If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my free Email alerts. Thanks for visiting!

REMINDS HOLDER OF HER LETTER OF MARCH 1ST, DEMANDS EX-RELATOR STATUS IN LIEU OF NON-ACTION

by John Charlton

Dr. Orly Taitz, esq.

(Dec. 14, 2009) — Without a doubt, the most important and significant legal action in the United States this wee, is Dr. Orly Taitz’s Letter to Eric Holder, sent today, demanding that he institute Quo Warranto proceedings against Barack Hussein Obama in the District Court of Washington, D.C..

The importance of this letter is the fact that the quo warranto provisions of the District of Columbia Code provide that a 3rd party may institute a quo warranto action if the U.S. Attorney General fails to respond within 3 months to a request.

Dr. Orly Taitz originally wrote Holder on March 1st.  In her recent letter, published today at her website, she demands that either he take action himself, or that her plaintiffs be granted ex-relator status to proceed in the name of the United States of America, as the D.C. code allows.

Quo warranto is a legal action whereby a plaintiff formally demands proof that the holder of an office, holds it lawfully, and if he does not, is empowered by the court to remove him from it.  The Code of the Disctrict of Columbia contains provisions for quo warranto, in such cases as the usurpation of any federal office exercised within the district.  Quo warranto can be used against Barack Hussein Obama because he is not a natural born citizen, and thus does not enjoy the Constitutional immunities of that office.

Dr. Taitz’s letter reads in full:

Dear Mr. Holder,

On March 1st on behalf of my clients I have submitted to you a request to file Quo Warranto against Mr. Barack Hussein Obama. The request was filed due to following troubling facts:

  1. According to a number of licensed investigators National Databases show Mr. Obama using as many as 39 different Social Security numbers, which included the numbers of deceased individuals and numbers never assigned.
  2. Number 042-68-4425 that Mr. Obama used for most of his life and is currently using while residing in the White House, is a number assigned to an individual born in 1890, who resided in the state of Connecticut and this Social Security number was issued in the state of Connecticut where Mr. Obama never resided.
  3. One of the leading forensic experts in the country Ms. Sandra Ramsey Lines has prepared an affidavit, stating that Mr. Obama’s short version Certification of Life Birth cannot be treated as genuine without seeing the original on file in the Health Department in HI.
  4. The state of Hawaii since 1911 had in its statutes a provision allowing Foreign born children of Hawaiian residents of get Hawaiian Birth Certificates(currently statute 338-17) and currently statute 338-5 allows one to get a birth certificate based on a statement of one relative only without any corroborating evidence from the hospital.
  5. In spite of over 100 law suits filed around the country and 12 Citizen Grand Jury indictments Mr. Obama refused to sign a consent to unseal his original birth certificate currently sealed in the Health Department of the state of  Hawaii and all the other vital records.
  6. Ms. Chiuomi Fukino, Director of the Health Department of the State of Hawaii has provided a statement that there is a document on file in Hawaii, however she refused to provide any information, as to what document is on file: whether it is a Birth Certificate given to a foreign born child of Hawaiian resident, whether it is an amended Birth certificate, obtained when Mr. Obama was adopted by his Indonesian stepfather. She refused to answer any questions as to whether his birth certificate was obtained based on a proper hospital birth certificate or based on a statement of one of his relatives only, which needs to be corroborated.
  7. Regardless of place of birth of Mr. Obama, since birth and until now Mr. Obama had a split allegiance. He had British citizenship at birth, Kenyan since age 2 and Indonesian since age 5. Allegiance to other Nations goes as a clear violation of the Natural citizenship clause of the article 2 section 1 of the Constitution.
  8. Under the Freedom of Information act 5 US 552, since no response was provided to numerous certified mail letters received by your office nine months ago, I demand a written response or Administrative hearing on the matter within 30 days. On behalf of my clients I demand an answer, as to when the Quo Warranto against Mr. Obama will be filed by the US Attorney General office, or in the alternative if the Attorney General office refuses to file Quo Warranto, I demand an ex-relator status for my clients to proceed with the Quo Warranto action against Mr. Obama in the DC court or the Supreme Court of the United States.

Signed,

Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ

Counsel to the plaintiffs-ex relators.

For more information about the issues raised in this report, click on the tags at the bottom of this article.

Join the Conversation

15 Comments

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. I agree with you, Tminu: “Holder is a hate-based criminal against the United States.” That he is! Holder works not for us, but for the criminal cabal billionaire elitists that shadow & control Obama. These would be the controlling parties of the membership societies to which most of our Congress belongs, those societies known as The Council on Foreign Relations; the Bilderberg Group; and The Trilateral Commission.

    Since assuming the post of U.S. Attorney General, Holder has repeatedly acted outside Constitutional boundaries while continually subverting or obstructing the rule of law. Holder acts against America’s best interest each time he ignores the rule of law. Holder blends in well with the rest of the criminal-cabal filth that has infiltrated our government and dirtied our White House. Even worse, Holder’s perverted behavior mirrors that of Obama. It is hard to accept the fact that Eric Holder is our country’s Attorney General when he regularly ignores the rule of law & acts against U.S. interests.

