Spread the love


by John Charlton

(Oct. 25, 2009)  — Eleven days ago The Post & Email published its story about the East African Standard report in 2004 naming Obama “Kenyan-born” — AP declares Obama “Kenyan-Born”! —; while this story had been reported elsewhere on the net in the previous 12 hours or so, The Post & Email was one of the first to attribute it to the Associated Press, on the basis of the “AP” logo attached to the report by that paper.  The story took off  and ended up being discussed on the Imus Show.  As the writing of this report, more than 27,000 individuals have viewed our coverage, making the single most read article of our site, all-time, and each day.

Since the report was published, no credible denials of it have been published anywhere.

For this reason it remains convincing, if but hearsay evidence, that the Obama Campaign was painting  a different picture of their candidate during the last 5 years.

Now Attorney Orly Taitz, esq., lead counsel for the Plaintiffs in Barnett vs. Obama (a case suing Barack Obama and others, in Federal Court, Santa Ana, California), has asked Judge David O. Carter to take judicial notice of the article.

In her request, Dr. Taitz makes the following presentation:

Come now the Plaintiffs with this Request for Judicial Notice of 2004 AP Newswire, embodied and included in the Kenyan publication attached as Exhibit A.

Although the contents of this document are self explanatory, this document is classic hearsay: an unsworn out of court statement to be submitted for the truth of the matters stated therein.  Moreover, it is unauthenticated, but is allegedly derived from a well-known and highly respected news wire service, namely the Associated Press.

If it were possible to authenticate the source for this information, and/or to trace, locate, and depose the authors and informants, and also to track the subsequent changes in the “story” as told over the newswires over the following four years, the Plaintiffs submit that they would obtain additional and important, and very solid, grounds for outlining the contours of a Complaint for Civil Racketeering (18 U.S.C. §1964(c)) concerning the 2008 Presidential elections, involving a massive scheme to defraud using the postal (document delivery) and electronic wire services for the purpose of depriving the American People of their intangible right to honest services.

Then Attorney Taitz reminded the Court that it has allowed limited discovery regarding evidentiary issues which might bear upon the Court’s decision regarding whether to grant or not to grant the Motion to Dismiss the case, presented by Obama’s lawyers, when Judge Carter ruled:

All discovery herein shall be stayed pending resolution of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, except for any discovery as to which Plaintiffs can demonstrate, to the satisfaction of Magistrate Judge Nakazato, is necessary for the purpose of opposing the Motion to Dismiss.

For this purpose, and to prepare a Second Amended Complaint, Dr. Taitz argues for permission to undertake discovery of whether the AP did report this “Kenyan-born” attribution, and to depose the reporters who wrote it:

Plaintiffs submit that they need to conduct limited discovery for the purpose of preparing this Second Amended Complaint (to flesh out more fully the extent of the fraud and accordingly solidify with evidence allegations necessary to establish Civil R.I.C.O. standing).  They accordingly ask the Court, in addition to taking judicial notice of the A.P. Wire bulletin attached as Exhibit A, to allow the following discovery to take place, addressed to a non-party, non-governmental source:

A deposition duces tecum on 15 days notice (rather than 30) of the custodian of records and archives at “the world’s oldest and largest newsgathering organization:”

The Associated Press

Headquarters: 450 W. 33rd Street, New York, NY 10001.

Taitz then argues that such a request is not burdensome:

There can be no doubt that the information to be retrieved is relevant to framing the Plaintiffs’ proposed Second Amended Complaint.  There can be no objection that this deposition will impose too great a burden on the Defendants because it is not addressed to them.  There can be no objection that the examination of the history of reporting concerning the history of reportage concerning the national origins, birthplace, citizenship, and life history of the President of the United States world’s oldest and largest newsgathering organization will impose any undue burdens on the Defendants, or on the Associated Press as a deponent.

Such an investigation of the Associated Press Headquarters would undoubtedly cause a national sensation; and hopefully shed light on what the Obama Campaign has been claiming regarding their “man in the Whitehouse.”

The Post & Email has prepared this report from an original copy of the Request for Judicial Notice provided by the office of the Plaintiff’s counsel.

Finally, the publication of this story before the filing became available on the Docket was a cause of consternation and dismay among some fanatical Obama supporters.

Join the Conversation

No comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. This pivital problem that Obama is not American born, a fact that looks like it can be proven shortly, probably explains his haste in getting his socialist programs passed by Congress before his fraud is proven.

    If he succeeds in getting them passed, what can be done to void his damage??


  2. How do we get him out of the White House if he is not a citizen of the US then, even if we can prove it. He has done nothing but wrong and lie to the people. It is even scarier thinking about having muslims in the army with him in control of the White House. What can we do?

  3. Intentionally uneducated black voters, mostly on welfare, rabidly Anti-Christ homosexuals and child molesters, homosexual and atheistic federal judges, dim-witted senators like Barney Frank, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Chris Dodd and a few dozen other radical Democrats could care less that Obama is a foreign born Muslim — just pass the government freebies to the folks milking the taxpayers and keep making radical Democrat millionaires into billionaires by robbing taxpayers and funding liberal pork programs. By the time the “po folks” figure out that they have been raped by Obama’s nanny government giveaways in exchange for their freedom, Obama and his thugocracy will have all the wealth of America and the people who voted him into the White House can kiss Obama’s radical liberal communist ass while they starve in the gutters of the most humane society that ever inhabited planet Earth.

  4. I didn’t know the story ended up on Imus. Good for him! Orly has been doing lots of radio and TV interviews that will undoubtedly push the issue into the MSM whether they like it or not. It has already appeared on CNN and MSNBC, probably because the more evidence Orly finds, the worse it looks for them and their cushy, elitist jobs.

  5. I remind the readers of the Comment Policy: this is not a blog, even if it uses that format: conversations between commentators are for other fora. Your pet theories to defend Obama are not appropriate: he ought to be man enough to defend himself, if he can.

  6. Despite the see-no-evil willful ignorance of mainstream media, the mound of evidence for a Kenya birth grows. If Obum could prove he is not an illegal alien, he would have done so long ago.

    Only a lunatic president would let doubts about his birthplace undermine his lofty status if he could easily put those doubts to rest. Obum cannot put the doubts to rest because the preponderance of evidence indicates that he is an illegal alien. Certainly he is an illegal president.

  7. Mr. Charlton, This article alone was worth my small donation to your noble cause. This article alone should be cause for everyone reading your page to make a small financial sacrifice. I don’t want to lose the opportunity to read your commentary!
    Now to the friendly readership, please click on the donation button. Congress hasn’t made a deadline since January that benifits “we the people”, but with your help, Mr. Charlton will reach his realistic attainable goals that will undoubtedly, be a reward for all for time to come!
    Sincerely, Fran