Where Did He Stand on Obama’s Q – Question in Confirmation Hearings to Justice Neil Gorsuch

BIGGEST FRAUD CASE IN U.S. HISTORY

by Cody Robert Judy, ©2017

(Feb. 1, 2017) — WHERE DID DONALD J TRUMP’s Nomination of  10th Circuit Court of Appeals Justice Neil Gorsuch come down on Barack Obama’s Qualification for U.S. President?

The grueling nomination process has only just begun for Justice Neil Gorsuch who no doubt will face a tidal wave of opposition from Democrats. For now, Democrat opposition will need to be courted by Republicans who lack a 60 majority vote in the Senate. Confirmation of a U.S. Supreme Court Justice was the only thing Sen. Reid left in tact on the opposition minority scant menu that the nuclear option of a simple majority would not do.

Therefore it would take yet another U.S. Senate Rule change, again, to wipe the minority party power completely off the Constitutional wagon train. Most of Trump’s cabinet picks, like Obama’s, have been pushed through with a simple majority confirmation.

Conservatives all over the Media in television and radio have been singing praises about President Trump’s nomination of the Constitutional originalist Justice Gorsuch. Even Glenn Beck said he didn’t think Trump would do it, but he did with his nomination pick chiming Justice Antonin Scalia would be proud. 

The 10th Circuit Court of Appeals has had a few Cases sent to it that put Obama’s Qualification in the cross hairs of the U.S. Constitution and U.S. Supreme Court precedent Case Minor v. Happersett sited as having no doubt that those born in the country to its Citizens were indeed the natural born Citizens.

So what argument do we know that Justice Neil Gorsuch would have reviewed in the 10th Circuit Duty of upholding the U.S. Constitution qualifications for President?

Here is one argument that a panel of three Judges decided on the 10th Circuit who Justice Neil Gorsuch was not part of, but who later was indeed asked to review their decision en blanc and what might be gathered from the proceedings as far as Constitutional original-ism and conservatism per se? This might be a good question to ask him about in his confirmation hearings as the American people look on.

Appellate courts in the United States sometimes grant rehearing en banc to reconsider a decision of a panel of the court (generally consisting of only three judges) in which the case concerns a matter of exceptional public importance or the panel’s decision appears to conflict with a prior decision of the court.

https://www.scribd.com/document/254647553/Petition-for-Rehearing-En-Blanc

Petition for Rehearing En Blanc by Cody Robert Judy on Scribd

Read the document here.