If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my free Email alerts. Thanks for visiting!

THE MANCHURIAN CANDIDATE

© 2010, by Emanuel A. Winston, Middle East Analyst & Commentator

Obama takes pride in his Islamic heritage: above, he dones the traditional costume of a Somali Warrior

Are all Muslims taught to be candidates for becoming “Manchurian Candidates”, some knowingly, some unknowingly? (The original movie by this title has American soldiers held hostage by the Chinese Communists, being brainwashed to become killers and mentally implanted with the post-hypnotic suggestion that, on a given signal, he would assassinate the American President.)

When a young Muslim is taught Koranic Law in a “Madrassa” (school for strict Islam), repeating his lessons by rote day-after-day, year-after-year, these lessons of Islam’s superiority and violence are deeply implanted and never to be forgotten. Add to that the lessons he is taught about Mohammed, both his proclamations as recorded in the Koran and how he lived his life with instructions written in his “Hadith” (Oral Teachings).

Few Muslim children (or adults) can resist what psychiatrists would call “post-hypnotic suggestion”, otherwise called “reduced cues” or “subliminal cues”. These strong inner motivations create a call to action, hence: the “Manchurian Candidate”, under the post-hypnotic suggestion and instruction to attack America(ns), Israel(is), the un-believers of Europe and the rest of the “infidels” (non-Muslims).

Once imprinted, such a manipulated brain cannot be cleaned. Like attack guard dogs, they cannot be de-programmed with any reliability that they will not attack when triggered.

Clearly, Muslims seem to have multiple personalities that range from friendly (at times) but which can quickly change to anger and then to being willing killers. They exhibit the face they want you to see at any given time.

The kinds of Muslims who become agents of terror

“Jihadists” (holy warriors for Islam), such as Dr. Humam Khalil Abu al Balawi who was thought to be a reliable agent for the CIA and Jordan apparently had many faces. He used his Muslim Killer face when he exploded himself among ranking CIA agents in Afghanistan, killing 8 (7 American CIA agents and 1 Jordanian). Balawi was a Jordanian doctor – sometimes – when he was not being an Al Qaeda recruit. (1)

Recall the 6 Muslim doctors who mounted failed car bomb Terror attack in Britain and Glasgow? British Police confirmed a Palestinian doctor and an Iraqi physician, plus a Muslim doctor arrested in Australia. July 2, 2007 (2)

A group of 45 Muslim doctors threatened to use car bombs and rocket grenades in terrorist attacks in the United States during discussions on an ‘extremist’ internet chat site. (3)

Dr. Ayman al-Zawahiri was a co-conspirator with Osama Bin Laden, an Egyptian doctor who became a master of Terror – ‘interested’ in the use of biological and chemical warfare – like anthrax. Bin Laden paid Chechen mobsters millions of dollars in cash and heroin to obtain radiological “suitcase” bombs left over from the Soviets. (4)

Our most recent 2 Muslim Terror attacks in America killed 13 American soldiers at Fort Hood by the base psychiatrist Dr. Nidal Abdul Hasan and the failed underwear bomber on Flight 253, December 25, 2009, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab whose underwear fire bomb was put out by irate and brave passengers.

Did you read about the Palestinian, Mansor Mohammad Asad of Toledo, Ohio – on a Detroit-bound Delta flight in Miami who, as it was taxiing away from the Terminal, began making loud anti-Semitic comments and chanting in Arabic, saying to the Miami-Dade police: “I am a Palestinian and I want (to) kill all Jews,” according to witnesses. (5)

Passengers at U.S. airports have been jolted by at least two dozen disruptive security incidents since the failed Northwest #253 December 25. The TSA (Transportation Security Administration) has tallied – 24 incidents at U.S. airports from Dec. 27 to Jan. 3; 37 incidents during the previous week; and 18 the week before that. (6)

The grave error of not associating Islamic Terror with Islam

We often hear from at least two Presidents coming to the defense of Islam and Muslims – usually after a Muslim Terrorist attack. Remember that all the Terror attacks in the past 2 decades have been by Muslim “Jihadi” (warriors for Islam) Terrorists. In 2009 U.S. Intelligence reports that there were at least 139 such attacks. Presumably, that does not include attacks thwarted by the FBI and others of America’s 16 Intel Agencies.

