Spread the love

REFUSES TO INVESTIGATE 2008 ELECTION FRAUD IN NEW HAMPSHIRE

by John Charlton

(Nov. 23, 2008) — New Hampshire Attorney General Michael A. Delaney has refused the request of NH State Representatives Rappaport and Vita, to investigate the election fraud which occurred in his state in 2008, saying that it is a Federal matter.

Rep. Laurence M. Rappaport has led the effort in New Hampshire to move the State Government to action regarding the evident violations of NH Statutes regarding the application of Barack Hussein Obama for admission to the State Ballot in the 2008 Presidential Election.

On September 10th he brought his initial complaint to Mr. William Gardner, the NH Secretary of State.  Gardner subsequently declined to act, saying on September 15th, that his office had not authority to investigate; thus refusing to conduct even an internal investigation into his office’s failure to comply with state laws.  Gardner did, however, pass on the complaint to the state Attorney General, Michael Delaney.

State laws have several requirements, the violation of which would be a basis for action by the state Attorney General, according to a previous report by The Post & Email.

Rappaport then scheduled a meeting with Delaney on Oct. 28th, to demand action after weeks of his silence on the issue.  And though Delaney broke his promise of a meeting at the last moment, Rappaport went to Delaney’s office anyhow, and obtained a rescheduled meeting for Nov. 21st.

At 10 A.M., on Friday, Nov. 21st, Rappaport finally got the chance to speak with Delaney face to face.

In an email to supporters, Rappaport reports what transpired:

“Well, here’s the sad news. Representative Vita, her husband and I met with New Hampshire Attorney General Michael Delaney and his assistant yesterday

(Friday) at 10 am. We wanted an investigation for potential fraud on either Obama or the Democratic Partly based mostly on our contention that since Obama ran for President in New Hampshire when we believe he was not eligible, we believe fraud was committed on the citizens of New Hampshire.

We based our suspicions and allegations on:

1. The Supreme Court’s definition of “natural born citizen” and subsequent affirmation of that definition by the US Congress last year, along with his admission that his father was Kenyan.

2. Questionable birth certificates, and an affadavit by a doctor that he delivered Mr. Obama as a baby in Kenya.

3. Multiple use of different Social Security numbers and a signed affidavit to that effect.

4. Attending a school in Indonesia which claimed to accept no foreign students.

Mr. Delaney still declined to prosecute saying that he thought this was a federal matter and that we should complain to the Federal Election Commission. (I most certainly will).

Disappointed, New Hampshire State Representative Laurence M. Rappaport issued this statement:

“Since I have presented evidence to both Mr. William Gardner, the New Hampshire Secretary of State, and Mr. Michael Delaney, the New Hampshire Attorney General, and neither has investigated, I am left to conclude that New Hampshire does not concern itself with the validity of candidates running for public office. Since it is too late for legislation in this session, I plan to introduce legislation next term forcing the Secretary of State’s office to confirm eligibility of all candidates running for office.

Needless to say, I am disappointed.

Another State Representative is, however, taking legislative action, according to Rappaport:

I have since learned that Representative Lars Christiansen will introduce legislation requiring the Secretary of State to verify the birth certificates of anyone running for the Presidency and Vice-Presidency in federal elections. While it is too late to sign on as a co-sponsor, I will certainly vote for that and urge my fellow Representatives to vote for it as well.

This legislation does not, however, address the natural-born-citizenship requirement, though, since that necessitates not only birth in the U.S.A., but also that the parents were citizens at time of the birth.  The proposed legislation would merely confirm Obama’s legitimacy, if he can produce the semblance of an American birth certificate.

Subscribe
Notify of

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

7 Comments
Newest
Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
TomD
Wednesday, November 25, 2009 12:26 PM

Pretty sure you just need to be born here to be a NBC, but O obviously wasn’t born here.
—————

Mr. Charlton replies: No TomD, that is not correct, as to the first part. It was Obama’s supporters who were the first to claim that you only need to be born in the USA to be a nbc. The facts of history are quite otherwise. See the search form at the top of this page, and search for 4 Supreme Court Cases…and then look for the article that comes up, with that name….you’d be surprised how well established in law it is….

racauth '80
Wednesday, November 25, 2009 8:11 AM

Mr. Delaney still declined to prosecute saying that he thought this was a federal matter and that we should complain to the Federal Election Commission. (I most certainly will).

yo
Tuesday, November 24, 2009 12:56 PM

–the birth certificate–

where are those russian hackers when you need them

it would be the coup de grace to expose the chicanery involved with the “filed, not accepted” information in the possession of the hawaii dept of health

James
Tuesday, November 24, 2009 12:55 PM

Bret Baier on Fox in a breif statement said, “that Fox News had determined that Owens was the winner and that there was no way Hoffman could attain enough votes to win even with the absentee ballots”. Not having much faith in what is reported on the media these days, I’m wondering what perpetuated the statement. Theirs been no annoucement from the election comission posted that I’ve seen and I’m sure many of the sites, inculding the Post & Email would have been on top of the confirmation of one contestant or the other. Really, eggs me, when things like this happen. Poor or biased reporting?
——————-

Mr. Charlton replies: It is very inappropriate for Fox News to arrogate to themselves the certification of the election. There is about as much certainty to the vote count as there is to Obama’s BC.

b fuller
Tuesday, November 24, 2009 12:14 PM

The laws in question are NH law, not federal law. The NH AG is a coward who should be removed from office by force if necessary.

yo
Tuesday, November 24, 2009 7:44 AM

When virtually the entire nation acts as accomplice to this constitutional crime, how will the entire nation not suffer for it?

I wonder what the prophets of the old testament would be saying about this behavior.

Tuesday, November 24, 2009 7:22 AM

Re: New Hampshire Attorney General Michael A. Delaney has refused the request of NH State Representatives Rappaport and Vita, to investigate the election fraud which occurred in his state in 2008, saying that it is a Federal matter.

No, it’s not. States run elections.