THE ELIGIBILITY MOVEMENT NEEDS TO DO MORE
by John Charlton
The usurpation of the presidency of the United States, the greatest national tragedy and crisis to befall our Nation since the Civil War, is only going to have a solution if the eligibility movement does more.
But first we have to break out addition to the Courts.
Valiant citizens and attorneys have gone to court dozens of times; dozens of times the Courts have refused to hear the case on merits.
The courts no longer believe that its their duty to save the republic. Let the lawyers who still struggle there have our support, but let us not wait for victory there where it is so uncertain.
The Republican and Democratic machines certainly are not going to listen to us, as they are the co-conspirators in the crime.
If we have had 1 small success it is in getting 80% of the American people to known something of the issue, and 50% of the Republicans to be concerned that the Obama might be born overseas.
But that is not the same of imparting to our fellow citizens the absolute conviction of the truth: that Obama is ineligible and therefore a usurper, and hence no law he signs, no appointment he makes, nothing he says or does has more value than Mickey Mouse. (I ask pardon of all the Mickey Mouse fans out there).
I propose, therefore a publicity campaign, and not in Washington, D.C.. Each patriot groups needs to explain, teach, instruct, the average citizen in the facts and history of our Nation, its Constitution, and the objective requirements for the presidency.
Let’s not get carried away with anything else, or concede to Obama victory.
Nor let us think that the victories of Republicans yesterday was some how significant: since the political machines won every race; the third-party candidates lost.
There were no Article II patriot candidates.
If we want the nation to go to pot, we need only do nothing.
And unless we pledge our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor, we shall not save the Nation by an unequal sacrifice.
We are in a great struggle of will and principle: of liberty and constitutional principles against tyranny and Marxist principles. It must be a struggle that consumes us, for righteousness sake, since we stand on the ground of Justice and Eternal Truth looks down upon us and blesses us in this struggle.
Millions of Americans knows Obama is not an American citizen,thinking about getting this job done by educating the people will be as bad as fooling around with these corrupted judges.
It seems behind it all is collecting money by donations hand over fist,I say if you, Orly Tatiz,Phil Berg have a case call for the millions to march on Washington D.C. and they that can’t afford to go to Washington stand up with the red white and blue held high in the air in every city,town,state across this land all on the same day with one voice demanding Obama summit his proof of American citizenship.
I will not donate a dime this can be done if it is done right with out courts,judges,call for a march all across this country trust the American people to stand up they have proved by the tea parties they will stand up.
other wise people need to just go on making their Obama coffee mugs,selling their bumper stickers and writing their Obama books as they all laugh their butts off all the way to the bank.
——————–
Mr. Charlton replies: I understand where you are comming from; but its to be expected that lawyers would seek solutoin in the courts, military by force of arms, and writers by writing; it’s the nature of our personal experience that molds our way of reacting; the lawyers who have sued obama have done fund raising; but they have also shown us that the Courts are not the quick solution they appear and that the conspiracy embraces even them. That knowledge will help mobilize citizenry; and education is still necessary.
I’m all for your idea of a orange revolution; but I don’t think the nation is willing to do that or support it.
Jon, Mr. Charlton is correct. There is no need to debate when you have the truth on your side. The term natural born citizen has already been defined by the US Supreme Court, and they are uniquely empowered to interpret the Constitution.
In the 1875 Minor v. Happersett case, the Supreme Court stated the following:
“The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first. For the purposes of this case it is not necessary to solve these doubts.”
This case establishes that the Constitution does not define the term natural born citizen, and that we must resort elsewhere for that definition. And since this case came 6 years after the 14th amendment (which is part of the Constitution), it is saying that the 14th amendment does not also define the term natural born citizen.
This case states that children born in the US to citizen parents are natural born citizens. Furthermore, it uses almost the same language as Vattel who defined the term natural born citizen in 1758: “The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.” Vattel’s definition is “elsewhere” to the Constitution.
Obama’s father was not a US citizen. Therefore, the Supreme Court is saying here that someone like Obama, born in Hawaii and having a non-US citizen father, would NOT be a natural born citizen.
Why not get a media outlet to have a debate on whether a president needs to be a natural born citizen? The venue can be a pro and con. Obama has already framed the issue when he was back at the University of Chicago by having scholars there address the issue. It’s obvious Obama knew he had a problem that could surface. He even attemped to pass legislation in the Congress that would have eliminated the requirement of a natural born citizen to be president. The debaters should be noted experts such as Constitutional lawyers from academia. If a large enough audience can be attracted and it has a profit there must be someone who will invest the capital to make the profit.
——————–
Mr. Charlton replies: When you admit that it should be debated that 1 + 1 = 2, you have already conceded that there is no truth, but only opinion, in the argument.
It has been obvious for some time that there is enough question relating to the legality of Soetoro’s SS# to justify a complete investigation as to how he received a SS# which was originally issued in Connecticut in between 1977-1979. The Trick will be to get a Federal judge to examine any allegations relating to it. If it is an illegal SS # I seriously doubt that any of our CROOKED courts will do anything about it. The courts are COMPLICIT in the entirety of Soetoro’s criminal conspiracy.
I’ve heard Govenor-elect Christie had tried and convicted some 115 corruption lawsuits against the political machine in New Jersey. True? If so, this man could be a strong ally to seeing justice done for the American people. I think there may yet be hope. Attorney, Mario Apuzzo comes to mind. He did say, “Come January, he would turn Trenton, upside down”. This man apparently means business.
Al Capone went to prison over taxes, and we can send Obama to jail over his tax forms. Obama’s Federal Tax returns are public information, and his social security # will be on the tax forms. Two private investigators have filed documents in Federal Courts that Obama’s social security # was issued in CN years ago to another person. Obama can not get around or stall over his social security #. The birth issue can and will be stalled in the courts, BUT the illegal social security # will bring him and his thugs to prison. Let’s fight the battle we can win. Jim Andrews
So let it be written so let it be done!