    Clearly, Obama cannot provide documentation in support of his claim U.S. citizenry. Obama would not have gone to such trouble to prevent exposure of the facts, nor would he have spent hundreds of thousands of dollars defending himself from allegations that he was not a U.S. citizen if he, indeed, a citizen.

    No U. S. citizen would have catered to foreign interests & worked against America as Obama has done with great regularity. to prevent this from happening, each state must certify a candidate’s citizenship as part of the presidential election process. The states certify each candidate’s eligibility after receiving the appropriate information from Congress. In this instance, however, Nancy Pelosi knowingly failed to certify Obama’s eligibility in most of the 50 states. Pelosi submitted a fraudulent certification document in which numerous key phrases just “happened” to be missing to all states except for Hawaii.

    http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/15127

  2. IF WE REAL AMERICANS CAN EVER GET THE MYSTERYMAN ACTING PRESIDENT IN AN HONEST COURT? AND MAYBE AN HONEST REAL AMERICA THINKING JUDGE? JUST MAYBE WE REAL AMERICANS COULD START CLEANING UP AMERICA WHITE HOUSE ON DOWN TO LOCAL YOKELS. ITS TAKEN TO MUCH TIME EVERYDAY MORE TO UNDO BY THE MYSTERYMAN. A BIRTHCERTIFICATE CARRYING LEGAL AMERICAN CITIZEN>>>>TTHINK ABOUT IT PLEASE>>>>>>REMEMBER ITS OUR COUNTRY AMERICA>>>>>

  3. ORLY TAITZ YOUR DOING WONDERFUL JUST WATCH OUT FOR YOURSELF?NOW IF THERE IS SUCH A THING AS AN HONEST COURT AND JUDGE IN AMERICA? I HOPE THEIR NOT ALL BOUGHT AND LIKE THE SENATE?FAR AS THAT GOES THE WHOLE PILE OF JUDGES AND CROOKED BOUGHT POLITITIANS? HARD TO BELIEVE THIS IS HAPPENING IN AMERICA. ORLY PLEASE KEEP IT MOVEING YOUR GETTING THERE.MANY THINGS ARE HITTING THE MYSTERYMAN AT ONE TIME HE WILL SLIP BURIE HIM LEGALLY WHEN HE DOES. A BIRTH CERTIFICATE CARRYING LEGAL AMERICAN CITIZEN>>>THANKS AGAIN>>>>

  4. We the people need to demand this be looked into. The Dem. electorate still has not proved this without a doubt. The media -what media? is not going to take it on. Fox might. Start e-mailing people. If this wasn’t an issue with B>Hussein Obama why does he fight so hard to keep this out of the public eye. Support Orly Taitz she may well be the one that ends up stopping this whole nightmare. He needs to show his live birthcertificate all his passports ect… and this will go away. BUUUUUUUUUt he refuses for some reason. He has continuously stepped on the Constitution and bent laws to his liking. Its all coming to an end shortly-LET’S ROLL PEOPLE!

  5. I am puzzled by the statement in the article of December 14 that says “Dr. Orly Taitz’s Letter to Eric Holder, sent today” while in the letter itself it says “March 01”. That’s a lot longer than 90 days.

    —————-

    Mr. Charlton replies: My lapse MP, read it again and see my corrections.

  6. Taitz: “or that her plaintiffs be granted ex-relator status to proceed in the name of the United States of America”

    So, what’s a “ex-relator”?

    —————-

    Mr. Charlton replies: I believe this is explained in the D.C. Code’s Quo Warranto provision itself…read more about this by clicking the tags on this article, above, or through this link

    http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/10/08/quo-warrento-in-the-district-of-columbia-code/

  7. whats with Orly can’t she appropriately say “Merry Christmas” instead of “Happy Holidays” ?

    ———————-

    Mr. Charlton replies: You cannot expect Dr. Orly Taitz, who is Jewish by religion, to give a Christian salutation; just as you could not expect a Christian to give a Jewish salutation.

  8. I look forward to the day this illegal criminal usurper is marched out of the office. he has brought disrepute on the office of the President of these United States. his entire administration is a stain on this republic.

  9. What if Holder ignores this demand? Holder and other members of the Obama administration have received other “demands” from Dr. Taitz and other lawyers, and they just trash them. How can anyone enforce any law or judgment that Holder, Obama, Pelosi, etc. doesn’t like? They just spit in our eye and go on with their lying and stealing. It is getting very discouraging to watch them blatantly break the laws, thwart our Constitution, and ruin our country, and there doesn’t seem to be a darn thing anyone can – or will – do to stop them.

      1. I’d love to see that, but nothing will happen there, depending on the makeup of the Court. And healthcare can’t end up there unless it’s in the lower courts first.