Blagojevich attorneys subpoena Obama to testify

WILL HE BE OBAMA’S ACHILLES’ HEEL?

by Kathleen Gotto

Rod Blagojevich, former Governor of Illinois

(Apr. 26, 2010) — Attorneys for former Illinois governor Rod Blagojevich submitted a motion to the court on April 22, 2010 to issue a subpoena (ad testificandum) to obtain Barack Obama’s testimony at his corruption trial scheduled to begin in June. Parts of the document have been redacted, presumably with the information that has been leaked. Not only is Blagojevich pressing for Obama to testify at the trial, but he also wants to force the release of “any and all reports generated during any and all interviews [prosecutors] had with…Barack Obama.”

In early December 2008, Blagojevich was arrested on criminal charges which included the attempted sale of the Senate seat vacated by Obama as well as conspiracy to commit wire and mail fraud and bribery.  The federal indictment against Blagojevich and his former chief of staff, John Harris, can be found here.

A footnote at the bottom of the first page of the subpoena of April 22, 2010 indicates that Blagojevich’s defense team preferred to have all “sealed” information made available to the public but acknowledges that “portions that contain sealed information provided by the government have been redacted.”

However, James B. Zagel, the presiding judge, scheduled an emergency evening meeting in his chambers on April 22, 2010 to ask attorneys to explain how redacted information showed up in a released defense filing. According to the judge, that information was to have remained sealed.

Blagojevich’s attorneys are requesting that Obama provide testimony “because he is a witness necessary to Rod Blagojevich’s Constitutional right to a fair trial” (p. 10).

An unredacted version of the subpoena can be found here which shows a total of 15 redactions.

The redacted information covered several issues and begs answers to many questions, among them:

1. Did Obama lie about his conversations and dealings with Tony Rezko, his former friend and fundraiser?

Blagojevich’s lawyers allege that the public official to whom Rezko admitted giving a large amount of money was Barack Obama. Obama claimed that Rezko never passed on a lobbyist’s request to hold a fundraiser in exchange for favorable legislative action. Blagojevich’s attorneys say Obama refused the request.

The redacted portion reads:

However, the defense has a good faith belief that Mr. Rezko, President Obama’s former friend, fund-raiser, and neighbor told the FBI and the United States Attorneys a different story about President Obama. In a recent in camera proceeding, the government tendered a three paragraph letter indicating that Rezko “has stated in interviews with the government that he engaged in election law violations by personally contributing a large sum of cash to the campaign of a public official who is not Rod Blagojevich. … Further, the public official denies being aware of cash contributions to his campaign by Rezko or others and denies having conversations with Rezko related to cash contributions. … Rezko has also stated in interviews with the government that he believed he transmitted a quid pro quo offer from a lobbyist to the public official, whereby the lobbyist would hold a fundraiser for the official in exchange for favorable official action, but that the public official rejected the offer. The public official denies any such conversation. In addition, Rezko has stated to the government that he and the public official had certain conversations about gaming legislation and administration, which the public official denies having had.”10

2. Did Obama lie about his involvement in trying to make a “deal” for his old Senate seat?

The defense for Blagojevich alleges that Obama told a labor union official that he would support the candidacy of Valerie Jarrett (Senate Candidate B) for his vacated Senate seat.

Redacted portions read:

18. President-elect Obama also suggested Senate Candidate A to Governor Blagojevich. John Harris told the FBI and the United States Attorneys that he spoke to President’s Chief of Staff on November 12, 2008. Harris took notes of the conversation and wrote that President’s Chief had previously worked as Blagojevich’s press secretary. Obama agreed of Staff told Harris that Senate Candidate A was acceptable to Obama as a senate pick. (Harris handwritten notes, OOG1004463) President’s Chief of Staff told the FBI that “he could not say where but somewhere it was communicated to him that” Senate Candidate A was a suggested candidate viewed as one of the four “right” candidates “by the Obama transition team.” (Rahm Emanuel 302, p. 5, December 20, 2008). Harris told Blagojevich Obama’s suggestion on November 12, 2008 (Blagojevich Home Phone Call # 539).

and:

Yet, despite President Obama stating that no representatives of his had any part of any deals, labor union president told the FBI and the United States Attorneys that he spoke to labor union official on November 3, 2008 who received a phone message from Obama that evening. After labor union official listened to the message labor union official told labor union president “I’m the one”. Labor union president took that to mean that labor union official was to be the one to deliver the message on behalf of Obama that Senate Candidate B was his pick. (Labor union president 302, February 2, 2009, p. 7).

and this:

Labor union official told the FBI and the United States Attorneys “Obama expressed his belief that [Senate Candidate B] would be a good Senator for the people of Illinois and would be a candidate who could win re-election. [Labor union official] advised Obama that [labor union official] would reach out to Governor Blagojevich and advocate for [Senate Candidate B].. . . [Labor union official] called [labor union president] and told [labor union president] that Obama was aware that [labor union official] would be reaching out to Blagojevich.” (Labor union official 302, February 3, 2009 p. 3).

