Orly Taitz motions to move Barnett vs. Obama to D.C. Court

SEEKS TO JUMP-START QUO WARRANTO CASE IN CAPITAL

by John Charlton

Dr. Orly Taitz is interviewed outside the Federal Court House in Santa Ana, California, after a recent hearing.

(Dec. 25, 2009) — Today, Dr. Orly Taitz, esq., publicly announced that she filed yesterday a Motion to request a hearing in the Federal Court of Santa Ana, California, to seek to move the case Barnett vs. Obama to the District Court of Washington, D.C., which has original jurisdiction over cases which seek by a writ of quo warranto to test the legitimacy of federal office holders.

Judge David O. Carter, who has shown himself to be very deceitful and conniving in the present legal action — in that he made promises he did not keep, and hired a legal clerk who is tied to the defendants — ruled against the Plaintiffs on Oct. 29th.

Dr. Taitz’s has previously attempted to save the legitimacy of her plaintiff’s case by filing a Motion for Reconsideration and a Motion for Clarification. In the first action, Carter refused to reconsider the injustice of his ruling; in the second he ignored the legal defect of his ruling (in that it did not dismiss the case) and ex post facto, declared that it did; he also further dismissed it with prejudice to prevent the plaintiffs from ever seeking justice in any federal court.

The present motion attempts to salvage that part of the case wherein Judge Carter said he did not have jurisdiction, and which, thus, ostensible has not been dismissed with prejudice: the quo warranto complaint, which Carter claims can only be heard in the District Court of Washington, D.C..

Dr. Orly Taitz’ new motion reads as follows:

All the parties in the above caption case are hereby notified of the motion hearing to be held on January 25, 2010, at the Central District Court of California, Santa Ana Division, Judge Honorable David O. Carter, 411 W 4th str. Courtroom 9D, Santa Ana, California, Ronald Reagan Federal Building. Motion to be heard is the Motion to transfer the above captioned case to Honorable judge Royce Lamberth, chief judge of the US district court for the district of Columbia

MOTION FOR TRANSFER OF THE CASE TO THE HONORABLE ROYCE LAMBERTH CHIEF JUDGE OF THE US DISTRICT COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Pursuant to local rule 7-4 prior to making the motion below the undersigned attorney contacted the US attorneys office for the Meet and Confer conference and got a response from the assistant US attorney David DeJutte via e-mail on 12.23.09.

Here come all the plaintiffs in this case aside from Willey Drake and Markham Robinson represented by Mr. Kreep and state the following:

1. During the October 5 motion hearing pursuant to the motion to dismiss due to lack of jurisdiction, the moving parties, the assistant US attorneys DeJutte and West have argued that they believe that the proper jurisdiction for this case is the District of Columbia.

2. On October 29 this case was dismissed for want of jurisdiction only and was never heard on the merits, as this court noted in the above order that the proper jurisdiction is the District of Columbia court.

3. 28 US Chapter 87 §1391 (b) A civil action wherein jurisdiction is not founded solely on diversity of citizenship may, except as otherwise provided by law, be brought only in (1) a judicial district where any defendant resides, if all defendants reside in the same state, (2) a judicial district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or a substantial part of property that is the subject of the action is situated, or (3) a judicial district in which any defendant may be found, if there is no district in which the action may otherwise be brought.

4. 28 US Code Chapter 87 §1404 (a) For the convenience of parties and witnesses, in the interest of justice, a district court may transfer any civil action to any other district or division where it might have been brought.

5. In the interest of judicial economy, for the convenience of parties and witnesses, in the interest of expedient resolution of this case of National importance for “We the People of the United States of America”, in the interest of the National Security and in the interest of Justice, the undersigned counsel respectfully moves the court to transfer this case to Honorable Judge Royce Lamberth, chief judge of the US District Court for the District of Columbia, for the case to be heard on the merits as soon as possible.

Dr. Taitz maintains a website at http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/ and is actively seeking donations to cover the legal expenses of this trial.

6 Responses to "Orly Taitz motions to move Barnett vs. Obama to D.C. Court"

  1. James   Sunday, January 10, 2010 at 10:22 AM

    Lastest on the uphill battle. Jan. 25, schuelded court-date before Carter, again. http://www.scribd.com/doc/24994808/Keyes-Reply-to-Opposition-Quo-Warranto

  2. Rick M.   Tuesday, January 5, 2010 at 7:52 PM

    Obama the usurper continues to commit treason every min, hour, day, week, year! Everything he signs is illegal everything ! He is making a mockery out of you and I through our Constituiton! Why do still some not see or get this? Why is it wrong to ask for the creditials of those that are to serve the people? Who do they think they are? Who do we think we are? Folks, plant a garden, store some water, stock up on food items. The day is coming that we will have to defend what is rightfully ours through the Constitution! Take a moment each day to note what is going on. Read between the lines that is where most of the answers lay. Theres a chance that the afore mentioned can be avoided. Vote these sons of……………. out of office ! That is first and foremost! Good luck my fellow Americans.

  3. ObserverUK   Saturday, December 26, 2009 at 8:37 AM

    Excellent unbiased reporting with no childish or derogatory stupidity. Something stinks here America, like rotting fish in the fridge. The sooner its dealt with the better or it pollutes. 1.5+M$ and rising spent in legal defence for a 15$ Full Birth Certificate something is seriosly wrong!!!

  4. Robert Laity   Saturday, December 26, 2009 at 2:48 AM

    The Criminal Complaint (USDC AO91 form) was personally “taken out” ,sworn to and served to Mehltretter by Restricted Delivery,US Mail by this writer.

  5. Robert Laity   Saturday, December 26, 2009 at 2:36 AM

    Treason and Election fraud are “Criminal” acts. Obama comitted treasonous acts when he actively campaigned for an enemy of the US,Raila Odinga for Kenyam President at a time when he also served as a US Senator from Illinois.

    http://americangrandjury.org/public
    http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/4353

    See also:

    18USC,Part 1,Chapter 115,Sec.2381

    A formal criminal complaint was served upon and receipted by Kathleen Mehltretter,acting US Attorney for the Western District of NY,in November,2009. A recent status request to her,through the “Attorney of the Day”,a
    Mr. DiGiacomo,has been ignored,to date.

  6. natural born citizen party   Friday, December 25, 2009 at 6:26 PM

    — so, Orly wants to join Chris Strunk (and hopefully Leo Donofrio) in USDC-DC for the pentultimate quo warranto nbc (natural born citizen) POTUS/CINC eligibility case. Perhaps John Hemenway’s case will be remanded back to district in some form of quo warranto.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.