California Resident Demands Investigation into Allegations of Fraud and Treason against Barack Hussein Obama


by Sharon Rondeau

Writ of Quo Warranto and Mandamus demanding that allegations of fraud and crime against Barack Hussein Obama be reviewed before California’s electors are permitted to cast their votes for him in the Electoral College

(Dec. 6, 2012) — California registered voter and Navy veteran Michael Lermen appeared in front of the Orange County Board of Supervisors to read a criminal complaint against Barack Hussein Obama and demand that all California electors to the Electoral College refrain from casting their votes for Obama on December 17, the date they are scheduled to meet in the state capitol.

Lermen stated that Obama is “identified as an agent for the World Communist Movement and the U.N.” (United Nations) and committed fraud, treason, “subversion, espionage and criminal acts to violently overthrow the United states republic and replace it with a rival dictatorship government not found or allowed in our US Constitution.”

Similar complaints of treason have been filed by another Navy veteran, Walter Francis Fitzpatrick, III, whose initial complaint was submitted to the two sitting federal grand juries in March 2009.  Fitzpatrick’s several complaints are included as part of Lermen’s report to the County Board of Supervisors.

Lermen told the supervisors that they would be “liable for aiding and abetting a criminal” if they do not enjoin the electors from casting votes for Obama absent a review undertaken by Congress, a “citizens special tribunal,” court or a “competent Jurisdiction” which could evaluate the evidence presented in Lermen’s report.  At the end of the video, the voice of the presumed head of the county commission tells the others, “You have not been served.”

In an email following the publication of Lermen’s presentation and documentation, Lermen stated that the Writ of Mandamus he prepared can be used by anyone who wishes to serve his or her own county elections commissioner, electors, and other public officials regarding allegations of crime committed by Obama.

One of Lermen’s attachments states that if the electors vote for Obama without judicial or congressional review, they will be considered “liable of aiding and abetting Rico [sic] and treason with all the liabilities attached…”

The document package was signed and notarized on December 4, 2012.

Obama has widely been accused of treason by thousands, if not millions, of Americans for violating federal laws; sparking conflict in the Middle East, including in Benghazi, Libya, where four Americans were killed on September 11, 2012; being ineligible to hold the position of president; and of committed “vote fraud” to control the U.S. government.  There is an abundance of evidence that the 2012 election, if not also the 2008 election also, was manipulated in several ways to confirm Obama as the winner, including touch-screen voting machines changing votes from Mitt Romney to Obama; illegals being bussed to polling places and instructed to cast ballots for Democrats even if they could not read the ballot; voter registration turnout at more than 100% in many swing-state counties; Republicans ahead during the early election returns but losing where they were predicted to win; and eyewitness evidence that voter laws requiring photo ID in some states were not upheld.

Many people believe that Obama did not actually win the election.

In his documentation, Lermen included affidavits from Sheriff Joe Arpaio and Cold Case Posse lead investigator Mike Zullo, both of Maricopa County, AZ.  The sheriff’s office and Cold Case Posse gave two public press conferences on March 1, 2012 and July 17, 2012, respectively, reporting first that there was “probable cause” to believe that Obama’s long-form birth certificate and Selective Service registration card were forgeries, and later, that the birth certificate was “definitely fraudulent.”

Lermen has given the county supervisors ten days in which to “order the Secretary of State and inform the California electors that Barack Obama is not lawfully and constitutional [sic] fit to hold the Office of presidency pursuant to California State Law…”

Print Friendly

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Categories: National

4 Responses to California Resident Demands Investigation into Allegations of Fraud and Treason against Barack Hussein Obama

  1. Robert Laity

    Sunday, December 9, 2012 at 7:19 AM

    Obama IS a Traitor and a Spy under U.S.Law. Before the 2001 attack on the World Trade Center, America was a different place to live. That said,I suspected changes were evolving in 1987 when I founded the Society for the Preservation of Democracy and Human Rights. Since then I have watched our freedoms erode. It got worse after the Patriot Act was enacted.,FAR worse when Obama usurped the Presidency. Obama has never been the bona-fides President (See:
    “There is NO ‘President’ Obama” here on the P&E. I have served on two Citizen Grand Juries also known as “Presentment” hearings. Prior to 1946,these hearings were ubiquitously used to hear evidence against public officials and then render a “presentment” that would serve as proof that there was evidence available that indicates that a public official or officials were breaking the law and it could lead to disbarment of said public officials who were doing so or who were not upholding the Constitution. In that year,1946,errant rulemakers who wrote the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure,called the “Presentment” an “Obsolete” method. The FIFTH Amendment of th U.S.Constitution lists the “Presentment” and the “Indictment”. The “Presentment”.,which is a citizen’s jury and is NOT Judicially enpaneled or attended by a Judge or District or U.S. Attorney was one step below the level of a “Grand Jury” finding called the “Indictment”.Grand Juries are Judicially enpaneled and attended by Attorneys. The Indicttment remains but are under the discretion of the aforementioned Attorneys to seek. The errant rulemakers of the FRCrimP,thinking that they could do so,illegally took the “Presentment” power away from “We the People”.The legal method to change the Law would have been by Amendment to the US Constitution. Insofar as the Fifth amendment has NOT been repealed the “Presentment” is still with us and has,in the past four years,been “dusted off” and put to use by the American Grand Jury and other citizens Jury websites. I served on two of these and the US Supreme Court and many others HAVE been served. If you give them a copy and have them give you a receipt or maill them by Certified Mail,they HAVE been “served”.

  2. gigclick

    Saturday, December 8, 2012 at 4:23 PM

    Election fraud was performed by the programmers/updaters that set up those machines, whether a forensic will be done is still up for grabs. They pulled it off the first time, why not a second? Now, they will attempt it again for a third to reach a Rosevelt stance, we hope that doesn’t happen but given America’s current state of stupor, anything is possible.

  3. Sidesaddle

    Saturday, December 8, 2012 at 9:50 AM

    “Many People believe that Obama did not actually win the election”

    I’m happy to admit that I’m one of the MANY!! May God prepare His FAVOR before Mr. Lermen in getting his case heard AND ACTED UPON!!!!

  4. Bob1939

    Friday, December 7, 2012 at 11:09 AM


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>