If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my free Email alerts. Thanks for visiting!
ASKS TO FILE QUO WARRANTO AGAINST BARACK OBAMA
News Summary by Harry Hunter
(Jan. 27, 2010) — On Jan. 25, Dr. Orly Taitz petitioned the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia for permission to question the Constitutional eligibility of Barack Obama to be president. She filed a “Motion for Leave of Court to file Quo Warranto,” listing herself as plaintiff and Obama as respondent.
Congress long ago provided a way to simply ask of an officeholder, “By what warrant (right) do you hold office?” Since Barack Hussein Obama has never established as a fact that he is a citizen of the United States, much less a natural born citizen as required by the Constitution, and since he has made every effort to conceal actual relevant records while staking his presidency on a possibly forged digital image of a secondary birth document posted on the internet, it would seem that Taitz has every right to ask that the court verify Obama’s eligibility.
In her motion, Taitz first deals with the question of jurisdiction: “The court has jurisdiction under DC statute Sections 16-3501—16-3503 . . . and the case revolves around the Federal Question of eligibility of the President under Quo Warranto.” Attorneys Leo C. Donofrio and Mario Apuzzo have dealt extensively with quo warranto at their respective websites here and here. Donofrio has subsequently sequestered his older blogs.
Taitz’s description of the respondent in this case is a brief summary of the eligibility questions surrounding our putative president:
Respondent – Barack Hussein Obama, hereinafter “Obama”, President of the United States and Commander in Chief, who refused to present in any court of law or to the public any legally acceptable vital records that would prove his eligibility for US presidency based on Article 2, section 1 of the Constitution, as one born in the United States to two citizen parents without allegiance to any other sovereignties. As described in the Law of Nations Emer De Vatttel, Vol 1, Chapter 19, §212. From birth and until now Mr. Obama had citizenship of and allegiance to three other nations: Great Britain, Kenya and Indonesia.
Not the First Time
Interestingly, this is not Orly Taitz’s first attempt to file a quo warranto petition. Under the heading “Background of the Case,” she informs the court that “Taitz has filed both with the Attorney General Eric Holder and the US Attorney Jeffrey A. Taylor and his successor Channing Phillips a request for Quo Warranto in March and April of 2009 respectively. Exhibits 5,6, copies of the Certified Mail receipts, showing that those were received.” Taylor resigned – possibly influenced by this issue – and neither Holder nor Phillips even bothered to reply in all the months since then.
Under “Questions Presented,” Orly Taitz covers ground that is all too familiar to patriots who have followed the eligibility issue over the past year and a half. (Note that Taitz speaks a number of languages and that English is not her native tongue. Her readers sometimes need to make allowance for slight variations from standard idiom.) Taitz first questions proof of Obama’s birthplace:
Considering Obama’s first cousin Raela Odinga, Prime Minister of Kenya, sealed alleged records of Obama’s birth in Mombasa; while the State of Hawaii holds Obama’s “original” sealed birth records, allows registration of births out of State, allows registration based on a statement of one relative only without any corroborating evidence and seals original birth records.
Among the many other questions Taitz wants the court to consider, this one seems to be the key to the Pandora’s Box of our usurper-president: “ Does birth to or adoption by a non-citizen father or mother incur foreign allegiance sufficient to negate being a ‘natural born citizen’ and disqualify a candidate from becoming President?” For the sake of simplicity and clarity, one might wish that “adoption” had been omitted here. Adoption does bear on Obama’s legal name, which Taitz treats separately, but the absolute barrier to Obama’s eligibility for president is that his Kenyan father was a British citizen, a fact – not a conspiracy theory – which made Obama a British citizen at birth.
The State of Hawaii, Again…
Orly Taitz is not noted for brevity, and her Jan. 25 Motion is not brief. She even includes the role of the State of Hawaii in concealing Obama’s birth records, questioning whether Hawaii has violated the Constitution by obstructing the people’s right to a legitimate election and the right of Congress to vet a President-elect. She also points out that “The state of Hawaii statute 338-5 allows one to get a birth certificate based on a statement of one relative only without any corroborative evidence from any hospital.”
Taitz also raises questions about evidence of Obama’s possible foreign allegiance, “such as campaigning for a candidate in a foreign election, or traveling on a foreign passport.” Then there is the question of Obama’s Social Security number(s):
Most egregious is the fact that the respondent has used for most of his life in Somerville Massachusetts, Chicago, Illinois and currently in the White House SSN XXX-XX-4425, which was issued in the state of Connecticut between 1976-1979 and assigned to an individual born in 1890, who would have been 120 years old, if he would be alive today. Respondent never resided in the state of Connecticut and he is clearly not 120 years old.
As to what relief Orly Taitz is seeking, she wants the court to do the following:
- Issue a writ of Quo Warranto against Obama to ascertain his eligibility for office.
- Order an evidentiary hearing on Obama’s possible fraud, identity theft, and Social Security fraud.
- Request that the Commissioner of Social Security explain Obama’s use of a social security number issued to someone born in 1890.
- Request that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton release the birth certificate Obama used to obtain a U.S. passport. [This could be impossible, since the passport files have been compromised. Besides, Obama might never have had a U.S. passport until he became a U.S. senator. Senators automatically get a passport, no questions asked.]
- Grant Taitz financial relief for her expenses in pursuing the issue of Obama’s illegitimacy and for emotional stress caused by “an orchestrated effort by this administration to stop her, to silence her.”