OK Candidate releases son’s 1981 Hawaiian Certificate of Live Birth

DOCUMENT CONFIRMS INVESTIGATORS’ SUSPICIONS, EXPOSES DOH AS LYING

by John Charlton

The Hawaii 1981 Certificate of Live Birth for Alan Paliko Booth (full size image).

(Feb. 10, 2010) — Miki Booth, a native Hawaiian and candidate for the U.S. House of Representatives for the State of Oklahoma, shocked and awed supporters of Barack Hussein Obama during the recent Tea Party Nation convention in Memphis, TN, when she publicly disclosed the Certificate of Live Birth for her son, Alan Paliko Booth, born on Nov. 24, 1981, at 7:55 AM, at Kapiolani Children’s Medical Center, the same hospital that Obama has claimed to be his own place of birth,nearly 20 years before.

The actual document contains a wealth of information such as the signature of the attending physician or midwife, a field for evidence presented for an Amended Birth Filing, race of parents and child, and a signature and date stamp, certifying the copy as an authentic representation of the information on file with the Hawaii Department of Health.

Importantly, the actual document, which you can view through this link, contains the fields, “Date received by Local Registrar” and “Date accepted by the State” and the name of the Local Registrar.  In recent months, Miss Janice Okubo has insisted that the terms mean the same thing and that she has no knowledge of what terms were used previously to the alleged Obama COLB.

The now widely recognized, crude forgery which Obama claims to be his own Certification of Live Birth bearing the date of 2007 but without the seal and confirmatory signature of the State Registrar, does not contain information regarding witnesses to the birth or the date the filing was accepted by the State.

This has led private researchers to speculate that Obama’s original vital records, which Dr. Fukino claims to have seen and which she herself admits are several, might contain a delayed birth filing, an amended birth filing, adoption record, or other changes regarding the name of the child and parents and location or nation in which the child was purported to be born.

The details of this actual 1981 “long form” “birth certificate” indicate more precisely the possible motives Obama might have for refusing to disclose his own real certificate, that is, if he was in fact born in Hawaii in the first place.  Because the actual form might indicate:

1) Race of Child: Negro or White — in the former case, Obama’s racism might take offense; in the latter case his race politics might be undone.  An at-home birth filing, reportedly, contains the race of the child.

2) Race of Parent: Father might be indicated as Negro rather than African, which would gut the prima facie evidentiary value of his own alleged BC.

3) Parents might not be who they are claimed to be — there has been a lot of speculation on that;

4) Place of birth might have originally been Mombassa, Kenya,  as Obama’s Co-grandmother and he himself have in the past claimed; if so, Obama is perhaps not even a U.S. Citizen.

5) No father might have been indicated originally, because Obama’s mother might not have been sure who the father was at the precise moment of the original filing — which would reflect badly on his mother’s morals and cast doubt upon any evidentiary value of whomever was subsequently claimed to be the real father; because doubt in such cases is prima facie evidence that there was more than one man who could have been the father.

6) Name of child might not be Barack Hussein Obama II, which, in the absence of name changes, would make Obama’s usage of his current name unlawful.

UPDATE: Due to a too hastily written title, the URL of this post is in accurate, whereas the current title is correct: viz., “Hawaiian Certificate of Live Birth.”  The URL is being left as-is, so that those who have already linked to the article, won’t lose their links.

20 Responses to "OK Candidate releases son’s 1981 Hawaiian Certificate of Live Birth"

  1. 12thGenerationAMERICAN   Thursday, February 11, 2010 at 9:05 PM

    Someone somehow needs to compare the DNA of Obama and his sister to see if they are indeed half brorher and sister?!!?

  2. Travis   Thursday, February 11, 2010 at 1:08 PM

    Joss is right. State got no say in it. What I read before is the Hawaiian courts are the only ones who can order that a marriage is invalid on account of bigamy. Its right there in the Hawaiian law. The man or woman or the former wife involved need TO ASK the Hawaiian courts, cos NOBODY ELSE can get the order. The Hawaiian courts never said the marriage was invalid. Heck, Hawaii divorced em. If he wasn’t born in the USA Obama could not be an American at that time. His mother was too young to pass it on.

  3. syc1959   Thursday, February 11, 2010 at 12:07 PM

    The “Certificate of Live Birth” different then a “Certification of Live Birth’ was issued on Dec 29, 1981, based on the date stamp on the document.

  4. Bill   Thursday, February 11, 2010 at 10:41 AM

    One issue that has not ben mentioned is that Obama’s heritage is EAST African, while most American Black people come from WEST Africa. Obama does not look like most American Blacks. He does not share the religious and slave society background of our people. So he does not have the historical, psychic, emotional, or social feeling and connection for American Black people.
    This is one important factor which will push toward his downfall.

  5. A pen   Thursday, February 11, 2010 at 8:29 AM

    If Obama can claim legitimacy in a book then anyone can. I think I’ll publish as the son of Howard Hughes who was born a love child of Marilyn Monroe which was discovered by Joe DiMaggio causing the split and later when Kennedys’ secret service discovered the affair she committed suicide with their aid so that I could become president someday as an immigrant born in Mexico to two great American citizens. :-)

  6. TexomaEd   Thursday, February 11, 2010 at 1:57 AM

    Miss Tickly, good to hear from you. Hope all is better, and that we will hear from you more!

  7. TexomaEd   Thursday, February 11, 2010 at 1:55 AM

    You are right that it would not matter if Obama’s father was really a US citizen — Obama would still not meet the Constitutional test.