Are Muslims merely ticking bombs, some awaiting instructions to go into action as “sleeper cells”, while some unknowingly have altered attack brain cells, tucked into the dark recesses of their mind that springs into murderous action when circumstance calls it up.

Presently, there is a new awareness in the West, namely, in America, England, France, the Netherlands, the Scandinavian countries and others about so-called home-grown Muslim Terrorists, some of them second or third generations coming out of their host countries. Seemingly ordinary, even well-educated and well-to-do young men suddenly sneak off to Yemen, Pakistan, Iran, Sudan, Somalia, Afghanistan to learn attack methods – including suicide bombers – burning for the cause of Islam.

To their victims it doesn’t matter one whit if they are well-taught Manchurian Candidates or merely subliminally implanted with Koranic teachings that surface sometimes in their adult life. The Victims are dead and the radical Islamists cheer their success, handing out candy in their rejoicing – then they go on to recruit more volunteers. Some have forgotten their cheers after 9/11’s ‘success’ in the Muslim communities around the world, including so-called peaceful, moderate Muslims in America.

Among the Muslim Arab Palestinians, they were giving out candy and dancing in the streets, celebrating the 3,000 viciously murdered innocent souls. In places like Chicago – Flint, Michigan – Los Angeles, their parties were a bit more subdued (lest they be noticed).

Concerns about Obama’s Islamic background

Many people are deeply concerned now about President Barack Hussein Obama’s birth to a Muslim father and early education as a Muslim, with all that entails. Some wonder why Obama was selected by an American black convert to Islam, Khalid al-Mansour (principal adviser of Saudi billionaire Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal), so Obama was approved to receive considerable funding to attend Harvard University. These funds reportedly came from Saudi Arabia.

Why was Obama profiled for greater things by Islamic leaders?

What was there in his person or personality that brought him to the attention of the Saudis – among other Muslims?

We still await the full story of why Antonin Rezko, a born Syrian, who changed his name to an Italian style, Tony, was so helpful in further funding Obama. Rezko is now in jail, having been convicted for kick-backs from companies seeking State Pension fund business through Governor Blagojevich. He also assisted the Obamas in a real estate hustle.

I cannot help but wonder how many Muslim Americans have been funded for education and elections because they can operate freely inside the American system?

How many second and third generation Muslims who pass as typical American but harbor plans to one day destroy America from the inside?

In effect, all Muslims may be potential Manchurian Candidates who can be activated to kill for the cause of Islam – unless they already have. Something is pathologically twisted in the cult of Islam through Koranic teachings that leaves them slaves to whatever violence is demanded of them.

In the “Madrassas”, mostly funded by the Saudis, the Mullahs and Imams speak disparagingly about the ungodly American ways, therefore, the Americans are deserving of conversion to Islam and strict “Sharia” laws. Also, that America, in its entirety, is destined to become an Islamic nation. Their preferred method of conversion is by the sword -which in today’s age of advanced technology means sophisticated bombs.

But, first the sleeper cells and the programmed Manchurian Candidates must subvert the targeted nations (America), weaken her financial system, have her ;military undermined through P.C. (Political Correctness), have her Courts similarly converted to judicial decisions compatible to Islam and Sharia laws. This is happening already in England, France, Canada, the Netherlands and other supposedly democratic “Free West” nations as the critical mass of Muslims grow in those nations and pressure their governments to ‘lean’ toward Islam.

In Israel, one of the key targets of the “Jihadists” (holy warriors for Islam), we observe enormous pressure coming from the regime of President Barack Hussein Obama and the Arabist U.S. State Department to accept the Arab demands to surrender to their fate.

Sadly, we also see Israeli politicians accept their ‘diktats’ under U.S. pressure, to surrender Land – our Biblical Jewish Homeland, given to the Jewish people by G-d in perpetuity – including ALL of Jerusalem, our Eternal Holy Capital for 3000 years. With these surrenders, so goes our sovereignty as the only Jewish Nation/State in the world. This would be just to please Obama and the Leftists in Israel and Europe. Obama’s hostility toward Israel while he is appeasing Iran, Syria and local Muslims is no longer conjecture but solid, observable fact.

