DID HAWAII OFFICIALS CONSPIRE TO CREATE A FALSE BIRTH RECORD FOR OBAMA?
by Sharon Rondeau
(May 2, 2011) — On February 25, 2011, Dr. Jerome Corsi, whose #1 best-selling book Where’s the Birth Certificate? is expected to be released on May 17, 2011, wrote an article about Hawaii Governor Abercrombie’s handling of the derailed appointment of Dr. Neal Palafox as Hawaii’s Director of Health.
Palafox withdrew his name from consideration after Abercrombie reportedly “persuaded” him to step down after a month as acting director. Hawaii State Senator Sam Slom had denounced Abercrombie’s “dismissal” of Palafox, claiming that “Palafox was determined to clean up the Hawaii Department of Health and he ran afoul of politics when the people he fired sought retribution.”
Palafox was quoted as having been “blindsided” by Abercrombie’s request that he withdraw from the nomination.
At the time, Slom also acknowledged the questions regarding Obama’s alleged birth in Hawaii by telling Corsi, “I don’t understand why Obama has spent hundreds of thousands of dollars to keep all his records from the public — not just his Hawaii birth records, but his passport records and his school records. All Obama’s records should be public, including any Hawaii birth records that exist.”
Slom has spoken with writer and contributor Miki Booth by telephone, reportedly admitting that the Hawaii Department of Health had arbitrarily begun denying certified copies of long-form birth certificates to people possessing the legal right to obtain them.
After declaring that he would make Obama’s records public, Abercrombie was unable to find or produce any record at all, admitting publicly on January 18, 2011 that “a long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate for Barack Obama may not exist within the vital records maintained by the Hawaii Department of Health.”
In paragraph 13, Corsi’s February 25 article makes a significant statement:
The latest development comes as well-connected sources in Hawaii are warning that certain government officials in the state have been contemplating releasing fraudulent birth records for Obama in the run-up to the 2012 election. (emphasis ours)
Did Corsi find out something that hasn’t been released yet? Is it in his book?
On Wednesday, April 27, 2011, Obama held a press conference which, via a split screen, showed an image purported to be a certified copy of his original birth certificate from Hawaii. It contained all of the information which has been disseminated to the public about his birth parents, their backgrounds, the hospital in which he was born, the date and the time.
It is this writer’s understanding that The Drudge Report first broke the story of the imminent release of the document. Obama claimed that the questions about his birthplace amounted to “silliness” and distractions. The Associated Press reported:
The certificate says Obama was born to an American mother and Kenyan father, in Hawaii, which makes him eligible to hold the office of president. Obama released a standard short form before he was elected in 2008 but requested copies of his original birth certificate from Hawaii officials this week in hopes of quieting the controversy.
How did the Associated Press know that a Hawaii birth, American mother and Kenyan father rendered him eligible? Where is the historical citation? Where is the reference to the term “natural born Citizen” from Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution?
Why, then, has Obama spent close to, if not more than, $2,000,000 paid to Perkins Coie keep his birth and other records hidden? Perkins Coie reportedly dispatched one of its attorneys, Judith Corley, to retrieve the two certified copies of Obama’s birth record from the Hawaii Department of Health last Tuesday, and a clerk from the same firm ended up working for Judge David O. Carter, who had originally vowed to hear a lawsuit challenging Obama’s constitutional eligibility to serve as president. Shortly after hiring the Perkins Coie lawyer, Carter made an abrupt reversal and dismissed the case, stating that his court was the wrong jurisdiction.
The same case, Barnett v. Obama, is scheduled for oral argument upon appeal to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals beginning on May 2, 2011, in Pasadena, CA. The Post & Email interviewed Ms. Barnett regarding a different lawsuit filed against the California Secretary of State.
If all that was on his birth certificate was information already in the public domain, what was there for Obama to hide for almost three years?
Did Hawaii officials collude with Obama to produce a fraudulent long-form birth certificate? To date, no paper original has been shown to the press to the best of our knowledge. The image on the internet appears to lack an official embossed seal which even the short-form birth certificates have.
On April 24, the Associated Press in Honolulu stated that “some Obama birth info” had been available on Obama all along, but that short-form birth certificates are the only type available to requesters now.
Yet, many reports have already been published which claim that the purported “Certificate of Live Birth” is a forgery. Was a forgery created because Obama has no long-form, Hawaiian birth certificate, as former elections supervisor Tim Adams has claimed?
One source calls the image a “poorly constructed fake.”
Could it be that Palafox would not play along with a scheme to “produce” a long-form birth certificate for Obama, but Loretta Fuddy, who was Interim Director for the Health Department and now permanent Director, did? Fuddy wrote that she made a special exception for Obama to obtain certified copies of his original birth record rather than a “computer-generated” copy.
If officials in Hawaii helped to construct a forged birth certificate in an attempt to keep Obama in office, why would they do so? Is it because Hawaii received millions, if not billions, in federal dollars over the years by representing illegals as Hawaiian citizens by providing them with a “Certification of Live Birth?” According to Desert Conservative:
That is why Hawaii is in collusion with Barack Obama. There were involved in massive welfare fraud and do not want this coming out.
With this kind of background, in families being “informed” of the opportunities involved in engaging in illegal citizenship, one Stanley Ann Dunham, hauled her little African eastern boy to Indonesia, until the jungle fever wore off, and then dumped him into the Hawaiian system again where Grandma Dunham was stuck with the kid.
Could this explain the motivation for protecting Obama? Are the officials in Hawaii also protecting decades of welfare fraud? Are they experienced document-forgers?