    Obama Senior claimed Obama Junior as a product of the marriage. In the time of our Founding Fathers, all that was necessary was for the father of record to claim he was the father in actuality, which Obama Senior did in the divorce papers. In the time of our Founding Fathers there was no way to test (such as with DNA) for paternity. If a man claimed to be the father of a son, then that was good enough for all legal purposes of identity, passing on of inheritance, land grants, and especially citizenship.

    Obama’s citizenship status at birth was dual (US and British/Kenyan) and so was his allegiance. His status at birth was “governed” by the laws of Great Britain. Natural born citizen status is the “strong check” against foreign influence, and this influence was present at the birth of Obama, as well as in the years that followed. These are all facts which will not go away should his father turn out to have been an American.

  8. Pingback: OK Candidate releases son’s 1981 Hawaiian Certification of Birth « Dancing Czars

  9. AttilasDaughter   Wednesday, February 10, 2010 at 10:54 PM

    Hey Miss Tickly,
    I missed You much!

  10. Greg Goss   Wednesday, February 10, 2010 at 5:27 PM

    Question. Do you know when this COLB was obtained?

  11. MissTickly   Wednesday, February 10, 2010 at 5:02 PM

    Excellent, John. Thanks for publishing a copy for us!

  12. kenneth   Wednesday, February 10, 2010 at 2:32 PM

    reply to David:
    The US citizens are armed and I think getting more restless for something to happen either politically are other action.
    As far standing a chance remember you do not kill a snake by cutting it’s tail off. In a revolution just a few would have to be removed and the lower levels would have no reason to fight as their power base would be gone.

  13. IceTrey   Wednesday, February 10, 2010 at 2:30 PM

    Add that no one has ever come forward saying they remember Ann even being pregnant and that no picture has ever surfaced showing her pregnant. I ask you what parents don’t take photos of their only daughters first pregnancy? Is Ann Dunham even Obama’s mother? Some have suggested Obama might be the son of Stanley Dunham and his mistress.

  14. jtx   Wednesday, February 10, 2010 at 1:55 PM

    Actually, Obama’s whole life seems to be nothing but a work of fiction. The man has never shown himself to be Constitutionally eligible to hold the office he now occupies.

    If you’d like to see something from a different point of view, watch the two short videos below which, even though they start slowly and have a bit of fun, contain a wealth of factual data – more than we’ve seen from Obama.

    In fact in the second video a famous senator is quoted speaking about someone that sounds for all the world like “Our Boy” and really strikes a chord.

    Only thing is the senator was the Roman named Cicero speaking in 42 BC – but the message is still very directed and pertinent for all of us:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OsX5DzZHkIU Three Little Words

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LNGG8tIJNMY Merry Christmas OmeriKa!!

  15. plain jane   Wednesday, February 10, 2010 at 1:02 PM

    I know there has been alout of discussion about the father and his identity. My original thoughts on the eligibility issue was that the father was an american and therefore BHO was a NBC. However I was informed that this doesn’t matter because he claimed BHO sr as his father and therfore this is the legal guardian and forms the basis for the real purpose of the NBC clause which is no foreign allegiance. Also, we need to remember that all personal records must be released to verify that no subsequent citizenships are in question.

  16. David McAfee   Wednesday, February 10, 2010 at 12:30 PM

    The reality that we are seeing though, is the massive conspiracy and fraud that is being done to the American people. The media, both parties, and the courts, all the way up to the Supreme Court, is complicit in this wide scale cover-up. The question is, what is it going to take to get this issue dealt with appropriately? I’m not sure the Tea party movement can muster what it will take and I fear that only active revolution will (which would not stand a chance against those in power).

  17. Jon   Wednesday, February 10, 2010 at 12:02 PM

    Let’s see if O’Reilly or Beck can take this excellent article along with real documentation and add their commentary for the Fox audience

  18. yo   Wednesday, February 10, 2010 at 8:59 AM

    Unable to find clickable link to larger image on my pc. Chrome. Would really like to see larger image.

    ————-

    Mr. Charlton replies: Sorry about that, yo, the link was left out of the article by accident….I thought it was in the image itself, but I added it as a hyperlink in the text

  19. Joss Brown   Wednesday, February 10, 2010 at 8:41 AM

    One correction: If Obama was in fact born abroad, then Obama isn’t “perhaps” not a US citizen. He is *definitely* not a US citizen, unless he naturalized at a later date. But naturalization would not be relevant. Only his status at birth is, and if born abroad, he cannot have been a US citizen at birth, unless his mother lied about her age, when they filed Obama’s foreign birth with the Hawaiian authorities. But he’s ineligible anyway: He was a foreign subject, no matter where he was born, and a natural born US citizen can’t at the same time also be a natural born British subject.

    —————–

    Mr. Charlton replies: Joss, I said “perhaps” because if the marriage was recognized by the State Deptment as invalid, because bigamous, then the child of a 17-18 year old would be eligible to petition for citizenship, if born abroad.

  20. dLegend   Wednesday, February 10, 2010 at 6:34 AM

    Simply said…..
    Even an illiterate would know where HBO was actually borned !

    His Grandmother in Kenya IS always RIGHT !!!
    He was borned under her nose in Kenya….
    Then~Came to Hawaii & got a ‘fake’ B-Cert to certify he was born here

    Now~Paragraph #5 gives great ponderance….????
    5) No father might have been indicated originally, because Obama’s mother might not have been sure who the father was, at the precise moment of the original filing — which would reflect badly on his mother’s morals, and cast doubt upon any evidentiary value of whomsoever was subsequently claimed to be the real father; because doubt in such cases is prima facie evidence that there was more than one man who could have been the father.

    If this is the case~Then, I think even his name is in question too ???

    There’s too many ‘unanswered’ questions about this ‘President’….
    How strange really….!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.