How can an American President and his wife be “Manchurian Candidates” who hate American ways, America’s democratic system of government and America’s once successful, capitalistic financial system?

Why has Obama been so protectively cocooned by the State Department and America’s 16 Intel Agencies?

Why does Obama flaunt this protective barrier about his true life and past history?

We all thought the President and the Government’s job was to protect the American people from all enemies – domestic and foreign. Do they agree that America is destined to become a Third World nation where the non-workers are to be supported by the industrious – with their entitlements written into law?

Obama promised during his eloquent election speeches to “Change” America and to “redistribute the wealth”. Why does he pick the pockets of industrious, hard-working Americans who built this nation and who is actually guiding his fingers?

Perhaps there are many different breeds of Manchurian Candidates – each with a separate mission which, in the end, serves the ultimate Muslim goal of harnessing a once great nation to the wagon of Islam.

Remember that the Muslims are taught their goal is to create a Global Caliphate for Islam. And also, remember that Not All Muslims Are Suicide Killers – But All Suicide Killers Are Muslims.

Sources

1. “IT WAS A MUSLIM DOCTOR WHO KILLED 7 CIA AGENTS & HIMSELF” by sheikyermami on January 4, 2010 http://sheikyermami.com/2010/01/04/it-was-a-muslim-doctor-7-cia-agents-and himself WINDS OF JIHAD by Sheik Yer’Mami

2. “LONDON/GLASGOW TERRORIST ATTACK TERRORIST ATTACKS: THE MEN IN THE DOCK” by Chris Greenwood, PA The INDEPENDENT Dec. 16, 2008

3. “45 MUSLIM DOCTORS PLANNED US TERROR RAIDS” by John Steele TELEGRAPH.CO.UK July 5, 2007

4. “THE MAN BEHIND BIN LADEN: How an Egyptian doctor became a master of terror” by Lawrence Wright THE NEW YORKER September 16, 2002

5. “MAN THREATENING JEWS HAULED OFF FLIGHT IN MIAMI” Reuters http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE60631120100107

6. “WARINESS PERSISTS AT AIRPORTS” by Melanie Trootman & Mike Esterl WALL ST. JOURNAL January 8, 2010

7. “REBUTTAL OF AIR/TRAN DENIAL & CHARGES OF HOAX OR “URBAN LEGEND” by Emanuel A. Winston Dec. 11, 2009 re: Air/Tran Flight #297 on November 17.

_____________

WINSTON MID EAST ANALYSIS & COMMENTARY January 13, 2010 Email: winston@winstonglobal.org Please disseminate & re-post. If you publish, send us a copy. Many of our articles appear in freeman.org; JewishIndy.com; gamla.org.il/english.

Join the Conversation

6 Comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. Article II, Section 1, Clause 5: No person except a natural-born citizen …shall be eligible to the office of President.

    The issue of whether or not Obama is “eligible to the office of President” depends upon whether or not he is an Article II “natural born citizen” of the United States.

    The phrase “natural born citizen” “must be interpreted in the light of the common law, the principles and history of which were familiarly known to the framers of the Constitution”.

    United States v. Wong Kim Ark., 18 S. Ct. 456, 169 U.S. 649 (U.S. 03/28/1898)

    [1] SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

    [16] The Constitution nowhere defines the meaning of these words [“citizen of the United States,” and “natural-born citizen of the United States”], either by way of inclusion or of exclusion, except in so far as this is done by the affirmative declaration that “all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States.” In this, as in other respects, it [The Constitution] must be interpreted in the light of the common law, the principles and history of which were familiarly known to the framers of the Constitution. Minor v. Happersett, 21 Wall. 162 [At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 21 Wall. 162 (1874]; Ex parte Wilson, 114 U.S. 417, 422; Boyd v. United States, 116 U.S. 616, 624, 625; Smith v. Alabama, 124 U.S. 465. The language of the Constitution, as has been well said, could not be understood without reference to the common law. 1 Kent Com. 336; Bradley, J., in Moore v. United States, 91 U.S. 270, 274.