3. Did a supporter of Obama offer a quid pro quo on a Valerie Jarrett senate appointment?

The redacted portion reads:

A supporter of Presidential Candidate Obama suggested that she talk to the wife of Governor Blagojevich about Senate Candidate B for Senator. (Valerie Jarrett 302, December 19, 2008). Supporter of Presidential Candidate Obama is mentioned in a phone call on November 3, 2008, having offered “fundraising” in exchange for Senate Candidate B for senator (Blagojevich Home Phone Call # 149).

4. Did Obama have a secret phone call with Rod Blagojevich?

The redacted portion reads:

President-elect Obama also spoke to Governor Blagojevich on December 1, 2008 in Philadelphia. On Harris Cell Phone Call # 139, John Harris and Governor’s legal counsel discuss a conversation Blagojevich had with President-elect Obama. The government claims a conspiracy existed from October 22, 2008 continuing through December 9, 2008.6 That conversation is relevant to the defense of the government’s theory of an ongoing conspiracy. Only Rod Blagojevich and President Obama can testify to the contents of that conversation. The defense is allowed to present evidence that corroborates the defendant’s testimony.7

On page 2 of the subpoena, Blagojevich’s lawyers assert that they have requested documentation from the government on an interview between FBI agents and Obama in December 2008 but have received nothing.  Defense lawyers also claim that “… Obama has direct knowledge to allegations made in the indictment.  In addition,  …Obama’s public statements contradict other witness statements…”

A report from December 2009 states that Obama, Valerie Jarrett and Rahm Emanuel, Obama’s Chief of Staff, were interviewed by the FBI.

The judge has set a trial date for June 3, 2010.

11 Responses to "Blagojevich attorneys subpoena Obama to testify"

  1. 2discern   Friday, April 30, 2010 at 5:01 PM

    UPDATE: 4-30-10
    Judge says no to Obama subpoena in Blago case from Breitbart headline. Looks like Blago’s best bet to present his story of obummer’s involvement is at the Manning trial at least he can open up there freely with pertinent facts.

    It appears all judges are not trustworthy for any decision regarding the liar-in-chief. Robert Bauer sure can get around putting out fires that ignite around the usurper.

  2. SapphireSunday   Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 3:01 PM

    Thanks for reminding us of that FACT!

  3. Kathy   Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 8:29 AM

    That’s very interesting; I hadn’t heard that before. I wonder what it will take to break the back of the monopolistic, conspiratorial, propaganda machine previously known as the mainstream media?

    Do ABC, NBC, MSNBC, CBS, CNN, FoxNews, et al hold licenses or contracts approved or provided by FTC for eternity? Makes one wonder what it would take for a conservative, truth-telling media organization to muscle into the monopoly on news…..

  4. TexomaEd   Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 12:51 AM

    When Burris was chosen to fill Obama’s Senate seat, he received alot of criticism for having been chosen by Blagojevich and for not being qualified in terms of experience. Well, that went on for a number of days, perhaps even weeks. Then one day, Burris professed being qualified, as he was from Illinois, he was old enough, and that he was a natural born citizen (which is required for President, but not Senator). Shortly after he made that statement, the criticisms regarding his qualifications suddenly died down. It seems that Burris knew something, and this was his way of telling the press to shut up or else hear more from him on the topic of natural born citizen.

  5. Trac   Monday, April 26, 2010 at 8:40 PM

    Dear Post and Email,

    One of these days something like this will be the straw that breaks the camel’s back. If not this particular trial then someday— something— will be the start of bringing Obama down and I strongly suspect it will be of the “if I go down Obama I’m bringing you down with me” kind of deal. After all, when a house is built on nothing but lies, involving who knows how many people, how can it stand forever? How has it even stood this long?
    Meanwhile, thank you for what you do, I pray someday those who scoff now will have to admit you had the true American heart and were right all along.

    Stay strong and never give up.

  6. stonek_1   Monday, April 26, 2010 at 6:19 PM

    Look for the judge to find some reason to leave Obama out of this and dismiss the lawsuit.
    As for Rezko he more than likely is loose somewhere outside America under a different name.
    That way there will be no incriminating evidence brought out. You know Obama cannot afford to have past friends prosecuted so will find reason NOT to!

  7. Pixel Patriot   Monday, April 26, 2010 at 1:53 PM

    Rick,
    Blithesomely in jest. The corruption bestowed upon us is of such great magnitude that a little humor is good for the soul from time to time. The sleeping giant has been awakened.

  8. rick   Monday, April 26, 2010 at 12:42 PM

    well pixel , the white house may have said they investigated it . but , dont they always say such ? maybe this will bring out the TRUTH ! we shall see

  9. jtx   Monday, April 26, 2010 at 10:35 AM

    … righhhht!!! …

  10. Pixel Patriot   Monday, April 26, 2010 at 10:14 AM

    The White House have already investigated their actions with regard to this matter and have exonerated themselves…nothing to see here…move along.

    http://www.RiseUpForAmerica.com

  11. Benaiah   Monday, April 26, 2010 at 9:13 AM

    Barack Hussein Obama, Taqqiya [Liar] in Chief
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/24002947/Allahu-Akhbar

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.