THE U.S. SUPREME COURT CASE PRIMED TO DEFINE “NATURAL BORN CITIZEN”
by Cody Robert Judy, Presidential Candidate, ©2016
(Jan. 20, 2016) — Carl Hulse, New York Times Washington Editor and accomplished writer has opined a piece in the New York Times with the Trump “It May Be Time to Resolve the Meaning of Natural Born Citizen.“
Indeed TIME maybe the very consideration of both [natural born Citizen] i.e., born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents espousing two generations of USA allegiance, as well as the consideration of the progressive liberal concern bringing up the conservative qualification for the Office of the President in light of 17 foreign born members of Congress as well as the 7 year mark that Barack Obama just passed in the Office of the President.
Indeed Presidential Candidate and U.S. Senator Ted Cruz has come into the high-beam Birther Headlights with Leading Poll GOP Presidential Candidate Donald Trump asserting, who Cruz calls the left-wing liberal activist lawyer Laurence H. Tribe who was Al Gore’s Lawyer in Bush v. Gore as well a Hillary Clinton supporter, that there were some very big Constitutional scholars who are saying Cruz is not eligible in the last GOP Debate.
Incidentally, Cruz left out of his commentary in the debate about Lawrence H. Tribe that he had cited him in commentary twice in Cases he had argued. The Medellin v. Texas Brief and Columbia v. Heller case principled around the second amendment individual right to bear arms.
It is the case the liberal and conservatism in many respects make good bed-fellows. After all, the bedrock legislative mandate for qualification of [natural born Citizen] remains one of the last bastions of hope for the U.S. Constitution unchanged in the Founding ARTICLES.
Ultimately Cruz apposes as a conservative along with what would be a solid majority of Conservative Based Media the [born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents] holding of precedent conducted by the Minor v. Happersett’s U.S. Supreme Court. Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity have all disparaged the [natural born Citizen] Birther arguments and refused to even host the legitimate Big Players in the Birther Movement born in modern era of 2008 questions regarding Sen. John McCain and Sen. Barack Obama’s ineligibility based on two fundamental questions: Place and Parents
With Obama it was : Parents and Place
1- The conferred Citizenship of his father who was never a U.S. Citizen but rather citizen of Kenya.
2- The confusion between lawful agencies the public has looked to circumscribing confusion around Obama’s birth place with Hawaii Officials and Sheriff Joe Arpiao’s Cold Case Posse Investigation directed out of necessity of Citizen of Arizona.
With McCain it was mainly:
Place
1- Born in Panama
As a founding Principle in the Articles of the Constitution the [natural born Citizen] clause may have indeed been one of the very few principles that liberals and conservatives of the time could agree upon and it is quite interesting to notice that those pretending ‘conservative’ principles are now so apposed to it and those who are touted liberal may indeed now be turning for it.
Nothing in the Grim-Reapers’s theater of fears and horrible night terrors grips most of the liberal progressives than that of a Cruz Administration. The one that dances with the devil entertaining an end to the U.S. Supreme Court Justices [Life Tenure] based on the ability to drift from the conservative round-tables of Pro-Life and Defense of Marriage Act that protected opposite gender marriage and ultimately smash Planned Parenthood in the mouth hard.
It’s not hard to imagine that just as the winds of Obama have sped up the liberal agenda to the north, that a Cruz Administration could not speed up conservative agenda to the south just as strong wiping out [Life Tenure] in the U.S. Supreme Court.
The concerns of Balance are brought up when of course our Checks and Balances begin to fail us.
Read the rest here.