DO OUR REPRESENTATIVES REALLY REPRESENT US?
(Oct. 12, 2011) — The following email was sent to the office of Rep. Marsha Blackburn, who has previously been unresponsive about Obama’s alleged social security fraud.
Sent: Tue 10/11/11 3:45 PM
To: jennifer.han@mail.house.gov
Cc: Margaret.Tipton@mail.house.gov
On October 5, 2011 I sent you an Email requesting a meeting with Congresswoman Blackburn to discuss an issue that I spoke with Ms. Tipton about. The issue is in regard to Federal Employee Barack Obama committing Social Security Fraud. In my note I asked that we meet with the congresswoman so that she is “informed of the issue and have access to the evidence that we have”.
It is now almost a week later and I have not received a reply to my request. As I mentioned in my note to Ms. Tipton “[r]efusing to address the crime does not absolve you, or Congresswoman Blackburn, of any guilt”. You have also been informed and are now an accessory to this Federal Crime.
My first contact with the congresswoman’s office about this issue was the first few days of September 2011. After calling the DC office on September 7, 2011 I was able to leave a voice mail for Ms. Tipton and receive a phone call on September 9, 2011. How was I able to get a return phone call? Simple. I did not mention the issue I wanted to discuss.
The political game being played in Washington DC is no longer being tolerated by us TRUE AMERICANS out here in the real world.
What I am asking is that I be notified by October 14, 2011 and told if Congresswoman Blackburn has been informed about the Social Security Fraud being committed by Federal Employee Barack Obama. I am also, again, requesting a meeting with the congresswoman.
The reply I receive, or lack there of, will determine exactly what step my attorney and I will take.
Where I grew up we’d be finding the nearest tree, ” Get a rope”. These people are like carpetbaggers, ” I nic the cenus man “. I guess these politically correct namby pamby excuses for americans today would suggest we vote them out at our earliest convenience. Balderdash, a rope is more immediate and gets the point across much more clearly. Hang one of ’em and see how quick the others take note.
To bob46: Bravo!
All of our representitives are ignoring us.WHO DO THEY THINK THEY ARE?? we put them in to represent us. WE NEED A NEW POLITICAL SYSTEM!!!
When attorney Orly Taitz received a call from the Congressional Judiciary Committee inviting her to Washington DC to speak about her evidence against Obama, namely the social security number and Selective Service fake document. I formally wrote to the Majority Leader Eric Canor (my Congressman) asking if he would either sit in on this meeting or make time to meet attorney Taitz while she was in DC. Equally, 2 Congressmen from Virginia also sit on the Judiciary Committee and I apprised them of the event and facts and asked for their support. I was also ignored by all 3 of them, lacking professionalism and integrity. Their lack of action, I informed, they failed to act, indicates to me that they lied when they swore to uphold the Constitution. Apparently it is something they say, not something they practice. This is unacceptable behavior for elected officials. I do not know who they think they are, but are not superior to those that hired them and in fact are insubordinate. A fireable offense. This is a right to work state. Maybe they need a definition to what that means.
Federal Employees that ignore those that hired and placed them in office become complicit and in this case culpable. When Fran contacted Congresswoman Blackburn’s office and defined her complaint the silence of the Congresswoman legally implies Tacit
1.
understood without being openly expressed; implied: tacit approval.
2.
silent; saying nothing: a tacit partner.
Therefore the Congresswoman agrees with Fran, an implied understanding. Fran gave sufficient time for the Congresswoman to object and reflect her opposition with just cause. By not opposing, she therefore agreed legally. Especially so when what Fran expressed was a violation of the law. The Congresswoman can not just ignore a violation of law, especially when she is a hired official and sits in a position to act upon this knowledge Fran brought. There is case law on Tacit being used in a Court of law. Fran should bring this fact up to her attorney. In Obama’s case a Plaintiff brought a case against Obama in a lower court. Obama nor his lawyers responded and failed to appear. The Court issued an order in favor of the Plaintiff by default. That order was used to file a Amicus Curiae Brief in a Federal Court regarding Obamacare. A judge has to approve the filing of an Amicus. The Federal Judge in Virginia did approve the Amicus filing with evidence. If Fran and her attorney bring these facts to the Congresswoman, she probably will get an audience.