to address the O inelig issue! They are crying day and night about unconstitutional this and that pushed by odevil and gang, but willingly let odevil usurp the presidency without a peep, giving him and his gang all the time they need to pile on the destruction! Why aren’t they standing up for constitution article 2 nbc presidential requirement – is that not worth defending? They are as hyprocritical as Odevil – proclaiming their love for the constitution yet unwilling or afraid to uphold article 2, the most basic provision! How can we blame congress or anyone for not upholding the Constitution when we ourselves are not doing so?
      Wake up! You either defend the entire constitution or you don’t.
      Stigma? Aren’t they calling us names no matter what we do or don’t do – the Tea Partiers are called all kinds of names although they don’t utter a peep about Odevil eligibility! Might as well give them the best reason to call you fringe nuts, by seriously addressing the Obama elig issue!

    3. Some people believe that the Birth Certificate is irrelavent. Not because that do not beleive that he is not a naturally born citizen but because it distracts from other issues that involve Obama as crook. I personally think that Obama is the de facto leader of the ” Corporation” and therefore why would he have a BC to show us and is why he is so arrogant. Our Government has been hijacked already by the Corporation. RestoreAmericaPlan.net

    1. You betcha I am! Are you in district 2 OK? If so, please vote in the July 27th Repub primary. I’m running against 4 RINO’s. Please visit my website http://mikiboothforcongress.com/ or facebook or “google” my name. I’ve been in the fight to expose BO/BS for the fraud, usurper, traitor, liar that he is. Thanks, Brian, for noticing. God bless you!

      1. Miki, is Tulsa in OK district #2? If so, I know someone there who probably would support you. I am on Texas side of the Red River, else you would have my vote!

  7. I hope Rev. Manning’s evidence is rock solid, or this could be a set back to getting the obvious usurper out of the presidency.

    Hard to know for sure what this is going to be.

    There is evidence that Obama never actually attended Columbia. Fox News interviewed 400 people who ostensibly attended the same classes at the same time as Obama at Columbia. Not a single person remembered Obama being there.