    The “common law, the principles and history of which were familiarly known to the framers of the Constitution” was plainly expressed by the Supreme Court of the United States in the dissenting opinion of Scott v. Sandford, which quoted Vattel, and explicitly stated, “The natives or natural-born citizens are those born in the country of parents who are citizens…”

    Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (U.S. 01/02/1856)

    [1] UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT

    [418] …The natives or natural-born citizens are those born in the country of parents who are citizens…

    Furthermore, the Supreme Court of the United States in 1814 relied upon Vattel’s “Law of Nations” as the authority on citizenship issues, and stated in The Venus, “The natives, or indigenes [natural-born citizens], are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.”

    The Venus, 12 U.S. (8 Cranch) 253, 1814

    “Vattel, …is more explicit and more satisfactory on it [CITIZENSHIP ISSUES] than any other whose work has fallen into my hands, [Vattel] says, ‘…The natives, or indigenes [natural-born citizens], are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.’ ”

    Vattel’s Law of Nations: § 212. Citizens and natives

    …The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.

    Finally, the Supreme Court of the United States, in Minor v. Happersett, confirmed the definition of a “natural born citizen” as “children born in a country of parents who were its citizens”.

    Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 21 Wall. 162 (1874)

    “ ‘No person except a natural-born citizen …shall be eligible to the office of President’… The Constitution does not in words say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.”

    Simply put, Article II “natural born citizens” are those citizens who are “born in the country, of parents who are citizens.”

    Hence, Obama is not an Article II “natural born citizen” of the United States, even if he was born in Hawaii, as his father was a “foreigner”…

    To reiterate, Obama’s father was not a citizen of the United States.

    Therefore, Obama is not an Article II “natural born citizen” of the United States.

    Thus, Obama is not “eligible to the office of President”.

  2. Corruption and incompetence reign supreme in the US as evinced by Obamas’ ability to hide constitutional required documentation aided by congress, the senate and the entire judiciary. They know treason is at hand and will be charged quire as soon as this cabal falls from favor or causes a catastrophe. The idea that slow change will cause people to forget the past and adopt new ways only works when it isn’t history that is being altered and the law that is being usurped is for unsound principles. This nation is one where this kind of act has never before been perpetrated upon the people yet they have allowed a lot through deception and fraud which has been hidden from view. I suspect the end result of both this criminal cabal and the impatience of the radicals will bring about a change alright, a very bloody and hostile one that will not be forgotten for ages. Tolerance is a gift which when abused turns to intolerance.

  3. I posted this on Dr. Taitz’s site a few days ago. I want to re-post it here because I feel it is something to consider. Are American children – with American birth certificates – being turned over to Madrassa to be taught Koranic Law? One more good reason Obama needs to be exposed as an illegal president and dealt with accordingly.

    You have all heard the stories about young women who have married Muslims from other countries, had children, and those children later taken back to the father’s homeland against the mother’s will. Thousands of mothers in that situation never saw their children again and have no idea what became of them. The children were raised in their father’s religion and educated/trained according to his beliefs. It is not a loving father that cruelly and permanently separates his children from their mother; however, it is something the typical Muslim extremist would do. It is long-term planning to be sure, but so was registering Obama in Hawaii to ensure him life-long eligibility for all the freebies and welfare perks offered by the government.

    If Obama is allowed to remain in his position of POTUS a precedent will be set, and all those American-born, Muslim-trained children will be eligible for the office of president. Actually they will be more eligible than Obama because they will have a valid American birth certificate and their mothers will likely have been old enough to confer citizenship at the time of their birth. This is not beyond the realm of possibility. Obama must be exposed NOW!

  4. Obama may have covered his tracks since he became president, but there are articles out there (see link below) from earlier years mentioning his Kenyan birth. In 2004 at the Convention he “admitted” Kenyan birth and his father being Kenyan born, and added later that it didn’t matter since he was not running for president (only U.S. senate) then suddenly when he decided to run for president, I guess he felt he was so important that he could anything he wanted to do. P.S. If anyone was paying attention, Obama flubbed the Oral Oath at the Presidential swearing in ceremony when he was to pledge to uphold our constitution and had to redo it in chambers. That was on purpose.

    http://web.archive.org/web/20040627142700/eastandard.net/headlines/news26060403.htm

    —————–

    Mr. Charlton replies: Susan, I think he only admitted a Kenyan born father, in his 2004 speech to the DNC, not that he was Kenyan born on that occasion; but The Post & Email has a slew of articles on this, just use our search form for “Kenyan-born” to read more.