A.D.

Why is Megyn Kelly refusing to ask tough questions about Obama’s background?

IS SHE A REAL JOURNALIST, OR AN IMPOSTOR?

December 31, 2010

Dear Editor:

Megyn Kelly grew up in Syracuse, NY and is an attorney as well as a Fox News anchor

The following email was sent to Megyn Kelly of Fox News in response to her recent coverage of those questioning Barack Hussein Obama’s constitutional eligibility to serve as president:

From: David LaRocque
Sent: Thu 12/30/10 3:18 PM
To: kelly@foxnews.com

Megyn,

I was looking forward to your coverage of the birther issue this morning in connection with Gov. Abercrombie’s recent call for the release of Obama’s original Hawaii long-form birth certificate.

I am sorry to say that I was extremely disappointed and even disgusted by your performance. You parroted the same old falsehoods concerning Obama’s nativity story, and referred to the outrageous forgery of the so-called “certification of live birth” posted on the Obama-controlled web sites as if this were a legally-admissible document. Surely you must have recognized by now that such a document, even if it were real and physically accessible (rather than a digitally-manipulated image) and not defective by virtue of the redaction of the document number, it would not be accepted for any official purpose (i.e., an application for a driver’s license or a passport, or entry into military service).

Moreover, the problems with the reliability of Hawaiian birth documents are by now legendary, as is the complete and total absence of any confirming evidence supporting Obama’s claim of Hawaiian birth (such as contemporary witnesses or hospital records) other than the virtually worthless Honolulu newspaper “birth announcements.”

With your background as an attorney, I expected much more from you. This was anything but a “fair and balanced” presentation. It looked and sounded more like the smug ridicule we have learned to expect from MSNBC and CNN.

Megyn, I have learned to respect you for your intelligence and your capacity for independent thought. You are clearly capable of covering this story properly, but this piece was not it.

I feel that the American people are owed a serious effort by someone on Fox News to cover this story seriously, in a fair and balanced way, and with integrity. All it would take would be a careful reading of one or more of the briefs filed in the Barnett case (Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals), or the Kerchner, Rhodes, and Hollister cases (U.S. Supreme Court), followed by a serious attempt to address the points raised in those cases. Such an analysis would almost certainly lead any unbiased reader to the unavoidable conclusion that there is a very high probability that Barack Obama is not eligible to serve in the office of President of the United States in accordance with Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the United States Constitution.

There are so many disturbing facts and serious unanswered questions raised in these briefs that no amount of obfuscation and ridicule by your leftist guests can disguise their increasingly desperate fear of the truth.

Megan Kelly – it is way past time for this story to be covered properly in the media. The otherwise proud reputation of Fox News is stained by the memory of Bill O’Reilly bloviating to the effect that he had “seen Obama’s birth certificate.” We all know this was a lie because no birth certificate has ever been produced.

If I were you, I could not live with myself after participating in the intellectual dishonesty which characterized your performance in today’s piece. I think you owe your listeners something more, and very soon.

David F. LaRocque
Captain, TWA (ret)
CDR USNR (ret)

A second letter to Kelly is as follows:

Mrs. Kelly:  I just saw a clip about the new Governor of Hawaii and his “going to release the Birth data.  Both you and the two clowns you had on haven’t got a clew about what you are talking about.  It does not matter whether or not he was born in Hawaii.  I am not a birther, I am a Constitutionalist.
You are either grossly misinformed, ignorant of the requirements in the Constitution or have been muzzled like the rest of the Fox News frauds.  For someone with a law degree, I find it hard to believe that you don’t know the basic requirements under the Constitution that require the President to be a “NATURAL BORN CITIZEN”.  He has stated himself that he had dual citizenship at birth and that his father was a British subject.  You should also know that he had other foreign citizenship as a child.
The truth will be coming out in the near future.  When it does you all will look either like idiots or highly paid escorts (you know what I mean).
Like the rest of your cohorts, you probably don’t have the guts to respond to this email.

Bob Cipperly

© 2010, The Post & Email. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified. To read more on our copyright restrictions, see our Copyright notice on the subheader of every page, along the left margin.

42 Responses for “Why is Megyn Kelly refusing to ask tough questions about Obama’s background?”

  1. James G. Borden says:

    I sent a copy of Barack Hussein Obama II”s (that’s the name that appear on this Birth Certificate) real Birth Certificate to the Governor of Hawaii proving he was born in Kenya, Africa with the below letter and have not received a reply.
    Anyone reading this my contact me at: jgborden96720@yahoo.com and I will email it to you.

    December 28, 2010
    Governor Neil Abercrombie of the State of Hawaii,
    I am contacting you regarding President Barack Hussein Obama’s true country of birth.
    Enclosed with this letter is a copy of Obama’s Certificate Of Birth, which proves he was born in Mombass, Kenya.
    This is a complete Certificate of Birth which shows the Chief Administrator’s signature and his location and Certificate of Birth Number 32018.
    This Certificate of Birth shows the name of the attending doctor.
    This Certificate of Birth shows the impression of the official government seal.
    This Certificate of Birth shows Obama’s foot print.
    This Certificate of Birth shows all the pertinent information that a real Birth Certificate must state in proving where a person was born, names of parents and their relevant information, and date and time of birth of the child born. This Certificate of Birth also gives the additional information of his weight, length of his body and even the width of inches between his shoulders.
    You know perfectly well that Obama wasn’t born in Hawaii and therefore you can’t show his Hawaii State’s original Birth Certificate stating he was born in Hawaii because no such authentic documentation exists in the Hawaii State Health Department.
    American Patriots’ Movement of America is demanding the immediate resignation of President Barack Hussein Obama based on the fact that he is illegible to be President of the United States of America because he wasn’t born on American soil and therefore he is in violation of the U.S. Constitution.
    Sincerely,

    James G. Borden
    Newsletter Editor
    AMERICAN PATRIOTS’ MOVEMENT OF AMERICA
    Hilo, Hawaii 96720
    Tel: 808-938-0973

    CC: Hawaii Tribune-Herald, Honolulu Star-Advertiser
    New York Times, Washington Post, Hawaii Free Press
    Boston Globe, Boston Herald, New Bedford Standard-Times
    L.A. Times, The Sacramento Bee, The Arizona Republic
    Other news media outlets will also be contacted.

  2. Capt-Dax says:

    ‘Birthers’ aren’t crazy

    In USA all births are registered by hospitals and not by mothers.

    No hospital of birth is listed nor is this a birth certificate.

    I Believe The Fix Was In for the 2008 Election and The Cover Up is Still Going Strong!

  3. Chris Rosenau says:

    Nice to see others getting upset about this as well. I sent this to her a few minutes after I saw her “interview” on her show:
    “OMg Megyn, you are so completely ignorant about the actual facts involved in the “Abercrombie” issues. There is no way you can disprove the actual provable and documented facts stated, and so well laid-out and hyperlinked in the following article. You have multiple false premises. No one who has studied the facts can come up with the statements you and your two guests made. http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=244797

    You will never deal with these issues because you won’t be able to hold
    your position any longer. Nothing claimed by this man in the Oval
    Office lines up with fact. He contradicts himself in his own books.
    Look at the facts for Pete’s Sake!
    Chris Rosenau

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Advertisement 5% off All Android OS Cell Phones at geartaker.com with code 5OFFPHONE, ends Mar. 31, 2012! Worldwide free shipping!
Donation Options

Search by Key word(s)

 

Articles by Month

Articles by Date

December 2010
S M T W T F S
« Nov   Jan »
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  


Wordpress Support by WordpressBoys